The assessment culture of mathematics in Finland: a student perspective

References

• Atjonen, P., Laivamaa, H., Levonen, A., Orell, S., Saari, M., Sulonen, K., … Immonen, J. (2019). Että tietää missä on menossa": oppimisen ja osaamisen arviointi perusopetuksessa ja lukiokoulutuksessa [”So that we know where we stand” assessment of learning and competence in basic education and general upper secondary education]. Helsinki: The publications of the Finnish Education Evaluation Centre no. 7.
   Google Scholar
• Bae, S., & Kokka, L. (2016). Student engagement in assessments: What students and teachers find engaging. Stanford, CA. Stanford Center for Opportunity Policy in Education and Stanford Center for Assessment, Learning, and Equity. https://edpolicy.stanford.edu/sites/default/files/publications/student-engagement-assessments-final.pdf [retrieved 20th, October, 2020].
   Google Scholar
• Banta, T. W. (ed.). (2002). Building a scholarship of assessment. San Francisco: John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Black, P. (2015). Formative assessment – An optimistic but incomplete vision. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 22(1), 161–177.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Black, P., & Wiliam, D. (2018). Classroom assessment and pedagogy. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 25(6), 551–575.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown, G. T., & Hirschfield, G. H. (2007). Students’ conceptions of assessment and mathematics: Self-regulation raises achievement. Australian Journal of Educational & Developmental Psychology, 7, 63–74.
   Google Scholar
• Brown, K., & Lally, V. (2018). Rhetorical relationships with students: A higher education case study of perceptions of online assessment in mathematics. Research in Comparative and International Education, 13(1), 7–26.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Camargo, M., & Ruthven, K. (2014). Assessment practices in secondary-school mathematics teaching in Brazil. In S. Pope (Ed.), Proceedings of the 8th British congress of mathematics education (pp. 41–48). Nottingham: University of Nottingham.
   Google Scholar
• Charteris, J., & Thomas, E. (2017). Uncovering ‘unwelcome truths’ through student voice: Teacher inquiry into agency and student assessment literacy. Teaching Education, 28(2), 162–177.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Dochy, F., Segers, M., Gijbels, D., & Struyven, K. (2007). Assessment engineering: Breaking down barriers between teaching and learning and assessment. In D. Boud, & N. Falchikov (Eds.), Rethinking assessment in higher education: Learning for the longer term (pp. 87–100). New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Eklöf, H., & Nyroos, M. (2013). Pupil perceptions of national tests in science: Perceived importance, invested effort, and test anxiety. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 28(2), 497–510.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Faber, J. M., Luyten, H., & Visscher, A. J. (2017). The effects of a digital formative assessment tool on mathematics achievement and student motivation: Results of a randomized experiment. Computers & Education, 106, 83–96.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Falchikov, N. (2004). Involving students in assessment. Psychology Learning & Teaching, 3(2), 102–108.
   Google Scholar
• FNAE (Finnish National Agency for Education). (2014). The national core curriculum for basic education 2014. Finnish National Agency for Education. Publications 2016:5.
   Google Scholar
• Fuller, M., Skidmore, S., Bustamante, R., & Holzweiss, P. (2016). Empirically exploring higher education cultures of assessment. The Review of Higher Education, 39(3), 395–429.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goos, M., Vale, C., Stillman, G., Makar, K., Herbert, S., & Geiger, V. (2020). Teaching secondary school mathematics: Research and practice for the 21st century. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Iannone, P., & Simpson, A. (2011). The summative assessment diet: How we assess in mathematics degrees. Teaching Mathematics and its Applications, 30(4), 186–196.
   Google Scholar
• Iannone, P., & Simpson, A. (2015). Students’ preferences in undergraduate mathematics assessment. Studies in Higher Education, 40(6), 1046–1067.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Iannone, P., & Simpson, A. (2019). The relation between mathematics students’ discipline-based epistemological beliefs and their summative assessment preferences. International Journal of Research in Undergraduate Mathematics Education, 5(2), 147–162.
   Google Scholar
• Iannone, P., & Simpson, A. (2021). How we assess mathematics degrees: The summative assessment diet a decade on. Teaching Mathematics and its Applications: An International Journal of the IMA, 1–10.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kumpulainen, K., & Lankinen, T. (2016). Striving for educational equity and excellence: Evaluation and assessment in Finnish basic education. In H. Niemi, A. Toom, & A. Kallioniemi (Eds.), Miracle of education: The principles and practices of teaching and learning in Finnish schools (pp. 71–82). Rotterdam, The Netherlands: Sense.
   Google Scholar
• Kyaruzi, F., Strijbos, J. W., Ufer, S., & Brown, G. T. (2019). Students’ formative assessment perceptions, feedback use and mathematics performance in secondary schools in Tanzania. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 26(3), 278–302.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lord, P., & Jones, P. (2006). Pupils’ experiences and perspectives of the national curriculum and assessment. Final report for the research review. https://www.nfer.ac.uk/publications/NCA01/NCA01.pdf [retrieved 15 September 2020].
   Google Scholar
• Löfgren, R., Löfgren, H., & Lindberg, V. (2019). Pupils’ perceptions of grades: A narrative analysis of stories about getting graded for the first time. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 26(3), 259–277.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maki, P. (2012). Assessing for learning: Building a sustainable commitment across the institution. Sterling, Virginia: Stylus.
   Google Scholar
• Martínez-Sierra, G., Valle-Zequeida, M. E., Miranda-Tirado, M., & Dolores-Flores, C. (2016). Social representations of high school students about mathematics assessment. Canadian Journal of Science, Mathematics and Technology Education, 16(3), 247–258.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mäkipää, T., & Ouakrim-Soivio, N. (2020). Finnish upper secondary school students’ perceptions of their teachers’ assessment practices. Journal of Teaching and Learning, 13(2), 23–42.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McMillan, J. H., Myran, S., & Workman, D. (2002). Elementary teachers’ classroom assessment and grading practices. The Journal of Educational Research, 95(4), 203–213.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Metsämuuronen, J., & Tuohilampi, L. (2014). Changes in achievement in and attitude toward mathematics of the Finnish children from grade 0 to 9—A longitudinal study. Journal of Educational and Developmental Psychology, 4(2), 145–169.
   Google Scholar
• Nieminen, J. H. (2020). Disrupting the power relations of grading in higher education through summative self-assessment. Teaching in Higher Education, 1–16. doi:10.1080/13562517.2020.1753687.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nieminen, J. H., Asikainen, H., & Rämö, J. (2021). Promoting deep approach to learning and self-efficacy by changing the purpose of self-assessment: A comparison of summative and formative models. Studies in Higher Education, 46(7), 1296–1311.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nieminen, J. H., & Lahdenperä, J. (2021). Assessment and epistemic (in)justice: How assessment produces knowledge and knowers. Teaching in Higher Education, doi:10.1080/13562517.2020.1753687
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• OECD. (2015). PISA 2015 Results. Volume III. Students’ well-being. https://www.oecd.org/pisa/PISA-2015-Results-Students-Well-being-Volume-III-Overview.pdf (retrieved 16, September, 2020).
   Google Scholar
• Palm, T., Andersson, C., Boström, E., & Vingsle, C. (2017). A review of the impact of formative assessment on student achievement in mathematics. Nordic Studies in Mathematics Education, 22(3), 25–50.
   Google Scholar
• Pitt, E., & Quinlan, K. M. (2021). Signature assessment and feedback practices in the disciplines. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 28(2), 97–100.
   Google Scholar
• Rakoczy, K., Pinger, P., Hochweber, J., Klieme, E., Schütze, B., & Besser, M. (2019). Formative assessment in mathematics: Mediated by feedback's perceived usefulness and students’ self-efficacy. Learning and Instruction, 60, 154–165.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rieg, S. (2007). Classroom assessment strategies: What do students at-risk and teachers perceive as effective and useful? Journal of Instructional Psychology, 34(4), 214–225.
   Google Scholar
• Robinson, C., & Fielding, M. (2007). Children and their primary schools: Pupils’ voices. Primary Review Research Survey 5/3. University of Cambridge. https://cprtrust.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2014/06/Research-Survey-5-3.pdf [retrieved 16 September 2020].
   Google Scholar
• Shulman, L. S. (2005). Signature pedagogies in the professions. Daedalus, 134(3), 52–59.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Skidmore, S., Hsu, H.-Y., & Fuller, M. (2018). A person-centred approach to understanding cultures of assessment. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 43(8), 1241–1257.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, C. D., Worsfold, K., Davies, L., Fisher, R., & McPhail, R. (2013). Assessment literacy and student learning: The case for explicitly developing students ‘assessment literacy’. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 38(1), 44–60.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sunzuma, G., Ndemo, Z., Zinyeka, G., & Zezekwa, N. (2012). The challenges of implementing student-centered instruction in the teaching and learning of secondary school mathematics in a selected district in Zimbabwe. International Journal of Current Research, 4(5), 145–155.
   Google Scholar
• Suurtamm, C., Koch, M., & Arden, A. (2010). Teachers’ assessment practices in mathematics: Classrooms in the context of reform. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 17(4), 399–417.
   Google Scholar
• Suurtamm, C., & Koch, M. J. (2014). Navigating dilemmas in transforming assessment practices: experiences of mathematics teachers in Ontario, Canada. Educational Assessment, Evaluation and Accountability, 26(3), 263–287.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Suurtamm, C., Thompson, D. R., Kim, R. Y., Moreno, L. D., Sayac, N., Schukajlow, S., … Vos, P. (2016). Assessment in mathematics education. Large-scale assessment and classroom assessment. ICME 13 topical surveys. Cham: Springer Open.
   Google Scholar
• Tanswell, F. S., & Rittberg, C. J. (2020). Epistemic injustice in mathematics education. ZDM, 52(6), 1199–1210.
   Google Scholar
• Veldhuis, M., Van den Heuvel-Panhuizen, M., Vermeulen, J., & Eggen, T. J. H. M. (2013). Teachers’ use of classroom assessment in primary school mathematics education in the Netherlands. Cadmo, 21(2), 35–53.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhao, X., Van den Heuvel-Panhuizen, M., & Veldhuis, M. (2018). Chinese primary school mathematics teachers’ assessment profiles: Findings from a large-scale questionnaire survey. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 16(7), 1387–1407.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar