An Activity to Encourage Writing in Mathematics

REFERENCES

• Andreissen, J., & Coirier, P. (1999). Foundations of argumentative text processing. Amsterdam, the Netherlands: Amsterdam University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Borasi, R., & Rose, B.J. (1989). Journal writing and mathematics instruction. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 20(4), 347–365.
   Google Scholar
• Bosse, M.J., & Faulconer, J. (2008). Learning and assessing mathematics through reading and writing. School Science and Mathematics, 108(1), 8–19.
   Google Scholar
• Clarke, D.J., Waywood, A., & Stephens, M. (1993). Probing the structure of mathematical writing. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 25(3), 235–250.
   Google Scholar
• Craig, T.S. (2011). Categorization and analysis of explanatory writing in mathematics. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 42(7), 867–878.
   Google Scholar
• Cross, D.I. (2009). Creating optimal mathematics learning environments: Combining argumentation and writing to enhance achievement. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 7(5), 905–930.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Doty, L.L. (2012). A mathematician learns the basics of writing instruction: An immersion experience with long-term benefits. Primus: Problems, Resources, and Issues in Mathematics Undergraduate Studies, 22(1), 14–29.
   Google Scholar
• Emig, J. (1977). Writing as a mode of learning. College Composition and Communication, 28(2), 122–128.
   Google Scholar
• Flavell, J.H. (1976). Metacognitive aspects of problem solving. In L.B. Resnick (Ed.), The nature of intelligence (pp. 231–236). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Kilpatrick, J., Swafford, J., & Findell, B. (Eds.). (2001). Adding+ it up: Helping children learn mathematics. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
   Google Scholar
• Knuth, E.J. (2000). Student understanding of the Cartesian connection: An exploratory study. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 31(4), 500–507.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Limón, M. (2001). On the cognitive conflict as an instructional strategy for conceptual change: A critical appraisal. Learning and Instruction, 11(4), 357–380.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• National Council of Teachers of Mathematics, Commission on Standards for School Mathematics. (1989). Curriculum and evaluation standards for school mathematics. Reston, VA: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Niss, M. (1999). Aspects of the nature and state of research in mathematics education. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 40(1), 1–24.
   Google Scholar
• Ntenza, S. P. (2006). Investigating forms of children's writing in grade 7 mathematics classrooms. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 61(3), 321–345.
   Google Scholar
• Pugalee, D.K. (2001). Writing, mathematics, and metacognition: Looking for connections through students’ work in mathematical problem solving. School Science and Mathematics, 101(5), 236–245.
   Google Scholar
• Pugalee, D.K. (2004). A comparison of verbal and written descriptions of students’ problem solving processes. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 55(1–3), 27–47.
   Google Scholar
• Sterrett, A. (1990). Using writing to teach mathematics. MAA notes, number 16. Washington, DC: Mathematical Association of America.
   Google Scholar
• Tirosh, D., & Tsamir, P. (2004). What can mathematics education gain from the conceptual change approach? And what can the conceptual change approach gain from its application to mathematics education? Learning and Instruction, 14(5), 535–540.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Dyke, F., Malloy, E.J., & Stallings, V. (2014). Conceptual writing in college-level mathematics courses and its impact on performance and attitude. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, (ahead-of-print), 1–11.
   Google Scholar
• Van Dyke, F., & White, A. (2004a). Examining students’ reluctance to use graphs. Mathematics Teacher, 97(7), 110–117.
   Google Scholar
• Van Dyke, F., & White, A. (2004b). A tool to use the first day of calculus. Primus: Problems, Resources, and Issues in Mathematics Undergraduate Studies, 14(3), 213–229.
   Google Scholar