Defining radian: provoked concept definitions of radian angle measure

References

• Akkoc, H. (2008). Pre-service mathematics teachers’ concept images of radian. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 39(7), 857–878. doi:10.1080/00207390802054458
   Google Scholar
• Alyami, H. (2020). Textbook representations of radian angle measure: The need to build on the quantitative view of angle. School Science and Mathematics, 120(1), 15–28. doi:10.1111/ssm.12380
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Axler, S. (2016). Precalculus: A prelude to calculus. Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Baldinger, E. E., Campbell, M. P., & Graif, F. (2020). Sorting out definitions. Mathematics Teacher: Learning and Teaching PK-12, 113(3), 209–215.
   Google Scholar
• Bressoud, D. M. (2010). Historical reflections on teaching trigonometry. The Mathematics Teacher, 104(2), 106–112.
   Google Scholar
• Carlson, M. P., Oehrtman, M. C., & Engelke, N. (2010). The precalculus concept assessment: A tool for assessing students’ reasoning abilities and understandings. Cognition and Instruction, 28, 113–145.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carter, J., Cuevas, G., Day, R., Malloy, C., Casey, R., & Holliday, B. (2011). Algebra 2. McGraw-Hill.
   Google Scholar
• Clement, J. (2000). Analysis of clinical interviews: Foundations and model viability. In A. E. Kelly, & R. A. Lesh (Eds.), Research design in mathematics and science education (pp. 547–589). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Confrey, J., & Smith, E. (1991). A framework for functions: Prototypes, multiple representations and transformations. In R. Underhill, & C. Brown (Eds.), Proceedings of the 13th annual meeting of the North American chapter of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education (pp. 57–63). Division of Curriculum and Instruction, Virginia Polytechnic Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Crompton, H. (2015). Understanding angle and angle measure: A design-based research study using context aware ubiquitous learning. The International Journal for Technology in Mathematics Education, 22(1), 19–30. doi:10.1564/tme_v22.1.02
   Google Scholar
• Dahlberg, R. P., & Housman, D. L. (1996). Facilitating learning events through example generation. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 33(3), 283–299.
   Google Scholar
• Davis, J. D. (2007). Real-world contexts, multiple representations, student-invented terminology, and y-intercept. Mathematical Thinking and Learning, 9(4), 387–418. doi:10.1080/10986060701533839
   Google Scholar
• Diezmann, C., & English, L. (2001). Promoting the use of diagrams as tools for thinking. In A. A. Cuoco, & F. R. Curcio (Eds.), The roles of representation in school mathematics: 2001 yearbook (pp. 77–89). National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.
   Google Scholar
• Dohrmann, C., & Kuzle, A. (2014). Unpacking children's angle “grundvorstellungen”: The case of distance “grundvortsellung” of 1° angle. In P. Liljedahl, C. Nicol, S. Oesterkle, & D. Allan (Eds.), Proceedings of the 38th conference of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education and the 36th conference of the North American chapter of the Psychology of Mathematics Education (Vol. 2, pp. 409–416). Psychology of Mathematics Education.
   Google Scholar
• Edwards, B., & Ward, M. (2008). The role of mathematical definitions in mathematics and in undergraduate mathematics courses. In M. Carlson, & C. Rasmussen (Eds.), Making the connection: Research and teaching in undergraduate mathematics (pp. 221–230). Mathematical Association of America.
   Google Scholar
• Fi, C. (2003). Preservice secondary school mathematics teachers’ knowledge of trigonometry: Subject matter content knowledge, pedagogical content knowledge and envisioned pedagogy [Unpublished doctoral dissertation]. University of Iowa.
   Google Scholar
• Giraldo, V., Tall, D., & Mariano Carvalho, L. (2003). Using theoretical-computational conflicts to enrich the concept image of derivative. Research in Mathematics Education, 5(1), 63–78.
   Google Scholar
• Goldin, G. A. (2000). A scientific perspective on structured, task-based interviews in mathematics education research. In A. E. Kelly, & R. A. Lesh (Eds.), Research design in mathematics and science education (pp. 517–545). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Haggarty, L., & Pepin, B. (2002). An investigation of mathematics textbooks in england. France and Germany: Some Challenges for England. Research in Mathematics Education, 4(1), 127–144.
   Google Scholar
• Hardison, H. L. (2020). Acknowledging non-circular quantification of angularity. In A. I. Sacristán, J. C. Cortés-Zavala, & P. M. Ruiz-Arias (Eds.), Mathematics education across cultures: Proceedings of the 42nd meeting of the North American chapter of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education, Mexico (pp. 671–675). Cinvestav/AMIUTEM/PME-NA. https://doi.org/10.51272/pmena.42.2020.
   Google Scholar
• Heath, T. L. (1956). The thirteen books of Euclid's elements (Vol. 1). Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Simba Information. (2016). K12 mathematics market report 2016. Author.
   Google Scholar
• Iori, M. (2018). Teachers’ awareness of the semio-cognitive dimension of learning mathematics. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 98(1), 95–113. doi:10.1007/s10649-018-9808-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keiser, J. M. (2004). Struggles with developing the concept of angle: Comparing sixth-grade students’ discourse to the history of the angle concept. Mathematical Thinking and Learning, 6(3), 285–306. doi:10.1207/s15327833mtl0603_2
   Google Scholar
• Kendal, M., & Stacey, K. (1996). Trigonometry: Comparing ratio and unit circle methods. Proceedings of the 19th annual conference of the Mathematics Education Research Group of australasia (pp. 322–329). The Mathematics Education Research Group of Australasia.
   Google Scholar
• Kjeldsen, T., & Petersen, P. (2014). Bridging history of the concept of function with learning of mathematics: Students’ meta-discursive rules, concept formation and historical awareness. Science & Education, 23(1), 29–45. doi:10.1007/s11191-013-9641-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kysh, J., Dietiker, L., Sallee, T., & Hoey, B. (2009a). Algebra 2 connections. College Preparatory Mathematics Educational Program.
   Google Scholar
• Kysh, J., Kasimatis, E., Hoey, B., & Sallee, T. (2009b). Pre-calculus with trigonometry: Volume 1. College Preparatory Mathematics [CPM] Educational Program.
   Google Scholar
• Lappan, G., Fey, J. T., Fitzgerald, M. W., Friel, S. N., & Phillips, E. D. (1996). Shapes and designs. Teacher’s guide. Dale Seymour.
   Google Scholar
• Larson, R., Boswell, L., Kanold, T., & Stiff, L. (2010). Algebra 2. Hold McDougal.
   Google Scholar
• Larson, R., Hostetler, R., & Edwards, B. (2008). Precalculus with limits. Houghton Mifflin.
   Google Scholar
• Lo, J.-J., Gaddis, K., & Henderson, D. (1996). Building upon student experience in a college geometry course. For the Learning of Mathematics, 16(1), 34–40.
   Google Scholar
• Maor, E. (2013). Trigonometric delights. Princeton University.
   Google Scholar
• Matos, J. (1990a). The historical development of the concept of angle. The Mathematics Educator, 1(1), 4–11.
   Google Scholar
• Matos, J. (1990b). The historical development of the concept of angle. The Mathematics Educator, 2(1), 18–24.
   Google Scholar
• Mitchelmore, M., & White, P. (1998). Development of angle concepts: A framework for research. Mathematics Education Research Journal, 10(3), 4–27.
   Google Scholar
• Mitchelmore, M., & White, P. (2000). Development of angle concepts by progressive abstraction and generalisation. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 41(3), 209–238. doi:10.1023/A:1003927811079
   Google Scholar
• Moore, K. C. (2012). Coherence, quantitative reasoning, and the trigonometry of students. In R. Mayes, R. Bonillia, L. L. Hatfield, & S. Belbase (Eds.), Quantitative reasoning: Current state of understanding (Vol. 2, pp. 75–92). University of Wyoming.
   Google Scholar
• Moore, K. C. (2013). Making sense by measuring arcs: A teaching experiment in angle measure. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 83(2), 225–245. doi:10.1007/s10649-012-9450-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moore, K. C. (2014). Quantitative reasoning and the sine function: The case of Zac. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 45(1), 102–138. doi:10.5951/jresematheduc.45.1.0102
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moore, K., LaForest, K., & Kim, H. (2016). Putting the unit in pre-service secondary teachers’ unit circle. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 92(2), 221–241. doi:10.1007/s10649-015-9671-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• National Governors Association Center for Best Practices, & Council of Chief State School Officers. (2010). Common core state standards for mathematics. Author. http://www.corestandards.org/assets/CCSSI_Math%20Standards.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Noddings, N. (1990). Constructivism in mathematics education. In R. B. Davis, C. A. Maher, & N. Noddings (Eds.), Constructivist views on the teaching and learning of mathematics [monograph]. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 4 (pp. 7–18). National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.
   Google Scholar
• Ouvrier-Buffet, C. (2006). Exploring mathematical definition construction processes. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 63(3), 259–282.
   Google Scholar
• Paoletti, T. (2020). Reasoning about relationships between quantities to reorganize inverse function meanings: The case of arya. The Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 57, 1–24. doi:10.1016/j.jmathb.2019.100741
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reys, B. J., Reys, R. E., & Chavez, O. (2004). Why mathematics textbooks matter. Educational Leadership, 61(5), 61–66.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saldana, J. (2013). The coding manual for qualitative researchers. SAGE.
   Google Scholar
• Sbaragli, S., & Santi, G. (2011). Teacher’s choices as the cause of misconceptions in the learning of the concept of angle. International Journal for Studies in Mathematics Education, 4(2), 117–157.
   Google Scholar
• Schunk, D. H. (2012). Learning theories: An educational perspective (6th ed.). Pearson.
   Google Scholar
• Sinclair, N., Cirillo, M., & De Villiers, M. (2017). The learning and teaching of geometry. In J. Cai (Ed.), Compendium for research in mathematics education (pp. 457–489). National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.
   Google Scholar
• Smith IIIJ. P., & Barrett, J. E. (2017). The learning and teaching of measurement: Coordinating quantity and number. In J. Cai (Ed.), Compendium for research in mathematics education (pp. 355–385). National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.
   Google Scholar
• Smith IIIJ. P., & Thompson, P. W. (2007). Quantitative reasoning and the development of algebraic reasoning. In J. J. Kaput, D. W. Carraher, & M. L. Blanton (Eds.), Algebra in the early grades (pp. 95–132). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Son, J.-W., & Kim, O.-K. (2016). Curriculum enactment patterns and associated factors from teachers’ perspectives. Mathematics Education Research Journal, 28(4), 585–614. doi:10.1007/s13394-016-0181-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steffe, L. P. (2017). Psychology in mathematics education: Past, present, and future. In E. Galindo, & J. Newton (Eds.), Proceedings of the 39th annual meeting of the North American chapter of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education (pp. 27–56). Hoosier Association of Mathematics Teacher Educators.
   Google Scholar
• Sullivan, M., & Sullivan, M. (2009). Precalculus enhanced with graphing utilities. Prentice Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Tall, D., & Vinner, S. (1981). Concept image and concept definition in mathematics with particular reference to limits and continuity. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 12(2), 151–169. doi:10.1007/BF00305619
   Google Scholar
• Tanguay, D., & Venant, F. (2016). The semiotic and conceptual genesis of angle. ZDM, 48(6), 875–894. doi:10.1007/s11858-016-0789-5
   Google Scholar
• Thompson, P. W. (1994). The development of the concept of speed and its relationship to concepts of rate. In G. Harel, & J. Confrey (Eds.), The development of multiplicative reasoning in the learning of mathematics (pp. 179–234). SUNY.
   Google Scholar
• Thompson, P. W. (2008). Conceptual analysis of mathematical ideas: Some spadework at the foundations of mathematics education. In O. Figueras, J. L. Cortina, S. Alatorre, T. Rojano, & A. Sepúlveda (Eds.), Plenary paper presented at the annual meeting of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education (Vol. 1, pp. 45–64). Psychology of Mathematics Education. http://pat-thompson.net/PDFversions/2008ConceptualAnalysis.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Thompson, P. W. (2011). Quantitative reasoning and mathematical modeling. In S. Chamberlin, L. L. Hatfield, & S. Belbase (Eds.), New perspectives and directions for collaborative research in mathematics education: Papers from a planning conference for wisdome (pp. 35–57). College of Education, University of Wyoming.
   Google Scholar
• Topcu, T., Kertil, M., Akkoc, H., Yilmaz, K., & Onder, O. (2006). Pre-service and in-service mathematics teachers’ concept images of radian. In J. Novotná, H. Moraová, M. Krátká, & N. Stehlíková (Eds.), Proceedings of the 30th conference of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education (Vol. 5, pp. 281–288). Psychology of Mathematics Education. http://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED496939.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Tossavainen, T., Suomalainen, H., & Mäkäläinen, T. (2017). Student teachers’ concept definitions of area and their understanding about two-dimensionality of area. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 48(4), 520–532. doi:10.1080/0020739X.2016.1254298
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vinner, S. (1991). The role of definitions in the teaching and learning of mathematics. In D. Tall (Ed.), Advanced mathematical thinking (pp. 65–81). Kluwer Academic.
   Google Scholar
• Vinner, S., & Hershkowitz, R. (1980). Concept images and common cognitive paths in the development of some simple geometrical concepts. In R. Karplus (Ed.), The fourth international conference for the Psychology of Mathematics education (pp. 177–184). University of California.
   Google Scholar
• Yeshurun, S. (1982). The angle: A logical gap in teaching geometry and trigonometry and its remedy. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 13(2), 133–138. doi:10.1080/0020739820130202
   Google Scholar
• Yigit, M. (2016). Mathematics education graduate students’ understanding of trigonometric ratios. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 47(7), 1028–1047. doi:10.1080/0020739X.2016.1155774
   Google Scholar
• Zandieh, M., & Rasmussen, C. (2010) Defining as a mathematical activity: A framework for characterizing progress from informal to more formal ways of reasoning. The Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 29(2), 57–75. doi:10.1016/j.jmathb.2010.01.001
   Google Scholar