The activity structure of technology-based mathematics lessons: a case study of three teachers in English secondary schools

References

• Barker, R. G. (1968). Ecological psychology: Concepts and methods for studying the environment of human behavior. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Barker, R. G., & Gump, P. V. (1964). Big school; small school: High school size and student behavior. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bozkurt, G., & Ruthven, K. (2017). Classroom-based professional expertise: A mathematics teacher’s practice with technology. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 94(3), 309–328. doi: 10.1007/s10649-016-9732-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burns, R. (1984). How time is used in elementary schools: The activity structure of classrooms. In L. Anderson (Ed.), Time and school learning: Theory, research, and practice (pp. 91–127). London: Croom Helm.
   Google Scholar
• Burns, R. B., & Anderson, L. W. (1987). The activity structure of lesson segments. Curriculum Inquiry, 17(1), 31–53. doi: 10.1080/03626784.1987.11075276
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clark-Wilson, A., Robutti, O., & Sinclair, N. (2014). The mathematics teacher in the digital era (pp. 373–393). Dordrecht: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Doyle, W. (1977). Paradigms for research on teacher effectiveness. In L.S. Shulman (Ed.), Review of research in education (vol. 5, pp. 163–198). Itasca, IL: Peacock.
   Google Scholar
• Drijvers, P. (2012). Teachers transforming resources into orchestrations. In G. Gueudet, B. Pepin, & L. Trouche (Eds.), From text to “lived” resources (pp. 265–281). New York: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Drijvers, P., Doorman, M., Boon, P., Reed, H., & Gravemeijer, K. (2010). The teacher and the tool: Instrumental orchestrations in the technology-rich mathematics classroom. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 75(2), 213–234. doi: 10.1007/s10649-010-9254-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Drijvers, P., Tacoma, S., Besamusca, A., Doorman, M., & Boon, P. (2013). Digital resources inviting changes in mid-adopting teachers’ practices and orchestrations. ZDM The International Journal on Mathematics Education, 45(7), 987–1001. doi: 10.1007/s11858-013-0535-1
   Google Scholar
• Glaser, B. G., & Strauss, A. L. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research. New York: Aldine de Gruyter.
   Google Scholar
• Goos, M., Soury-Lavergne, S., Assude, T., Brown, J., Kong, C. M., Glover, D., … Sinclair, M. (2010). Teachers and teaching: Theoretical perspectives and issues concerning classroom implementation. In C. Hoyles, & J. B. Lagrange (Eds.), Mathematics education and technology - rethinking the terrain: The 17th ICMI study (pp. 311–328). New York: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Gump, P. (1964). Environmental guidance of the classroom behavioral system. In B. Biddle, & W. Ellena (Eds.), Contemporary research on teacher effectiveness (pp. 165–195). New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
   Google Scholar
• Hohenwarter, M., & Preiner, J. (2007). Dynamic mathematics with GeoGebra. Journal of Online Mathematics and its Applications, 7. Article ID 1448.
   Google Scholar
• Laborde, C. (2001). Integration of technology in the design of geometry tasks with cabri-geometry. International Journal of Computers for Mathematical Learning, 6(3), 283–317. doi: 10.1023/A:1013309728825
   Google Scholar
• Lagrange, J.-B., Artigue, M., Laborde, C., & Trouche, L. (2003). Technology and mathematics education: A multidimensional study of the evolution of research and innovation. In A. J. Bishop, M. A. Clements, C. Keitel, J. Kilpatrick, & F. K. S. Leung (Eds.), Second international handbook of mathematics education (Vol. 1, pp. 237–269). Dordrecht: Kluwer.
   Google Scholar
• Monaghan, J. (2004). Teachers’ activities in technology-based mathematics lessons. International Journal of Computers for Mathematical Learning, 9(3), 327–357. doi: 10.1007/s10758-004-3467-6
   Google Scholar
• Prediger, S., Bikner-Ahsbahs, A., & Arzarello, F. (2008). Networking strategies and methods for connecting theoretical approaches: First steps towards a conceptual framework. ZDM The International Journal on Mathematics Education, 40, 165–178. doi: 10.1007/s11858-008-0086-z
   Google Scholar
• Ruthven, K. (2009). Towards a naturalistic conceptualisation of technology integration in classroom practice: The example of school mathematics. Education & Didactique, 3(1), 131–159. doi: 10.4000/educationdidactique.434
   Google Scholar
• Ruthven, K. (2012). Constituting digital tools and materials as classroom resources: The example of dynamic geometry. In G. Gueudet, B. Pepin, & L. Trouche (Eds.), From text to ‘lived’ resources: Mathematics curriculum materials and teacher development (pp. 83–103). New York: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Ruthven, K. (2014). Frameworks for analysing the expertise that underpins successful integration of digital technologies into everyday teaching practice. In A. Clark-Wilson, O. Robutti, & N. Sinclair (Eds.), The mathematics teacher in the digital era (pp. 373–393). Dordrecht: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Ruthven, K., Deaney, R., & Hennessy, S. (2009). Using graphing software to teach about algebraic forms. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 71(3), 279–297.
   Google Scholar
• Stodolsky, S. S. (1983). Classroom activity structures in the fifth grade. Final Report. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago.
   Google Scholar
• Tabach, M. (2011). A mathematics teacher’s practice in a technological environment: A case study analysis using two complementary theories. Technology, Knowledge and Learning, 16(3), 247–265.
   Google Scholar
• Tabach, M. (2013). Developing a general framework for instrumental orchestration. In B. Ubuz, C. Haser, & M. A. Mariotti (Eds.), Proceedings of the eighth congress of the European society for research in mathematics education CERME8, Antalya (pp. 2744–2753).
   Google Scholar
• Trouche, L. (2004). Managing the complexity of human/machine interactions in computerized learning environments: Guiding students’ command process through instrumental orchestrations. International Journal of Computers for Mathematical Learning, 9(3), 281–307. doi: 10.1007/s10758-004-3468-5
   Google Scholar