Planning for the unexpected in the mathematics classroom: an account of teacher and student change

References

• Bancroft, S., Fawcett, M., & Hay, P. (2008). Researching children researching the world. Stoke on Trent: Trentham.
   Google Scholar
• Bateson, G. (2002). Mind and nature: A necessary unity. Cresskill, NJ: Hampton Press Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Brown, L. (2013). Stories of learning as a mathematics teacher educator through narrative interviewing. In 4th Global Conference Storytelling. Prague: Oxford Inter-Disciplinary Press.
   Google Scholar
• Brown, L., & Coles, A. (2000). Complex decision-making in the classroom: The teacher as an intuitive practitioner. In T. Atkinson, & G. Claxton (Eds.), The intuitive practitioner: On the value of not always knowing what one is doing. (pp. 165 – 181). Milton Keynes: Open University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Brown, L. & Coles, A. (2010). Mathematics teacher and mathematics teacher educator change—insight through theoretical perspectives. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 13, 375–382. doi:10.1007/s10857-010-9159-3
   Google Scholar
• Brown, L. & Coles, A. (2011). Developing expertise: How enactivism re-frames mathematics teacher development. ZDM, The International Journal on Mathematics Education, 43, 861–873. doi:10.1007/s11858-011-0343-4
   Google Scholar
• Bruner, J. (1990). Acts of meaning. London: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Chapman, O., & Heater, B. (2010). Understanding change through a high school mathematics teacher’s journey to inquiry-based teaching. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 13, 445–458. doi:10.1007/s10857-010-9164-6
   Google Scholar
• Coles, A. (2013). Being alongside: For the teaching and learning of mathematics. Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Coles, A. (2014). Transitional devices. For the Learning of Mathematics, 34(2), 24–30.
   Google Scholar
• Coles, A. (2015). On enactivism and language: Towards a methodology for studying talk in mathematics classrooms. ZDM, The International Journal on Mathematics Education, 47, 235–246. doi:10.1007/s11858-014-0630-y
   Google Scholar
• Damasio, A. (1996). Descartes' error: Emotion, rason and the human brain. London: Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Gattegno, C. (1970). Gattegno mathematics textbook 1. New York, NY: Educational Solution Worldwide Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Gattegno, C. (1974). The common sense of teaching mathematics. New York, NY: Educational Solution Worldwide Inc. Retrieved from http://www.calebgattegno.org/teaching-mathematics.html
   Google Scholar
• Gattegno C. (2010). What we owe children: the subordination of teaching to learning. New York: Educational Solutions. (First published 1971) Retrieved from http://calebgattegno.org/subordinating-teaching-to-learning.html
   Google Scholar
• Krainer, K. (2011). Teachers as stakeholders in mathematics education research. In B. Ubuz (Ed.), Proceedings of the thirty-fifth conference of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education (Vol. 1, pp. 47–62). Ankara, Turkey: PME 35.
   Google Scholar
• Mason, J. & Davis, B. (2013). The importance of teachers’ mathematical awareness for in-the-moment pedagogy. Canadian Journal of Science, Mathematics and Technology Education, 13, 182–197. doi:10.1080/14926156.2013.784830
   Google Scholar
• Maturana, H. (1987). Everything said is said by an observer. In W. Thompson (Ed.), Gaia: A way of knowing (pp. 65–82). Hudson, NY: Lindisfarne Press.
   Google Scholar
• Maturana, H., & Varela, F. (1987). The tree of knowledge: The biological roots of human understanding. Boston: Shambala.
   Google Scholar
• Potari, D., Sakonidis, H., Chatzigoula, R., & Manaridis, A. (2010). Teachers’ and researchers’ collaboration in analysing mathematics teaching: A context for professional reflection and development. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 13, 473–485. doi:10.1007/s10857-010-9161-9
   Google Scholar
• Reid, D. (1996). Enactivism as a methodology. In L. Puig & A. Gutierrez (Eds.), Proceedings of the twentieth annual conference of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education (Vol. 4, pp. 203–209). Valencia, Spain: PME 20.
   Google Scholar
• Reid, D., & Mgombelo, J. (2015). Soots and key concepts in enactivist theory and methodology. ZDM, The International Journal on Mathematics Education, 47, 171–183. doi:10.1007/s11858-014-0634-7
   Google Scholar
• Rinaldi, C. (2006). In dialogue with Reggio Emilia: Listening, researching and learning. Oxford: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Rowland, T., Huckstep, P., & Thwaites, A. (2005). Elementary teachers’ mathematics subject knowledge: The Knowledge Quartet and the case of Naomi. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 8, 255–281. doi:10.1007/s10857-005-0853-5
   Google Scholar
• Rowland, T. & Turner, F. (2007). Developing and using the ‘Knowledge Quartet’: A framework for the observation of mathematics teaching. The Mathematics Educator, 10(1), 107–123.
   Google Scholar
• Rowland, T. & Zazkis, R. (2013). Contingency in the mathematics classroom: opportunities taken and opportunities missed. Canadian Journal of Science, Mathematics and Technology Education, 13(2), 137–153. doi:10.1080/14926156.2013.784825
   Google Scholar
• Sinclair, N., deFreitas, E., & Ferrara, F. (2013). Virtual encounters: The murky and furtive world of mathematical inventiveness. ZDM, The International Journal on Mathematics Education, 45, 239–252.
   Google Scholar