‘Everything Looks Better from the Seat of a Bike’: a qualitative exploration of the San José Bike Party

References

• About Us and Mission. (n.d.). Retrieved from http://www.sjbikeparty.org/about/
   Google Scholar
• Aldred, R. (2010). ‘On the outside’: Constructing cycling citizenship. Social & Cultural Geography, 11(1), 35–52.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aldred, R. (2013a). Incompetent or too competent? Negotiating everyday cycling identities in a motor dominated society. Mobilities, 8(2), 252–271.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aldred, R. (2013b). Who are Londoners on Bikes and what do they want? Negotiating identity and issue definition in a ‘pop-up’ cycle campaign. Journal of Transport Geography, 30(1), 194–201.
   Google Scholar
• Angrosino, M. (2007). Doing ethnographic and observational research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Black, G. (2008). Critical mass: Help or hurt the cause of bike advocacy? Bicycle Paper, 37(7), 3.
   Google Scholar
• Blickstein, S., & Hanson, S. (2001). Critical mass: Forging a politics of sustainable mobility in the information age: Transportation (pp. 347–362). Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Bray, J. N., Lee, J., Smith, L., & Yorks, L. (2000). Collaborative inquiry in practice: Action, reflection, and making meaning. London: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Brown, H. S., Vergragt, P., Green, K., & Berchicci, L. (2003). Learning for sustainability transition through bounded socio-technical experiments in personal mobility. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 15(3), 291–315.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bryer, T. A. (2013). Designing social media strategies for effective citizen engagement: A case example and model. National Civic Review, 102(1), 43–50.
   Google Scholar
• Cammaerts, B. (2015). Social media and activism. In R. Mansell & P. Hwa (Eds.), The international encyclopedia of digital communication and society (pp. 1027–1034). Oxford, UK: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Carlsson, C. (Ed.). (2002). Critical mass: Bicycling’s defiant celebration. Edinburgh: AK Press.
   Google Scholar
• Carlsson, C. (2007). Outlaw bicycling. Affinities: A Journal of Radical Theory, Culture and Action, 1(1), 86–106.
   Google Scholar
• Dahl, G. T. (2009). Empowerment of cyclist collective identity in the social, safe, and celebratory spaces of critical mass (A thesis presented to the faculty of the College of Arts and Sciences of Ohio University).
   Google Scholar
• Dill, J., & Voros, K. (2007). Factors affecting bicycling demand: Initial survey findings from the Portland region. Washington, DC: Transportation Research Board.
   Google Scholar
• Frisby, W., & Millar, S. (2002). The actualities of doing community development to promote the inclusion of low-income populations in local sport and recreation. European Sport Management Quarterly, 2(3), 209–233.
   Google Scholar
• Furness, Z. (2005). Biketivism and technology: Historical reflections and appropriations. Social Epistemology, 19(4), 401–417.
   Google Scholar
• Furness, Z. (2007). Critical mass, urban space and vélomobility. Mobilities, 2(2), 299–319.
   Google Scholar
• Furness, Z. (2010). One less car: Bicycling and the politics of automobility. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Heinen, E., Van Wee, B., & Maat, K. (2010). Commuting by bicycle: An overview of the literature. Transport Reviews: A Transnational Transdisciplinary Journal, 30(1), 59–96.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Horton, D. (2006). Environmentalism and the bicycle. Environmental Politics, 15(1), 41–58.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• How We Ride. (n.d.). Retrieved from http://www.sjbikeparty.org/about/
   Google Scholar
• Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Lugo, A. (2013). CicLAvia and human infrastructure in Los Angeles: Ethnographic experiments in equitable bike planning. Journal of Transport Geography, 30(1), 202–207.
   Google Scholar
• McIlvenny, P. (2015). The joy of biking together: Sharing everyday experiences of velomobility. Mobilities, 10(1), 55–82.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sheller, M. (2011). Mobility, Sociopedia.Isa. http://www.sagepub.net/isa/resources/pdf/Mobility.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• The Short Version of Everything You Want to Know. (n.d.). Retrived from http://www.sjbikeparty.org/the-short-version-of-everything-you-want-to-know/
   Google Scholar
• Sparkes, A. C., & Smith, B. (2014). Qualitative research methods in sport, exercise and health. London: Taylor & Francis.
   Google Scholar
• St. John, G. (2004). Counter-tribes, global protest and carnivals of reclamation. Peace Review, 16(4), 421–428.
   Google Scholar
• Stehlin, J. (2014). Regulating inclusion: Spatial form social process, and the normalization of cycling practice in the USA. Mobilities, 9(1), 21–41.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stinson, M. A., & Bhat, C. R. (2003). An analysis of commuter bicyclist route choice using stated preference survey. Washington, DC: Transportation Research Board.
   Google Scholar
• Terry, D. P., & Todd, A. M. (2013). It’s a party, not a protest: Environmental community, co-incident performance, and the San José Bike Party. Performance on Behalf of the Environment, 9, 1.
   Google Scholar