1,297
Views
2
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

A comparative synthesis of UK mathematics education research: what are we talking about and do we align with international discourse?

ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon & ORCID Icon
Pages 39-62 | Received 16 Jun 2019, Accepted 10 Jan 2020, Published online: 18 May 2020

References

  • Adler, J., Alshwaikh, J., Essack, R., & Gcsamba, L. (2016). Mathematics education research in South Africa 2007–2015: Review and reflection. African Journal of Research in Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 21(1), 1–14. doi: 10.1080/18117295.2016.1265858
  • Anthony, G., Cooke, A., & Muir, T. (2016). Challenges, reforms, and learning in initial teacher education. In K. Makar, S. Dole, J. Visnovska, M. Goos, A. Bennison, & K. Fry (Eds.), Research in mathematics education in Australasia 2012–2015 (pp. 305–327). Singapore: Springer. doi: 10.1007/978-981-10-1419-2_15
  • Beswick, K., Anderson, J., & Hurst, C. (2016). The education and development of practicing teachers. In K. Makar, S. Dole, J. Visnovska, M. Goos, A. Bennison, & K. Fry (Eds.), Research in mathematics education in Australasia 2012–2015 (pp. 329–352). Singapore: Springer. doi: 10.1007/978-981-10-1419-2_16
  • Blei, D., Ng, A., & Jordan, M. (2003). Latent Dirichlet allocation. The Journal of Machine Learning Research, 3, 993–1022.
  • Borthwick, A., & Harcourt-Heath, M. (2007, March). Calculation strategies used by year 5 children. In D. Küchemann (Ed.), Proceedings of the British society for research into learning mathematics (pp. 12–17). London: BSRLM.
  • Boylan, M., Maxwell, B., Wolstenholme, C., Jay, T., & Demack, S. (2018). The mathematics teacher exchange and ‘mastery’ in England: The evidence for the efficacy of component practices. Education Sciences, 8(4), 202–232. doi: 10.3390/educsci8040202
  • Coupland, M., Dunn, P., Galligan, L., Oates, G., & Trenholm, S. (2016). Tertiary mathematics education. In K. Makar, S. Dole, J. Visnovska, M. Goos, A. Bennison, & K. Fry (Eds.), Research in mathematics education in Australasia 2012–2015 (pp. 187–211). Singapore: Springer. doi: 10.1007/978-981-10-1419-2_10
  • Department for Education. (2013). National curriculum in England: Mathematics programmes of study. London: Author.
  • Department for Education and Employment. (1999). The national numeracy strategy: Framework for teaching mathematics from reception to year 6. London: Author.
  • Dreyfus, T., Artigue, M., Potari, D., Prediger, S., & Ruthven, K. (Eds.). (2018). Developing research in mathematics education: Twenty years of communication, cooperation and collaboration in Europe. London: Routledge.
  • Duckworth, L., Lawley, S., Siddiqui, M., & Stevenson, M. (2015, November). Maths Hub, mastery and messy research. In G. Adams (Ed.), Proceedings of the British society for research into learning mathematics (pp. 31–36). London: BSRLM.
  • Eickhoff, M., & Neuss, N. (2017, June). Topic modelling methodology: Its use in information systems and other managerial disciplines. In I. Ramos, V. Tuunainen, & H. Krcmar (Eds.), Proceedings of the 25th European conference on information systems (pp. 1327–1347). Guimarães: ECIS.
  • Faragher, R., Hill, J., & Clarke, B. (2016). Inclusive practices in mathematics education. In K. Makar, S. Dole, J. Visnovska, M. Goos, A. Bennison, & K. Fry (Eds.), Research in mathematics education in Australasia 2012–2015 (pp. 119–141). Singapore: Springer. doi: 10.1007/978-981-10-1419-2_7
  • Geiger, V., Calder, N., Tan, H., Loong, E., Miller, J., & Larkin, K. (2016). Transformations of teaching and learning through digital technologies. In K. Makar, S. Dole, J. Visnovska, M. Goos, A. Bennison, & K. Fry (Eds.), Research in mathematics education in Australasia 2012–2015 (pp. 255–280). Singapore: Springer. doi: 10.1007/978-981-10-1419-2_13
  • Hanna, G., & Sidoli, N. (2002). The story of ESM. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 50(2), 123–156. doi: 10.1023/A:1021162617070
  • Hodgen, J., Küchemann, D., Brown, M., & Coe, R. (2008, November). Children’s understandings of algebra 30 years on. In M. Joubert (Ed.), Proceedings of the British society for research into learning mathematics (pp. 36–41). London: BSRLM.
  • Hodgen, J., Oldenburg, R., & Strømskag, H. (2018). Algebraic thinking. In T. Dreyfus, M. Artigue, D. Potari, S. Prediger, & K. Ruthven (Eds.), Developing research in mathematics education: Twenty years of communication, cooperation and collaboration in Europe (pp. 32–45). London: Routledge.
  • Hošpesová, A., Carrillo, J., & Santos, L. (2018). Mathematics teacher education and professional development. In T. Dreyfus, M. Artigue, D. Potari, S. Prediger, & K. Ruthven (Eds.), Developing research in mathematics education: Twenty years of communication, cooperation and collaboration in Europe (pp. 181–195). London: Routledge.
  • Hunter, R., Hunter, J., Jorgensen, R., & Heng Choy, B. (2016). Innovative and powerful pedagogical practices in mathematics education. In K. Makar, S. Dole, J. Visnovska, M. Goos, A. Bennison, & K. Fry (Eds.), Research in mathematics education in Australasia 2012–2015 (pp. 213–234). Singapore: Springer. doi: 10.1007/978-981-10-1419-2_11
  • Inglis, M., & Foster, C. (2018). Five decades of mathematics education research. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 49(4), 462–500. doi: 10.5951/jresematheduc.49.4.0462
  • Jayarajah, K., Saat, R., Rauf, A., & Amnah, R. (2014). A review of science, technology, engineering & mathematics (STEM) education research from 1999–2013: A Malaysian perspective. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science & Technology Education, 10(3), 155–163. doi: 10.12973/eurasia.2014.1072a
  • Jones, K., Black, L., & Coles, A. (2019). Marking 21 years of research in mathematics education. Research in Mathematics Education, 21(1), 1–5. doi: 10.1080/14794802.2019.1592336
  • Kuzniak, A., Richard, P., & Michael-Chrysanthou, P. (2018). From geometrical thinking to geometrical working competencies. In T. Dreyfus, M. Artigue, D. Potari, S. Prediger, & K. Ruthven (Eds.), Developing research in mathematics education: Twenty years of communication, cooperation and collaboration in Europe (pp. 8–22). London: Routledge.
  • Makar, K., Dole, S., Visnovska, J., Goos, M., Bennison, A., & Fry, K. (Eds.). (2016). Research in mathematics education in Australasia 2012–2015. Singapore: Springer. doi: 10.1007/978-981-10-1419-2_1
  • Mariotti, M., Durand-Guerrier, V., & Stylianides, G. (2018). Argumentation and proof. In T. Dreyfus, M. Artigue, D. Potari, S. Prediger, & K. Ruthven (Eds.), Developing research in mathematics education: Twenty years of communication, cooperation and collaboration in Europe (pp. 75–89). London: Routledge.
  • Marks, R., Barclay, N., Barnes, A., & Treacy, P. (2019). Research review of BSRLM 2003–2017. Retrieved from BSRLM website http://www.bsrlm.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2019/03/Research-Review-of-BSRLM-2003-2017_FEBRUARY2019.pdf
  • Marton, F. (2015). Necessary conditions of learning. London: Routledge.
  • McCallum, A. (2002). MALLET: MAchine Learning for LanguagE Toolkit. Retrieved from MALLET website http://mallet.cs.umass.edu
  • Nickson, M. (2003). A review of BSRLM research 1995-2002. Retrieved from BSRLM website: http://www.bsrlm.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2016/09/BSRLM-Nickson-Review-of-BSRLM-Research-1995-2002.pdf
  • Nivens, R., & Otten, S. (2017). Assessing journal quality in mathematics education. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 48(4), 348–368. doi: 10.5951/jresematheduc.48.4.0348
  • Planas, N., Morgan, C., & Schütte, M. (2018). Mathematics education and language: Lessons and directions from two decades of research. In T. Dreyfus, M. Artigue, D. Potari, S. Prediger, & K. Ruthven (Eds.), Developing research in mathematics education: Twenty years of communication, cooperation and collaboration in Europe (pp. 196–210). London: Routledge.
  • Rezat, S., & Ejersbo, L. (2018). Number sense in teaching and learning arithmetic. In T. Dreyfus, M. Artigue, D. Potari, S. Prediger, & K. Ruthven (Eds.), Developing research in mathematics education: Twenty years of communication, cooperation and collaboration in Europe (pp. 23–31). London: Routledge.
  • Schoenfeld, A. (2016). Research in mathematics education. Review of Research in Education, 40(1), 497–528. doi: 10.3102/0091732X16658650
  • Serow, P., Callingham, R., & Tout, D. (2016). Assessment of mathematics learning: What are we doing? In K. Makar, S. Dole, J. Visnovska, M. Goos, A. Bennison, & K. Fry (Eds.), Research in mathematics education in Australasia 2012–2015 (pp. 235–254). Singapore: Springer. doi: 10.1007/978-981-10-1419-2_12
  • Spencer, R., & Fielding, H. (2015, November). Using the Singapore Bar model to support the interpretation and understanding of word problems in key stage 2. In G. Adams (Ed.), Proceedings of the British society for research into learning mathematics (pp. 114–119). London: BSRLM.
  • Turner, F. (2009, November). Identifying and developing the mathematical apprehensions of beginning primary school teachers. In M. Joubert (Ed.), Proceedings of the British society for research into learning mathematics (pp. 91–96). London: BSRLM.
  • Way, J., Bobis, J., Lamb, J., & Higgins, J. (2016). Researching curriculum, policy and leadership in mathematics education. In K. Makar, S. Dole, J. Visnovska, M. Goos, A. Bennison, & K. Fry (Eds.), Research in mathematics education in Australasia 2012–2015 (pp. 49–71). Singapore: Springer. doi: 10.1007/978-981-10-1419-2_4
  • Winsløw, C., Gueudet, G., Hochmuth, R., & Nardi, E. (2018). Research on university mathematics education. In T. Dreyfus, M. Artigue, D. Potari, S. Prediger, & K. Ruthven (Eds.), Developing research in mathematics education: Twenty years of communication, cooperation and collaboration in Europe (pp. 60–74). London: Routledge.
  • Xu, B. (2010). Research on mathematics education in China in the last decade: A review of journal articles. Frontiers of Education in China, 5(1), 130–155. doi: 10.1007/s11516-010-0009-y
  • Yore, L., & Lerman, S. (2008). Metasyntheses of qualitative research studies in mathematics and science education. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 6(2), 217–223. doi: 10.1007/s10763-008-9128-9

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.