Developing the role of modelling in the teaching and learning of probability

References

• Ainley, J., & Pratt, D. (2017). Computational modelling and children’s expressions of signal and noise. Statistics Education Research Journal, 16(2), 419–435. doi: https://doi.org/10.52041/serj.v16i2.183
   Google Scholar
• Ainley, J., Pratt, D., & Hansen, A. (2006). Connecting engagement and focus in pedagogic task design. British Educational Research Journal, 32(1), 23–38. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/01411920500401971
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Albert, J. (2002). Teaching introductory statistics from a Bayesian perspective. In B. Philips (Ed.), Proceedings of the 6th International conference on teaching statistics. Cape Town, South Africa [CD-ROM] (pp. 1–6). Voorburg: International Statistical Institute. Retrieved from: www.stat.auckland.ac.nz/∼iase/publications/1/3f1_albe.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Aridor, K., & Ben-Zvi, D. (2018). Statistical modelling to promote students’ aggregate reasoning with sample and sampling. ZDM Mathematics Education, 50(7), 1165–1181. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-018-0994-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bakker, A. (2004). Design research in statistics education: On symbolising and computer tools. Utrecht: CD Beta Press.
   Google Scholar
• Biehler, R., Frischemeier, D., & Podworny, S. (2017). Statistical reasoning about models and modelling in the context of informal statistical inference [Special issue]. Statistics Education Research Journal, 16(2). doi: https://doi.org/10.52041/serj.v16i2.192
   Google Scholar
• Biehler, R., Frischemeier, D., & Podworny, S. (2018). Elementary preservice teachers’ reasoning about statistical modelling in a civic statistics context. ZDM Mathematics Education, 50(7), 1237–1251. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-018-1001-x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bryant, P., & Nunes, T. (2012). Children’s understanding of probability: A literature review. London: Nuffield Foundation.
   Google Scholar
• Chernoff, E. J. (2014). Will the real Bayesian probability please stand up!? In K. Makar, B. de Sausa, & R. Gould (Eds.), Proceedings of the 9th International conference on teaching statistics. Flagstaff, AZ, USA (pp. 1–6). Voorburg: International Statistical Institute. Retrieved from: https://icots.info/9/proceedings/pdfs/ICOTS9_6A1_CHERNOFF.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Coles, A., Barwell, R., Cotton, T., Winter, J., & Brown, L. (2013). Teaching secondary mathematics as if the planet matters. Abingdon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Department for Education. (2014). The national curriculum in England: Key stages 3 and 4 framework document. Retrieved from: https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/national-curriculum-in-england-secondary-curriculum
   Google Scholar
• Díaz, C. (2010). Psychology students’ understanding of elementary Bayesian inference. In C. Reading (Ed.), Proceedings of the Eight International conference for teaching statistics (pp. 1–6). Ljubljana: International Statistical Institute. Retrieved from: http://iase-web.org/documents/papers/icots8/ICOTS8_4I1_DIAZ.pdf
   Google Scholar
• English, L. D., & Watson, J. M. (2016). Development of probabilistic understanding in fourth grade. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 47(1), 28–62. doi: https://doi.org/10.5951/jresematheduc.47.1.0028
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Helmerich, M. (2015). Rolling the dice: Exploring different approaches to probability with primary school students. CERME 9 – Ninth Congress of the European Society for research in mathematics education, Charles University in Prague, Faculty of Education; ERME, Feb 2015, Prague, Czech Republic. pp.678–684.
   Google Scholar
• Hoyles, C. (2018). Transforming the mathematical practices of learners and teachers through digital technology. Research in Mathematics Education, 20(3), 209–228. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/14794802.2018.1484799
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huber, B. L., & Huber, O. (1987). Development of the concept of comparative subjective probability. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 44(3), 304–316. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-0965(87)90036-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ireland, S., & Watson, J. (2009). Building a connection between experimental and theoretical aspects of probability. International Electronic Journal of Mathematics Education, 4(3), 339–370.
   Google Scholar
• Jones, G. A., Langrall, C. W., & Mooney, E. S. (2007). Research in probability: Responding to classroom realities. In F. K. Lester (Ed.), Second handbook of research on mathematics teaching and learning (pp. 909–956). Charlotte, NC: Information Age Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Jones, K. (2000). Providing a foundation for deductive reasoning: Students’ interpretations when using dynamic geometry software. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 44(1&2), 55–85. doi: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1012789201736
   Google Scholar
• Kawakami, T. (2018). How models and modelling approaches can promote young children’s statistical reasoning. In M. A. Sorto, A. White, & L. Guyot (Eds.), Proceedings of the Tenth International conference on teaching statistics (ICOTS10). Retrieved from https://iase-web.org/icots/10/proceedings/pdfs/ICOTS10_2G1.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Kazak, S. (2015). ‘How confident are you?’ Supporting young students’ reasoning about uncertainty in chance games through students’ talk and computer simulations. In A. Zieffler & E. Fry (Eds.), Reasoning about uncertainty: Learning and teaching informal inferential reasoning (pp. 29–55). Minneapolis, MN: Catalyst Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kazak, S., & Leavy, A. (2018). Emergent reasoning about uncertainty in primary school children with a focus on subjective probability. In A. Leavy, M. Meletiou-Mavrotheris, & E. Paparistodemou (Eds.), Statistics in early childhood and primary education. Early mathematics learning and development (pp. 37–54). Singapore: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Kazak, S., Pratt, D., & Gökce, R. (2018). Sixth grade students’ emerging practices of data modelling. ZDM Mathematics Education, 50(7), 1151–1163. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-018-0988-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Konold, C., Harradine, A., & Kazak, S. (2007). Understanding distributions by modelling them. International Journal of Computers for Mathematical Learning, 12, 217–230. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10758-007-9123-1
   Google Scholar
• Konold, C., & Kazak, S. (2008). Reconnecting data and chance. Technology Innovations in Statistics Education, 2(1), Article 1. Retrieved from: http://repositories.cdlib.org/uclastat/cts/tise/vol2/iss1/art1 doi: https://doi.org/10.5070/T521000032
   Google Scholar
• Konold, C., Madden, S., Pollatsek, A., Pfannkuch, M., Wild, C., Ziedins, I., … Kazak, S. (2011). Conceptual challenges in coordinating theoretical and data-centered estimates of probability. Mathematical Thinking and Learning, 13(1–2), 68–86. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/10986065.2011.538299
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Konold, C., & Miller, C. D. (2011). Tinkerplots2.0: Dynamic data exploration. Emeryville, CA: Key Curriculum.
   Google Scholar
• Lee, H. S., Angotti, R. L., & Tarr, J. E. (2010). Making comparisons between observed data and expected outcomes: Students’ informal hypothesis testing with probability simulation tools. Statistics Education Research Journal, 9(1), 68–96.
   Google Scholar
• Lehrer, R., & English, L. (2018). Introducing children to modelling variability. In D. Ben Zvi, K. Makar, & J. Garfield (Eds.), International handbook of research in statistics education (pp. 229–260). NY: Springer International Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Lehrer, R., Kim, M. J., & Schauble, L. (2007). Supporting the development of conceptions of statistics by engaging students in measuring and modeling variability. International Journal of Computers for Mathematical Learning, 12(3), 195–216. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10758-007-9122-2
   Google Scholar
• Lehrer, R., & Schauble, L. (2010). What kind of explanation is a model? In M. K. Stein & L. Kucan (Eds.), Instructional explanation in the disciplines (pp. 9–22). New York: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Makar, K., & Rubin, A. (2009). A framework for thinking about informal statistical inference. Statistics Education Research Journal, 8(1), 82–105.
   Google Scholar
• Manor, H., & Ben-Zvi, D. (2017). Students’ emergent articulations of statistical models and modelling in making informal statistical inferences. Statistics Education Research Journal, 16(2), 116–143. doi: https://doi.org/10.52041/serj.v16i2.187
   Google Scholar
• Martignon, L., & Erickson, T. (2014). Proto-Bayesian reasoning of children in fourth class. In K. Makar, B. de Sausa, & R. Gould (Eds.), Proceedings of the 9th International conference on teaching statistics. Flagstaff, AZ, USA (pp. 1–6). Voorburg: International Statistical Institute. Retrieved from: https://iase-web.org/icots/9/proceedings/pdfs/ICOTS9_6A2_MARTIGNON.pdf?1405041657
   Google Scholar
• Milli Eğitim Bakanlığı (2018). Matematik Öğretim Programı (İlkokul ve Ortaokul 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 ve 8. Sınıflar). Ankara: TTKB.
   Google Scholar
• Nilsson, P., Blomberg, P., & Ärlebäck, J. B. (2014). Exploring realistic Bayesian modeling situations. In K. Makar, B. de Sausa, & R. Gould (Eds.), Proceedings of the 9th International conference on teaching statistics. Flagstaff, AZ, USA (pp. 1–6). Voorburg: International Statistical Institute. Retrieved from: http://icots.info/icots/9/proceedings/pdfs/ICOTS9_6A3_NILSSON.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Noll, J., Clement, K., Dolor, J., Kirin, D., & Petersen, M. (2018). Students’ use of narrative when constructing statistical models in TinkerPlots. ZDM Mathematics Education, 50(7), 1267–1280. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-018-0981-x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Noll, J., & Shaughnessy, M. (2012). Aspects of students’ reasoning about variation in empirical sampling distributions. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 43(5), 509–556. doi: https://doi.org/10.5951/jresematheduc.43.5.0509
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nunes, T., Bryant, P., Evans, D., Gottardis, L., & Terlektsi, M.-E. (2014). The cognitive demands of understanding the sample space. ZDM Mathematics Education, 46(3), 437–448. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-014-0581-3
   Google Scholar
• Olivero, F. (2001). Conjecturing in open geometric situations using dynamic geometry: An exploratory classroom experiment. Research in Mathematics Education, 3(1), 229–246. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/14794800008520095
   Google Scholar
• Papert, S. (1982). Mindstorms: Children, computers and powerful ideas. London: Harvester Press.
   Google Scholar
• Patel, A., & Pfannkuch, M. (2018). Developing a statistical modelling framework to characterize year 7 students’ reasoning. ZDM Mathematics Education, 50(7), 1197–1212. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-018-0960-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pfannkuch, M., Ben-Zvi, D., & Budgett, S. (2018). Innovations in statistical modelling to connect data, chance and context [Special issue]. ZDM Mathematics Education, 50(7), 1113–1123. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-018-0989-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pfannkuch, M., & Ziedins, I. (2014). A modelling perspective on probability. In E. J. Chernoff & B. Sriraman (Eds.), Probabilistic thinking, advances in mathematics education (pp. 101–116). Dordrecht: Springer Science + BusinessMedia.
   Google Scholar
• Pratt, D. (1998a). The co-ordination of meanings for randomness. Learning of Mathematics, 18(3), 2–11.
   Google Scholar
• Pratt, D. (1998b). The construction of meanings in and for a stochastic domain of abstraction. Unpublished Doctoral Thesis, Institute of Education, University of London.
   Google Scholar
• Pratt, D. (2000). Making sense of the total of two dice. Journal of Research in Mathematics Education, 31(5), 602–625. doi: https://doi.org/10.2307/749889
   Google Scholar
• Pratt, D. (2012). Making mathematics Phenomenal, based on an Inaugural Professorial lecture delivered at the Institute of education, university of London, on 14 March 2012. London: Institute of Education, University of London, Professorial Lecture Series.
   Google Scholar
• Pratt, D., & Kazak, S. (2018). Research on uncertainty. In D. Ben-Zvi, K. Makar, & J. Garfield (Eds.), International handbook of research in statistics education (pp. 193–227). NY: Springer International Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Pratt, D., & Noss, R. (2002). The micro-evolution of mathematical knowledge: The case of randomness. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 11(4), 453–488. doi: https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327809JLS1104_2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pratt, D., & Noss, R. (2010). Designing for mathematical abstraction. International Journal of Computers for Mathematical Learning, 15(2), 81–97. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10758-010-9160-z
   Google Scholar
• Prodromou, T., & Pratt, D. (2006). The role of causality in the co-ordination of two perspectives on distribution within a virtual simulation. Statistics Education Research Journal, 5(2), 69–88.
   Google Scholar
• Prodromou, T., & Pratt, D. (2013). Making sense of stochastic variation and causality in a virtual environment. Technology, Knowledge and Learning, 18, 121–147. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10758-013-9210-4
   Google Scholar
• Rossman, A. J. (2008). Reasoning about informal statistical inference: One statistician’s view. Statistical Education Research Journal, 7(2), 5–19.
   Google Scholar
• Shaughnessy, J. M. (1992). Research in probability and statistics: Reflections and directions. In D. A. Grouws (Ed.), Handbook of research on mathematics teaching and learning (pp. 465–494). Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.
   Google Scholar
• Shaughnessy, J. M. (2003). Research on students’ understandings of probability. In J. Kilpatrick, W. G. Martin & D. Schifter (Eds.), A research companion to the principles and standards for school mathematics (pp. 216–226). Reston, VA: NCTM.
   Google Scholar
• Sinclair, N., & Robutti, O. (2013). Technology and the role of proof: The case of dynamic geometry. In M. A. (Ken) Clements, A. J. Bishop, C. Keitel, J. Kilpatrick, & F. K. S. Leung (Eds.), Third international handbook of mathematics education (pp. 571–596). New York, NY: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Sorto, M. A., White, A., & Guyot, L. (Eds.) (2018). Looking back, looking forward. In Proceedings of the Tenth International Conference on Teaching Statistics (ICOTS10, July, 2018), Kyoto, Japan. Voorburg: International Statistical Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Steinbring, H. (1991). The theoretical nature of probability in the classroom. In R. Kapadia & M. Borovcnik (Eds.), Chance encounters: Probability in education (pp. 135–167). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Taleb, N. N. (2007). The black swan: The impact of the highly improbable (2nd ed). London: Penguin.
   Google Scholar
• Tukey, J. (1977). Exploratory data analysis. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
   Google Scholar
• Watson, A., Jones, K., & Pratt, D. (2013). Key ideas in teaching mathematics: Research-based guidance for ages 9-19. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Weintrop, D., & Wilensky, U. (2014). Situating programming abstractions in a constructionist video game. Informatics in Education, 13(2), 307–321. doi: https://doi.org/10.15388/infedu.2014.19
   Google Scholar
• Wild, C. J. (2006). The concept of distribution. Statistics Education Research Journal, 5(2), 10–26.
   Google Scholar
• Wisittanawat, P., & Lehrer, R. (2018). Teacher assistance in modelling chance processes. In M. A. Sorto, A. White, & L. Guyot (Eds.), Proceedings of the Tenth International conference on teaching statistics (ICOTS10). https://iase-web.org/icots/10/proceedings/pdfs/ICOTS10_2A2.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Zieffler, A., Garfield, J., delMas, B., & Reading, C. (2008). A framework to support research on informal inferential reasoning. Statistics Education Research Journal, 7(2), 40–58.
   Google Scholar