Don't Fear the Cyborg: Toward Embracing Posthuman and Feminist Cyborg Discourses in Teacher Education and Educational Technology Research

REFERENCES

• Autio, O. (2011). The development of technological competence from adolescence to adulthood. Journal of Technology Education, 22(2), 71–89.
   Google Scholar
• Badmington, N. (2006). Cultural studies and the posthumanities. In G. Hall & C. Birchall (Eds.), New cultural studies: Adventures in theory (pp. 260–274). Athens, GA: University of Georgia Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bain, A. (2012). The learning edge: What technology can do to educate all children. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
   Google Scholar
• Baker, S. (2011). Final jeopardy: Man vs. machine and the quest to know everything. New York, NY: Houghton Mifflin Harcourt.
   Google Scholar
• Bauerlein, M. (2008). The dumbest generation: How the digital age stupefies young Americans and jeopardizes our future. New York, NY: Tarcher/Penguin.
   Google Scholar
• Beas, M.I., & Salanova, M. (2006). Self-efficacy beliefs, computer training and psychological well-being among information and communication technology workers. Computers in Human Behavior, 22(6), 1043–1058.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blades, D. (2003). The pedagogy of technological replacement. In E. Hasebe-Ludt & W. Hurren (Eds.), Curriculum intertext: Place/language/pedagogy (pp. 205–226). New York, NY: Peter Lang.
   Google Scholar
• Braun, L.W. (2007). Teens, technology, and literacy: Or, why bad grammar isn't always bad. Westport, CT: Libraries Unlimited.
   Google Scholar
• Carr, N. (2008, July). Is Google making us stupid? The Atlantic. Retrieved from http://www.theatlantic.com/magazine/archive/2008/07/is-google-making-us-stupid/6868/
   Google Scholar
• Carr, N. (2011). The shallows: What the Internet is doing to our brains. New York, NY: W. W. Norton & Company.
   Google Scholar
• Cassidy, S., & Eachus, P. (2002). Developing the Computer User Self-Efficacy (CUSE) Scale: Investigating the relationship between computer self-efficacy, gender and experience with computers. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 26(2), 133–153.
   Google Scholar
• Cerqui, D. (2002). The future of humankind in the era of human and computer hybridization: An anthropological analysis. Ethics and Information Technology, 4(2), 101–108.
   Google Scholar
• Clark, A. (2003). Natural born cyborgs. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Conrad, A.M., & Munro, D. (2008). Relationships between computer self-efficacy, technology, attitudes and anxiety: Development of the computer technology use scale (CTUS). Journal of Educational Computing Research, 39(1), 51–73.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dennett, D.C. (1997). When HAL kills, who's to blame? In D.G. Stork (Ed.), HAL's legacy: 2001's Computer as dream and reality (pp. 351–365). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Detterman, D.K. (2011). A challenge to Watson. Intelligence, 39, 77–78.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Downey, G.L., Dumit, J., & Williams, S. (1995). Cyborg anthropology. Cultural Anthropology, 10(2), 264–269.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Galloway, A. (2007). Radical illusion (a game against). Games and Culture, 2(4), 376–391.
   Google Scholar
• Glieck, J. (2011, August). How Google dominates us. The New York Review of Books. . Retrieved from http://www.nybooks.com/articles/archives/2011/aug/18/how-google-dominates-us/
   Google Scholar
• Gray, C.H. (2002). Cyborg citizen: Politics in the posthuman age. New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Haraway, D. (2007). A cyborg manifesto. In S. During (Ed.), The cultural studies reader (pp. 315–334). New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Harding, S. (1986). The science question in feminism. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Harding, S. (1991). Whose science? Whose knowledge? Thinking from women's lives. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hayles, M.K. (1999). How we became posthuman. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• International Technology Education Association. (2000). Standards for technological literacy: Content for the study of technology. Reston, VA: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Jackson, M. (2009). Distracted: The erosion of attention and the coming dark age. New York, NY: Prometheus Books.
   Google Scholar
• Jennings, K. (2011). My puny human brain: Jeopardy! genius Ken Jennings on what it's like to play against a supercomputer. . Retrieved from http://www.slate.com/articles/arts/culturebox/2011/02/my_puny_human_brain.html
   Google Scholar
• Knight-Ridder Newspapers. (1983, . August 11). $10 million awarded to family of plant worker killed by robot. Ottawa Citizen, p. 14.
   Google Scholar
• Kotrlik, J.W., & Redmann, D.H. (2005). Extent of technology integration in instruction by adult basic education teachers. Adult Education Quarterly, 55(3), 200–219.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kotrlik, J.W., & Redmann, D.H. (2009). Technology adoption for use in instruction by secondary technology education teachers. Journal of Technology Education, 21(1), 44–59.
   Google Scholar
• Kubrick, S. (Producer & Director). (1968). 2001: A space odyssey. United States: MGM Studios.
   Google Scholar
• Latour, B. (2002). War of the worlds?: What about peace? Chicago, IL: Prickly Paradigm Press.
   Google Scholar
• Magnet, S.A. (2011). When biometrics fail: Gender, race, and the technology of identity. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Marx, L. (1994). The idea of “technology” and postmodern pessimism.” In M.R. Smith & L. Marx (Eds.), Does technology drive history?: The dilemma of technological determinism (pp. 237–257). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• McKibben, B. (2003). Enough: Staying human in an engineered age. New York, NY: Henry Holt and Company, LLC.
   Google Scholar
• National Film Preservation Act of 1988, as Amended 2 U.S.C. 179l note (2005).
   Google Scholar
• Newborn, M. (2011). Beyond deep blue: Chess in the stratosphere. London, England: Springer-Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Noble, D. (1998). Digital diploma mills: The automation of higher education. First Monday, 3(1–5). . Retrieved from http://firstmonday.org/ojs/index.php/fm/article/view/569/490
   Google Scholar
• Salanova, M., Grau, R., Cifre, E., & Llorens, S. (2000). Computer training, frequency of usage and burnout: The moderating role of computer self-efficacy. Computers in Human Behavior, 16(6), 575–590.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Selwyn, N. (2011). Editorial: In praise of pessimism—the need for negativity in educational technology. British Journal of Educational Technology, 42(5), 713–719.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shaw, D.B. (2000). Women, science and fiction: The Frankenstein inheritance. New York, NY: Palgrave.
   Google Scholar
• Shaw, D.B. (2008). Technoculture: The key concepts. Oxford, England: Berg.
   Google Scholar
• Shelley, M.W. (1985). Frankenstein: Or, the modern Prometheus. London, England: Everyman.
   Google Scholar
• Silver, J. (Producer), Wachowski, A., & Wachowski, L. (Directors). (1999). The matrix . [Motion picture]. United States: Warner Bros. Pictures.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, B., Caputi, P., & Rawstorne, P. (2000). Differentiating computer experience and attitudes toward computers: An empirical investigation. Computers in Human Behavior, 16(1), 59–81.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sparrow, B., Liu, J., & Wegner, D. (2011). Google effects on memory: Cognitive consequences of having information at our fingertips. Science, 333(6043), 776–778.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stork, D.G. (1997). “The best-informed dream”: HAL and the vision of 2001. In D.G. Stork (Ed.), HAL's legacy: 2001's Computer as dream and reality (pp. 1–14). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Tamerius, S.D., Griffin, D., Friedman, H., Wisse, B., Loud, M., Rhine, J.,... McClenaghan, R. (Writers) & McCarthy, K. (Director). (2011). Show #6086: The IBM Challenge. In H. Friedman (Producer), . Jeopardy! Culver City, CA: Sony Pictures Television.
   Google Scholar
• Tarafdar, M., Tu, Q., & Ragu-nathan, T.S. (2011). Impact of technostress on end-user satisfaction and performance. Journal of Management Information Systems, 27(3), 303–334.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taylor, T. (2010). The artificial ape: How technology changed the course of human evolution. New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Ursavas, Ö.F., & Teo, T. (2011). A multivariate analysis of the effect of gender on computer anxiety among elementary school teachers. British Journal of Educational Technology, 42(2), E19–E20.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Warner, S.A. (2009). The soul of technology education: Being human in an overly rational world. Journal of Technology Education, 21(1), 72–86.
   Google Scholar
• Warwick, K. (1998). In the mind of the machine. London, England: Arrow Books, Ltd.
   Google Scholar
• Wendling, A.E. (2009). Karl Marx on technology and alienation. London, England: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• William, R. (1980). Problems in materialism and culture: Selected essays. London, England: Verso
   Google Scholar
• Williams, J.A., Podeschi, C., Palmer, N., Schwadel, P., & Meyler, D. (2012). The human–environment dialog in award-winning children's picture books. Sociological Inquiry, 82(1), 145–159.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Worthington, V.L., & Zhao, Y. (1999). Existential computer anxiety and changes in computer technology: What past research on computer anxiety has missed. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 20(4), 299–315.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar