A process of students and their instructor developing a final closed-book mathematics exam

References

• Åkerlind, G. (2012). Variation and commonality in phenomenographic research methods. Higher Education Research & Development, 31, 115–127. doi:10.1080/07294360.2011.642845
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blair, A., Wyburn-Powell, A., Goodwin, M., & Shields, S. (2014). Can dialogue help to improve feedback on examinations? Studies in Higher Education, 39, 1039–1054. doi:10.1080/03075079.2013.777404
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cook-Sather, A., Bovill, C., & Felten, P. (2014). Engaging students as partners in learning and teaching: A guide for faculty. San Francisco: Jossey Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Dochy, F., Segers, M., & Sluijsmans, D. (1999). The use of self-, peer and co-assessment in higher education: A review. Studies in Higher Education, 24, 331–350. doi:10.1080/03075079912331379935
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Drew, S. (2001). Perceptions of what helps learn and develop in education. Teaching in Higher Education, 6, 309–331. doi:10.1080/13562510120061197
   Google Scholar
• Earl, L. (2003). Assessment as learning: Using classroom assessment to maximise student learning. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
   Google Scholar
• Entwistle, N. (1997a). Introduction: Phenomenography in higher education. Higher Education Research & Development, 16, 127–134. doi:10.1080/0729436970160202
   Google Scholar
• Entwistle, N. (1997b). Contrasting perspectives on learning. In F. Marton, D. J. Hounsell, & N. J. Entwistle (Eds.), The experience of learning. (2nd ed.) (pp. 3–22). Edinburgh, Scotland: Scottish Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Evans, C. (2013). Making sense of assessment feedback in higher education. Review of educational research, 83(1), 70–120. doi: 10.3102/0034654312474350
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fluckiger, J., Vigil, Y. T. Y., Pasco, R., & Danielson, K. (2010). Formative feedback: Involving students as partners in assessment to enhance learning. College teaching, 58(4), 136–140. doi: 10.1080/87567555.2010.484031
   Google Scholar
• Gough, K., Morris, J., & Hession, A. (2013). Media industries beyond the curriculum: motivating blended professionalism for enhanced student engagement and employability. In C. Nygaard, S. Brand, P. Bartholomew, & L. Millard (Eds.), Student engagement: Identity, motivation and community (pp. 165–84). Faringdon: Libri Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• HEA. (2012). A marked improvement. Higher Education Academy. Retrieved from www.heacademy.ac.uk/resources/detail/assessment/a-marked-improvement
   Google Scholar
• Healey, M., Flint, A., & Harrington, K. (2014). Engagement through partnership: Students as partners in learning and teaching in higher education. York: Higher Education Academy.
   Google Scholar
• Houston, K. (2001). Assessing undergraduate mathematics students. In D. Holton (Ed.), The teaching and learning of mathematics at university level: An ICMI study (pp. 407–422). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer.
   Google Scholar
• Iannone, P., & Simpson, A. (2013). Students’ perceptions of assessment in undergraduate mathematics. Research in Mathematics Education, 15, 17–33. doi:10.1080/14794802.2012.756634
   Google Scholar
• Marton, F. (1976). What does it take to learn? Some implications of an alternative view of learning. In N. J. Entwistle (Ed.), Strategies for research and development in higher education, 32–42. Amsterdam: Swets and Zeitlinger.
   Google Scholar
• Marton, F. (1981). Phenomenography: Describing conceptions of the world around us. Instructional Science, 10, 177–200. doi: 10.1007/BF00132516
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marton, F. (1994). Phenomenography. In T. Husén & T. N. Postlethwaite (Eds.), The International encyclopedia of education (pp. 4424–4429). England: Elsevier Science.
   Google Scholar
• Marton, F., Beaty, E., & Dall'Alba, G. (1993). Conceptions of learning. International Journal of Educational Research, 19, 277–300.
   Google Scholar
• Marton, F., & Booth, S. (1997). Learning and awareness. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Marton, F., & Säljö, R. (1976). On qualitative differences in learning I: Outcome and process. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 46, 115–127. doi: 10.1111/j.2044-8279.1976.tb02304.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marton, F., & Säljö, R. (1997). Approaches to learning. In F. Marton, D. Hounsell, & N. Entwistle (Eds.), The experience of learning (pp. 39–59). Edinburgh, Scotland: Scottish Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Miller, C., & Parlett, M. (1974). Up to the mark: A study of the examination game. Guildford: Society for Research into Higher Education.
   Google Scholar
• Myers, C., & Myers, S. (2007). Assessing assessment: The effects of two exam formats on course achievement and evaluation. Innovative Higher Education, 31, 227–236. doi:10.1007/s10755-006-9020-x
   Google Scholar
• Parsad, B., & Lewis, L. (2003). Remedial education at degree-granting postsecondary institutions in fall 2000. Statistical Analysis Report.
   Google Scholar
• Price, M., Carroll, J., O'Donovan, B., & Rust, C. (2011). If I was going there I wouldn't start from here: A critical commentary on current assessment practice. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 36, 479–492. doi:10.1080/02602930903512883
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Radu, O. (2012). A review of the literature in undergraduate mathematics assessment. In P. Iannone & A. Simpson (Eds.), Mapping university mathematics assessment practices (pp. 17–23). Norwich: University of East Anglia.
   Google Scholar
• Säljö, R. (1975). Qualitative differences in learning as a function of the learner's conception of the task. Gothenburg: Acta Universitatis Gothoburgensis.
   Google Scholar
• Sambell, K., McDowell, L., & Brown, S. (1997). ‘But is it fair?’: An exploratory study of student perceptions of the consequential validity of assessment. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 23(4), 349–371. doi:10.1016/S0191-491X(97)86215-3
   Google Scholar
• Somervell, H. (1993). Issues in assessment, enterprise and higher education: The case for self-, peer and collaborative assessment. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 18, 221–233. doi:10.1080/0260293930180306
   Google Scholar
• Struyven, K., Dochy, F., & Janssens, S. (2005). Students’ perceptions about evaluation and assessment in higher education: A review. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 30, 325–341. doi:10.1080/02602930500099102
   Google Scholar
• Tan, K. (2008). Qualitatively different ways of experiencing student self- assessment. Higher Education Research & Development, 27, 15–29. doi:10.1080/07294360701658708
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taras, M. (2002). Using assessment for learning and learning from assessment. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 27, 501–510. doi:10.1080/0260293022000020273
   Google Scholar
• Webber, K. (2012). The use of learner-centered assessment in US colleges and universities. Research in Higher Education, 53, 201–228. doi:10.1007/s11162-011-9245-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Willingham, D. T. (2002). Allocating student study time. “Massed” versus “distributed” practice. American Educator, 26(2), 37–39.
   Google Scholar