Evaluating good practice in coaching delivery between governing bodies of sport and county sports partnerships in the United Kingdom

References

• 6,P., Goodwin, N., Peck, E., & Freeman, T. (2006). Managing networks of twenty-first century organizations. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Alexander, J. A., Comfort, M. E., Weiner, B. J., & Bogue, R. (2001). Leadership in collaborative community health partnerships. Nonprofit Management and Leadership, 12, 159–175. doi:10.1002/(ISSN)1542-7854
   Google Scholar
• Alexander, V. D. (1998). Environmental constraints and organizational strategies: Complexity, conflict, and coping in the nonprofit sector. In W. W. Powell & E. S. Clemens (Eds.), Private action and the public good (pp. 227–290). London: Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Armistead, C., Pettigrew, P., & Aves, S. (2007). Exploring leadership in multi-sectoral partnerships. Leadership, 3, 211–230. doi:10.1177/1742715007076214
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Asthana, S., Richardson, S., & Halliday, J. (2002). Partnership working in public policy provision: A framework for evaluation. Social Policy and Administration, 36, 780–795. doi:10.1111/spol.2002.36.issue-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Babiak, K. M. (2009). Criteria of effectiveness in multiple cross-sectoral interorganizational relationships. Evaluation and Program Planning, 32, 1–12. doi:10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2008.09.004
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Babiak, K. M., & Thibault, L. (2009). Challenges in multiple cross-sector partnerships. Non-profit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 38, 117–143. doi:10.1177/0899764008316054
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Babiak, K. M., & Thibault, L. (2008). Managing inter-organisational relationships: The art of plate spinning. International Journal of Sport Management and Marketing, 3, 281–302. doi:10.1504/IJSMM.2008.017193
   Google Scholar
• Bennett, R. J., Fuller, C., & Ramsden, M. (2004). Local government and local economic development in Britain: An evaluation of developments under labour. Progress in Planning, 62, 209–274. doi:10.1016/j.progress.2004.07.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bevir, M., & Rhodes, R. A. W. (2003). Searching for civil society: Changing patterns of governance in Britain. Public Administration, 81, 41–62. doi:10.1111/padm.2003.81.issue-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bloyce, D., & Smith, A. (2010). Sport policy and development: An introduction. Abingdon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Bolton, N., Fleming, S., & Elias, B. (2008). The experience of community sport development: A case study of Blaenau Gwent. Managing Leisure, 13, 92–103. doi:10.1080/13606710801933446
   Google Scholar
• Bowling, A. (2005). Quantitative social science: The survey. In A. Bowling & S. Ebrahim (Eds.), Handbook of research methods in health: Investigation, measurement and analysis (pp. 190–214). Maidenhead: Open University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Brookes, S., & Wiggan, J. (2009). Reflecting on the public value of sport. Sport Management Review, 11, 401–420.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bryman, A. (2012). Social research methods. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bryman, A., & Cramer, D. (2011). Quantitative data analysis with IBM SPSS 17, 18 & 19: A guide for social scientists. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Bullough, S. J. (2012). A new look at the latent demand for sport and its potential to deliver a positive legacy for London 2012. International Journal of Sport Policy and Politics, 4, 39–54. doi:10.1080/19406940.2011.627357
   Google Scholar
• Butterfoss, F. D. (2006). Process evaluation for community participation. Annual Review of Public Health, 27, 323–340.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Butterfoss, F. D. (2007). Coalitions and partnerships in community health. San Francisco, CA: John Wiley and Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Butterfoss, F. D., Goodman, R. M., & Wandersman, A. (1993). Community coalitions for prevention and health promotion. Health Education Research, 8, 315–330. doi:10.1093/her/8.3.315
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Butterfoss, F. D., Goodman, R. M., & Wandersman, A. (1996). Community coalitions for prevention and health promotion: Factors predicting satisfaction, participation, and planning. Health Education & Behavior, 23, 65–79. doi:10.1177/109019819602300105
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Butterfoss, F. D., & Kegler, M. C. (2002). Towards a comprehensive understanding of community coalitions moving from practice to theory. In R. J. DiClemente, R. A. Crosby, & M. C. Kegler (Eds.), Emerging theories in health promotion practice and research strategies for improving public health (pp. 159–193). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Butterfoss, F. D., Lachance, L. L., & Orians, C. E. (2006). Building allies coalitions: Why formation matters. Health Promotion Practice, 7(23S–33S). doi:10.1177/1524839906287062
   Google Scholar
• Chinman, M. J., Anderson, C. M., Imm, P. S. I., Wandersman, A., & Goodman, R. M. (1996). The perceptions of costs and benefits of high active versus low active groups in community coalitions at different stages in coalition development. Journal of Community Psychology, 24, 263–274. doi:10.1002/(SICI)1520-6629(199607)24:3<263::AID-JCOP6>3.3.CO;2-N
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chinman, M. J., & Wandersman, A. (1999). The benefits and costs of volunteering in community organizations: Review and practical implications. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 28, 46–64. doi:10.1177/0899764099281004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Daly, G., & Davis, H. (2002). Partnerships for local governance: Citizens, communities and accountability. In C. Glendinning, M. Powell & K. Rummer (Eds.), Partnerships, new labour and the governance of welfare (pp. 97–112). Bristol: The Policy Press.
   Google Scholar
• DCMS. (2012). Creating a sporting habit for life. London: DCMS.
   Google Scholar
• DCMS/Strategy Unit. (2002). Game Plan: A strategy for delivering government’s sport and physical activity objectives. London: Cabinet Office.
   Google Scholar
• Department of the Environment, Transport and the Regions. (2001). Local strategic partnerships. London: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Department for Transport, Local Government and the Regions. (2001). Local strategic partnerships. London: HMSO.
   Google Scholar
• Department of Health. (2004). Choosing health: Making healthier choices easier. London: HMSO.
   Google Scholar
• El Ansari, W., Oskrochi, R., & Phillips, C. (2008). One size fits all partnerships? What explains community partnership leadership skills? Health Promotion Practice, 11, 501–514. doi:10.1177/1524839908318289
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• El Ansari W., & Phillips, C. J. (2001). Partnerships, community participation and intersectoral collaboration in South Africa. Journal of Interprofessional Care, 15(2), 119–132.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• El Ansari, W., & Phillips, C. J. (2004). The costs and benefits to participants in community partnerships: A paradox? Health Promotion Practice, 5, 35–48. doi:10.1177/1524839903258066
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Field, A. (2013). Discovering statistics using IBM SPSS Statistics (4th ed.). Sage: London.
   Google Scholar
• Foster-Fishman, P. G., Berkowitz, S. L., Lounsbury, D. W., Jacobson, S., & Allen, N. A. (2001). Building collaborative capacity in community coalitions: A review and integrative framework. American Journal of Community Psychology, 29, 241–261. doi:10.1023/A:1010378613583
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Francisco, V. T., Paine, A. L., & Fawcett, F. B. (1993). A methodology for monitoring and evaluating community health coalitions. Health Education Research, 8(3), 401–416.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frisby, W., Thibault, L., & Kikulis, L. (2004). The organizational dynamics of undermanaged partnerships in leisure service departments. Leisure Studies, 23, 109–126. doi:10.1080/0261436042000224482
   Google Scholar
• Geddes, M. (2006). Partnership and the Limits to Local Governance in England: Institutionalist Analysis and Neoliberalism. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 30, 76–97. doi:10.1111/ijur.2006.30.issue-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Geddes, M., Davies, J., & Fuller, C. (2007). Evaluating local strategic partnerships: Theory and practice of change. Local Government Studies, 33, 97–116. doi:10.1080/03003930601081358
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Glasby, J., Dickinson, H., & Peck, E. (2006). Guest editorial: Partnership working in health and social care. Health and Social Care in the Community, 14, 373–374. doi:10.1111/hsc.2006.14.issue-5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Granner, M. L., & Sharpe, P. A. (2004). Evaluating community coalition characteristics and functioning: A summary of measurement tools. Health Education Research, 19, 514–532. doi:10.1093/her/cyg056
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Green, J. C., & Caracelli, V. J. (1997). Defining and describing the paradigm issue in mixed-method evaluation. New Directions in Evaluation, 74, 5–18. doi:10.1002/ev.1068
   Google Scholar
• Green, M. (2004). Power, policy and political priorities: Elite sport development in Canada and the United Kingdom. Sociology of Sport Journal, 21, 376–396.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grix, J. (2010). The ‘governance debate’ and the study of sport policy. International Journal of Sport Policy and Politics, 2, 159–171. doi:10.1080/19406940.2010.488061
   Google Scholar
• Grix, J., & Phillpots, L. (2011). Revisiting the ‘Governance Narrative’: ‘Asymmetrical Network Governance’ and the deviant case of the sports policy sector. Public Policy and Administration, 26, 3–19. doi:10.1177/0952076710365423
   Google Scholar
• Hammersley, M., & Atkinson, P. (2007). Ethnography: Principles in practice (3rd ed.). London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Harris, S., & Houlihan, B. (2014). Delivery networks and community sport in England. International Journal of Public Sector Management, 27(2), 113–127.
   Google Scholar
• Hayhurst, L. M. C., & Frisby, W. (2010). Inevitable tensions: Swiss and Canadian sport for development NGO perspectives on partnerships with high performance sport. European Sport Management Quarterly, 10, 75–96. doi:10.1080/16184740903554140
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hirst, P. (2000). Democracy and governance. In J. Pierre (Ed.), Debating governance (pp. 13–25). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hogg, M., & Vaughan, G. (2010). Essentials of social psychology. Harlow: Pearson Education Limited.
   Google Scholar
• Houlihan, B., & Green, M. (2009). Modernization and sport: The reform of sport England and U.K. Sport. Public Administration, 87, 678–698. doi:10.1111/padm.2009.87.issue-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Houlihan, B., & Lindsey, I. (2008). Networks and partnerships in sports development. In V. Girginov (Ed.), Management of sports development (pp. 225–242). Oxford: Butterworth-Heinemann.
   Google Scholar
• Huxham, C., & Vangen, S. (2005). Managing to collaborate: The theory and practice of collaborative advantage. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Johnson, R. B., Onwuegbuzie, A. J., & Turner, L. A. (2007). Toward a definition of mixed methods research. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 1, 112–133.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kegler, M. C., Steckler, A., McLeroy, K., & Malek, S. H. (1998). Factors that contribute to effective community health promotion coalitions: A study of 10 project ASSIST coalitions in North Carolina. Health Education & Behavior, 25, 338–353. doi:10.1177/109019819802500308
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kenney, E., & Sofaer, S. (2001). The Coalition Self-Assessment Survey (CSAS). Ann Arbor: University of Michigan - Allies Against Asthma National Program Office.
   Google Scholar
• Lachance, L. L., Houle, C. R., Cassidy, E. F., Bourcier, E., Cohn, J. H., Orians, C. E., & Clark, N. M. (2006). Collaborative design and implementation of a multisite community coalition evaluation. Health Promotion Practice, 7, 44S–55S. doi:10.1177/1524839906287066
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lasker, R. D., Weiss, E. S., & Miller, R. (2001). Partnership synergy: A practical framework for studying and strengthening the collaborative advantage. The Milbank Quarterly, 79, 179–205. doi:10.1111/milq.2001.79.issue-2
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lindsey, I. (2009). Collaboration in local sport services in England: Issues emerging from case studies of two local authority areas. International Journal of Sport Policy and Politics, 1, 71–88. doi:10.1080/19406940802681210
   Google Scholar
• Mackintosh, C. I. (2011). An analysis of County Sports Partnerships in England: The fragility, challenges and complexity of partnership working in sports development. International Journal of Sport Policy and Politics, 3, 45–64. doi:10.1080/19406940.2010.524809
   Google Scholar
• McDonald, I. (2005). Theorising partnerships: Governance, communicative action and sport policy. Journal of Social Policy, 34, 579–600. doi:10.1017/S0047279405009165
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McLaughlin, H. (2004). Partnerships: Panacea or pretence? Journal of Interprofessional Care, 18, 103–113. doi:10.1080/13561820410001686873
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Mitchell, S. M., & Shortell, S. M. (2000). The governance and management of effective community health partnerships: A typology for research, policy, and practice. Milbank Quarterly, 78, 241–289. doi:10.1111/milq.2000.78.issue-2
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Newman, J. (2001). Modernising governance: New Labour, policy, and society. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• O’Cathain, A., Murphy, E., & Nicholl, J. (2008). The quality of mixed methods studies in health services research. Journal of Health Services Research & Policy, 13, 92–98. doi:10.1258/jhsrp.2007.007074
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Onwuegbuzie, A. J., & Collins, K. M. T. (2007). A typology of mixed methods sampling designs in social science research. The Qualitative Report, 12, 281–316.
   Google Scholar
• Parent, M. M., & Harvey, J. (2009). Towards a management model for sport and physical activity community-based partnerships. European Sport Management Quarterly, 9, 23–45. doi:10.1080/16184740802461694
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pfeffer, J., & Salancik, G. R. (2003). The external control of organisations: A resource dependence perspective. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Phillpots, L., Grix, J., & Quarmby, T. (2011). Centralized grassroots sport policy and ‘new governance’: A case study of County Sports Partnerships in the UK – Unpacking the paradox. International Review for the Sociology of Sport, 46, 265–281. doi:10.1177/1012690210378461
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rhodes, R. A. W. (2007). Understanding governance: Ten years on. Organization Studies, 28(8), 1243–1264.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Robson, S. (2008). Partnerships in sport. In K. Hylton & P. Bramham (Eds.), Sport development: Policy, processes and practice (2nd ed., pp. 118–142). London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Rogers, T., Howard-Pitney, B., Feighery, E. C., Altman, D. G., Endres, J. M., & Roeseler, A. G. (1993). Characteristics and participant perceptions of tobacco control coalitions in California. Health Education Research, 8, 345–357. doi:10.1093/her/8.3.345
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roussos, S. T., & Fawcett, S. B. (2000). A review of collaborative partnerships as a strategy for improving community health. Annual Review of Public Health, 21, 369–402. doi:10.1146/annurev.publhealth.21.1.369
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rummery, K. (2003). Progress towards partnership? The development of relations between primary care organisations and social services concerning older people’s services in the UK. Social Policy and Society, 3, 33–42. doi:10.1017/S1474746403001489
   Google Scholar
• Schmitt, N. (1996). Uses and abuses of coefficient alpha. Psychological Assessment, 8, 350–353. doi:10.1037/1040-3590.8.4.350
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sport England. (2004). The Framework for Sport in England. London: Sport England.
   Google Scholar
• Shaw, S., & Allen, J. (2006). “It basically is a fairly loose arrangement…and that works out fine, really”. Analysing the Dynamics of an lnterorganisational Partnership. Sport Management Review, 9, 203–228.
   Google Scholar
• Sport England. (2007). Community sports networks implementation and investment guidance. London: Sport England.
   Google Scholar
• Sport England. (2008). Sport England Strategy 2008-2011. London: Sport England.
   Google Scholar
• Sport England. (2012a). Sports we invest in. London: Sport England. Retrieved from http://www.sportengland.org/funding/ngb_investment/whole_sport_plans_2013-17.aspx
   Google Scholar
• Sport England. (2012b). County Sports partnerships core specification for core funding from Sport England April 2012 – March 2013. London: Sport England.
   Google Scholar
• Sport England. (2013a). Active People Survey 7. London: Sport England. Retrieved from http://archive.sportengland.org/research/active_people_survey/active_people_survey_7.aspx
   Google Scholar
• Sport England. (2013b). Economic value of sport in England. London: Sport England. Retrieved from http://www.sportengland.org/media/177230/economic-value-of-sport.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Sports Coach UK. (2014). England Coaching Network Annual Report 2013-14. Retrieved from http://www.sportscoachuk.org/sites/default/files/ECN%20Annual%20Report%202013-14.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Sullivan, H., & Skelcher, C. (2002). Working across boundaries. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Teddlie, C. T., & Tashakkori, A. (2009). Foundations of mixed methods research: Integrating quantitative and qualitative approaches in the social and behavioural sciences. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Tekleab, A. G., & Chiaburu, D. S. (2011). Social exchange: Empirical examination of form and focus. Journal of Business Research, 64(5), 460–466.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taylor, M., & O’Sullivan, N. (2009). How should national governing bodies of sport be governed in the UK? An exploratory study of board structure. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 17, 681–693. doi:10.1111/corg.2009.17.issue-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• UK Sport. (2003). Investing in change: High level review of the modernisation programme for governing bodies of sport. London: Deloitte and Touche.
   Google Scholar
• Walters, G., Trenberth, L., & Tacon, R. (2010). Good governance in sport: A survey of UK national governing bodies of sport. London: Birkbeck Sport Business Centre.
   Google Scholar
• Waltz, C. F., Strickland, O. L., & Lenz, E. R. (2010). Measurement in nursing and health research (4th ed.). New York: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Whittington, C. (2003). Collaboration and partnership in context. In J. Weinstein, C. Whittington & T. Leiba (Eds.), Collaboration is social work practice (pp. 13–38). London: Jessica Kingsley Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Zakus, J. D. L., & Lysack, C. L. (1998). Revisiting community participation. Health Policy and Planning, 13(1), 1–12.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar