239
Views
7
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

The Seventh Current: A Case for the Environment in STSE Education

REFERENCES

  • Aikenhead, G.S. (1988). Teaching science through a science–technology–society–environment approach: An instruction guide (SIDRU Research Report 12). Regina, Canada: Regina University, Saskatchewan Instructional Development and Research Unit.
  • Aikenhead, G.S. (1992). The integration of STS into science education. Theory Into Practice, 31(1), 27–35.
  • Aikenhead, G.S., & Michell, H. (2011). Bridging cultures: Indigenous and scientific ways of knowing. Don Mills, Canada: Pearson Education.
  • Alsop, S., & Pedretti, E. (2001). Science technology society. In S. Alsop & K. Hicks (Eds.), Teaching science (pp. 193–205). London, England: Kogan Page Limited.
  • Bai, H. (2009). Reanimating the universe: Environmental education and philosophical animism. In M. McKenzie, P. Hart, H. Bai, & B. Jickling (Eds.), Field of green: Restorying culture, environment and education (pp. 135–151). Cresskill, NJ: Hampton Press.
  • Barrett, S.E., & Pedretti, E. (2006). Contrasting orientations: STSE for social reconstruction or social reproduction. School and Science Mathematics, 106(5), 237–247.
  • Bencze, L., Di Giuseppe, M., Hodson, D., Pedretti, E., Serebrin, L., & Decoito, I. (2003). Paradigmic road blocks in elementary school science “reform”: Reconsidering nature-of-science teaching within a rational–realist milieu. Systemic Practice and Action Research, 16(5), 285–308.
  • Bingle, W.H., & Gaskell, P.J. (1994). Scientific literacy for decision making and the social construction of scientific knowledge. Science Education, 78(2), 185–201.
  • Carson, R. (1962). Silent spring. New York, NY: Houghton Mifflin.
  • Council of Ministers of Education, Canada. (1997). Common framework of science learning outcomes: Pan-Canadian protocol for collaboration on school curriculum. Toronto, Canada: Author.
  • Council of Outdoor Educators of Ontario. (2007). Reconnecting children through outdoor education: A research summary. Toronto, Canada: Author.
  • Dillon, J. (2002). Perspectives on environmental education-related research in science education. International Journal of Science Education, 24(11), 1111–1117.
  • Gayford, C. (2002). Controversial environmental issues: A case study for the professional development of science teachers. International Journal of Science Education, 24(11), 1191–1200.
  • Gough, A. (2002). Mutualism: A different agenda for environmental and science education. International Journal of Science Education, 24(11), 1201–1215.
  • Greenwood, D. (2009). Place: The nexus of geography and culture. In M. McKenzie, P. Hart, H. Bai, & B. Jickling (Eds.), Field of green: Restorying culture, environment and education (pp. 271–281). Cresskill, NJ: Hampton Press.
  • Gruenewald, D. (2004). A Foucauldian analysis of environmental education: Toward the socioecological challenge of the Earth Charter. The Ontario Institute for Studies in Education of the University of Toronto Curriculum Inquiry, 34(1), 71–107.
  • Gruenewald, D., & Manteaw, B. (2007). Oil and water still: How No Child Left Behind limits and distorts environmental education in U.S. schools. Environmental Education Research, 13(2), 171–188.
  • Hargreaves, A., & Macmillan, R. (1992, April). Balkanized secondary schools and the malaise of modernity. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, San Francisco, CA.
  • Hart, P. (2002). Environment in the science curriculum: The politics of change in the Pan-Canadian science curriculum development process. International Journal of Science Education, 24(11), 1239–1254.
  • Hart, P. (2003). Teachers’ thinking in environmental education: Consciousness and responsibility. New York, NY: Peter Lang.
  • Hart, P. (2007). Environmental education. In S.K. Abell & N.G. Lederman (Eds.), Handbook of research in science education (pp. 689–728). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Publishers.
  • Hodson, D. (2003). Time for action: Science education for an alternative future. International Journal of Science Education, 25(6), 645–670.
  • Hodson, D. (2010). Science education as a call to action. Canadian Journal of Science, Mathematics and Technology Education, 10(3), 197–206.
  • Hodson, D., & Bencze, L. (1998). Becoming critical about practical work: Changing views and changing practice through action research. International Journal of Science Education, 20(6), 683–694.
  • Jensen, B.B., & Schnack, K. (2006). The action competence approach in environmental education. Environmental Education Research, 12(3), 471–486.
  • Louv, R. (2005). Last child in the woods: Saving our children from nature-deficit disorder. Chapel Hill, NC: Algonquin Books.
  • Naess, A. (1989). Ecology, community, and lifestyle: Outline of an ecosophy. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
  • Ontario Curriculum Council. (2007). Shaping our schools, shaping our future: Environmental education in Ontario schools. Toronto, Canada: Queen's Printer for Ontario.
  • Ontario Ministry of Education. (2004). Social Studies, Grades 1–6; History and Geography, Grades 7 and 8. Toronto, Canada: Queen's Printer for Ontario.
  • Ontario Ministry of Education. (2005). Canadian and World Studies, Grades 9 and 10. Toronto, Canada: Queen's Printer for Ontario.
  • Ontario Ministry of Education. (2007). Science and Technology, Grades 1–8, revised. Toronto, Canada: Queen's Printer for Ontario.
  • Ontario Ministry of Education. (2008a). Science: Grade 9 and 10, revised. Toronto, Canada: Queen's Printer for Ontario.
  • Ontario Ministry of Education. (2008b). Science: Grade 11 and 12, revised. Toronto, Canada: Queen's Printer for Ontario.
  • Ontario Ministry of Education. (2009). Acting today, shaping tomorrow: A policy framework for environmental education in Ontario schools. Toronto, Canada: Queen's Printer for Ontario.
  • Pedretti, E. (2003). Teaching science, technology, society and environment (STSE) education: Preservice teachers’ philosophical and pedagogical landscapes. In D.L. Zeidler (Ed.), The role of moral reasoning on socioscientific issues and discourse in science education (pp. 219–240). Dordrecht, the Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Press.
  • Pedretti, E., & Forbes, J. (2000). STSE education: From curriculum rhetoric to classroom reality. Orbit, 31(3), 39–41.
  • Pedretti, E., & Nazir, J. (2011). Currents in STSE education: Mapping a complex field, 40 years on. Science Education, 95(4), 601–626.
  • Pedretti, E.G., Bencze, L., Hewitt, J., Romkey, L., & Jivraj, A. (2008). Promoting issues-based STSE perspectives in science teacher education: Problems of identity and ideology. Science and Education, 17, 941–960.
  • Russell, C.L., & Bell, A.C. (1996). A politicized ethic of care: Environmental education from an ecofeminist perspective. In K. Warren (Ed.), Women's voices in experiential education (pp. 172–181). Dubuque, IA: Kendall/Hunt Publishing Company.
  • Sauvé, L. (1996). Environmental education and sustainable development: A further appraisal. Canadian Journal of Environmental Education, 1, 7–34.
  • Sauvé, L. (2005). Currents in environmental education: Mapping a complex and evolving pedagogical field. Canadian Journal of Environmental Education, 10, 11–37.
  • Smyth, J.C. (2006). Environment and education: A view of a changing scene. Environmental Education Research, 12(2), 247–264.
  • Steele, A. (2011). Beyond contradiction: Exploring the work of secondary science teachers as they embed environmental education in curricula. International Journal of Environmental and Science Education, 6(1), 1–22.
  • Stevenson, R.B. (2007a). Schooling and environmental education: Contradictions in purpose and practice. Environmental Education Research, 13(2), 139–153.
  • Stevenson, R.B. (2007b). Schooling and environmental/sustainability education: From discourses of policy and practice to discourses of professional learning. Environmental Education Research, 13(2), 265–285.
  • Tan, M., & Pedretti, E. (2010). Negotiating the complexities of environmental education: A study of Ontario teachers. Canadian Journal of Science, Mathematics and Technology Education, 10(1), 61–78.
  • Venville, G., Sheffield, R., Rennie, L.J., & Wallace, J. (2008). The writing on the wall: Classroom context, curriculum implementation, and student learning integrated, community-based science projects. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 45(8), 857–880.
  • Wals, A., & Alblas, A. (1997). School-based research and development of environmental education: A case study. Environmental Education Research, 3(3), 253–267.
  • Winther, A.A., Volk, T.L., & Shrock, S.A. (2002). Teacher decision making in the 1st year of implementing an issues-based environmental education program: A qualitative study. Journal of Environmental Education, 33(3), 27–33.
  • Zeidler, D., Sadler, T., Simmons, M., & Howes, E. (2004). Beyond STS: A research-based framework for socioscientific issues education. Science Education, 89(3), 357–377.
  • Ziman, J. (1994). The rationale of STS education is in the approach. In J. Solomon & G. Aikenhead (Eds.), STS education: International perspectives on reform (pp. 21–31). New York, NY: Teachers College Press.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.