The answer depends on your lecturer

References

• Ball, D. L., & Bass, H. (2009). With an eye on the mathematical horizon: Knowing mathematics for teaching to learners’ mathematical futures. Paper presented at the The 2009 Curtis Center Mathematics and Teaching Conference. Retrieved February 27, 2016, from https://www.mathematik.tu-dortmund.de/ieem/cms/media/BzMU/BzMU2009/Beitraege/Hauptvortraege/BALL_Deborah_BASS_Hyman_2009_Horizon.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Ball, D. L., Thames, M. H., & Phelps, G. (2008). Content knowledge for teaching what makes it special? Journal of Teacher Education, 59(5), 389–407. doi: 10.1177/0022487108324554
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Breidenbach, D., Dubinsky, E., Hawks, J., & Nichols, D. (1992). Development of the process conception of function. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 23, 247–285. doi: 10.1007/BF02309532
   Google Scholar
• Cangelosi, R., Madrid, S., Cooper, S., Olson, J., & Hartter, B. (2013). The negative sign and exponential expressions: Unveiling students’ persistent errors and misconceptions. The Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 32(1), 69–82. doi: 10.1016/j.jmathb.2012.10.002
   Google Scholar
• Denzin, N. K., & Lincoln, Y. S. (2009). Qualitative research. Yogyakarta: PustakaPelajar.
   Google Scholar
• Eilon, T. (2009). Mathematics for middle-school, 7th grade, Part B. Jerusalem: The Hebrew University Press. [in Hebrew].
   Google Scholar
• Goren, B. (n.d.). Mathematics (5-Point Level): Questionnaire 035007. Tel-Aviv: Goren’s Publication. [in Hebrew].
   Google Scholar
• Hall, J. E. (1971). Algebra: A precalculus course. Belmont, CA: Brooks/Cole Publishing Company.
   Google Scholar
• Hill, H. C., Rowan, B., & Ball, D. L. (2005). Effects of teachers’ mathematical knowledge for teaching on student achievement. American Educational Research Journal, 42(2), 371–406. doi: 10.3102/00028312042002371
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kontorovich, I. (2016). Exploring the image of the square root concept among university students. In C. Csíkos, A. Rausch, & J. Szitányi (Eds.), Proceedings of the 40th conference of the international group for the psychology of mathematics education (vol. 3, pp. 99–106). Szeged: PME.
   Google Scholar
• Leikin, R., & Winicki-Landman, G. (2000). On equivalent and non-equivalent definitions: Part 2. For the Learning of Mathematics, 20(2), 24–29.
   Google Scholar
• Mosvold, R., & Fauskanger, J. (2014). Teachers’ beliefs about mathematical horizon content knowledge. International Journal for Mathematics Teaching and Learning. Retrieved September 26, 2014, from http://www.cimt.plymouth.ac.uk/journal/mosvold2.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Pitta-Pantazi, D., Christou, C., & Zachariades, T. (2007). Secondary school students’ levels of understanding in computing exponents. Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 26, 301–311. doi: 10.1016/j.jmathb.2007.11.003
   Google Scholar
• Shir, K. (2004). Learning a meta-mathematical concept: The case of a mathematical definition (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Technion – Israel Institute of Technology Press, Haifa, Israel.
   Google Scholar
• Shulman, L. S. (1986). Those who understand: Knowledge growth in teaching. Educational Researcher, 15(2), 4–14. doi: 10.3102/0013189X015002004
   Google Scholar
• Starkov, V. N., & Stepenko, N. A. (2007). Theory of functions with a complex variable. Saint-Petersburg: Saint-Petersburg National University Press. [in Russian]
   Google Scholar
• Tall, D. (2013). How humans learn to think mathematically: Exploring the three worlds of mathematics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Van Dormolen, J., & Zaslavsky, O. (2003). The many facets of a definition: The case of periodicity. The Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 22(1), 91–106. doi: 10.1016/S0732-3123(03)00006-3
   Google Scholar
• Wilensky, U. (1991). Abstract meditations on the concrete and concrete implications for mathematics education. In I. Harel & S. Papert (Eds.), Constructionism (pp. 193–204). Norwood, NJ: Ablex Publishing Corp.
   Google Scholar
• Wilensky, U. (1993). Connected mathematics – Building concrete relationships with mathematical knowledge (Unpublished PhD dissertation). Massachusetts University of Technology.
   Google Scholar
• Wilensky, U. (1995). Paradox, programming, and learning probability: A case study in a connected mathematics framework. Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 14, 253–280. doi: 10.1016/0732-3123(95)90010-1
   Google Scholar
• Winicki-Landman, G., & Leikin, R. (2000). On equivalent and non-equivalent definitions: Part 1. For the Learning of Mathematics, 20(1), 17–21.
   Google Scholar
• Yaquel, G. (n.d.). Mathematics for students at the 5-point level: The new examination program. 12th Grade Questionnaire 035807. Part A. Kiryat Tiv’on: Mishbezet. [in Hebrew]
   Google Scholar
• Zaslavsky, O., & Shir, K. (2005). Students’ conceptions of a mathematical definition. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 36(4), 317–346.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zaslavsky, O., et al. (2012). It can be done otherwise as well: Mathematics for middle-school, Grade 7, Part A. Jerusalem: Ministry of Education Press. [in Hebrew]
   Google Scholar
• Zazkis, R., & Zazkis, D. (2011). The significance of mathematical knowledge in teaching elementary methods course: Perspectives of mathematics teacher educators. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 76(3), 247–263. doi: 10.1007/s10649-010-9268-z
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar