Exploring and developing a framework for analysing whole-class discussions in mathematics

References

• Alexander, R. (2018). Developing dialogic teaching: Genesis, process, trial. Research Papers in Education, 33(5), 561–598. https://doi.org/10.1080/02671522.2018.1481140
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anthony, G., & Walshaw, M. (2009). Characteristics of effective teaching of mathematics: A view from the West. Journal of Mathematics Education, 2, 147–164. https://educationforatoz.com/images/_9734_12_Glenda_Anthony.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Brodie, K. (2010). Pressing dilemmas: Meaning-making and justification in mathematics teaching. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 42(1), 27–50. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220270903149873
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cengiz, N., Kline, K., & Grant, T. J. (2011). Extending students’ mathematical thinking during whole-group discussions. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 14(5), 355–374. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10857-011-9179-7
   Google Scholar
• Chapin, S., O’Connor, C., O’Connor, M., & Anderson, N. (2009). Classroom discussions: Using math talk to help students learn, Grades K-6. Math Solutions.
   Google Scholar
• da Ponte, J. P., & Quaresma, M. (2016). Teachers’ professional practice conducting mathematical discussions. Educational Studies in mathematics, 93(1), 51–66. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-016-9681-z
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Drageset, O. G. (2014). Redirecting, progressing, and focusing actions—a framework for describing how teachers use students’ comments to work with mathematics. Educational Studies in mathematics, 85(2), 281–304. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-013-9515-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Drageset, O. G. (2015a). Different types of student comments in the mathematics classroom. The Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 38, 29–40. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmathb.2015.01.003
   Google Scholar
• Drageset, O. G. (2015b). Student and teacher interventions: A framework for analysing mathematical discourse in the classroom. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 18(3), 253–272. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10857-014-9280-9
   Google Scholar
• Evans, S., & Dawson, C. (2017). Orchestrating productive whole class discussions: The role of designed student responses. Mathematics Teacher Education and Development, 19, 159–179. https://mted.merga.net.au/index.php/mted/article/view/370
   Google Scholar
• Fraivillig, J. L., Murphy, L. A., & Fuson, K. C. (1999). Advancing children's mathematical thinking in everyday mathematics classrooms. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education JRME, 30(2), 148–170. https://doi.org/10.2307/749608
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Franke, M. L., Turrou, A. C., Webb, N. M., Ing, M., Wong, J., Shin, N., & Fernandez, C. (2015). Student engagement with others’ mathematical ideas: The role of teacher invitation and support moves. The Elementary School Journal, 116(1), 126–148. https://doi.org/10.1086/683174
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Green, K., & Longman, D. (2012). Polling learning: Modelling the use of technology in classroom questioning. Teacher Education Advancement Network Journal (TEAN), 4, 16–34. https://bit.ly/pollinglearning
   Google Scholar
• Grossman, P., Franke, M., Kavanagh, S., Windschitl, M., Dobson, J., Ball, D., & Bryk, A. (2014). Enriching research and innovation through the specification of professional practice: The core practice consortium [Video]. Youtube. https://youtu.be/zEKov9RXLhc
   Google Scholar
• Gustafsson, P. (2023). Productive mathematical whole-class discussions: A mixed-method approach exploring the potential of multiple-choice tasks supported by a classroom response system. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 1–24. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-023-10402-w
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gustafsson, P., & Ryve, A. (2022). Developing design principles and task types for classroom response system tasks in mathematics. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 53(11), 3044–3065. https://doi.org/10.1080/0020739X.2021.1931514
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hennessy, S., Rojas-Drummond, S., Higham, R., Márquez, A. M., Maine, F., Ríos, R. M., García-Carrión, R., Torreblanca, O., & Barrera, M. J. (2016). Developing a coding scheme for analysing classroom dialogue across educational contexts. Learning, Culture and Social Interaction, 9, 16–44. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lcsi.2015.12.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Henning, J. E., McKeny, T., Foley, G. D., & Balong, M. (2012). Mathematics discussions by design: Creating opportunities for purposeful participation. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 15(6), 453–479. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10857-012-9224-1
   Google Scholar
• Herbel-Eisenmann, B., Meaney, T., Bishop, J. P., & Heyd-Metzuyanim, E. (2017). Highlighting heritages and building tasks: A critical analysis of mathematics classroom discourse literature. In J. Cai (Ed.), Compendium for research in mathematics education (pp. 722–765). National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.
   Google Scholar
• Herbel-Eisenmann, B. A., Steele, M. D., & Cirillo, M. (2013). (Developing) teacher discourse moves: A framework for professional development. Mathematics Teacher Educator, 1(2), 181–196. https://doi.org/10.5951/mathteaceduc.1.2.0181
   Google Scholar
• Heyd-Metzuyanim, E. (2019). Changing teaching practices towards explorative mathematics instruction – the interweaving of teacher identity and pedagogical discourse. Teaching and Teacher Education, 86, 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2019.06.016
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hufferd-Ackles, K., Fuson, K. C., & Sherin, M. G. (2004). Describing levels and components of a math-talk learning community. Journal for research in mathematics education, 35(2), 81–116. https://doi.org/10.2307/30034933
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huq, R.-u., & Amir, A. (2015). When the tokens talk: IRF and the position of acknowledgement tokens in teacher-student talk-in-interaction. Novitas-ROYAL, 9, 60–76. http://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn = urn:nbn:se:liu:diva-127604
   Google Scholar
• Ingram, J. (2018). Moving forward with ethnomethodological approaches to analysing mathematics classroom interactions. ZDM, 50(6), 1065–1075. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-018-0951-3
   Google Scholar
• Ingram, J., Andrews, N., & Pitt, A. (2019). When students offer explanations without the teacher explicitly asking them to. Educational Studies in mathematics, 101(1), 51–66. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-018-9873-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jacobs, V. R., & Spangler, D. A. (2017). Research on core practices in K-12 mathematics teaching. In J. Cai (Ed.), Compendium for research in mathematics education (pp. 766–792). National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.
   Google Scholar
• Kimura, D., Malabarba, T., & Kelly Hall, J. (2018). Data collection considerations for classroom interaction research: a conversation analytic perspective. Classroom Discourse, 9(3), 185–204. https://doi.org/10.1080/19463014.2018.1485589
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klemp, T. (2020). Early mathematics – teacher communication supporting the pupil’s agency. Education 3-13, 48(7), 833–846. https://doi.org/10.1080/03004279.2019.1663893
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koole, T. (2012). Teacher evaluations. In G. Rasmussen, C. Brouwer, & D. Day (Eds.), Evaluating cognitive competences in interaction (pp. 43–66). John Benjamins Publishing Company. https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.225.03koo
   Google Scholar
• Kooloos, C., Oolbekkink-Marchand, H., Kaenders, R., & Heckman, G. (2020). Orchestrating mathematical classroom discourse about various solution methods: Case study of a teacher’s development. Journal für Mathematik-Didaktik, 41(2), 357–389. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13138-019-00150-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Linell, P. (1998). Approaching dialogue: Talk, interaction and contexts in dialogical perspectives (Vol. 3). John Benjamins Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Matsumura, L. C., Slater, S. C., & Crosson, A. (2008). Classroom climate, rigorous instruction and curriculum, and students’ interactions in urban middle schools. The Elementary School Journal, 108(4), 293–312. https://doi.org/10.1086/528973
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mercer, N. (2008). The seeds of time: Why classroom dialogue needs a temporal analysis. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 17(1), 33–59. https://doi.org/10.1080/10508400701793182
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mercer, N., & Howe, C. (2012). Explaining the dialogic processes of teaching and learning: The value and potential of sociocultural theory. Learning, Culture and Social Interaction, 1(1), 12–21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lcsi.2012.03.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Michaels, S., Hall, M. W., & Resnick, L. B. (2013). Accountable talk sourcebook: For classroom conversation that works. University of Pittsburgh.
   Google Scholar
• Michaels, S., & O’Connor, C. (2015). Conceptualizing talk moves as tools: Professional development approaches for academically productive discussions. In L. B. Resnick, C. S. C. Asterhan, & S. N. Clarke (Eds.), Socializing intelligence through talk and dialogue (pp. 347–361). American Educational Research Association. https://doi.org/10.3102/978-0-935302-43-1_27
   Google Scholar
• Michaels, S., O’Connor, C., & Resnick, L. B. (2008). Deliberative discourse idealized and realized: Accountable talk in the classroom and in civic life. Studies in Philosophy and Education, 27(4), 283–297. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11217-007-9071-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’Connor, C., Michaels, S., Chapin, S., & Harbaugh, A. G. (2017). The silent and the vocal: Participation and learning in whole-class discussion. Learning and Instruction, 48, 5–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2016.11.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Park, J., Michaels, S., Affolter, R., & O’Connor, C. (2017). Traditions, research, and practice supporting academically productive classroom discourse. Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Education. https://doi.org/10.1093/acrefore/9780190264093.013.21
   Google Scholar
• Ryve, A. (2011). Discourse research in mathematics education: A critical evaluation of 108 journal articles. Journal for research in mathematics education, 42(2), 167–198. https://doi.org/10.5951/jresematheduc.42.2.0167
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schoenfeld, A. H., & Kilpatrick, J. (2008). Toward a theory of proficiency in teaching mathematics. In T. Wood, & D. Tirosh (Eds.), International handbook of mathematics teacher education: Volume 2. Tools and Processes in Mathematics Teacher Education (pp. 321–354). Sense Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Shenton, A. K. (2004). Strategies for ensuring trustworthiness in qualitative research projects. Education for Information, 22(2), 63–75. https://doi.org/10.3233/EFI-2004-22201
   Google Scholar
• Solomon, E. D., Repice, M. D., Mutambuki, J. M., Leonard, D. A., Cohen, C. A., Luo, J., & Frey, R. F. (2018). A Mixed-Methods Investigation of Clicker Implementation Styles in STEM. CBE—Life Sciences Education, 17(2), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.17-08-0180
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Solomon, Y., Hough, S., & Gough, S. (2021). The role of appropriation in guided reinvention: Establishing and preserving devolved authority with low-attaining students. Educational Studies in mathematics, 106(2), 171–188. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-020-09998-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Staples, M. (2007). Supporting whole-class collaborative inquiry in a secondary mathematics classroom. Cognition and Instruction, 25(2-3), 161–217. https://doi.org/10.1080/07370000701301125
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stein, M. K., Engle, R. A., Smith, M. S., & Hughes, E. K. (2008). Orchestrating productive mathematical discussions: Five practices for helping teachers move beyond show and tell. Mathematical Thinking and Learning, 10(4), 313–340. https://doi.org/10.1080/10986060802229675
   Google Scholar
• Walshaw, M., & Anthony, G. (2008). The teacher’s role in classroom discourse: A review of recent research into mathematics classrooms. Review of Educational Research, 78(3), 516–551. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654308320292
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Webb, N. M., Franke, M. L., Ing, M., Turrou, A. C., Johnson, N. C., & Zimmerman, J. (2019). Teacher practices that promote productive dialogue and learning in mathematics classrooms. International Journal of Educational Research, 97, 176–186. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijer.2017.07.009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Webb, N. M., Franke, M. L., Ing, M., Wong, J., Fernandez, C. H., Shin, N., & Turrou, A. C. (2014). Engaging with others’ mathematical ideas: Interrelationships among student participation, teachers’ instructional practices, and learning. International Journal of Educational Research, 63, 79–93. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijer.2013.02.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wester, J. S. (2021). Students’ possibilities to learn from group discussions integrated in whole-class teaching in mathematics. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 65(6), 1020–1036. https://doi.org/10.1080/00313831.2020.1788148
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wood, T. (1998). Alternative patterns of communication in mathematics classes: Funneling or focusing. In H. Steinbring, M. G. Bartolini Bussi, & A. Sierpinska (Eds.), Language and communication in the mathematics classroom (pp. 167–178). National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.
   Google Scholar
• Wood, T., Williams, G., & McNeal, B. (2006). Children's mathematical thinking in different classroom cultures. Journal for research in mathematics education, 37, 222–255. http://www.jstor.org/stable/30035059
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar