On mathematicians’ disagreements on what constitutes a proof

References

• Aberdein, A. (2009). Mathematics and argumentation. Foundations of Science, 14, 1–8.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Adamchik, V., & Wagon, S. (1997). A simple formula for π. American Mathematical Monthly, 104, 852–855.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alcock, L., & Weber, K. (2005). Proof validation in real analysis: Inferring and checking warrants. The Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 24(2), 125–134.
   Google Scholar
• Almeida, D. (1996). Variation in proof standards: Implications for mathematics education. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 27(5), 659–665.
   Google Scholar
• Azzouni, J. (2004). The derivation-indicator view of mathematical practice. Philosophia Mathematica, 12, 81–106.
   Google Scholar
• Balacheff, N. (1988). Aspects of proof in pupils’ practice of school mathematics. In D. Pimm (Ed.), Mathematics, teachers and children (pp. 216–235). London: Hodder & Stoughton.
   Google Scholar
• Balacheff, N. (1999). For an ethnomathematical questioning on the teaching of proof. International Newsletter on the Teaching and Learning of Mathematical Proof. Retrieved from http://www.lettredelapreuve.org/OldPreuve/Newsletter/990910Theme/990910ThemeUK.html
   Google Scholar
• Balacheff, N. (2008). The role of the researcher’s epistemology in mathematics education: An essay on the case of proof. ZDM, 40(3), 501–512.
   Google Scholar
• Berry, D. (2018). Proof and the virtues of shared enquiry. Philosophia Mathematica, 26, 40–58.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boero, P. (1999). Argumentation and mathematical proof: A complex, productive, unavoidable relationship in mathematics and mathematics education. International Newsletter on the Teaching and Learning of Mathematical Proof. Retrieved from http://www.lettredelapreuve.org/OldPreuve/Newsletter/990708Theme/990708ThemeUK.html
   Google Scholar
• Boero, P., Fenaroli, G., & Guala, E. (2018). Mathematical argumentation in elementary teacher education: The key role of the cultural analysis of the content. In A. Stylianides & G. Harel (Eds.), Advances in mathematics education research on proof and proving (pp. 49–67). Dordrecht: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• CadwalladerOlsker, T. (2011). What do we mean by mathematical proof? Journal of Humanistic Mathematics, 1, 33–60.
   Google Scholar
• Cirillo, M., Kosko, K., Newton, J., Staples, M., & Weber, K. (2015). Conceptions and consequences of what we call argumentation, argument, and proof. In T. Bortell & K. Bieda (Eds.), Proceedings of the 37th annual meeting of the North American chapter of the psychology of mathematics education (pp. 1343–1351). East Lansing, MI: PME-NA.
   Google Scholar
• Cook, J. P., & Fukawa-Connelly, T. (2015). The pedagogical examples of groups and rings that algebraists think are most important in an introductory course. Canadian Journal of Science, Mathematics and Technology Education, 15(2), 171–185.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Czocher, J., & Weber, K. (in press). Proof as a cluster concept. To appear in Journal for Research in Mathematics Education.
   Google Scholar
• Dawkins, P., & Weber, K. (2017). Values and norms of proof for mathematicians and students. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 95, 123–142.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dreyfus, T. (2004). What counts as proof in the mathematics classroom? In M. Kourkoulos, G. Troulis, & C. Tzanakis (Eds.), Proceedings of the 3rd colloquium on the didactics of mathematics (pp. 114–132). Rethymnon: Department of Education, University of Crete.
   Google Scholar
• Duval, R. (1999). Questioning argumentation. International Newsletter on the Teaching and Learning of Mathematical Proof. Downloaded from: http://www.lettredelapreuve.org/OldPreuve/Newsletter/991112Theme/991112ThemeUK.html
   Google Scholar
• Fallis, D. (1996). Mathematical proof and the reliability of DNA evidence. The American Mathematical Monthly, 103, 491–497.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Geist, C., Löwe, B., & Van Kerkhove, B. (2010). Peer review and testimony in mathematics. In B. Löwe & T. Müller (Eds.), Philosophy of mathematics: Sociological aspects and mathematical practice (pp. 155–178). London: College Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Gosling, S. D., Vazire, S., Srivastava, S., & John, O. P. (2004). Should we trust web-based studies? A comparative analysis of six preconceptions about Internet questionnaires. American Psychologist, 59, 93–104.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harel, G. (2001). The development of mathematical induction as a proof scheme: A model for DNR-based instruction. In S. Campbell & R. Zaskis (Eds.), Learning and teaching number theory: Research in cognition and instruction (pp. 185–212). Dordrecht: Kluwer.
   Google Scholar
• Harel, G., & Sowder, L. (2007). Toward comprehensive perspectives on the learning and teaching of proof. In F. Lester (Ed.), Second handbook of research on mathematics teaching and learning (pp. 805–842). Reston, VA: NCTM.
   Google Scholar
• Healy, L., & Hoyles, C. (2000). A study of proof conceptions in algebra. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 31(4), 396–428.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Herbst, P., & Balacheff, N. (2009). Proving and knowing in public: The nature of proof in a classroom. In M. Blanton, D. Stylianou, & E. Knuth (Eds.), Teaching and learning proof across the grades: A K-16 perspective (pp. 40–64). New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Holdener, J. (2002). A theorem of Touchard on the form of odd perfect numbers. The American Mathematical Monthly, 109, 661–663.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Inglis, M., & Aberdein, A. (2016). Diversity in proof appraisals. In B. Larvor (Ed.), Mathematics cultures (pp. 163–179). Dordrecht: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Inglis, M., Mejia-Ramos, J. P., Weber, K., & Alcock, L. (2013). On mathematicians’ different standards when evaluating elementary proofs. Topics in Cognitive Science, 5, 270–282.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Inglis, M., & Mejia-Ramos, P. (2009a). The effect of authority on the persuasiveness of mathematical arguments. Cognition and Instruction, 27, 25–50.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Inglis, M., & Mejia-Ramos, P. (2009b). On the persuasiveness of visual arguments in mathematics. Foundations of Science, 14, 97–110.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jones, G., & Jones, M. (1998). Elementary number theory. London: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Ko, Y. Y., & Knuth, E. J. (2013). Validating proofs and counterexamples across content domains: Practices of importance for mathematics majors. The Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 32(1), 20–35.
   Google Scholar
• Kranz, J., & Dalal, R. (2000). Validity of web-based psychological research. In M. Birnbaum (Ed.), Psychological experiments on the internet (pp. 35–60). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lai, Y., Weber, K., & Mejia-Ramos, J. P. (2012). Mathematicians’ perspectives on features of a good pedagogical proof. Cognition and Instruction, 30, 146–169.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lakatos, I. (1976). Proofs and refutations: The logic of mathematical discovery. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lew, K. (2016). Conventions of the language of mathematical proof writing at the undergraduate level (Doctoral dissertation). Rutgers University-Graduate School, New Brunswick.
   Google Scholar
• Mariotti, M. A. (2006). Proof and proving in mathematics education. In A. Gutierrez & P. Boero (Eds.), Handbook of research on the psychology of mathematics education: Past, present and future (pp. 173–204). Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• McKnight, C., Magid, M., Murphy, T. J., & McKnight, M. (2000). Mathematics education research: A guide for the research mathematician. Washington, DC: American Mathematical Society.
   Google Scholar
• Mejia-Ramos, J. P., & Weber, K. (2014). Why and how mathematicians read proofs: Further evidence from a survey study. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 85, 161–173.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nelsen, R. (2008). Visual Gems of number theory. Math Horizons, 15, 7–31.
   Google Scholar
• Rav, Y. (1999). Why do we prove theorems? Philosophia Mathematica, 7(1), 5–41.
   Google Scholar
• Rav, Y. (2007). A critique of a formalist-mechanist version of the Justification of arguments in mathematicians' proof practices. Philosophia Mathematica, 15, 291–320.
   Google Scholar
• Reid, D., & Knipping, C. (2010). Proof in mathematics education. Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Rota, G. C. (1997). The phenomenology of mathematical beauty. Synthese, 111(2), 171–182.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Selden, A., & Selden, J. (2003). Validations of proofs considered as texts: Can undergraduates tell whether an argument proves a theorem? Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 34(1), 4–36.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Staples, M. E., Bartlo, J., & Thanheiser, E. (2012). Justification as a teaching and learning practice: Its (potential) multifacted role in middle grades mathematics classrooms. The Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 31, 447–462.
   Google Scholar
• Steiner, M. (1978). Mathematical explanations. Philosophical Studies, 34(2), 135–151.
   Google Scholar
• Stillman, G., Brown, J., & , Czocher, J. (in preparation). Yes, mathematicians do X so students should do X, but it's not the X you think.
   Google Scholar
• Stylianides, A. (2007). Proof and proving in school mathematics. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 38, 289–321.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stylianides, A., Bieda, K., & Morselli, F. (2016). Proof and argumentation in mathematics education research. In A. Gutierez, G. Leder, & P. Boero (Eds.), 2nd handbook on the psychology of mathematics education (pp. 315–351). Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Stylianides, G., Stylianides, A., & Weber, K. (2017). Research on the teaching and learning of proof: Taking stock and moving forward. In J. Cai (Ed.), Compendium for research in mathematics education (pp. 237–266). Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.
   Google Scholar
• Weber, K. (2003). Students’ difficulty with proof. In A. Selden & J. Selden (Eds.), Research sampler, 8. Available from the following MAA website on the teaching of learning of mathematics: http://www.maa.org/t_and_l/sampler/research_sampler.html, Last downloaded: January 14, 2019
   Google Scholar
• Weber, K. (2010). Mathematics majors’ perceptions of conviction, validity, and proof. Mathematical Thinking and Learning, 12, 306–336.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weber, K. (2013). On the sophistication of naïve empirical reasoning: Factors influencing mathematicians’ persuasion ratings of empirical arguments. Research in Mathematics Education, 15, 100–114.
   Google Scholar
• Weber, K., & Dawkins, P. (2018). Toward an evolving theory of mathematical practice informing pedagogy: What standards for this research paradigm should we adopt? In A. Stylianides & G. Harel (Eds.), Advances in mathematics education research on proof and proving (pp. 69–82). Dordrecht: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Weber, K., Inglis, M., & Mejia-Ramos, J. P. (2014). How mathematicians obtain conviction: Implications for mathematics instruction and research on epistemic cognition. Educational Psychologist, 49, 36–58.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weber, K., & Mejia-Ramos, J. P. (in press). An empirical study on the admissibility of graphical inferences in mathematical proofs. To appear. In A. Aberdein & M. Inglis (Eds.), Advances in experimental philosophy of logic and mathematics. London: Bloomsbury.
   Google Scholar