Using Scaffold Supports to Improve Student Practice and Understanding of an Authentic Inquiry Process in Science

References

• Allaire, S. (2006). Les affordances socionumériques d'un environnement d'apprentissage hybride en soutien à des stagiaires en enseignement secondaire: De l'analyse réflexive à la coélaboration de connaissances [Socionumériques affordances in a blended learning environment to support preservice teachers in secondary education: From the reflexive analysis to knowledge building] (Unpublished doctoral thesis). Université Laval, Canada.
   Google Scholar
• American Association for the Advancement of Science. (1994). Benchmarks for science literacy. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bereiter, C., & Scardamalia, M. (2005). Technology and literacies: From print literacy to dialogic literacy. In N. Bascia, A. Cumming, A. Datnow, K. Leithwood, & D. Livingstone (Eds.), International handbook of educational policy (pp. 749–761). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Brown, J. S., Collins, A., & Duguid, P. (1989). Situated cognition and the culture of learning. Educational Researcher, 18(1), 32–42.
   Google Scholar
• Bruner, J. (1960). The process of education. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bruner, J. (1983). Le développement de l'enfant. Savoir faire, Savoir dire [Child's talk: Learning to use language]. Paris, France: PUF.
   Google Scholar
• Burtis, J. (2001). The Analytic Toolkit for Knowledge Forum. Toronto, ON, Canada: Knowledge Forum Project, Ontario Institute for Studies in Education/University of Toronto. Retrieved from http://kftools.oise.utoronto.ca/atk/
   Google Scholar
• Chan, C. K. K., Lam, Y. C. K., & van Aalst, J. (2003, April). Social-constructivist assessment, knowledge building discourse, and conceptual understanding. Paper presented at the AERA, Chicago, IL.
   Google Scholar
• Clancey, W. J. (1995). A tutorial on situated learning. In J. Self (Ed.), Proceedings of the International Conference on Computers and Education (pp. 49–70). Charlottesville, VA: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE).
   Google Scholar
• Collins, A., Brown, J. S., & Newman, S. E. (1989). Cognitive apprenticeship: Teaching the craft of reading, writing, and mathematics. In L. B. Resnick (Ed.), Knowing, learning, and instruction: Essays in honor of Robert Glaser (pp. 453–494). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Etheris, A. I., & Tan, S. C. (2004). Computer-supported collaborative problem solving and anchored instruction in a mathematics classroom: An exploratory study. International Journal of Learning Technology, 1(1), 16–39.
   Google Scholar
• Hakkarainen, K. (2003). Emergence of progressive-inquiry culture in computer-supported collaborative learning. Learning Environments Research, 6, 199–220.
   Google Scholar
• Hamel, C., Turcotte, S., & Laferrière, T. (2013). Evolution of the conditions for successful innovation in remote networked schools. International Education Studies, 6(3), 1–14. doi:10.5539/ies.v6n3p1
   Google Scholar
• Laferrière, T., Hamel, C., Allaire, S., Turcotte, S., Breuleux, A., Beaudoin, J., & Gaudreault-Perron, J. (2011). L'École éloignée en réseau (ÉÉR), un modèle [Remote networked schools: A model]. Québec, QC, Canada: Centre francophone d'informatisation des organisations (CEFRIO).
   Google Scholar
• Laferrière, T., Hamel, C., & Searson, M. (2013). Barriers to successful implementation of technology integration in educational settings: A case study. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 29(5), 463–473. doi:10.1111/jcal.12034
   Google Scholar
• Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lee, E. Y. C., Chan, C. K. K., & Aalst, J. (2006). Students assessing their own collaborative knowledge building. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 1(2), 277–307. doi:10.1007/s11412-006-8997-6
   Google Scholar
• Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis (2nd ed.). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• National Research Council. (1996). National science education standards. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
   Google Scholar
• National Research Council. (2000). Educating teachers of science, mathematics and technology: New practices for the new millennium. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
   Google Scholar
• National Research Council. (2011). A framework for K–12 science education: Practices, crosscutting concepts, and core ideas. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
   Google Scholar
• Palincsar, A. S., & Herrenkohl, L. R. (2002). Designing collaborative learning contexts. Theory Into Practice, 41(1), 26–32.
   Google Scholar
• Pea, R. D. (2004). The social and technological dimensions of scaffolding and related theoretical concepts for learning, education, and human activity. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 13(3), 423–451.
   Google Scholar
• Scardamalia, M. (2004). CSILE/Knowledge Forum. In Educational technology: An encyclopedia. Santa Barbara, CA: ABC-CLIO.
   Google Scholar
• Scardamalia, M., Bereiter, C., & Lamon, M. (1994). The CSILE project: Trying to bring the classroom into world 3. In K. McGilly (Ed.), Classroom lessons: Integrating cognitive theory and classroom practice (pp. 201–228). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Turcotte, S. (2008). Computer-supported collaborative inquiry in remote networked schools (Unpublished doctoral thesis). McGill University, Montreal, Canada.
   Google Scholar
• Turcotte, S. (2012). Computer-supported collaborative inquiry on buoyancy: A discourse analysis supporting the “pieces” position on conceptual change. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 21(6), 808–825.
   Google Scholar
• Turcotte, S., Laferrière, T., Hamel, C., & Breuleux, A. (2009). Multilevel innovation in remote networked schools. Systemic Practice and Action Research, 23(4), 285–299. doi:10.1007/s11213-009-9160-x
   Google Scholar
• Zhang, J., Scardamalia, M., Lamon, M., Messina, R., & Reeve, R. (2006). Socio-cognitive dynamics of knowledge building in the work of 9- and 10-year-olds. Educational Technology Research and Development, 55(2), 117–145. doi:10.1007/s11423-006-9019-0
   Google Scholar