98
Views
4
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

The Pedagogical Examples of Groups and Rings That Algebraists Think Are Most Important in an Introductory Course

&

REFERENCES

  • Alcock, L. (2010). Mathematicians’ perspectives on the teaching and learning of proof. In F. Hitt, D. Holton, & P.W. Thompson (Eds.), Research in collegiate mathematics education VII (pp. 63–91). Washington, DC: The Mathematical Association of America.
  • Bills, L., & Watson, A. (2008). Special issue: Role and use of exemplification in mathematics education [Editorial introduction]. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 69, 77–79.
  • Cook, J.P. (2014). The emergence of algebraic structure: students come to understand units and zero-divisors. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 45(3), 349–359.
  • Cuoco, A., Goldenberg, E.P., & Mark, J. (1997). Habits of mind: An organizing principle for mathematics curriculum. Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 15(4), 375–402.
  • Fukawa-Connelly, T.P., & Newton, C. (2014). Analyzing the teaching of advanced mathematics courses via the enacted example space. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 87(3), 323–349.
  • Goldenberg, P., & Mason, J. (2008). Shedding light on and with example spaces. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 69, 183–194. doi: 10.1007/s10649-008-9143-3
  • Hungerford, T.W. (1997). Abstract algebra: An introduction ( 2nd ed.). Florence, KY: Brooks/Cole.
  • Lai, Y., Weber, K., & Mejia-Ramos, J.P. (2012). Mathematicians’ perspectives on features of a good pedagogical proof. Cognition and Instruction, 30(2), 146–169.
  • Lakatos, I. (1976). Proofs and refutations. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
  • Larsen, S. P. (2013). A local instructional theory for the guided reinvention of the group and isomorphism concepts. The Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 32(4), 712725.
  • Larsen, S., Johnson, E., & Bartlo, J. (2013). Designing and scaling up an innovation in abstract algebra. The Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 32(4), 693711.
  • Ling, L.M. (2012). Variation theory and the improvement of teaching and learning. Göteborg, Sweden: Acta Universitatis Gothoburgensis.
  • Ling, L.M., & Marton, F. (2011). Towards a science of the art of teaching: Using variation theory as a guiding principle of pedagogical design. International Journal for Lesson and Learning Studies, 1(1), 7–22.
  • Marton, F., & Booth, S.A. (1997). Learning and awareness. Mahwah, NJ: Psychology Press.
  • Mason, J., & Watson, A. (2008). Mathematics as a constructive activity: Exploiting dimensions of possible variation. In M. Carlson & C. Rasmussen (Eds.), Making the connection: Research and practice in undergraduate mathematics (pp. 189–202). Washington, DC: The Mathematical Association of America.
  • Michener, E.R. (1978). Understanding understanding mathematics. Cognitive Science, 2, 361–383.
  • Mills, M. (2014). A framework for example usage in proof presentations. The Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 33, 106–118.
  • Runesson, U. (2006). What is it possible to learn? On variation as a necessary condition for learning. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 50, 397–410.
  • Sinclair, N., Watson, A., Zazkis, R., & Mason, J. (2011). The structuring of personal example spaces. The Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 30, 291–303.
  • Tall, D., & Bills, L. (1998). Operable definitions in advanced mathematics: The case of the least upper bound. Paper presented at PME 22, Stellenbosch, South Africa.
  • Tall, D., & Vinner, S. (1981). Concept image and concept definition in mathematics, with particular reference to limits and continuity. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 12(2), 151–169.
  • Wagner, J. (2010). Transfer-in-pieces. Cognition and Instruction, 24(1), 1–71.
  • Watson, A., & Mason, J. (2005). Mathematics as a constructive activity: Learners generating examples. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
  • Weber, K. (2012). Mathematicians’ perspectives on their pedagogical practice with respect to proof. International Journal of Mathematics Education in Science and Technology, 43(4), 463–475.
  • Weber, K., & Mejía-Ramos, J.P. (2011). Why and how mathematicians read proofs: An exploratory study. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 76(3), 329–344.
  • Zodik, I., & Zaslavsky, O. (2008). Characteristics of teachers’ choice of examples in and for the mathematics classroom. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 69, 165–182. doi: 10.1007/s10649-008-9140-6.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.