Vertical interlocking and decision making in national and provincial/territorial non-profit sport organization boards

References

• Anagnostopoulos, C., Byers, T., & Kolyperas, D. (2017). Understanding strategic decision-making through a multi-paradigm perspective: The case of charitable foundations in English football. Sport, Business and Management: An International Journal, 7(1), 2–20. https://doi.org/10.1108/SBM-02-2016-0005
   Google Scholar
• Anagnostopoulos, C., Byers, T., & Shilbury, D. (2014). Corporate social responsibility in professional team sport organisations: Towards a theory of decision-making. European Sport Management Quarterly, 14(3), 259–281. https://doi.org/10.1080/16184742.2014.897736
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Australian Sports Commission. (2020). Sport governance principles. https://www.sportaus.gov.au/__data/assets/pdf_file/0006/912705/Sport-Governance-Framework.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Barzuza, M., & Curtis, Q. (2014). Board interlocks and corporate governance. Delaware Journal of Corporate Law, 39, 669–702.
   Google Scholar
• Bezemer, P. J., Nicholson, G., & Pugliese, A. (2018). The influence of board chairs on director engagement: A case‐based exploration of boardroom decision‐making. Corporate Governance, 26(3), 219–234. https://doi.org/10.1111/corg.12234
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bloch, R. I., Harris, E. E., & Peterson, A. N. (2020). Interlocking boards in nonprofit organizations. Accounting Horizons, 34(2), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.2308/horizons-16-104
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2013). Successful qualitative research: A practical guide for beginners. SAGE.
   Google Scholar
• Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2022a). Conceptual and design thinking for thematic analysis. Qualitative Psychology, 9(1), 3–26.
   Google Scholar
• Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2022b). Thematic analysis: A practical guide. SAGE.
   Google Scholar
• Braun, V., Clarke, V., Hayfield, N., & Terry, G. (2019). Thematic analysis. In P. Liamputtong (Ed.), Handbook of research methods in health social sciences (pp. 843–860). Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Brown, W. A. (2014). Antecedents to board member engagement in deliberation and decision-making. In C. Cornforth & W. A. Brown (Eds.), Nonprofit governance: Innovative perspectives and approaches (pp. 84–100). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Buch-Hansen, H. (2014). Interlocking directorates and collusion: An empirical analysis. International Sociology, 29(3), 249–267. https://doi.org/10.1177/0268580914527021
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burris, V. (2005). Interlocking directorates and political cohesion among corporate elites. American Journal of Sociology, 111(1), 249–283. https://doi.org/10.1086/428817
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Byers, T., & Slack, T. (2001). Strategic decision-making in small businesses within the leisure industry. Journal of Leisure Research, 33(2), 121–136. https://doi.org/10.1080/00222216.2001.11949934
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Canadian Olympic Committee. (2023). Canadian sport governance code. https://nso.olympic.ca/wp-content/uploads/2021/09/Canadian_Sports_Governance_Code.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Colvin, C. L. (2014). Interlocking directorates and conflicts of interest: The rotterdamsche bankvereeniging, Müller & Co. and the Dutch financial crisis of the 1920s. Business History, 56(2), 314–334. https://doi.org/10.1080/00076791.2013.771342
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Conyon, M. J., & Muldoon, M. R. (2006). The small world of corporate boards. Journal of Business Finance & Accounting, 33(9‐10), 1321–1343. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-5957.2006.00634.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cray, D., Mallory, G. R., Butler, R. J., Hickson, D. J., & Wilson, D. C. (1988). Sporadic, fluid and constricted processes: Three types of strategic decision making in organizations. Journal of Management Studies, 25(1), 13–39. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6486.1988.tb00020.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crotty, M. J. (1998). The foundations of social research: Meaning and perspective in the research process. SAGE.
   Google Scholar
• Cyert, R. M., & March, J. G. (1963). A behavioral theory of the firm. Prentice Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Daft, R. L. (2021). Organization theory & design (13th ed.). Cengage.
   Google Scholar
• Dooley, P. C. (1969). The interlocking directorate. The American Economic Review, 59(3), 314–323.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hamm-Kerwin, S., & Doherty, A. (2010). Intragroup conflict in nonprofit sport boards. Journal of Sport Management, 24(3), 245–271. https://doi.org/10.1123/jsm.24.3.245
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haunschild, P. R., & Beckman, C. M. (1998). When do interlocks matter? Alternate sources of information and interlock influence. Administrative Science Quarterly, 43(4), 815–844. https://doi.org/10.2307/2393617
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hickson, D. J., Butler, R. J., & Wilson, D. C. (2018). The Bradford studies of strategic decision making. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Hindman, L. C., Walker, N. A., & Agyemang, K. J. (2021). Bounded rationality or bounded morality? The national basketball association response to COVID-19. European Sport Management Quarterly, 21(3), 333–349. https://doi.org/10.1080/16184742.2021.1879191
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoye, R., & Doherty, A. (2011). Nonprofit sport board performance: A review and directions for future research. Journal of Sport Management, 25(3), 272–285. https://doi.org/10.1123/jsm.25.3.272
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoye, R., Parent, M. M., Thompson, A., Lachance, E. L., Naraine, M. L., Taks, M., & Séguin, B. (2023). Decision-making processes used by Canadian national sport organization boards: Differences between design archetypes. Journal of Sport Management, 37(6), 440–451. https://doi.org/10.1123/jsm.2022-0201
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ingram, K., & O’Boyle, I. (2018). Sport governance in Australia: Questions of board structure and performance. World Leisure Journal, 60(2), 156–172. https://doi.org/10.1080/16078055.2017.1340332
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson, R. B., Onwuegbuzie, A. J., & Turner, L. A. (2007). Toward a definition of mixed methods research. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 1(2), 112–133. https://doi.org/10.1177/1558689806298224
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kerwin, S., Doherty, A., & Harman, A. (2011). “It’s not conflict, it’s differences of opinion”: An in-depth examination of conflict in nonprofit boards. Small Group Research, 42(5), 562–594. https://doi.org/10.1177/1046496411398395
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kikulis, L. M., Slack, T., & Hinings, B. (1995). Does decision making make a difference? Patterns of change within Canadian national sport organizations. Journal of Sport Management, 9(3), 273–299. https://doi.org/10.1123/jsm.9.3.273
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lachance, E. (2022). Opening the “black box”: Exploring board decision making in non-profit sport organizations operating in a multi-level governance system [ Doctoral dissertation]. University of Ottawa Research. http://dx.doi.org/10.20381/ruor-28251
   Google Scholar
• Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. SAGE.
   Google Scholar
• Lockstone-Binney, L., Ong, F., & Mair, J. (2021). Examining the interlocking of tourism editorial boards. Tourism Management Perspectives, 38, 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tmp.2021.100829
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ma, J., & DeDeo, S. (2018). State power and elite autonomy in a networked civil society: The board interlocking of Chinese non-profits. Social Networks, 54, 291–302. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socnet.2017.10.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mariolis, P. (1975). Interlocking directorates and control of corporations: The theory of bank control. Social Science Quarterly, 56(3), 425–439.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McLeod, J., Ferkins, L., & O’Boyle, I. (2022). Reflecting, prioritising, and energising for a new generation of sport governance research. In D. Shilbury (Ed.), A research agenda for sport management (pp. 77–94). Edward Elgar Publishing Limited.
   Google Scholar
• McLeod, J., Shilbury, D., & Zeimers, G. (2021). Power and rent-seeking on boards: A case study of national sport federations in India. Sport Management Review, 24(4), 697–721. https://doi.org/10.1080/14413523.2021.1880745
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McLeod, J., Star, S., & Shilbury, D. (2023). Board composition in national sport federations: A cross-country comparative analysis of diversity and board size. Managing Sport and Leisure, 28(6), 714–731. https://doi.org/10.1080/23750472.2021.1970614
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mintz, B. A., & Schwartz, M. (1985). The power structure of American business. University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mintzberg, H., Raisinghani, D., & Theoret, A. (1976). The structure of “unstructured” decision processes. Administrative Science Quarterly, 21(2), 246–275. https://doi.org/10.2307/2392045
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mizruchi, M. S. (1989). Similarity of political behavior among large American corporations. American Journal of Sociology, 95(2), 401–424. https://doi.org/10.1086/229274
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mizruchi, M. S., & Stearns, L. B. (1988). A longitudinal study of the formation of interlocking directorates. Administrative Science Quarterly, 33(2), 194–210. https://doi.org/10.2307/2393055
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nutt, P. C., & Wilson, D. C. (Eds.). (2010). Handbook of decision making. John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• O’Boyle, I., & Shilbury, D. (2020). Sport systems, national organisations and the governance of sport codes. In D. Shilbury & L. Ferkins (Eds.), Routledge handbook of sport governance (pp. 94–106). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Okhuysen, G., & Bonardi, J. P. (2011). The challenges of building theory by combining lenses. Academy of Management Review, 36(1), 6–11. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.36.1.zok006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parent, M. M., Hoye, R., Taks, M., Thompson, A., Naraine, M. L., Lachance, E. L., & Séguin, B. (2023). National sport organization governance design archetypes for the twenty-first century. European Sport Management Quarterly, 23(4), 1115–1135. https://doi.org/10.1080/16184742.2021.1963801
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parent, M. M., & Lachance, E. L. (2022). Board conflicts of interest. Sport Information Resource Centre. https://sirc.ca/wp-content/uploads/2022/06/Board-conflicts-of-interest-EN-June-17-update.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Parent, M. M., Naraine, M. L., & Hoye, R. (2018). A new era for governance structures and processes in Canadian national sport organizations. Journal of Sport Management, 32(6), 555–566. https://doi.org/10.1123/jsm.2018-0037
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pennings, J. M. (1980). Interlocking directorates: Origins and consequences of connections among organizations’ board of directors. Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Ross, A., & Willson, V. C. (2017). Basic and advanced statistical tests: Writing results sections and creating tables and figures. Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Roudaki, J., & Bhuiyan, M. B. (2015). Interlocking directorship in New Zealand. Australasian Accounting, Business and Finance Journal, 9(3), 45–58. https://doi.org/10.14453/aabfj.v9i3.4
   Google Scholar
• Ruigrok, W., Peck, S. I., & Keller, H. (2006). Board characteristics and involvement in strategic decision making: Evidence from Swiss companies. Journal of Management Studies, 43(5), 1201–1226. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6486.2006.00634.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schoorman, F. D., Bazerman, M. H., & Atkin, R. S. (1981). Interlocking directorates: A strategy for reducing environmental uncertainty. Academy of Management Review, 6(2), 243–251. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1981.4287813
   Google Scholar
• Shilbury, D., & Kellett, P. (2006). Reviewing organisational structure and governance: The Australian touch association. Sport Management Review, 9(3), 271–317. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1441-3523(06)70029-8
   Google Scholar
• Simon, H. A. (1955). A behavioral model of rational choice. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 69(1), 99–118. https://doi.org/10.2307/1884852
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Soares, J., Correia, A., & Rosado, A. (2010). Political factors in the decision-making process in voluntary sports associations. European Sport Management Quarterly, 10(1), 5–29. https://doi.org/10.1080/16184740903554033
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spira, L. F. (2022). Board composition and decision-making: Who makes the decisions? In O. Marnet (Ed.), Research handbook on corporate board decision-making (pp. 20–40). Edward Elgar Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• U.K. Sport. (2016). A code for sports governance. https://web.archive.org/web/20171231124810/https://www.sportengland.org/about-us/governance/a-code-for-sportsgovernance/
   Google Scholar
• Useem, M. (1984). The inner circle. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Van de Ven, A. H., & Poole, M. S. (1995). Explaining development and change in organizations. Academy of Management Review, 20(3), 510–540. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1995.9508080329
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vidovich, L., & Currie, J. (2012). Governance networks: Interlocking directorships of corporate and nonprofit boards. Nonprofit Management & Leadership, 22(4), 507–523. https://doi.org/10.1002/nml.21042
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ward, A. J., & Feldman, D. C. (2008). Survival of the embedded: Expelling and embedding forces on members of the corporate elite. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 16(3), 239–251. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8683.2008.00683.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Willems, J., Van Puyvelde, S., Jegers, M., Vantilborgh, T., Bidee, J., & Pepermans, R. (2015). Exploring board interlocking behaviour between nonprofit organizations. Annals of Public and Cooperative Economics, 86(1), 73–88. https://doi.org/10.1111/apce.12067
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Withers, M. C., Hillman, A. J., & Cannella, A. A., Jr. (2012). A multidisciplinary review of the director selection literature. Journal of Management, 38(1), 243–277. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206311428671
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang, C., Chen, X., & Chen, X. (2021). Vertical interlock and stock price crash risk. Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, 68, 101387. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pacfin.2020.101387
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yin, R. K. (2018). Case study research: Design and applications (6th ed.). SAGE.
   Google Scholar
• Yoon, N. (2021). Understanding theoretical orientation and consequences of board interlock: Integration and future directions. Nonprofit Management & Leadership, 31(4), 717–736. https://doi.org/10.1002/nml.21451
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yoon, N. (2022). Nonprofit board governance policy adoption: Toward an integrated board interlock network and institutional perspectives. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 51(5), 1074–1094. https://doi.org/10.1177/08997640211057452
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zajac, E. J. (1988). Interlocking directorates as an interorganizational strategy: A test of critical assumptions. Academy of Management Journal, 31(2), 428–438. https://doi.org/10.5465/256558
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zeimers, G., Shilbury, D., & McLeod, J. (2022). A qualitative study examining how passion impacts sport board functioning. Leisure Sciences, 1–23. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1080/01490400.2022.2157913
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zeimers, G., Shilbury, D., & McLeod, J. (2023). Examining sport board leadership: How chairs manage passion. Managing Sport and Leisure, 1–17. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1080/23750472.2023.2192723
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zeitlin, M. (1974). Corporate ownership and control: The large corporation and the capitalist class. American Journal of Sociology, 79(5), 1073–1119. https://doi.org/10.1086/225672
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhu, H., Wang, P., & Bart, C. (2016). Board processes, board strategic involvement, and organizational performance in for-profit and non-profit organizations. Journal of Business Ethics, 136(2), 311–328. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-014-2512-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zona, F., Gomez-Mejia, L. R., & Withers, M. C. (2018). Board interlocks and firm performance: Toward a combined agency–resource dependence perspective. Journal of Management, 44(2), 589–618. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206315579512
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar