Interpreting difficulties in the learning of algebraic inequalities, as an emerging macro-phenomenon in Large Scale Assessment

References

• Arzarello, F., Bazzini, L., & Chiappini, G. (1994). L’algebra come strumento di pensiero. Pavia: University of Pavia.
   Google Scholar
• Arzarello, F., Bazzini, L., & Chiappini, G. (2001). A model for analysing algebraic processes of thinking. In R. Sutherland, T. Rojano, A. Bell, & R. Lins (Eds.), Perspectives on school algebra (pp. 61–82). Dordrecht: Kluwer.
   Google Scholar
• Arzarello, F., Garuti, R., & Ricci, R. (2015). The impact of PISA studies on the Italian national assessment system. In K. Stacey, & R. Turner (Eds.), Assessing mathematical literacy: The PISA experience (pp. 249–260). Heidelberg: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Bolondi, G. (2016). Epistemology and didactics in Federigo Enriques. Isonomia, 8, 19–30.
   Google Scholar
• Bolondi, G., & Ferretti, F. (2021). Quantifying solid findings in mathematics education: Loss of meaning for algebraic symbols. International Journal of Innovation in Science and Mathematics Education, 29(1), 1–15.
   Google Scholar
• Bolondi, G., Ferretti, F., & Gambini, A. (2017). Il database GESTINV delle prove standardizzate INVALSI: Uno strumento per la ricerca. In P. Falzetti (Ed.), I dati INVALSI: Uno strumento per la ricerca (pp. 33–42). Milano: FrancoAngeli.
   Google Scholar
• Bolondi, G., Ferretti, F., & Maffia, A. (2020). Monomials and polynomials: The long march towards a definition. Teaching Mathematics and its Applications, 39(2), 1–12.
   Google Scholar
• Cai, J., & Knuth, E. (2011). Early algebraization. New York, NY: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Chevallard, Y. (1989). Arithmétique, algèbre, modélisation - etapes d'une recherche. Publications de l'IREM d'Aix-marseille, n. 16. Marseille: IREM.
   Google Scholar
• Chiarugi, I., Fracassina, G., Furinghetti, F., & Paola, D. (1995). Parametri, variabili e altro: un ripensamento su come questi concetti sono presentati in classe. L’insegnamento della Matematica e delle Scienze integrate, 18B(1), 34–50.
   Google Scholar
• D’Amore, B. (2003). La complexité de la noétique en mathématiques ou les raisons de la dévolution manquée. For the Learning of Mathematics, 23(1), 47–51.
   Google Scholar
• D’Amore, B., & Sbaragli, S. (2005). Analisi semantica e didattica dell’idea di “misconcezione”. La matematica e la sua didattica, 2, 139–163.
   Google Scholar
• Davydov, V. V. (1982). The psychological characteristics of the formation of elementary mathematical operations in children. In T. P. Carpenter, et al. (Ed.), Addition and subtraction: A cognitive perspective (pp. 224–238). Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• De Lange, J. (2007). Large-scale assessment and mathematics education. In F. K. Lester (Ed.), Second handbook of research on mathematics teaching and learning (pp. 1111–1142). Charlotte, NC: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics (NCTM).
   Google Scholar
• Duval, R. (1993). Registres de représentations sémiotique et fonctionnement cognitif de la pensée. Annales de Didactique et de Sciences Cognitives, 5(1), 37–65.
   Google Scholar
• Duval, R. (1995). Sémiosis et pensée humaine: Registres sémiotiques et apprentissages intellectuels. Berne: Peter Lang.
   Google Scholar
• Duval, R. (2017). Understanding the mathematical way of thinking: The registers of semiotic representations. Cham: Springer International Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Ernest, P. (2006). A semiotic perspective of mathematical activity: The case of number. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 61(1-2), 67–101.
   Google Scholar
• Ferrara, F., & Sinclair, N. (2016). An early algebra approach to pattern generalisation: Actualising the virtual through words, gestures and toilet paper. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 92(1), 917–939.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ferretti, F., & Bolondi, G. (2019). This cannot be the result! The didactic phenomenon ‘the age of the earth’. International Journal of Mathematical Education, 52(2), 1–14.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ferretti, F., Gambini, A., & Santi, G. (2020). The Gestinv database: A tool for enhancing teachers professional development within a community of inquiry. In H. Borko, & D. Potari (Eds.), Pre-proceedings of the twenty-fifth ICMI study school teachers of mathematics working and learning in collaborative groups (pp. 621–628). Lisbon: University of Lisbon.
   Google Scholar
• Ferretti, F., & Giberti, C. (2021). The properties of power: Didactic contract and gender gap. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 19, 1717–1735.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gray, E. M., & Tall, D.O. (1994). Duality, ambiguity and flexibility. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 26(2), 115–141.
   Google Scholar
• Hewitt, D. (1996). Mathematical fluency: The nature of practice and the role of subordination. For the Learning of Mathematics, 16(2), 28–35.
   Google Scholar
• Ilyenkov, E. V. (1977). The concept of the ideal. In Philosophy in the USSR: Problems of dialectical materialism (pp. 71–91). Moscow: Progress Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• INVALSI. (2015b). Servizio Nazionale di Valutazione a.s. 2014/15. Rapporto SNV PN 2015. Roma: Author.
   Google Scholar
• INVALSI. (2018). Il quadro di riferimento delle prove di matematica del sistema nazionale di valutazione. Roma: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Kirshner, D., & Awtry, T. (2004). Visual salience of algebraic transformations. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 35(4), 224–257.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leont'ev, A. N. (1978). Activity, consciousness and personality (trans. by M. J. Hall). Englewood Cliffs: Prentice Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Leont'ev, A. N. (1981). Problems of the development of the mind (trans. by M. Kopylova). Progress.
   Google Scholar
• Linchevsky, L., & Sfard, A. (1992). Rules without reasons as processes without objects – the case of equations and inequalities. In F. Furinghetti (Ed.), Proceedings of the 15th Conference of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education (Vol. 2, pp. 317–324). Assisi: PME.
   Google Scholar
• Lotman, Y. M. (1990). Universe of the mind: A semiotic theory of culture. London: IB Taurus.
   Google Scholar
• McNeil, N. M. (2014). A change–resistance account of children’s difficulties understanding mathematical equivalence. Child Development Perspectives, 8, 42–47. doi:10.1111/cdep.12062
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meinck, S., Neuschmidt, O., & Taneva, M. (2017). Workshop theme: “Use of educational large-scale assessment data for research on mathematics didactics. In G. Kaiser (Ed.), Proceedings of the 13th International Congress on Mathematical Education, ICME-13 Monographs. Cham: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Prediger, S., & Bikner-Ahsbahs, A. (2014). Introduction to networking: Networking strategies and their background. In A. Bikner-Ahsbahs & S. Prediger (Eds.), Networking of theories as a research practice in mathematics education. Advances in Mathematics Education. Cham: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Prediger, S., Bikner-Ahsbahs, A., & Arzarello, F. (2008). Networking strategies and methods for connecting theoretical approaches: First steps towards a conceptual framework. ZDM Mathematics Education, 40, 165–178.
   Google Scholar
• Radford, L. (2002). The seen, the spoken and the written. A semiotic approach to the problem of objectification of mathematical knowledge. For the Learning of Mathematics, 22(2), 14–23.
   Google Scholar
• Radford, L. (2003). Gestures, speech, and the sprouting of signs. Mathematical Thinking and Learning, 5(1), 37–70.
   Google Scholar
• Radford, L. (2006a). Elements of a cultural theory of objectification. In L. Radford, & B. D’Amore (Eds.), Semiotics, culture and mathematical thinking [special issue]. Revista Latinoamericana de Investigación en Matemática Educativa (RELIME) (pp. 103–129).
   Google Scholar
• Radford, L. (2006b). The anthropology of meaning. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 61(1-2), 39–65.
   Google Scholar
• Radford, L. (2008). The ethics of being and knowing: Towards a cultural theory of learning. In L. Radford, G. Schubring, & F. Seeger (Eds.), Semiotics in mathematics education: Epistemology, history, classroom, and culture (pp. 215–234). Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Radford, L. (2010). Algebraic thinking from a cultural semiotic perspective. Research in Mathematics Education, 12(1), 1–19.
   Google Scholar
• Radford, L. (2012). On the development of early algebraic thinking. PNA, 6(4), 117–133.
   Google Scholar
• Radford, L. (2013). Three key concepts of the theory of objectification: Knowledge, knowing, and learning. Journal of Research in Mathematics Education, 2(1), 7–44.
   Google Scholar
• Radford, R. (2007). Towards a cultural theory of knowledge. In D. Pitta-Pantazi, & G. Philippou (Eds.), Proceedings of the fith congress of the European Society for Research in Mathematics Education (CERME-5) (pp. 1782–1797). Larnaca: University of Cyprus.
   Google Scholar
• Rasch, G. (1960). Probabilistic models for some intelligence and attainment tests. København: Danish Institute for Educational Research.
   Google Scholar
• Sfard, A. (1991). On the dual nature of mathematical conceptions: Reflections on processes and objects as different sides of the same coins. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 22, 1–36.
   Google Scholar
• Sfard, A. (1994). Reification as a birth of a metaphor. For the Learning of Mathematics, 14(1), 14–55.
   Google Scholar
• Sfard, A., & Linchevski, L. (1994). The gains and the pitfalls of reification: The case of algebra. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 26(2-3), 191–228.
   Google Scholar
• Stavy, R., & Tirosh, D. (1992). Overgeneralization in mathematics and science: The effect of external similarity. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 23(2), 239–248.
   Google Scholar
• Tsamir, P., Almog, N., & Tirosh, D. (1998). Students’ solutions to inequalities. In A. Olivier, & K. Newstead (Eds.), Proceedings of the 22nd Conference of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics education (Vol. 4, pp. 129–136). Stellenbosch: PME Program Committee.
   Google Scholar
• Wittgenstein, L. (1953). Philosophische Untersuchugen. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
   Google Scholar