References
- Bramley, T. (2007). Paired comparison methods. In P. Newton, J.-A. Baird, H. Goldstein, H. Patrick, & P. Tymms (Eds.), Techniques for monitoring the comparability of examination standards (pp. 264–294). London: QCA.
- Crisp, V., & Johnson, M. (2007). The use of annotations in examination marking: Opening a window into markers’ minds. British Educational Research Journal, 33, 943–961. doi: 10.1080/01411920701657066
- Drake, P., Wake, G., & Noyes, A. (2012). Assessing ‘functionality’ in school mathematics examinations: What does being human have to do with it? Research in Mathematics Education, 14, 237–252. doi: 10.1080/14794802.2012.734969
- Fukawa-Connelly, T. (2005). Thoughts on learning advanced mathematics. For the Learning of Mathematics, 25, 33–35.
- Leron, U. (1983). Structuring mathematical proofs. The American Mathematical Monthly, 90(3), 174–184. doi: 10.2307/2975544
- Lithner, J. (2008). A research framework for creative and imitative reasoning. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 67, 255–276. doi: 10.1007/s10649-007-9104-2
- Morgan, C., & Sfard, A. (2016). Investigating changes in high-stakes mathematics examinations: A discursive approach. Research in Mathematics Education, 18, 92–119. doi: 10.1080/14794802.2016.1176596
- Newton, P., & Shaw, S. (2014). Validity in educational and psychological assessment. SAGE.
- Newton, P. E. (1996). The reliability of marking of general certificate of secondary education scripts: Mathematics and English. British Educational Research Journal, 22, 405–420. doi: 10.1080/0141192960220403
- Rowland, T. (2001). Generic proofs in number theory. In S. Campbell & R. Zazkis (Eds.), Learning and teaching number theory: Research in cognition and instruction (pp. 157–184). Westport: Ablex.
- Scouller, K. (1998). ‘The influence of assessment method on students’ learning approaches: Multiple choice question examination versus assignment essay. Higher Education, 35, 453–472. doi: 10.1023/A:1003196224280
- Suto, W. I., & Nádas, R. (2009). Why are some GCSE examination questions harder to mark accurately than others? Using Kelly’s repertory grid technique to identify relevant question features. Research Papers in Education, 24, 335–377. doi: 10.1080/02671520801945925
- Swan, M., & Pead, D. (2008). Bowland maths professional development resources. Bowland Trust/Department for Children, Schools and Families.
- van den Heuvel-Panhuizen, M. (1996). Assessment and realistic mathematics education (vol. 19). Utrecht: Utrecht University.
- Weber, K. (2012). Mathematicians’ perspectives on their pedagogical practice with respect to proof. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 43(4), 463–482. doi: 10.1080/0020739X.2011.622803
- White, J. (2014). Who needs examinations? A story of climbing ladders and dodging snakes. London: Institute of Education Press.