Facilitating collaborative interdisciplinary research: exploring process and implications for leisure scholars

References

• Aboelela, S. W., Larson, E., Bakken, S., Carrasquillo, O., Formicola, A., Glied, S. A., … Gebbie, K. M. (2007). Defining interdisciplinary research: Conclusions from a critical review of the literature. Health Services Research, 42(1), 329–346. doi:10.1111/j.1475-6773.2006.00621.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Amey, M. J., & Brown, D. F. (2005). Interdisciplinary collaboration and academic work: A case study of a university-community partnership. New Directions for Teaching and Learning, (102), 23–35. doi:10.1002/tl.194
   Google Scholar
• Bedimo-Rung, A. L., Mowen, A. J., & Cohen, D. A. (2005). The significance of parks to physical activity and public health: A conceptual model. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 28(2S2). doi:10.1016/j.amepre.2004.10.024
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bensimon, E. M., & Neumann, A. (1993). Redesigning collegiate leadership: Teams and teamwork in higher education. Baltimore, Md.: Johns Hopkins University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bolman, L. G., & Deal, T. E. (1997). Reframing organisations: Artistry, choice and leadership (2nd ed.). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Burnett-Wolle, S., & Godbey, G. (2007). Refining research on older adults’ leisure: Implications of selection, optimization, and compensation and socioemotional selectivity theories. Journal of Leisure Research, 39(3), 498–513.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Floyd, M. F. (2014). Social justice as an integrating force for leisure research. Leisure Sciences, 36(4), 379–387. doi:10.1080/01490400.2014.917002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Golden, S. D., & Earp, J. A. L. (2012). Social ecological approaches to individuals and their contexts: Twenty years of health education & behavior health promotion interventions. Health Education & Behavior, 39(3), 364–372. doi:10.1177/1090198111418634
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Henderson, K. A. (2014). The imperative of leisure justice research. Leisure Sciences, 36(4), 340–348. doi:10.1080/01490400.2014.916971
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Henderson, K. A., & Bialeschki, M. D. (2005). Leisure and active lifestyles: Research reflections. Leisure Sciences, 27, 355–365. doi:10.1080/01490400500225559
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jablin, F. M., & Sias, P. M. (2001). Communication competence. In F. M. Jablin & L. L. Putnam (Eds.), The new handbook of organisational communication: Advances in theory, research and methods (pp. 819–862). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Kanbur, R. (2002). Economics, social science and development. World Development, 30(3), 477–486. doi:10.1016/S0305-750X(01)00117-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kemmis, S., & McTaggart, R. (2001). Participatory action research. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of Qualitative Research (2nd ed., pp. 567–605). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Kezar, A. (2005). Redesigning for collaborations within higher education institutions: An exploration into the developmental process. Research in Higher Education, 46(7), 831–860. doi:10.1007/s11162-004-6227-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kezar, A. (2006). Redesigning for collaborations in learning initiatives: An examination of four highly collaborative campuses. Journal of Higher Education, 77(7), 804–838. doi:10.1353/jhe.2006.0043
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Latucca, L. (2001). Creating interdisciplinary: Interdisciplinary research and teaching among college and university faculty. Nashville, TN: Vanderbilt University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lawrence, R. J. (2004). Housing and health: From interdisciplinary principles to transdisciplinary research and practice. Futures, 36(4), 487–502. doi:10.1016/j.futures.2003.10.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Librett, J., Henderson, K., Godbey, G., & Morrow, J. R., Jr. (2007). An introduction to parks, recreation, and public health: Collaborative frameworks for promoting physical activity. Journal of Physical Activity & Health, 4(1), S1–S13.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lindeke, L. L., & Block, D. E. (1998). Maintaining professional integrity in the midst of interdisciplinary collaboration. Nursing Outlook, 46(5), 213–218. doi:10.1016/S0029-6554(98)90052-5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lowe, P., & Phillipson, J. (2006). Reflexive interdisciplinary research: The making of a research programme on the rural economy and land use. Journal of Agricultural Economics, 57(2), 165–184. doi:10.1111/jage.2006.57.issue-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mair, H. (2006). The potential of interdisciplinarity for leisure research. Leisure Sciences, 28(2), 197–202. doi:10.1080/01490400500484099
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marinez-Moyano, I. J. (2006). Exploring the dynamics of collaboration in interorganisational settings. In S. Schuman (Ed.), Creating a culture of collaboration (p. 83). Ch. 4. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• McIntyre, A. (2008). Participatory action research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• McTaggart, R. (1991). Principles for participatory action research. Adult Education Quarterly, 41(3), 168–187. doi:10.1177/0001848191041003003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Merriam, S. B. (2009). Qualitative research. A guide to design and implementation. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Patton, M. Q. (1990). Qualitative evaluation and research methods. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Pedlar, A. (1995). Relevance and action research in leisure. Leisure Sciences, 17(2), 133–140. doi:10.1080/01490409509513250
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Plank, J., Feldon, D., Sherman, W., & Elliot, J. (2011). Complex systems, interdisciplinary collaboration, and institutional renewal. Change. The Magazine of Higher Learning, 43(3), 35–43. doi:10.1080/00091383.2011.569248
   Google Scholar
• Ramaley, J. (2001). Why do we engage in engagement? Metropolitan Universities, 12(3), 13–19.
   Google Scholar
• Reason, P., & Bradbury, H. (Eds.). (2001). Handbook of action research. London: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Rubin, H. J., & Rubin, I. S. (1995). Qualitative interviewing: The art of hearing data. London: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Samdahl, D. M. (1999). Epistemological and methodological issues in leisure research. In E. L. Jackson & T. L. Burton (Eds.), Leisure studies: Prospects for the 21st century (pp. 119–133). State College, PA: Venture.
   Google Scholar
• Stewart, W. (2014). Leisure research to enhance social justice. Leisure Sciences, 36(4), 325–339. doi:10.1080/01490400.2014.916961
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thompson, A. M., & Perry, J. L. (2006). Collaboration processes: Inside the black box. Public Administration Review, 20–32. December, Special Issue. doi:10.1111/j.1540-6210.2006.00663.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thompson, J. L. (2009). Building collective communication competence in interdisciplinary research teams. Journal of Applied Communication Research, 37(3), 278–297. doi:10.1080/00909880903025911
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tompkins, F. M., & Others, A. (1989). How institutional factors are perceived to influence interdisciplinary collaboration efforts among educational preparation programs. Teacher Education and Special Education, 12(1–2), 75–78. doi:10.1177/088840648901200114
   Google Scholar
• Tuckman, B. W. (1965). Developmental sequence in small groups. Psychological Bulletin, 6(63), 384–389. doi:10.1037/h0022100
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• U.S. National Academy of Sciences. (2005). Facilitating interdisciplinary research. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.
   Google Scholar