A heuristic approach to assess change in mathematical knowledge for teaching geometry after a practice-based professional learning intervention

References

• Adler, J., & Davis, Z. (2006). Opening another black box: Researching mathematics for teaching in mathematics teacher education. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 39(4), 270–296.
   Google Scholar
• Ball, D. L., & Bass, H. (2002). Toward a practice-based theory of mathematical knowledge for teaching. In E. Simmt & B. Davis (Eds.), Proceedings of the 2002 annual meeting of the Canadian Mathematics Education Study Group (pp. 3–14). Edmonton, AB: CMESG.
   Google Scholar
• Ball, D. L., Lubienski, S. T., & Mewborn, D. S. (2001). Research on teaching mathematics: The unsolved problem of teachers’ mathematical knowledge. In V. Richardson (Ed.), Handbook of research on teaching (4th ed., pp. 433–456). Washington, DC: AERA.
   Google Scholar
• Ball, D. L., Thames, M. H., & Phelps, G. (2008). Content knowledge for teaching: What makes it special? Journal of Teacher Education, 59(5), 389–407.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bradshaw, L., Izsák, A., Templin, J., & Jacobson, E. (2014). Diagnosing teachers’ understandings of rational numbers: Building a multidimensional test within the diagnostic classification framework. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 33(1), 2–14.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clarke, D., & Hollingsworth, H. (2002). Elaborating a model of teacher professional growth. Teaching and Teacher Education, 18(8), 947–967.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Copur-Gencturk, Y., Tolar, T., Jacobson, E., & Fan, W. (2019). An empirical study of the dimensionality of the mathematical knowledge for teaching construct. Journal of Teacher Education, 70(5), 485–497.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harvill, L. M. (1991). An NCME instructional Module on. Standard Error of measurement. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 10(2), 33–41.
   Google Scholar
• Herbst, P., with González, G., Hsu, H. Y., Chen, C., Weiss, M., & Hamlin, M. (2010). Instructional situations and students’ opportunities to reason in the high school geometry class. Manuscript. Deep Blue at the University of Michigan. Retrieved from http://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/78372
   Google Scholar
• Herbst, P., Chazan, D., Kosko, K., Dimmel, J., & Erickson, A. (2016). Using multimedia questionnaires to study influences on the decisions mathematics teachers make in instructional situations. ZDM-The International Journal of Mathematics Education, 48, 167–183.
   Google Scholar
• Herbst, P., & Kosko, K. (2014). Mathematical knowledge for teaching and its specificity to high school geometry instruction. In J. Lo, K. R. Leatham, & L. R. Van Zoest (Eds.), Research trends in mathematics teacher education (pp. 23–45). New York, NY: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Herbst, P., & Milewski, A. (2018). What StoryCircles can do for mathematics teaching and teacher education. In R. Zazkis & P. Herbst (Eds.), Scripting approaches in mathematics education (pp. 321–364). Cham, CH: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Hiebert, J., Gallimore, R., & Stigler, J. W. (2002). A knowledge base for the teaching profession: What would it look like and how can we get one? Educational Researcher, 31(5), 3–15.
   Google Scholar
• Hill, H. C. (2010). The nature and predictors of elementary teachers’ mathematical knowledge for teaching. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 41(5), 513–545.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hill, H. C., & Ball, D. L. (2004). Learning mathematics for teaching: Results from California’s mathematics professional development institutes. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 35(5), 330–351.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hill, H. C., Blunk, M. L., Charalambous, C. Y., Lewis, J. M., Phelps, G. C., Sleep, L., & Ball, D. L. (2008). Mathematical knowledge for teaching and the mathematical quality of instruction: An exploratory study. Cognition and Instruction, 26(4), 430–511.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hill, H. C., Schilling, S. G., & Ball, D. L. (2004). Developing measures of teachers’ mathematics knowledge for teaching. The Elementary School Journal, 105(1), 11–30.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jurich, D. P., & Bradshaw, L. P. (2014). An illustration of diagnostic classification modeling in student learning outcomes assessment. International Journal of Testing, 14(1), 49–72.
   Google Scholar
• Kane, M. T. (2013). Validating the interpretations and uses of test scores. Journal of Educational Measurement, 50(1), 1–73.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ko, I. (2019). Investigating the dimensionality of teachers’ mathematical knowledge for teaching secondary mathematics using item factor analyses and diagnostic classification models (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Ann Arbor: University of Michigan.
   Google Scholar
• Koichu, B., & Zazkis, R. (2018). “I understand” talk in script writing: A case from Euclid’s elements. In R. Zazkis & P. Herbst (Eds.), Scripting approaches in mathematics education (pp. 163–184). Cham, CH: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Krauss, S., Brunner, M., Kunter, M., Baumert, J., Blum, W., Neubrand, M., & Jordan, A. (2008). Pedagogical content knowledge and content knowledge of secondary mathematics teachers. Journal of Educational Psychology, 100(3), 716–725.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lewis, C., Perry, R., & Murata, A. (2006). How should research contribute to instructional improvement? The case of lesson study. Educational Researcher, 35(3), 3–14.
   Google Scholar
• Madison, M. J., & Bradshaw, L. P. (2018). Assessing growth in a diagnostic classification model framework. Psychometrika, 83(4), 963–990.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Milewski, A., Herbst, P., Bardelli, E., & Hetrick, C. (2018). The role of simulations for supporting professional growth: Teachers’ engagement in virtual professional experimentation. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 26(1), 103–126.
   Google Scholar
• Morris, A. K., & Hiebert, J. (2011). Creating shared instructional products: An alternative approach to improving teaching. Educational Researcher, 40(1), 5–14.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morris, A. K., Hiebert, J., & Spitzer, S. M. (2009). Mathematical knowledge for teaching in planning and evaluating instruction: What can preservice teachers learn? Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 40(5), 491–529.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Muthén, L. K., & Muthén, B. O. (1998–2015). Mplus User's Guide (7th ed.). Los Angeles, CA: Muthén & Muthén.
   Google Scholar
• Ricks, T. E. (2011). Process reflection during Japanese lesson study experiences by prospective secondary mathematics teachers. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 14(4), 251–267.
   Google Scholar
• Rowland, T., Huckstep, P., & Thwaites, A. (2005). Elementary teachers’ mathematics subject knowledge: The knowledge quartet and the case of Naomi. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 8(3), 255–281.
   Google Scholar
• Rupp, A. A., Templin, J., & Henson, R. A. (2010). Diagnostic measurement: Theory, methods, and applications. New York: Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Santagata, R. (2009). Designing video-based professional development for mathematics teachers in low-performing schools. Journal of Teacher Education, 60(1), 38–51.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schwartz, C., Walkowiak, T. A., Poling, L., Richardson, K., & Polly, D. (2018). The nature of feedback given to elementary student teachers from university supervisors after observations of mathematics lessons. Mathematics Teacher Education and Development, 20(1), 62–85.
   Google Scholar
• Shulman, L. S. (1986). Those who understand: Knowledge growth in teaching. Educational Researcher, 15(2), 4–14.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, D. E. (1907). The preparation of the teacher of mathematics in secondary schools. School Science and Mathematics, 7(4), 247–253.
   Google Scholar
• Speer, N. M., King, K. D., & Howell, H. (2015). Definitions of mathematical knowledge for teaching: Using these constructs in research on secondary and college mathematics teachers. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 18(2), 105–122.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Templin, J., & Bradshaw, L. (2013). Measuring the reliability of diagnostic classification model examinee estimates. Journal of Classification, 30(2), 251–275.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Templin, J. L., & Henson, R. A. (2006). Measurement of psychological disorders using cognitive diagnosis models. Psychological Methods, 11(3), 287–305.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thompson, A. G., & Thompson, P. W. (1996). Talking about rates conceptually, Part II: Mathematical knowledge for teaching. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 27, 2–24.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thompson, P. W. (2016). Researching mathematical meanings for teaching. In L. English & D. Kirshner (Eds.), Handbook of international research in mathematics education (pp. 435–461). New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Wainer, H., & Kiely, G. L. (1987). Item clusters and computerized adaptive testing: A case for testlets. Journal of Educational Measurement, 24(3), 185–201.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilson, M. (2005). Constructing measures: An item response modeling approach. New York: Psychology Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wirth, R. J., & Edwards, M. C. (2007). Item factor analysis: Current approaches and future directions. Psychological Methods, 12(1), 58–79.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar