Preservice middle school mathematics teachers’ strategy repertoire in proportional problem solving

References

• Arican, M. (2018). Preservice middle and high school mathematics teachers’ strategies when solving proportion problems. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 16(2), 315–335. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-016-9775-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arican, M. (2019). Preservice mathematics teachers’ understanding of and abilities to differentiate proportional relationships from nonproportional relationships. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 17(7), 1423–1443. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-018-9931-x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arican, M., & Kiymaz, Y. (2022). Investigating preservice mathematics teachers’ definitions, formulas, and graphs of directly and inversely proportional relationships. The Mathematics Enthusiast, 19(2), 632–656. https://doi.org/10.54870/1551-3440.1566
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ball, D. L., Thames, M. H., & Phelps, G. (2008). Content knowledge for teaching: What makes it special? Journal of Teacher Education, 59(5), 389–407. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022487108324554
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bart, W. M., Post, T., Behr, M., & Lesh, R. (1994). A diagnostic analysis of a proportional reasoning test item: An introduction to the properties of a semi-dense item. Focus on Learning Problems in Mathematics, 16(3), 1–11.
   Google Scholar
• Baumert, J., Kunter, M., Blum, W., Brunner, M., Dubberke, T., Jordan, A., Klusmann, U., Krauss, S., Neubrand, M., & Tsai, Y.-M. (2010). Teachers’ mathematical knowledge, cognitive activation in the classroom, and student progress. American Educational Research Journal, 47(1), 133–180. https://doi.org/10.3102/0002831209345157
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berk, D., Taber, S. B., Gorowara, C. C., & Poetzl, C. (2009). Developing prospective elementary teachers’ flexibility in the domain of proportional reasoning. Mathematical Thinking and Learning, 11(3), 113–135. https://doi.org/10.1080/10986060903022714
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boston, M. D., Smith, M. S., & Hillen, A. F. (2003). Building on students’ intuitive strategies to make sense of cross multiplication. Mathematics Teaching in the Middle School, 9(3), 150–155. https://doi.org/10.5951/MTMS.9.3.0150
   Google Scholar
• Brakoniecki, A., Amador, J. M., & Glassmeyer, D. M. (2021). One task, multiple proportional reasoning strategies. Mathematics Teacher: Learning and Teaching PK-12, 114(1), 33–40. https://doi.org/10.5951/MTLT.2019.0276
   Google Scholar
• Burgos, M., & Godino, J. D. (2020). Prospective primary school teachers’ competence for analysing the difficulties in solving proportionality problem. Mathematics Education Research Journal, 34(2), 269–291. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13394-020-00344-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cabero-Fayos, I., Santágueda-Villanueva, M., Villalobos-Antúnez, J. V., & Roig-Albiol, A. I. (2020). Understanding of inverse proportional reasoning in pre-service teachers. Education Sciences, 10(11), 308. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci10110308
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carney, M., Smith, E., Hughes, G., Brendefur, J., Crawford, A., & Totorica, T. (2015). Analysis of students’ proportional reasoning strategies. In T. Bartell, K. N. Bieda, R. T. Putnam, K. Bradfield, & H. Dominguez (Eds.), Proceedings of the 37th annual meeting of the north American chapter of the international group for the psychology of mathematics education (pp. 141–148). Michigan State University. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED584206.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Carpenter, T. P., Ansell, E., Franke, M. L., Fennema, E., & Weisbeck, L. (1993). Models of problem solving: A study of kindergarten children’s problem-solving processes. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 24(5), 427–440. https://doi.org/10.2307/749152
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carpenter, T. P., & Fennema, E. (1992). Chapter 4 cognitively guided instruction: Building on the knowledge of students and teachers. International Journal of Educational Research, 17(5), 457–470. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0883-0355(05)80005-9
   Google Scholar
• Copur-Gencturk, Y., & Doleck, T. (2021). Linking teachers’ solution strategies to their performance on fraction word problems. Teaching and Teacher Education, 101(5), Article 103314. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2021.103314. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0742051X2100038X.
   Google Scholar
• Cramer, K., & Post, T. (1993). Making connections: A case for proportionality. The Arithmetic Teacher, 60(6), 342–346. https://doi.org/10.5951/AT.40.6.0342
   Google Scholar
• Cramer, K., Post, T., & Currier, S. (1993). Learning and teaching ratio and proportion: Research implications. In D. Owens (Ed.), Research ideas for the classroom (pp. 159–178). Macmillan Publishing Company.
   Google Scholar
• Fernández, C., Llinares, S., Van Dooren, W., De Bock, D., & Verschaffel, L. (2011). Effect of number structure and nature of quantities on secondary school students’ proportional reasoning. Studia Psychologica, 53(1), 69–81.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fernández, C., Llinares, S., Van Dooren, W., De Bock, D., & Verschaffel, L. (2012). The development of students’ use of additive and proportional methods along primary and secondary school. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 27(3), 421–438. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10212-011-0087-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fisher, L. C. (1988). Strategies used by secondary mathematics teachers to solve proportion problems. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 19(2), 157–168. https://doi.org/10.5951/jresematheduc.19.2.0157
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Große, C. S., & Renkl, A. (2006). Effects of multiple solution methods in mathematics learning. Learning and Instruction, 16(2), 122–138. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2006.02.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guberman, R., & Leikin, R. (2013). Interesting and difficult mathematical problems: Changing teachers’ views by employing multiple-solution tasks. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 16(1), 33–56. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10857-012-9210-7
   Google Scholar
• Hines, E., & McMahon, M. (2005). Interpreting middle school students’ proportional reasoning strategies: Observations from preservice teachers. School Science and Mathematics, 105(2), 88–105. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1949-8594.2005.tb18041.x
   Google Scholar
• Izsák, A., & Jacobson, E. (2013). Understanding teachers’ inferences of proportionality between quantities that form a constant difference or constant product [Conference presentation]. The National Council of Teachers of Mathematics Research Presession, Denver, CO, United States.
   Google Scholar
• Jacobson, E., Lobato, J., & Orrill, C. H. (2018). Middle school teachers’ use of mathematics to make sense of student solutions to proportional reasoning problems. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 16(8), 1541–1559. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-017-9845-z
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jiang, R., Li, X., Fernández, C., & Fu, X. (2017). Students’ performance on missing-value word problems: a cross-national developmental study. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 32(4), 551–570. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10212-016-0322-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Joshua, S., & Lee, M. Y. (2022). Incoherencies in elementary pre-service teachers’ understanding of calculations in proportional tasks. International Electronic Journal of Mathematics Education, 17(4), em0698. https://doi.org/10.29333/iejme/12178
   Google Scholar
• Kaput, J. J., & West, M. M. (1994). Missing-value proportional reasoning problems: Factors affecting informal reasoning patterns. In G. Harel & J. Confrey (Eds.), The development of multiplicative reasoning in the learning of mathematics (pp. 235–287). State University of New York Press.
   Google Scholar
• Karplus, R., Pulos, S., & Stage, E. (1983). Proportional reasoning of early adolescents. In R. Lesh & M. Landau (Eds.), Acquisition of mathematics concepts and processes (pp. 45–90). Academic.
   Google Scholar
• Kilpatrick, J., Swafford, J., & Findell, B. (2001). Adding it up: Helping children learn mathematics. National Academy Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lamon, S. (2007). Rational numbers and proportional reasoning: Toward a theoretical framework for research. In F. K. Lester (Ed.), Second handbook of research on mathematics teaching and learning (Vol. 1, pp. 629–667). Information Age Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Lamon, S. J. (1993). Ratio and proportion: Connecting content and children’s thinking. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 24(1), 41–61. https://doi.org/10.2307/749385
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leikin, R., & Levav-Waynberg, A. (2008). Solution spaces of multiple-solution connecting tasks as a mirror of the development of mathematics teachers’ knowledge. Canadian Journal of Science, Mathematics and Technology Education, 8(3), 233–251. https://doi.org/10.1080/14926150802304464
   Google Scholar
• Lesh, R., Post, T., & Behr, M. (1988). Proportional reasoning. In J. Hiebert & M. Behr (Eds.), Number concepts and operations in the middle grades (Vol. 2, pp. 93–118). National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.
   Google Scholar
• Livy, S., & Vale, C. (2011). First year pre-service teachers’ mathematical content knowledge: methods of solution for a ratio question. Mathematics Teacher Education and Development, 13(2), 22–43. https://mted.merga.net.au/index.php/mted/article/view/40.
   Google Scholar
• Lo, J. J. (2004). Prospective elementary school teachers’ solution strategies and reasoning for a missing value proportion task. In M. J. Høines & A. B. Fuglestad (Eds.), Proceedings of the 28th international group for the psychology of mathematics education conference (pp. 265–272). Bergen University College.
   Google Scholar
• Lobato, J., Ellis, A. B., & Zbiek, R. M. (2010). Developing essential understanding of ratios, proportions, and proportional reasoning for teaching mathematics: Grades 6-8. National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.
   Google Scholar
• Lobato, J., Orrill, C., Druken, B., & Jacobson, E. (2011). Middle school teachers’ knowledge of proportional reasoning for teaching [Conference presentation]. The American Educational Research Association (AERA), New Orleans, LA.
   Google Scholar
• Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis: An expanded sourcebook (2nd ed.). Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Misailidou, C., & Williams, J. (2003). Diagnostic assessment of children’s proportional reasoning. The Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 22(3), 335–368. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0732-3123(03)00025-7
   Google Scholar
• Riehl, S. M., & Steinthorsdottir, O. B. (2019). Missing-value proportion problems: The effects of number structure characteristics. Investigations in Mathematics Learning, 11(1), 56–68. https://doi.org/10.1080/19477503.2017.1375361
   Google Scholar
• Riley, K. R. (2010, October). Teachers’ understanding of proportional reasoning. In Proceedings of the 32nd Annual Meeting of the North American Chapter of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education, 6, 1055–1061.
   Google Scholar
• Ruchti, W. P., & Bennett, C. A. (2013). Develop reasoning through pictorial representations. Mathematics Teaching in the Middle School, 19(1), 30–36. https://doi.org/10.5951/mathteacmiddscho.19.1.0030
   Google Scholar
• Schukajlow, S., & Krug, A. (2014). Do multiple solutions matter? Prompting multiple solutions, interest, competence, and autonomy. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 45(4), 497–533. https://doi.org/10.5951/jresematheduc.45.4.0497
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schukajlow, S., Krug, A., & Rakoczy, K. (2015). Effects of prompting multiple solutions for modelling problems on students’ performance. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 89(3), 393–417. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-015-9608-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shield, M. J., & Dole, S. (2013). Assessing the potential of mathematics textbooks to promote deep learning. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 82(2), 183–199. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-012-9415-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Silver, E. A., Ghousseini, H., Gosen, D., Charalambous, C., & Strawhun, B. T. F. (2005). Moving from rhetoric to praxis: Issues faced by teachers in having students consider multiple solutions for problems in the mathematics classroom. The Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 24(3-4), 287–301. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmathb.2005.09.009
   Google Scholar
• Thornton, M. C., & Fuller, R. G. (1981). How do college students solve proportion problems? Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 18(4), 335–340. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.3660180408
   Google Scholar
• Turkish Ministry of National Education. (2018a). Mathematics teaching program (Primary and middle school: Grades 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 and 8). MEB.
   Google Scholar
• Turkish Ministry of National Education. (2018b). Secondary school mathematics teaching program (Grades 9, 10, 11, and 12). MEB.
   Google Scholar
• Van Dooren, W., De Bock, D., Evers, M., & Verschaffel, L. (2009). Students’ overuse of proportionality on missing-value problems: How numbers may change solutions. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 40(2), 187–211. https://www.jstor.org/stable/40539331.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar