When what routinely happens conflicts with what ought to be done: a scenario-based assessment of secondary mathematics teachers’ decisions

References

• Bishop, A. J. (1976). Decision-making, the intervening variable. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 7(1), 41–47.
   Google Scholar
• Bishop, A. J., & Whitfield, R. C. (1972). Situations in teaching. Maidenhead Berkshire: McGraw-Hill.
   Google Scholar
• Braswell, M. (2014). Once more unto the breaching experiment. Teaching Sociology, 42(2), 161–167.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buchbinder, O., Chazan, D. I., & Capozzoli, M. (2019). Solving equations: Exploring instructional exchanges as lenses to understand teaching and its resistance to reform. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 50(1), 51–83.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buchmann, M. (1986). Role over person: Morality and authenticity in teaching. The Teachers College Record, 87(4), 529–543.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carter, K. (1992). Creating cases for the development of teacher knowledge. In T. Russell, & H. Munby (Eds.), Teachers and teaching: From classroom to reflection (pp. 109–123). New York: Falmer Press.
   Google Scholar
• Chazan, D., Sela, H., & Herbst, P. (2012). Is the role of equations in the doing of word problems in school algebra changing? Initial indications from teacher study groups. Cognition and Instruction, 30(1), 1–38.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chazan, D., Herbst, P., & Clark, L. (2016). Research on the teaching of mathematics: A call to theorize the role of society and schooling in mathematics instruction. In D. Gitomer & C. Bell (Eds.), Handbook of Research on Teaching (pp. 1039–1097). Washington, DC: American Educational Research Association.
   Google Scholar
• Clark, L. A., & Watson, D. (1995). Constructing validity: Basic issues in objective scale development.. Psychological Assessment, 7(3), 309–319.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Darling-Hammond, L., & Snyder, J. (2000). Authentic assessment of teaching in context. Teaching and Teacher Education, 16(5-6), 523–545.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dimmel, J. K., & Herbst, P. G. (2018). What details do teachers expect from student proofs? A study of proof checking in geometry. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 49(3), 261–291.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gadermann, A. M., Guhn, M., & Zumbo, B. D. (2012). Estimating ordinal reliability for Likert-type and oridinal item response data: A conceptual, empirical, and practical guide. Practical Assessment, Research, and Evaluation, 17, Article 3.
   Google Scholar
• Garfinkel, H. (1964). Studies of the routine grounds of everyday activities. Social Problems, 11(3), 225–250.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goldenberg, C. (1992). The limits of expectations: A case for case knowledge about teacher expectancy effects. American Educational Research Journal, 29(3), 517–544.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Graham, J. (2006). Congeneric and (essentially) Tau-Equivalent estimates of score reliability. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 66(6), 930–944.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Herbst, P. G. (2002). Establishing a custom of proving in American school geometry: Evolution of the two-column proof in the early twentieth century. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 49(3), 283–312.
   Google Scholar
• Herbst, P. G., Aaron, W. A., Dimmel, J. K., & Erickson, A. W. (2013, April). Expanding students’ involvement in proof problems: Are geometry teachers willing to depart from the norm? Roundtable session at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, San Francisco, CA; deep blue: http://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/97425
   Google Scholar
• Herbst, P. G., Aaron, W. A., & Erickson, A. W. (2013, April). How preservice teachers respond to representations of practice: A comparison of animations and video. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, San Francisco, CA.
   Google Scholar
• Herbst, P., & Chazan, D. (2011). Research on practical rationality: Studying the justification of actions in mathematics teaching. The Mathematics Enthusiast, 8(3), 405–462.
   Google Scholar
• Herbst, P., Chazan, D., Chen, C., Chieu, V. M., & Weiss, M. (2011). Using comics-based representations of teaching, and technology, to bring practice to teacher education courses. ZDM, 43(1), 91–103.
   Google Scholar
• Herbst, P., & Chazan, D. (2012). On the instructional triangle and sources of justification for actions in mathematics teaching. ZDM, 44(5), 601–612.
   Google Scholar
• Herbst, P., Chazan, D., Kosko, K., Dimmel, J., & Erickson, A. (2016). Using multimedia questionnaires to study influences on the decisions mathematics teachers make in instructional situations. ZDM, 48(1–2), 167–183.
   Google Scholar
• Herbst, P., & Kosko, K. W. (2014). Using representations of practice to elicit mathematics teachers’ tacit knowledge of practice: A comparison of responses to animations and videos. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 17(6), 515–537.
   Google Scholar
• Herbst, P., Nachlieli, T., & Chazan, D. (2011). Studying the practical rationality of mathematics teaching: What goes into “installing” a theorem in geometry? Cognition and Instruction, 29(2), 218–255.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hill, H. C., Rowan, B., & Ball, D. L. (2005). Effects of teachers’ mathematical knowledge for teaching on student achievement. American Educational Research Journal, 42(2), 371–406.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim, H., & Hannafin, M. J. (2008). Situated case-based knowledge: An emerging framework for prospective teacher learning. Teaching and Teacher Education, 24(7), 1837–1845.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lande, E., & Mesa, V. (2016). Instructional decision making and agency of community college mathematics faculty. ZDM, 48(1–2), 199–212.
   Google Scholar
• Jee, B. D., & Anggoro, F. K. (2012). Comic cognition: Exploring the potential cognitive impacts of science comics. Journal of Cognitive Education and Psychology, 11(2), 196–208. doi:https://doi.org/10.1891/1945-8959.11.2.196
   Google Scholar
• Masingila, J. O., & Doerr, H. M. (2002). Understanding pre-service teachers’ emerging practices through their analyses of a multimedia case study of practice. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 5(3), 235–263.
   Google Scholar
• Mason, J. (2016). Perception, interpretation and decision making: Understanding gaps between competence and performance: A commentary. ZDM, 48(1–2), 219–226.
   Google Scholar
• Nachlieli, T., Herbst, P., & González, G. (2009). Seeing a colleague encourage a student to make an assumption while proving: What teachers put in play when casting an episode of instruction. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 40, 427–459.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Olson-Buchanan, J. B., & Drasgow, F. (2006). Multimedia situational judgment tests: The medium creates the message. In J. A. Weekley, & R. E. Ployhart (Eds.), Situational judgment tests: Theory, measurement and application (pp. 253–278). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Philipp, R. A. (2007). Mathematics teachers’ beliefs and affect. In F. K. Lester (Ed.), Second handbook of research on mathematics teaching and learning (pp. 257–315). Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.
   Google Scholar
• Potari, D., & Stouraitis, K. (2019). Teacher decision making: Developments in research and theory. In D. Potari & O. Chapman (Eds.), In international handbook of mathematics teacher education (Vol. 1, pp. 303–325). Boston: Brill Sense.
   Google Scholar
• Santagata, R., & Yeh, C. (2016). The role of perception, interpretation, and decision making in the development of beginning teachers’ competence. ZDM, 48(1-2), 153–165.
   Google Scholar
• Schoenfeld, A. H. (2010). How we think: A theory of goal-oriented decision making and its educational applications. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Schoenfeld, A. H. (2011). Toward professional development for teachers grounded in a theory of decision making. ZDM, 43(4), 457–469.
   Google Scholar
• Shulman, L. S. (1986). Those who understand: Knowledge growth in teaching. Educational Researcher, 15(2), 4–14.
   Google Scholar
• Skott, J. (2013). Understanding the role of the teacher in emerging classroom practices: Searching for patterns of participation. ZDM, 45(4), 547–559.
   Google Scholar
• Stahnke, R., Schueler, S., & Roesken-Winter, B. (2016). Teachers’ perception, interpretation, and decision-making: A systematic review of empirical mathematics education research. ZDM, 48(1–2), 1–27.
   Google Scholar
• StataCorp. (2017). Stata statistical software: Release 15. College Station, TX: StataCorp LLC.
   Google Scholar
• Stigler, J. W., & Hiebert, J. (2009). The teaching gap: Best ideas from the world’s teachers for improving education in the classroom. New York: Simon and Schuster.
   Google Scholar
• Stipek, D. J., Givvin, K. B., Salmon, J. M., & MacGyvers, V. L. (2001). Teachers’ beliefs and practices related to mathematics instruction. Teaching and Teacher Education, 17(2), 213–226.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stokoe, E. (2008). Dispreferred actions and other interactional breaches as devices for occasioning audience laughter in television “sitcoms”. Social Semiotics, 18(3), 289–307.
   Google Scholar
• Stouraitis, K., Potari, D., & Skott, J. (2017). Contradictions, dialectical oppositions and shifts in teaching mathematics. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 95(2), 203–217.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thomas, M., & Yoon, C. (2014). The impact of conflicting goals on mathematical teaching decisions. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 17(3), 227–243.
   Google Scholar
• Weekley, J. A., & Ployhart, R. E. (Eds.). (2013). Situational judgment tests: Theory, measurement, and application. Mahwah, NJ: Psychology Press.
   Google Scholar
• Westerman, D. A. (1991). Expert and novice teacher decision making. Journal of Teacher Education, 42(4), 292–305.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar