References
- Akcayir, M., Dundar, H., & Akcayir, G. (2016). What makes you a digital native? Is it enough to be born after 1980? Computers in Human Behaviour, 60(1), 435–440. doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2016.02.089
- Artigue, M. (2010). The future of teaching and learning mathematics with digital technologies. In C. Hoyles & J.-B. Langrange (Eds.), Mathematics education and technology-rethinking the terrain. The 17th ICMI study (pp. 463–475). New York, NY: Springer.
- Borba, M., & Villarreal, M. (2005). Humans with Media and the reorganization of mathematical thinking: Information and communication technologies, modeling, visualization and experimentation. New York, NY: Springer.
- Doorman, L. M., & Gravemeijer, K. P. E. (2009). Emergent modeling: Discrete graphs to support the understanding of change and velocity. ZDM: International Journal on Mathematics Education, 41(1/2), 199–211. doi: 10.1007/s11858-008-0130-z
- Economic Intelligent Unit. (2015). Driving the skills agenda: Preparing students for the future. London: The Economist. Retrieved from https://www.eiuperspectives.economist.com/sites/default/files/Drivingtheskillsagenda.pdf
- Ng, O-L. (2016). Comparing calculus communication across static and dynamic environments using a multimodal approach. Digital Experiences in Mathematics Education, 2(2), 115–141. doi: 10.1007/s40751-016-0014-8
- Prensky, M. (2010). Teaching digital natives: Partnering for real learning. London: Sage Publishers.
- Sinclair, N., & Yurita, V. (2008). To be or to become: How dynamic geometry changes discourse. Research in Mathematics Education, 10(2), 135–150. doi: 10.1080/14794800802233670
- Thompson, P. (2013). The digital natives as learners: Technology Use patterns and approaches to learning. Computers & Education, 65(1), 12–33. doi: 10.1016/j.compedu.2012.12.022