Fraction images: the case of six and a half

References

• Anderson-Pence, K. L., Moyer-Packenham, P. S., Westenskow, A., Shumway, J., & Jordan, K. (2014). Relationships between visual static models and students’ written solutions to fraction tasks. International Journal for Mathematics Teaching and Learning, 15, 1–18.
   Google Scholar
• Bagley, S., Rasmussen, C., & Zandieh, M. (2015). Inverse, composition, and identity: The case of function and linear transformation. The Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 37, 36–47.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ball, D. L. (1993). Halves, pieces, and twoths: Constructing and using representational contexts in teaching fractions. In T. P. Carpenter, E. Fennema, & T. A. Romberg (Eds.), Rational numbers: An integration of research (pp. 157–195). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Ball, D. L., Thames, M. H., & Phelps, G. (2008). Content knowledge for teaching: What makes it special? Journal of Teacher Education, 59(5), 389–407.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baroody, A. J., & Hume, J. (1991). Meaningful mathematics instruction: The case of fractions. Remedial and Special Education, 12(3), 54–68.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bingolbali, E., & Monaghan, J. (2008). Concept image revisited. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 68(1), 19–35.
   Google Scholar
• Brown, S. (2018). Difficult dialogs about degenerate cases: A proof script study. The Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 52, 61–76.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Čadež, T. H., & Kolar, V. M. (2018). How fifth-grade pupils reason about fractions: A reliance on part-whole subconstructs. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 99(3), 335–357.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Castro-Rodríguez, E., Pitta-Pantazi, D., Rico, L., & Gómez, P. (2016). Prospective teachers’ understanding of the multiplicative part-whole relationship of fraction. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 92, 129–146.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Charalambous, C. Y., & Pitta-Pantazi, D. (2007). Drawing on a theoretical model to study students’ understandings of fractions. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 64(3), 293–316.
   Google Scholar
• Depaepe, F., Van Roy, P., Torbeyns, J., Kleickmann, T., Van Dooren, W., & Verschaffel, L. (2018). Stimulating pre-service teachers’ content and pedagogical content knowledge on rational numbers. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 99, 197–216.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DeWolf, M., & Vosniadou, S. (2015). The representation of fraction magnitudes and the whole number bias reconsidered. Learning and Instruction, 37, 39–49.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Domoney, B. (2002). Student teachers’ understanding of rational number: Part-whole and numerical constructs. Research in Mathematics Education, 4(1), 53–67.
   Google Scholar
• Duval, R. (2006). A cognitive analysis of problems of comprehension in a learning of mathematics. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 61(1–2), 103–131.
   Google Scholar
• Duval, R. (2017). Understanding the mathematical way of thinking – The registers of semiotic representations. ( T. M. M. Campos, Ed.). Cham: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Fereday, J., & Muir-Cochrane, E. (2006). Demonstrating rigor using thematic analysis: A hybrid approach of inductive and deductive coding and theme development. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 5(1), 80–92.
   Google Scholar
• Hazewinkel, M. (Ed.). (1989). Encyclopaedia of mathematics: An updated and annotated translation of the Soviet “Mathematical Encyclopaedia” (Vol. 4). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic.
   Google Scholar
• Hsieh, H.-F., & Shannon, S. E. (2005). Three approaches to qualitative content analysis. Qualitative Health Research, 15(9), 1277–1288.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jakobsen, A., Ribeiro, C. M., & Mellone, M. (2014). Norwegian prospective teachers’ MKT when interpreting pupils’ productions on a fraction task. Nordic Studies in Mathematics Education, 19(3–4), 135–150.
   Google Scholar
• Kieren, T. E. (1976). On the mathematical, cognitive and instructional foundations of rational numbers. In R. A. Lesh & D. A. Bradbard (Eds.), Number and measurement: Papers from a research workshop (pp. 101–144). Columbus, OH: ERIC/SMEAC.
   Google Scholar
• Klein, J. (1968/1992). Greek mathematical thought and the origin of algebra. ( E. Brann, Trans.) ( Reprint). New York, NY: Dover.
   Google Scholar
• Koichu, B., & Zazkis, R. (2013). Decoding a proof of Fermat’s Little Theorem via script writing. The Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 32(3), 364–376.
   Google Scholar
• Kondracki, N. L., Wellman, N. S., & Amundson, D. R. (2002). Content analysis: Review of methods and their applications in nutrition education. Journal of Nutrition Education and Behavior, 34(4), 224–230.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marmur, O. (2018). Key memorable events: A lens on affect, learning, and teaching in the mathematics classroom. The Journal of Mathematical Behavior. doi: 10.1016/j.jmathb.2018.09.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marmur, O., & Zazkis, R. (2018). Space of fuzziness: Avoidance of deterministic decisions in the case of the inverse function. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 99(3), 261–275.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mason, J. (1987). What do symbols represent? In C. Janvier (Ed.), Problems of representation in the teaching and learning of mathematics (pp. 73–81). Hillsdale, NJ: L. Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• McGee, D. L., & Martinez-Planell, R. (2014). A study of semiotic registers in the development of the definite integral of functions of two and three variables. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 12(4), 883–916.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Munn, P. (1998). Symbolic function in pre-schoolers. In C. Donlan (Ed.), The development of mathematical skills (pp. 47–71). Hove: Psychology Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ni, Y., & Zhou, Y.-D. (2005). Teaching and learning fraction and rational numbers: The origins and implications of whole number bias. Educational Psychologist, 40(1), 27–52.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Osana, H. P., & Royea, D. A. (2011). Obstacles and challenges in preservice teachers’ explorations with fractions: A view from a small-scale intervention study. The Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 30(4), 333–352.
   Google Scholar
• Pantziara, M., & Philippou, G. (2012). Levels of students’ “conception” of fractions. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 79(1), 61–83.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Park, J., Güçler, B., & McCrory, R. (2013). Teaching prospective teachers about fractions: Historical and pedagogical perspectives. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 82(3), 455–479.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Petit, M. M., Laird, R. E., & Marsden, E. L. (2010). A focus on fractions: Bringing research to the classroom. New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Rønning, F. (2010). Tensions between an everyday solution and a school solution to a measuring problem. In V. Durand-Guerrier, S. Soury-Lavergne, & F. Arzarello (Eds.), Proceedings of the sixth congress of the European society for research in mathematics education (pp. 1013–1022). Lyon: INRP.
   Google Scholar
• Rowland, T., & Zazkis, R. (2013). Contingency in the mathematics classroom: Opportunities taken and opportunities missed. Canadian Journal of Science, Mathematics and Technology Education, 13(2), 137–153.
   Google Scholar
• Saxe, G. B., Taylor, E. V., McIntosh, C., & Gearhart, M. (2005). Representing fractions with standard notation: A developmental analysis. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 36(2), 137–157.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shulman, L. S. (1986). Those who understand: Knowledge growth in teaching. Educational Researcher, 15(2), 4–14.
   Google Scholar
• Simon, M. A., Placa, N., Avitzur, A., & Kara, M. (2018). Promoting a concept of fraction-as-measure: A study of the learning through activity research program. The Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 52, 122–133.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Skemp, R. R. (1987). The psychology of learning mathematics. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Spencer, L. J. (2014, September 24). 6 1/2 Avenue: Manhattan’s secret street. Retrieved from https://www.atlasobscura.com/places/6-1-2-avenue-manhattan-s-secret-street
   Google Scholar
• Stafylidou, S., & Vosniadou, S. (2004). The development of students’ understanding of the numerical value of fractions. Learning and Instruction, 14(5), 503–518.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tall, D., & Vinner, S. (1981). Concept image and concept definition in mathematics with particular reference to limits and continuity. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 12, 151–169.
   Google Scholar
• Tanton, J. (2005). Encyclopedia of mathematics. New York, NY: Facts On File.
   Google Scholar
• Tirosh, D. (2000). Enhancing prospective teachers’ knowledge of children’s conceptions: The case of division of fractions. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 31(1), 5–25.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tirosh, D., Fischbein, E., Graeber, A. O., & Wilson, J. W. (1998, August 8). Prospective elementary teachers’ conceptions of rational numbers. Retrieved from http://jwilson.coe.uga.edu/Texts.Folder/Tirosh/Pros.El.Tchrs.html
   Google Scholar
• Tirosh, D., & Graeber, A. O. (1990). Evoking cognitive conflict to explore preservice teachers’ thinking about division. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 21(2), 98–108.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tsamir, P., & Dreyfus, T. (2005). How fragile is consolidated knowledge? Ben’s comparisons of infinite sets. The Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 24(1), 15–38.
   Google Scholar
• Tsamir, P., & Ovodenko, R. (2013). University students’ grasp of inflection points. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 83(3), 409–427.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vamvakoussi, X., & Vosniadou, S. (2004). Understanding the structure of the set of rational numbers: A conceptual change approach. Learning and Instruction, 14(5), 453–467.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vamvakoussi, X., & Vosniadou, S. (2007). How many numbers are there in a rational numbers interval? Constraints, synthetic models and the effect of the number line. In S. Vosniadou, A. Baltas, & X. Vamvakoussi (Eds.), Reframing the conceptual change approach in learning and instruction (pp. 265–282). Oxford: Elsevier.
   Google Scholar
• Vamvakoussi, X., & Vosniadou, S. (2010). How many decimals are there between two fractions? Aspects of secondary school students’ understanding of rational numbers and their notation. Cognition and Instruction, 28(2), 181–209.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Hoof, J., Degrande, T., Ceulemans, E., Verschaffel, L., & Van Dooren, W. (2018). Towards a mathematically more correct understanding of rational numbers: A longitudinal study with upper elementary school learners. Learning and Individual Differences, 61, 99–108.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vinner, S. (1983). Concept definition, concept image and the notion of function. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 14(3), 293–305.
   Google Scholar
• Weber, R. P. (1990). Basic content analysis (2nd ed.). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Whitacre, I., Atabaş, Ş., & Findley, K. (2018). Exploring unfamiliar paths through familiar mathematical territory: Constraints and affordances in a preservice teacher’s reasoning about fraction comparisons. The Journal of Mathematical Behavior. doi: 10.1016/j.jmathb.2018.06.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zakaryan, D., & Ribeiro, M. (2018). Mathematics teachers’ specialized knowledge: A secondary teacher’s knowledge of rational numbers. Research in Mathematics Education. doi: 10.1080/14794802.2018.1525422
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zazkis, R., & Herbst, P. (Eds.). (2018). Scripting approaches in mathematics education: Mathematical dialogues in research and practice. Cham: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Zazkis, R., & Kontorovich, I. (2016). A curious case of superscript (−1): Prospective secondary mathematics teachers explain. The Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 43, 98–110.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zazkis, R., Sinclair, N., & Liljedahl, P. G. (2013). Lesson play in mathematics education: A tool for research and professional development. Dordrecht: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Zhou, X., & Wang, B. (2004). Preschool children’s representation and understanding of written number symbols. Early Child Development and Care, 174(3), 253–266.
   Google Scholar