178
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Article

Comprehensive example generation: mathematicians’ uses of examples when developing conjectures

ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon & ORCID Icon

References

  • Alcock, L. (2010). Mathematicians’ perspectives on the teaching and learning of proof. Research in Collegiate Mathematics Education, 16, 63–91. https://doi.org/10.1090/cbmath/016/03
  • Alcock, L., & Inglis, M. (2008). Doctoral students’ use of examples in evaluating and proving conjectures. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 69(2), 111–129. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-008-9149-x
  • Alcock, L., & Weber, K. (2010). Undergraduates’ example use in proof construction: Purposes and effectiveness. Investigations in Mathematics Learning, 3(1), 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1080/24727466.2010.11790298
  • Andreescu, T., Andrica, D., & Feng, Z. (2007). 104 number theory problems: From the training of the USA IMO team. Birkhauser.
  • Antonini, S. (2006). Graduate students’ processes in generating examples of mathematical objects. In Proceedings of the 30th Conference of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education (Vol. 2, pp. 57–64). Prague, Czech Republic: PME.
  • Ball, D., Hoyles, C., Jahnke, H., & Movshovitz-Hadar, N. (2002, August). The teaching of proof. Paper presented at the International Congress of Mathematicians, Beijing, China.
  • Belnap, J., & Parrott, A. (2013). Understanding mathematical conjecturing. In S. Brown, G. Karakok, K. H. Roh, & M. Oehrtman (Eds.), Electronic proceedings of the sixteenth special interest group of the MAA on research on undergraduate mathematics education (Vol. 1, pp. 66–78). Northern Colorado University.
  • Bills, L., & Watson, A. (2008). Editorial introduction. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 69(2), 77–79. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-008-9147-z
  • Branch, J. L. (2000). Investigating the information-seeking processes of adolescents: The value of using think alouds and think afters. Library and Information Science Research, 22(4), 371–392. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0740-8188(00)00051-7
  • Broley, L., Caron, F., & Saint-Aubin, Y. (2018). Levels of programming in mathematical research and university mathematics education. International Journal of Research in Undergraduate Mathematics Education, 4(1), 38–55. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40753-017-0066-1
  • Buchbinder, O., & Zaslavsky, O. (2009). A framework for understanding the status of examples in establishing the validity of mathematical statements. In M. Tzekaki, M. Kaldrimidou, & C. Sakonidis (Eds.), Proceedings of the 33rd conference of the international group for the psychology of mathematics education (Vol. 2, pp. 225–232). ZDM.
  • Buchbinder, O., & Zaslavsky, O. (2011). Is this a coincidence? The role of examples in fostering a need for proof. ZDM, 43(2), 269–281. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-011-0324-7
  • Cañadas, M. C., Deulofeu, J., Figueiras, L., Reid, D., & Yevdokimov, O. (2007). The conjecturing process: Perspectives in theory and implications in practice. Journal of Teaching and Learning, 5(1). https://doi.org/10.22329/jtl.v5i1.82
  • Carlson, M., & Bloom, I. (2005). The cyclic nature of problem solving: An emergent multidimensional problem-solving framework. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 58(1), 45–75. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-005-0808-x
  • Chazan, D., & Houde, R. (1989). How to use conjecturing and microcomputers to teach geometry. National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.
  • Ellis, A. B., Ozgur, Z., Vinsonhaler, R., Dogan, M. F., Carolan, T., Lockwood, E., Lynch, A., Sabouri, P., Knuth, E., & Zaslavsky, O. (2019). Student thinking with examples: The criteria-affordances-purposes-strategies framework. The Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 53, 263–283. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmathb.2017.06.003
  • Epstein, D., & Levy, S. (1995). Experimentation and proof in mathematics. Notice of the AMS, 42(6), 670–674.
  • Ericsson, K. A., & Simon, H. A. (1998). How to study thinking in everyday life: Contrasting think-aloud protocols with descriptions of and explanations of thinking. Mind, Culture, and Activity, 5(3), 178–186. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327884mca0503_3
  • Garuti, R., Boero, P., & Lemut, E. (1998). Cognitive unity of theorems and difficulty of proof. In Proceedings of the 20th Conference of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education (Vol. 2, pp. 2–345).
  • Goldenberg, P., & Mason, J. (2008). Shedding light on and with example spaces. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 69(2), 183–194. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-008-9143-3
  • Healy, L., & Hoyles, C. (2000). A study of proof conceptions in algebra. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 31(4), 396–428. https://doi.org/10.2307/749651
  • Iannone, P., Inglis, M., Mejia-Ramos, J. P., Simpson, A., & Weber, K. (2011). Does generating examples aid proof production? Educational Studies in Mathematics, 77(1), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-011-9299-0
  • Inglis, M., Mejía-Ramos, J. P., & Simpson, A. (2007). Modelling mathematical argumentation: The importance of qualification. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 66(1), 3–21. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-006-9059-8
  • Knuth, E. (2002). Secondary school mathematics teachers’ conceptions of proof. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 33(5), 379–405. https://doi.org/10.2307/4149959
  • Knuth, E., Choppin, J., & Bieda, K. (2009). Middle school students’ production of mathematical justifications. In D. Stylianou, M. Blanton, & E. Knuth (Eds.), Teaching and learning proof across the grades: A K–16 perspective (pp. 153–170). Routledge.
  • Komatsu, K., Jones, K., Ikeda, T., & Narazaki, A. (2017). Proof validation and modification in secondary school geometry. The Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 47, 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmathb.2017.05.002
  • Krusemeyer, M. I., Gilbert, G. T., & Larson, L. C. (2012). A mathematical orchard: Problems and solutions. Mathematical Association of America.
  • Lannin, J., Ellis, A. B., & Elliott, R. (2011). Essential understandings project: Mathematical reasoning (Gr. K – 8). National Council of the Teachers of Mathematics.
  • Lin, M. L., & Wu, C. J. (2007). Uses of examples in geometric conjecturing In Proceedings of the 30th Conference of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education, 3, 209-216.
  • Lockwood, E., DeJarnette, A. F., & Thomas, M. (2019). Computing as a mathematical disciplinary practice. The Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 54, 100688. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmathb.2019.01.004
  • Lockwood, E., Ellis, A. B., Dogan, M. F., Williams, C., & Knuth, E. (2012). A framework for mathematicians’ example-related activity when exploring and proving mathematical conjectures. In L. R. Van Zoest, J. J. Lo, & J. L. Kratky (Eds.), Proceedings of the 34th annual meeting of the north American chapter of the international group for the psychology of mathematics education (pp. 151–158). Western Michigan University.
  • Lockwood, E., Ellis, A. B., & Lynch, A. G. (2016). Mathematicians’ example-related activity when exploring and proving conjectures. International Journal of Research in Undergraduate Mathematics Education, 2(2), 165–196. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40753-016-0025-2
  • Lockwood, E., Ellis, A., & Knuth, E. (2013). Mathematicians’ example-related activity when proving conjectures. In S. Brown, G. Karakok, K. H. Roh, & M. Oehrtman (Eds.), Electronic proceedings for the sixteenth special interest group of the MAA on research on undergraduate mathematics education (Vol. 1, pp. 16–30). Northern Colorado University. February 21–23, 2013.
  • Lynch, A. G., & Lockwood, E. (2019). A comparison between mathematicians’ and students’ use of examples for conjecturing and proving. The Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 53, 323–338. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmathb.2017.07.004
  • Mejía-Ramos, J. P., & Weber, K. (2014). Why and how mathematicians read proofs: Further evidence from a survey study. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 85(2), 161–173. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-013-9514-2
  • Michener, E. R. (1978). Understanding understanding mathematics. Cognitive Science, 2(4), 361–383. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15516709cog0204_3
  • Norton, A. (2008). Josh's operational conjectures: Abductions of a splitting operation and the construction of new fractional schemes. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 39(4), 401–430. https://doi.org/10.5951/jresematheduc.39.4.0401
  • Ozgur, Z., Ellis, A. B., Vinsonhaler, R., Dogan, M. F., & Knuth, E. (2019). From examples to proof: Purposes, strategies, and affordances of example use. The Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 53, 284–303. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmathb.2017.03.004
  • Pedemonte, B. (2007). How can the relationship between argumentation and proof be analysed? Educational Studies in Mathematics, 66(1), 23–41. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-006-9057-x
  • Pedemonte, B., & Buchbinder, O. (2011). Examining the role of examples in proving processes through a cognitive lens: The case of triangular numbers. ZDM, 43(2), 257–267. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-011-0311-z
  • Recio, A. M., & Godino, J. D. (2001). Institutional and personal meanings of mathematical proof. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 48(1), 83–99. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1015553100103
  • Rowland, T. (2008). The purpose, design and use of examples in the teaching of elementary mathematics. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 69(2), 149–163. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-008-9148-y
  • Sandefur, J., Mason, J., Stylianides, G. J., & Watson, A. (2013). Generating and using examples in the proving process. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 83(3), 323–340. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-012-9459-x
  • Savic, M. (2012). What do mathematicians do when they have a proving impasse? In S. Brown, S. Larsen, K. Marrongelle, & M. Oehrtman (Eds.), Electronic proceedings for the fifteenth special interest group of the MAA on research on undergraduate mathematics education (Vol. 1, pp. 388–399). Portland State University.
  • Stylianides, G. J., & Stylianides, A. J. (2009). Facilitating the transition from empirical arguments to proof. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 40(3), 314–352. https://doi.org/10.5951/jresematheduc.40.3.0314
  • Weber, K. (2008). How mathematicians determine if an argument is a valid proof. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 39(4), 431–459. https://doi.org/10.5951/jresematheduc.39.4.0431
  • Weber, K. (2010). Mathematics majors’ perceptions of conviction, validity, and proof. Mathematical Thinking and Learning, 12(4), 306–336. https://doi.org/10.1080/10986065.2010.495468
  • Weber, K., & Mejia-Ramos, J. P. (2011). Why and how mathematicians read proofs: An exploratory study. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 76(3), 329–344. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-010-9292-z
  • Wilkerson-Jerde, M. H., & Wilensky, U. J. (2011). How do mathematicians learn math?: Resources and acts for constructing and understanding mathematics. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 78(1), 21–43. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-011-9306-5
  • Zazkis, R., & Leikin, R. (2007). Generating examples: From pedagogical tool to a research tool. For the Learning of Mathematics, 27(2), 15–21.
  • Zazkis, R., & Leikin, R. (2008). Exemplifying definitions: A case of a square. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 69(2), 131–148. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-008-9131-7

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.