References
- Ball, D. L., Thames, M. H., & Phelps, G. (2008). Content knowledge for teaching: What makes it special? Journal of Teacher Education, 59(5), 389–407.
- Bartolini Bussi, M. G. (1996). Mathematical discussion and perspective drawing in primary school. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 31(1–2), 11–41.
- Borasi, R. (1996). Reconceiving mathematics instruction: A focus on errors. Norwood, NJ: Ablex Publishing Company.
- Carrillo-Yañez, J., Climent, N., Montes, M., Contreras, L. C., Flores-Medrano, E., Escudero-Ávila, … Muñoz-Catalán, M. C. (2018). The mathematics teacher’s specialised knowledge (MTSK) model. Research in Mathematics Education. doi: 10.1080/14794802.2018.1479981
- Davis, B. (1997). Listening for differences: An evolving conception of mathematics teaching. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 28(3), 355–376.
- Di Martino, P., Mellone, M., & Ribeiro, M. (2019). Interpretative knowledge. In S. Lerman (Ed.), Encyclopedia of mathematics education. Cham: Springer. doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-77487-9_100019-1
- Hallman-Thrasher, A. (2017). Prospective elementary teachers’ responses to unanticipated incorrect solutions to problem-solving tasks. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 20, 519–555.
- Jacobs, V. R., Lamb, L. L. C., & Philipp, R. A. (2010). Professional noticing of children’s mathematical thinking. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 41(2), 169–202.
- Jakobsen, A., Ribeiro, C. M., & Mellone, M. (2014). Norwegian prospective teachers’ MKT when interpreting pupils’ productions on a fraction task. Nordic Studies in Mathematics Education, 19(3–4), 135–150.
- Krauss, S., Baumert, J., & Blum, W. (2008). Secondary mathematics teachers’ pedagogical content knowledge and content knowledge: Validation of the COACTIV constructs. ZDM Mathematics Education, 40, 873–892.
- Levin, B. B. (1995). Using the case method in teacher education: The role of discussion and experience in teachers’ thinking about cases. Teaching and Teacher Education, 11, 63–79.
- Mason, J. (2002). Researching your own practice: The discipline of noticing. London, UK: Routledge Falmer.
- Mellone, M., Romano, P., & Tortora, R. (2013). Different ways of grasping structure in arithmetical tasks, as steps toward algebra. In B. Ubuz, Ç. Haser & M. A. Mariotti (Eds.), Proceedings of the eight congress of the European society for research in mathematics education (pp. 480–489). Antalya, Turkey: ERME.
- Ribeiro, C. M., Mellone, M., & Jakobsen, A. (2016). Interpretation students’ non-standard reasoning: Insights for mathematics teacher education. For the Learning of Mathematics, 36(2), 8–13.
- Rowland, T., Huckstep, P., & Thwaites, A. (2005). Elementary teachers’ mathematics subject knowledge: The knowledge quartet and the case of Naomi. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 8, 255–281.
- Shulman, L. S. (1986). Those who understand: Knowledge growth in teaching. Educational Researcher, 15(4), 4–14.
- Takker, S., & Subramaniam, K. (2019). Knowledge demands in teaching decimals. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 22(3), 257–280.
- Vygotsky, L. S. (1934). Myšlenie i reč’. Psichologičeskie issledovanija. Moscow: Socekiz. Italian critical edition: Mecacci L. (Ed.) (1990). Pensiero e Linguaggio. Ricerche psicologiche. Bari: LaTerza.