References
- Adkins, M., & Noyes, A. (2018). Do advanced mathematics skills predict success in biology and chemistry degrees? International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 16(3), 487–502.
- Advisory Committee on Mathematics Education. (2011). Mathematical needs: Mathematics in the workplace and in higher education. London: ACME.
- British Academy. (2015). Count us in: Quantitative skills for a new generation [online]. London: British Academy. Retrieved April 18, 2018 from https://www.britac.ac.uk/count-us-in
- British Academy. (2016). Professor Sir Adrian Smith’s review of post-16 mathematics provision in England: A response from the British Academy. Retrieved December 1, 2018 from: https://www.britac.ac.uk/sites/default/files/British%20Academy%20submission%20to%20Adrian%20Smith%20review%20of%20Mathematics%20Post-16_FINAL.pdf
- Brown, M., Brown, P., & Bibby, T. (2008). ‘I would rather die’: Reasons given by 16-year-olds for not continuing their study of mathematics. Research in Mathematics Education, 10(1), 3–18.
- Browne, R., Koenig, J., Mackay, N., Sheldon, N., Silcott, N., & Wake, G. (2013). Report of the expert panel on core mathematics. London: Advisory Committee on Mathematics Education/Royal Society. Retrieved April 23, 2020 from: http://www.acme-uk.org/media/13699/final%2007october2013,%20expert%20panel%20on%20core%20mathematics%20report.pdf
- Buuren, S. (2012). Flexible imputation of missing data. Boca Raton, FL: Chapman and Hall/CRC.
- Chapman, L. (2010). Dealing with maths anxiety: How do you teach mathematics in a geography department? Journal of Geography in Higher Education, 34(2), 205–213.
- Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd edition). Hillsdale, NJ: Routledge.
- Crowe, A. R. (2010). What’s math got to do with it?: Numeracy and social studies education. The Social Studies, 101(3), 105–110.
- Crowther, K., Thompson, D., & Cullingford, C. (1997). Engineering degree students are deficient in mathematical expertise – Why? International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 28(6), 85–792.
- Department for Education. (2013). Introduction of 16 to 18 core maths qualifications: Policy statement.
- Department for Education. (2014). GCE As and A level content for biology, Chemistry, physics and psychology. London: DFE. https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/593849/Science_AS_and_level_formatted.pdf
- Department for Education. (2015). Core maths qualifications: technical guidance. London: DFE. Retrieved July 8, 2016 from https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/core-maths-qualifications-technical-guidance
- Department for Education. (2018). Core maths qualifications: technical guidance. London: DFE. Retrieved July 8, 2016 from https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/core-maths-qualifications-technical-guidance
- Department for Education. (2020). National pupil database. GOV.UK. Retrieved April 24, 2020 from: https://www.gov.uk/government/collections/national-pupil-database
- Field, A. (2013). Discovering statistics using IBM SPSS statistics. London: Sage Publications.
- Geiger, V., Forgasz, H., & Goos, M. (2015). A critical orientation to numeracy across the curriculum. ZDM, 47(4), 611–624.
- Gill, T. (2018). Preparing students for university study: A statistical comparison of different post-16 qualifications. Research Papers in Education, 33(3), 301–319.
- Hoban, R. A., Finlayson, O. E., & Nolan, B. C. (2013). Transfer in chemistry: A study of students’ abilities in transferring mathematical knowledge to chemistry. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 44(1), 14–35.
- Hodgen, J., McAlinden, M., & Tomei, A. (2014). Mathematical transitions: Report on the mathematical and statistical needs of students undertaking undergraduate studies in various disciplines. York: Higher Education Academy. Retrieved September 10, 2019 https://www.heacademy.ac.uk/knowledge-hub/mathematical-transitions-report-mathematical-and-statistical-needs-students
- Hodgen, J., Pepper, D., Sturman, L., & Ruddock, G. (2010). Is the UK an outlier? An international comparison of upper secondary mathematics education. London: Nuffield Foundation.
- Homer, M., Mathieson, R., Banner, I., & Tasara, I. (2020). The early take-up of Core Maths: Successes and challenges – Final report. London: Nuffield Foundation.
- Hoyles, C., Wolf, A., Molyneux-Hodgson, S., & Kent, P. (2002). Mathematical skills in the workplace: Final report to the Science Technology and Mathematics Council. London: Institute of Education, University of London; Science, Technology and Mathematics Council. Retrieved April 23, 2020 from https://discovery.ucl.ac.uk/id/eprint/10001565/
- Mathieson, R., Homer, M., Tasara, I., & Banner, I. (2020). ‘Core Maths chooses you; you don’t choose Core Maths’. The positioning of a new mathematics course within the post-16 curriculum in England. The Curriculum Journal, 31(4), 704–721.
- McAlinden, M., & Noyes, A. (2019a). Assessing mathematics within advanced school science qualifications. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 26(3), 340–355.
- McAlinden, M., & Noyes, A. (2019b). Mathematics in the disciplines at the transition to university. Teaching Mathematics and its Applications: An International Journal of the IMA, 38(2), 61–73.
- MEI. (2016). Response to Professor Sir Adrian Smith’s Post-16 Mathematics Review. Retrieved April 1, 2017 from http://mei.org.uk/files/pdf/MEI-response-to-Prof-Sir-Adrian-Smith-Post-16-Maths-Review.pdf
- Noyes, A., & Adkins, M. (2016). Reconsidering the rise in A-level mathematics participation. Teaching Mathematics and its Applications. doi:https://doi.org/10.1093/teamat/hrv016
- Noyes, A., & Adkins, M. (2017). Rethinking the value of advanced mathematics participation. Nottingham: University of Nottingham. Retrieved December 1, 2018 from: http://www.nottingham.ac.uk/education/documents/research/revamp-final-report-3.1.17.pdf
- Noyes, A., Wake, G., & Drake, P. (2011). Widening and increasing post-16 mathematics participation: Pathways, pedagogies and politics. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 9(2), 483–501.
- Nuffield Foundation. (2012). Mathematics in A level assessments: a report on the mathematical content of A level assessments in Business Studies, Computing, Economics, Geography, Psychology and Sociology. London. Retrieved April 23, 2020 from https://www.nuffieldfoundation.org/about/publications/mathematics-in-a-level-assessments-a-report-on-the-mathematical-content-of-a-level-assessments-in-business-studies-computing-economics-geography-psychology-and-sociology
- Ofqual. (2018). Grade outcomes in Extended Project Qualification. London: Ofqual. Retrieved 5, May 2020 https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/grade-outcomes-in-extended-project-qualification.
- Quinnell, R., Thompson, R., & LeBard, R. J. (2013). It’s not maths; it’s science: Exploring thinking dispositions, learning thresholds and mindfulness in science learning. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 44(6), 808–816.
- Russell Group. (2020). For teachers and career advisers. The Russell Group. Accessed May 5, 2020 https://russellgroup.ac.uk/for-students/school-and-college-in-the-uk/for-teachers-and-career-advisers/
- Science Community Representing Education. (2012). Mathematics within A-level science examinations. London: Science Community Representing Education.
- Skolverket (Swedish National Agency for Education). (2011). Overview of the Swedish upper secondary school. Stockholm: Skolverket.
- Smith, A. (2004). Making mathematics count. London: The Stationery Office.
- Smith, A. (2017). Report of Professor Sir Adrian Smith’s review of post-16 mathematics. London: Stationery Office. Retrieved July 21, 2017 from https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/smith-review-of-post-16-maths-report-and-government-response
- Smith, C., & Morgan, C. (2016). Curricular orientations to real-world contexts in mathematics. The Curriculum Journal, 27(1), 24–45.
- Smith, M. (2013). Independent chair’s report on the review of current GCE ‘specification content’ within subject criteria. Coventry: Ofqual.
- Smith, M. (2014). Results of the consultation on revised A level subject content. London: Department for Education.
- Steen, L. A. (2001). The case for quantitative literacy. In: Mathematics and democracy: The case for quantitative literacy. Princeton: NCED.
- The Royal Society. (2008). Science and mathematics education 14–19. A ‘state of the nation’ report on the participation and attainment of 14–19 year olds in science and mathematics in the UK, 1996–2007. London: The Royal Society.
- Wasserstein, R. L., & Lazar, N. A. (2016). The ASA’s statement on p-values: Context, process, and purpose. The American Statistician, 70(2), 129–133.
- Zevenbergen, R. (2004). Technologizing numeracy: Intergenerational differences in working mathematically in new times. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 56(1), 97–117.