180
Views
4
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Editorial

Introduction to the Special Issue on Courting Controversy: Socioscientific Issues and School Science and Technology/Introduction au numéro spécial sur rechercher la controverse: les questions socio-scientifiques dans les cours de sciences et de technologie à l'école

&
Pages 303-312 | Published online: 07 Dec 2013

REFERENCES/RÉFÉRENCES

  • Aikenhead , G. S. 2006 . Science education for everyday life: Evidence-based practice , New York , NY : Teachers College Press .
  • Bader , B. 2003 . Interprétation d’une controverse scientifique: Stratégies argumentatives d’adolescentes et d’adolescents québécois . Revue canadienne de l’enseignement des sciences, des mathématiques et des technologies , 3 : 231 – 250 .
  • Bell , W. 1996 . “ What do we mean by futures studies? ” . In New thinking for a new millennium , Edited by: Slaughter , R. 3 – 25 . Hawthorn , , Australia : DDM Media Group .
  • Bernard , M.-C. 2013 . Intégration de questions socialement vives (QS) en cours de biologie par des enseignants et enseignantes du collégial et du lycée . Canadian Journal of Science, Mathematics and Technology Education , 13 ( 4 ) : 386–399
  • Brown , J. , Collins , A. and Duguid , P. 1989 . Situated cognition and the culture of learning . Educational Researcher , 18 ( 1 ) : 32 – 42 .
  • Dawson , V. and Venville , G. 2013 . Introducing high school biology students to argumentation about socioscientific issues . Canadian Journal of Science, Mathematics and Technology Education , 13 ( 4 ) : 356–372
  • Duschl , R. A. and Osborne , J. 2002 . Supporting and promoting argumentation discourse in science education . Studies in Science Education , 38 ( 1 ) : 39 – 72 .
  • Erduran , S. and Jiménez-Alexandre , M.-P. 2007 . Argumentation in science education: Recent developments and future directions , New York , NY : Springer .
  • Gallagher , J. J. 1971 . A broader base for science teaching . Science Education , 55 ( 3 ) : 329 – 338 .
  • Hare , W. 1973 . Controversial issues and the teacher . The High School Journal , 57 ( 2 ) : 51 – 60 .
  • Hingant , B. , Chevrier , J. and Albe , V. 2013 . Développement d’une séquence pédagogique sur les nanotechnologies documentée par une analyse de controverses . Canadian Journal of Science, Mathematics and Technology Education , 13 ( 4 ) : 332–355
  • Hodson , D. 2013 . Don't be nervous, don't be flustered, don't be scared. Be prepared . Canadian Journal of Science, Mathematics and Technology Education , 13 ( 4 ) : 313–331
  • Hogan , K. 2002 . Small groups’ ecological reasoning while making an environmental management decision . Journal of Research in Science Teaching , 39 : 341 – 368 .
  • Jiménez-Aleixandre , M.-P. and Pereiro-Muñoz , C. 2002 . Knowledge producers or knowledge consumers? Argumentation and decision making about environmental management . International Journal of Science Education , 24 : 1171 – 1190 .
  • Kelly , G. J. and Takao , A. 2002 . Epistemic levels in argument: An analysis of university students’ use of evidence in writing . Science Education , 86 : 314 – 342 .
  • Larochelle , M. and Desautels , J. 2001 . Les enjeux des désaccords entre scientifiques: un aperçu de la construction discursive d’étudiants et étudiantes . Revue canadienne de l’enseignement des sciences, des mathématiques et des technologies , 1 : 39 – 60 .
  • Laugksch , R. C. 2000 . Scientific literacy: A conceptual overview . Science Education , 84 : 71 – 94 .
  • Leach , J. and Lewis , J. 2002 . “ The role of students’ epistemological knowledge in the process of conceptual change in science ” . In Reconsidering conceptual change. Issues in theory and practice , Edited by: Limón , M. and Mason , L. Dortrecht , The Netherlands : Kluwer .
  • Lewis , J. and Leach , J. 2006 . Discussion of socio-scientific issues: The role of science knowledge . International Journal of Science Education , 28 : 1267 – 1287 .
  • Lloyd , D. and Wallace , J. 2004 . Imaging the future of science education: The case for making futures studies explicit in student learning . Studies in Science Education , 40 ( 1 ) : 139 – 177 .
  • Mbazogue-Owono , L. 2013 . Prévention du sida et aspects culturels du point de vue d’enseignantes et enseignants de sciences . Canadian Journal of Science, Mathematics and Technology Education , 13 ( 4 ) : 400–414
  • Molinatti , G. 2005, October . Préfiguration d’un protocole de débat lycéen sur des questions socio-scientifiques relatives au développement des neurosciences. Eléments d’analyse , Lyon , , France : Communication aux 4èmes journées de l’ARDIST .
  • Nelkin , D. 1995 . “ Science controversies: The dynamics of public disputes in the U.S ” . In Handbook of science and technology studies , Edited by: Jasanoff , S. , Markle , G. , Petersen , J. and Pinch , T. 444 – 456 . London , England : Sage .
  • Nielsen , J. A. 2013 . Delusions about evidence: On why scientific evidence should not be the main concern in socioscientific decision making . Canadian Journal of Science, Mathematics and Technology Education , 13 ( 4 ) : 373–385
  • Osborne , J. , Erduran , S. and Simon , S. 2004 . Enhancing the quality of argumentation in school science . Journal of Research in Science Teaching , 41 ( 10 ) : 994 – 1020 .
  • Pedretti , E. 1999 . Decision making and STS education: Exploring scientific knowledge and social responsibility in schools and science centers through an issues-based approach . Journal of School Science and Mathematics , 99 : 174 – 181 .
  • Pedretti , E. and Bellomo , K. 2013 . A time for change: Advocating for STSE education through professional learning communities . Canadian Journal of Science, Mathematics and Technology Education , 13 ( 4 ) : 415–437
  • Pedretti , E. and Nazir , J. 2011 . Currents in STSE education: Mapping a complex field, 40 years on . Science Education , 95 ( 4 ) : 601 – 626 .
  • Ratcliffe , M. 1997 . Pupil decision‐making about socio-scientific issues within the science curriculum . International Journal of Science Education , 19 ( 2 ) : 167 – 182 .
  • Roberts , D. A. 2007 . “ Scientific literacy/science literacy ” . In Handbook of research on science education , Edited by: Abell , S. K. and Lederman , N. G. 729 – 780 . Mahwah , NJ : Lawrence Erlbaum .
  • Sadler , T. D. , Chambers , F. W. and Zeidler , D. L. 2004 . Student conceptualisations of the nature of science in response to a socioscientific issue . International Journal of Science Education , 26 : 387 – 410 .
  • Sadler , T. D. and Fowler , S. R. 2006 . A threshold model of content knowledge transfer for socioscientific argumentation . Science Education , 90 : 986 – 1004 .
  • Schweizer , D. M. and Kelly , G. J. 2001, March . An investigation of student engagement in a global warming debate , St Louis , MO : Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Association of Research in Science Teaching .
  • Simonneaux , L. 2003 . Argumentation dans les débats en classe sur une technoscience controversée . Aster , 37 : 189 – 214 .
  • Stenhouse , L. 1970 . “ Controversial value issues in the classroom ” . In Values and the curriculum: Report of the Fourth International Curriculum Conference , Edited by: Carr , W. G. 103 – 115 . Washington , DC : National Education Association Publications .
  • Yang , F.-Y. 2004 . Exploring high school students’ use of theory and evidence in an everyday context: The role of scientific thinking in environmental science decision‐making . International Journal of Science Education , 26 ( 11 ) : 1345 – 1364 .
  • Yang , F.-Y. and Anderson , O. R. 2003 . Senior high school students’ preference and reasoning modes about nuclear energy use . International Journal of Science Education , 25 ( 2 ) : 221 – 244 .
  • Zeidler , D. L. , Sadler , T. D. , Simmons , M. and Howe , E. 2005 . Beyond STS: A research-based framework for socioscientific issues education . Science Education , 89 ( 3 ) : 357 – 377 .
  • Zohar , A. and Nemet , F. 2002 . Fostering students’ knowledge and argumentation skills through dilemmas in human genetics . Journal of Research in Science Teaching , 39 : 35 – 62 .

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.