The spatial contiguity principle in mathematics textbooks

References

• Aaron, I. E. (1965). Reading in mathematics. Journal of Reading, 8(6), 391–395. http://www.jstor.org/stable/40017213
   Google Scholar
• Andrá, C., Arzarello, F., Ferrara, F., Holmqvist, K., Lindström, P., Robutti, O., & Sabena, C. (2009). How students read mathematical representations: An eye tracking study. Proceedings of the 33rd Conference of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education, 1, 49–56. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-013-9484-y
   Google Scholar
• Andrá, C., Lindström, P., Arzarello, F., Holmqvist, K., Robutti, O., & Sabena, C. (2015). Reading mathematics representations: An eye- tracking study. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 13(Suppl. 2), 237–259. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-013-9484-y
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Atagi, N., DeWolf, M., Stigler, J. W., & Johnson, S. P. (2016). The role of visual representations in college students' understanding of mathematical notation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 22(3), 295–304. https://doi.org/10.1037/xap0000090
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ayres, P., & Sweller, J. (2005). The split-attention principle in multimedia learning. In R. E. Mayer (Ed.), The Cambridge handbook of multimedia learning (pp. 135–146). Cambridge University Press.. doi:10.1017/CBO9781139547369.011 .
   Google Scholar
• Barton, M. L., & Heidema, C. (2002). Teaching reading in mathematics (2 ed.). Mid-continent Research for Education and Learning.
   Google Scholar
• Berger, M. (2019). Reading mathematics text: A study of two empirical readings. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 17(2), 385–404. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-017-9867-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bisson, M. J., Gilmore, C., Inglis, M., & Jones, I. (2016). Measuring conceptual understanding using comparative judgement. International Journal of Research in Undergraduate Mathematics Education, 2(2), 141–164. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40753-016-0024-3
   Google Scholar
• Bradley, R. A., & Terry, M. E. (1952). Rank analysis of incomplete block designs: I. The method of paired comparisons. Biometrika, 39(3), 324. https://doi.org/10.2307/2334029
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bramley, T., & Vitello, S. (2019). The effect of adaptivity on the reliability coefficient in adaptive comparative judgement. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 26(1), 43–58. https://doi.org/10.1080/0969594X.2017.1418734
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carter, B. T., & Luke, S. G. (2020). Best practices in eye tracking research. International Journal of Psychophysiology, 155, 49–62. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2020.05.010
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Catrysse, L., Gijbels, D., Donche, V., De Maeyer, S., Lesterhuis, M., & P. Van den Bossche (2018). How are learning strategies reflected in the eyes? Combining results from self-reports and eye-tracking. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 88(1), 118–137. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjep.2018.88.issue-1
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chandler, P., & Sweller, J. (1991). Cognitive load theory and the format of instruction. Cognition and Instruction, 8(4), 293–332. https://doi.org/10.1207/s1532690xci0804_2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clark, R. E. (1982). Antagonism between achievement and enjoyment in ATI studies. Educational Psychologist, 17(2), 92–101. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461528209529247
   Google Scholar
• Conklin, K., Pellicer-Sánchez, A., & Carrol, G. (2018). Eye-tracking: a guide for applied linguistics research. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Davies, B., Alcock, L., & Jones, I. (2020). Comparative judgement, proof summaries and proof comprehension. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 105(2), 181–197. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-020-09984-x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davies, B., Alcock, L., & Jones, I. (2021). What do mathematicians mean by proof? A comparative-judgement study of students' and mathematicians' views. The Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 61, 100824. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmathb.2020.100824
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Doerr, H. M., & Temple, C. (2016). It's a different kind of reading. Journal of Literacy Research, 48(1), 5–38. https://doi.org/10.1177/1086296X16637180
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dolezalova, J., & Popelka, S. (2016). Scangraph: A novel scanpath comparison method using visualisation of graph cliques. Journal of Eye Movement Research, 9(4), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.16910/jemr.9.4.5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fan, L., Zhu, Y., & Miao, Z. (2013). Textbook research in mathematics education: Development status and directions. ZDM, 45(5), 633–646. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-013-0539-x
   Google Scholar
• Firth, D. (2005). Bradley–Terry models in R. Journal of Statistical Software, 12(1), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v012.i01
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heldsinger, S. A., & Humphry, S. M. (2013). Using calibrated exemplars in the teacher-assessment of writing: an empirical study. Educational Research, 55(3), 219–235. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131881.2013.825159
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hodds, M., Alcock, L., & Inglis, M. (2014). Self-explanation training improves proof comprehension. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 45(1), 62–101. https://doi.org/10.5951/jresematheduc.45.1.0062
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holmberg, N., Sandberg, H., & Holmqvist, K. (2016). Advert saliency distracts children's visual attentionduring task-oriented internet use. Frontiers in Psychology, 5, 51. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00051
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holmes, S. D., He, Q., & Meadows, M. (2017). An investigation of construct relevant and irrelevant features of mathematics problem-solving questions using comparative judgement and Kelly's repertory grid. Research in Mathematics Education, 19(2), 112–129. https://doi.org/10.1080/14794802.2017.1334576
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holmqvist, K., Örbom, S. L., Hooge, I. T. C., Niehorster, D. C., Alexander, R. G., Andersson, R., & Hessels, R. S. (2022). Eye tracking: Empirical foundations for a minimal reporting guideline. Behavior Research Methods. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-021-01762-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holsanova, J., Holmberg, N., & Holmqvist, K. (2009). Reading information graphics: The role of spatial contiguity and dual attentional guidance. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 23(9), 1215–1226. https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.v23:9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Inglis, M., & Alcock, L. (2012). Expert and novice approaches to reading mathematical proofs. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 43(4), 358–390. https://doi.org/10.5951/jresematheduc.43.4.0358
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jarodzka, H., Holmqvist, K., & Gruber, H. (2017). Eye tracking in educational science: Theoretical frameworks and research agendas. Journal of Eye Movement Research, 10(1), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.16910/jemr.10.1.3
   Google Scholar
• Jarodzka, H., Janssen, N., Kirschner, P. A., & Erkens, G. (2015). Avoiding split attention in computer-based testing: Is neglecting additional information facilitative? British Journal of Educational Technology, 46(4), 803–817. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12174
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jefferson, B., Bowles, D., Mullan, E., Wiseman, G., Rayneau, J., Wood, K., & Wagner, R. (2017). AQA A level maths: year 1 + year 2 AQA A level maths: year 1 + year 2. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Johnson, C. I., & Mayer, R. E. (2012). An eye movement analysis of the spatial contiguity effect in multimedia learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 18(2), 178–191. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0026923
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jones, I., & Inglis, M. (2015). The problem of assessing problem solving: Can comparative judgement help? Educational Studies in Mathematics, 89(3), 337–355. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-015-9607-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jones, I., & Wheadon, C. (2015). Peer assessment using comparative and absolute judgement. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 47, 93–101. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stueduc.2015.09.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jones, I., Wheadon, C., Humphries, S., & Inglis, M. (2016). Fifty years of A-level mathematics: Have standards changed? British Educational Research Journal, 42(4), 543–560. https://doi.org/10.1002/berj.3224
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Just, M. A., & Carpenter, P. A. (1976). Eye fixations and cognitive processes. Cognitive Psychology, 8(4), 441–480. https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-0285(76)90015-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Just, M. A., & Carpenter, P. A. (1980). A theory of reading: From eye fixations to comprehension. Psychological Review, 87(4), 329–354. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.87.4.329
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kirk-Johnson, A., Galla, B. M., & Fraundorf, S. H. (2019). Perceiving effort as poor learning: The misinterpreted-effort hypothesis of how experienced effort and perceived learning relate to study strategy choice. Cognitive Psychology, 115, 101237. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cogpsych.2019.101237
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Makransky, G., Terkildsen, T. S., & Mayer, R. E. (2019). Role of subjective and objective measures of cognitive processing during learning in explaining the spatial contiguity effect. Learning and Instruction, 61, 23–34. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2018.12.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mayer, R. E. (1989). Systematic thinking fostered by illustrations in scientific text. Journal of Educational Psychology, 81(2), 240–246. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.81.2.240
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mayer, R. E. (2005). Cognitive theory of multimedia learning. In R. E. Mayer (Ed.), The Cambridge handbook of multimedia learning (pp. 31–48). Cambridge University Press.. doi:10.1017/9781316941355 .
   Google Scholar
• Mayer, R. E. (2020). Multimedia learning. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316941355
   Google Scholar
• Mayer, R. E., Steinhoff, K., Bower, G., & Mars, R. (1995). A generative theory of textbook design: Using annotated illustrations to foster meaningful learning of science text. Educational Technology Research and Development, 43(1), 31–41. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02300480
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mayer, R. E., Wells, A., Parong, J., & Howarth, J. T. (2019). Learner control of the pacing of an online slideshow lesson: Does segmenting help? Applied Cognitive Psychology, 33(5), 930–935. https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.v33.5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McMahon, S., & Jones, I. (2015). A comparative judgement approach to teacher assessment. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 22(3), 368–389. https://doi.org/10.1080/0969594X.2014.978839
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mejía Ramos, J. P., Evans, T., Rittberg, C., & Inglis, M. (2021). Mathematicians' assessments of the explanatory value of proofs. Axiomathes, 31(5), 575–599. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10516-021-09545-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moreno, R., & Mayer, R. E. (1999). Cognitive principles of multimedia learning: The role of modality and contiguity. Journal of Educational Psychology, 91(2), 358–368. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.91.2.358
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ögren, M., Nyström, M., & Jarodzka, H. (2017). There's more to the multimedia effect than meets the eye: Is seeing pictures believing? Instructional Science, 45(2), 263–287. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11251-016-9397-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Österholm, M. (2006). Characterizing reading comprehension of mathematical texts. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 63(3), 325–346. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-005-9016-y
   Google Scholar
• Österholm, M. (2008). Do students need to learn how to use their mathematics textbooks? The case of reading comprehension. Nordic Studies in Mathematics, 13(3), 7–27. https://www.diva-portal.org/smash/record.jsf?dswid=-3318&pid=diva2%3A150875
   Google Scholar
• Österholm, M., & Bergqvist, E. (2013). What is so special about mathematical texts? Analyses of common claims in research literature and of properties of textbooks. ZDM, 45(5), 751–763. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-013-0522-6
   Google Scholar
• Paas, F., & van Gog, T. (2006). Optimising worked example instruction: Different ways to increase germane cognitive load. Learning and Instruction, 16(2), 87–91. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2006.02.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Panse, A., Alcock, L., & Inglis, M. (2017). Reading proofs for validation and comprehension: An expert-novice eye-movement study. International Journal of Research in Undergraduate Mathematics Education, 4(3), 357–375. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40753-018-0077-6
   Google Scholar
• Pollitt, A. (2012). The method of adaptive comparative judgement. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 19(3), 281–300. https://doi.org/10.1080/0969594X.2012.665354
   Google Scholar
• R Core Team (2020). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing.
   Google Scholar
• Rahal, R. M., & Fiedler, S. (2019). Understanding cognitive and affective mechanisms in social psychology through eye-tracking. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 85, 103842. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2019.103842
   Google Scholar
• Rayner, K. (1998). Eye movements in reading and information processing: 20 years of research. Psychological Bulletin, 124(3), 372–422. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.124.3.372
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rayner, K. (2009). The 35th sir Frederick Bartlett Lecture: Eye movements and attention in reading, scene perception, and visual search. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 62(8), 1457–1506. https://doi.org/10.1080/17470210902816461
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rezat, S., & Straesser, R. (2014). Mathematics textbooks and how they are used. In P. Andrews & T. Rowland (Eds.), Masterclass in mathematics education: International perspectives on teaching and learning (pp. 51–62). Bloomsbury.
   Google Scholar
• Saß, S., Schütte, K., & Lindner, M. A. (2017). Test-takers' eye movements: Effects of integration aids and types of graphical representations. Computers and Education, 109, 85–97. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2017.02.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schindler, M., & Lilienthal, A. J. (2019). Domain-specific interpretation of eye tracking data: towards a refined use of the eye-mind hypothesis for the field of geometry. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 101(1), 123–139. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-019-9878-z
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schotter, E. R., Angele, B., & Rayner, K. (2012). Parafoveal processing in reading. Attention, Perception, and Psychophysics, 74(1), 5–35. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13414-011-0219-2
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schroeder, N. L., & Cenkci, A. T. (2020). Do measures of cognitive load explain the spatial split-attention principle in multimedia learning environments? A systematic review. Journal of Educational Psychology, 112(2), 254–270. https://doi.org/10.1037/edu0000372
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shepherd, M. D., Selden, A., & Selden, J. (2012). University students' reading of their first-year mathematics textbooks. Mathematical Thinking and Learning, 14(3), 226–256. https://doi.org/10.1080/10986065.2012.682959
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shepherd, M. D., & van de Sande, C. C. (2014). Reading mathematics for understanding-from novice to expert. Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 35, 74–86. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmathb.2014.06.003
   Google Scholar
• Strohmaier, A. R., MacKay, K. J., Obersteiner, A., & Reiss, K. M. (2020). Eye-tracking methodology in mathematics education research: A systematic literature review. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 104(2), 147–200. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-020-09948-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Strukelj, A., Scheiter, K., Nyström, M., & Holmqvist, K. (2016). Exploring the lack of a disfluency effect: Evidence from eye movements. Metacognition and Learning, 11(1), 71–88. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11409-015-9146-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sweller, J., van Merrienboer, J. J., & Paas, F. G. (1998). Cognitive architecture and instructional design. Educational Psychology Review, 10(3), 251–296. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1022193728205
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tarmizi, R. A., & Sweller, J. (1988). Guidance during mathematical problem solving. Journal of Educational Psychology, 80(4), 424–436. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.80.4.424
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thurstone, L. L. (1927). A law of comparative judgement. Psychological Review, 34(4), 273–286. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0070288
   Google Scholar
• Tindall-Ford, S., Chandler, P., & Sweller, J. (1997). When two sensory modes are better than one. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 3(4), 257–287. https://doi.org/10.1037/1076-898X.3.4.257
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tobii Pro (n.d.). Tobii Pro Lab: User's Manual v.1.86.
   Google Scholar
• Tobii Technology AB (2014). Tobii X2-60 Eye Tracker User's manual v.1.0.3.
   Google Scholar
• Verhavert, S. (2018). Beyond a mere rank order: The method, the reliability and the efficiency of comparative judgement [Unpublished doctoral dissertation]. University of Antwerp.
   Google Scholar
• Verhavert, S., Bouwer, R., Donche, V., & De Maeyer, S. (2019). A meta-analysis on the reliability of comparative judgement. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy and Practice, 26(5), 541–562. https://doi.org/10.1080/0969594X.2019.1602027
   Google Scholar
• Verhavert, S., De Maeyer, S., Donche, V., & Coertjens, L. (2018). Scale separation reliability: What does it mean in the context of comparative judgement? Applied Psychological Measurement, 42(6), 428–445. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146621617748321
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weinberg, A., Wiesner, E., Benesh, B., & Boester, T. (2012). Undergraduate students' self-reported use of mathematics textbooks. Primus, 22(2), 152–175. https://doi.org/10.1080/10511970.2010.509336
   Google Scholar
• Willingham, D. T. (2017). The reading mind: A cognitive approach to understanding how the mind reads. Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar