Another London, another point of view: the use of defamiliarisation to elicit empathy in the reader for the white working-class protagonist in Another London and their ‘real-world’ equivalents

References

• Ahmed, S. 2004. “Declarations of Whiteness: The Non-Performativity of Anti-Racism.” Borderlands Ejournal 3 (2): 1–16.
   Google Scholar
• Ali, M. 2007. Brick Lane. London: Black Swan.
   Google Scholar
• Amis, M. 1989. London Fields. London: Jonathan Cape.
   Google Scholar
• Bal, M. 2009. Narratology: Introduction to the Theory of Narrative. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
   Google Scholar
• Barrett, E. 2010. “Foucault’s ‘What is an Author’: Towards a Critical Discourse of Practice as Research.” In Practice as Research: Approaches to Creative Arts Enquiry, edited by E. Barrett and B. Bolt, London: I.B. Tauris. Available at http://public.eblib.com/choice/publicfullrecord.aspx?p=676435.
   Google Scholar
• Bentley, N. 2008. Contemporary British Fiction. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Booth, W. C. 1983. The Rhetoric of Fiction. Chicago, IL; London: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bray, J. 2007. “The ‘Dual Voice’ of Free Indirect Discourse: A Reading Experiment.” Language and Literature 16 (1): 37–52. doi: 10.1177/0963947007072844
   Google Scholar
• Carey, J. 1992. The Intellectuals and the Masses: Pride and Prejudice among the Literary Intelligentsia, 1880-1939. London: Faber and Faber.
   Google Scholar
• Carter, P., and E. Barrett. 2010. “Interest: The Ethics of Invention.” In Practice as Research: Approaches to Creative Arts Enquiry, edited by B. Bolt. London: I.B. Tauris. Available at http://public.eblib.com/choice/publicfullrecord.aspx?p=676435.
   Google Scholar
• Crewe, J. 2017. ‘Another London: A Novel and Critical Commentary Investigating Representations of the White Working Class in Media, Politics and Literature in an Age of Multiculturalism’, PhD diss., The University of Surrey. Available at http://epubs.surrey.ac.uk/id/eprint/813208.
   Google Scholar
• Currie, G. 2010. Narratives and Narrators: A Philosophy of Stories. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Available at: http://public.eblib.com/choice/publicfullrecord.aspx?p=477039.
   Google Scholar
• Dench, G., K. Gavron, and M. D. Young. 2006. The New East End: Kinship, Race and Conflict. London: Profile.
   Google Scholar
• Fludernik, M., and D. P. Häusler-Greenfiel. 2009. An Introduction to Narratology. Abingdon; New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Glade-Wright, R. E. 2017. “New Insights Effectively Shared: Originality and New Knowledge in Creative Arts Postgraduate Degrees.” Qualitative Research Journal 17 (2): 89–98. doi: 10.1108/QRJ-04-2016-0023
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Griffith, P. 2014. “Changing Communities.” In Alien Nation? New Perspectives on the White Working Class and Disengagement in Britain, edited by P. Griffith and A. Glennie, 9–12. London: Institute for Public Policy Research.
   Google Scholar
• Griffith, P., and A. Glennie eds. 2014. Alien Nation? New Perspectives on the White Working Class and Disengagement in Britain. London: Institute for Public Policy Research.
   Google Scholar
• Hakemulder, J. F. 2004. “Foregrounding and Its Effect on Readers’ Perception.” Discourse Processes: A Multidisciplinary Journal 38 (2): 193–218. doi: 10.1207/s15326950dp3802_3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harper, G. 2008. “Creative Writing: Words as Practice-led Research.” Journal of Visual Art Practice 7 (2): 161–171. doi: 10.1386/jvap.7.2.161_1
   Google Scholar
• Haseman, B. 2010. “Rupture and Recognition: Identifying the Performative Research Paradigm.” In Practice as Research: Approaches to Creative Arts Enquiry, edited by E. Barrett and B. Bolt. London: I.B. Tauris. Available at http://public.eblib.com/choice/publicfullrecord.aspx?p=676435.
   Google Scholar
• Haylett, C. 2001. “Illegitimate Subjects? Abject Whites, Neoliberal Modernisation, and Middle-Class Multiculturalism.” Environment and Planning D: Society and Space 19 (3): 351–370.
   Google Scholar
• Jameson, F. 1988. The Ideologies of Theory. Essays 1971–1986 2. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Jameson, F. 2010. The Political Unconscious: Narrative as a Socially Symbolic Act. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Jameson, F. 2013. The Antinomies of Realism. London: Verso.
   Google Scholar
• Jones, O. 2011. Chavs: The Demonization of the Working Class. London; New York: Verso.
   Google Scholar
• Kaufman, E., and G. Harris. 2014. Changing Places: Mapping the White British Response to Ethnic Change. London: Demos.
   Google Scholar
• Kuiken, D., D. S. Miall, and S. Sikora. 2004. “Forms of Self-Implication in Literary Reading.” Poetics Today 25 (2): 171–203. doi: 10.1215/03335372-25-2-171
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leavy, P. 2014. Method Meets Art, Second Edition: Arts-Based Research Practice. New York: Guilford Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Macpherson, W. 1999. The Stephen Lawrence Inquiry. London: The Home Department.
   Google Scholar
• Miall, D. S., and D. Kuiken. 1999. “What Is Literariness? Three Components of Literary Reading.” Discourse Processes 28 (2): 121. doi: 10.1080/01638539909545076
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Newland, C. 2000. Society Within. London: Abacus.
   Google Scholar
• Nunning, A. F. 2008. “Reconceptualizing Unreliable Narration: Synthesizing Cognitive and Rhetorical Approaches.” In A Companion to Narrative Theory, edited by J. Phelan and P. J. Rabinowitz, 89–107. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell. Available at http://www.myilibrary.com?ID=28599.
   Google Scholar
• Oatley, K. 1999. “Meetings of Minds: Dialogue, Sympathy, and Identification, in Reading Fiction.” Poetics 26 (5-6): 439–454. doi: 10.1016/S0304-422X(99)00011-X
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Open Society Foundations. 2014. Europe’s White Working Class Communities. New York: Open Society Foundations.
   Google Scholar
• Phillips, C. 2004. A Distant Shore. London: Vintage.
   Google Scholar
• Research Excellence Framework. 2018. Draft Guidance on Submissions. United Kingdom. Available at https://www.ref.ac.uk/media/1016/draft-guidance-on-submissions-ref-2018_1.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Richardson, B. 2006. Unnatural Voices: Extreme Narration in Modern and Contemporary Fiction. Columbus: Ohio State University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sanford, A. J., and C. Emmott. 2012. Mind, Brain and Narrative. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Schlenker, P. 2004. “Context of Thought and Context of Utterance: A Note on Free Indirect Discourse and the Historical Present.” Mind and Language 19 (3): 279–304. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-0017.2004.00259.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scholes, R., J. Phelan, and R. L. Kellogg. 2006. The Nature of Narrative. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Skeggs, B. 2009. “Haunted by the Spectre of Judgement: Respectability, Value and Affect in Class Relations.” In Who Cares About the White Working Class?, edited by K. P. Sveinsson, 36–44. London: Runnymede Trust.
   Google Scholar
• Sklar, H. 2013. The Art of Sympathy in Fiction Forms of Ethical and Emotional Persuasion. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company. Available at http://public.eblib.com/choice/publicfullrecord.aspx?p=1135384.
   Google Scholar
• Sullivan, G. 2009. “Making Space: The Purpose and Place of Practice-led Research.” In Practice-led Research, Research-led Practice in the Creative Arts, edited by H. Smith and R. T. Dean. Edinburgh University Press. Available at http://handle.uws.edu.au:8081/1959.7/513591.
   Google Scholar
• Sveinsson, K. P. 2009. Who Cares About the White Working Class? London: Runnymede Trust.
   Google Scholar
• Tew, P. 2007. The Contemporary British Novel. London; New York: Continuum.
   Google Scholar
• Tyler, K. 2008. “Majority Cultures and the Everyday Politics of Ethnic Difference.” In Majority Cultures and the Everyday Practices of Ethnic Difference: Whose House is This?, edited by B. Petersson and K. Tyler, 1–12. Basingstoke, England; New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Van Dyck, T. A. 1993. “Stories and Racism.” In Narrative and Social Control: Critical Perspectives, edited by D. K. Mumby, 121–142. Newbury Park: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Van Peer, W., and P. Pander Maat. 1996. “Perspectivation and Sympathy: Effects of Narrative Point of View.” In Empirical Approaches to Literature and Aesthetics, edited by R. J. Kreuz and M. S. Macnealy, 143–154. Norwood, NJ: Ablex Pub.
   Google Scholar