Mechanized tree planting with an excavator-mounted M-Planter planting device

References

• Arnkil R. 1997. Bräcke Planter- ja Ilves-istutuskoneiden tuottavuus ja työjälki metsänistutuksessa [Productivity and quality of work of Bräcke Planter and Ilves planting devices]. [M.Sc. Thesis]. University of Helsinki, Faculty of Agriculture and Forestry. 51 p. (In Finnish).
   Google Scholar
• Björheden R, Thompson MA. 2000. An international nomenclature for forest work study. In: Field, DB, editor. Proceedings of IUFRO 1995 S3.04 Subject Area: 20th World Congress; Tampere Finland. Orono (ME): University of Maine; p. 190–215.
   Google Scholar
• Edwards LJ, Muller KE, Wolfinger RD, Qaqish BF, Schabenberger O. 2008. An R2 statistic for fixed effects in the linear mixed model. Stat Med. 2008:6137–6157.
   Google Scholar
• Ersson BT. 2010. Possible concepts for mechanized tree planting in Southern Sweden – an introductory essay on forest technology. Arbetsrapport 269. Sveriges lantbruksuniversitet, Institutionen för skoglig resushushållning. 51 p.
   Google Scholar
• Hallonborg U, von Hofsten H, Mattson S, Hagberg J, Thorsén Å, Nyström C, Arvidsson H. 1995. Mechanized planting with Silva Nova tree planter – recent state and feasibility compared with manual planting. Skogforsk, Redogörelse 6. 24 p. (In Swedish).
   Google Scholar
• Hallongren H, Rantala J. 2012. Commercialization and international market potential of Finnish silvicultural machines. Silva Fenn. 46:583–593.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Härkönen M. 2008. M-Planter- ja Bräcke-istutuskoneiden työn laatu. Abtract: Work quality of M-Planter and Bräcke forest planting machines [M.(Sc.) thesis]. University of Joensuu, Faculty of Forest Sciences. 59 p. (In Finnish).
   Google Scholar
• Harstela P. 1991. Work studies in forestry. Silva Carelica. 18:39 p.
   Google Scholar
• Juntunen M-L, Herrala-Ylinen H. 2009. Silviculture. In: Aarne, M. Herrala-Ylinen, H. Ihalainen, A. Juntunen, M-L. Mustonen, M. Mäki-Simola, E. Peltola, A. Toropainen, M. Torvelainen, J. Uotila, E. and Ylitalo, E, editors. Finnish statistical yearbook of forestry. Finland: Finnish Forest Research Institute; p. 107–152 (In Finnish, English summary).
   Google Scholar
• Kaila S. 1984. G.A. Serlachius Oy:n istutuskone [The G.A. Serlachius planting machine. Test report to the machine]. Metsätehon katsaus 9:1–6 (In Finnish).
   Google Scholar
• Kankaanhuhta V, Saksa T, Smolander H. 2009. Variation in the results of Norway spruce planting and Scots pine direct seeding in privately-owned forests in southern Finland. Silva Fenn. 43:51–70.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kariniemi A. 2006. Kuljettajakeskeisen hakkuukonetyön malli – työn suorituksen kognitiivinen tarkastelu. Abstract: operator-specific model for mechanical harvesting – cognitive approach to work performance. Helsingin yliopiston metsävarojen käytön laitoksen julkaisuja 38. 126 p (In Finnish).
   Google Scholar
• Karppinen H, Hänninen H, Ripatti P. 2002. Suomalainen metsänomistaja 2000 [Finnish forest-owner 2000]. Finnish Forest Research Institute. Reserach Papers 852. 83 p. (In Finnish).
   Google Scholar
• Kuitto PJ, Keskinen S, Lindroos J, Oijala T, Rajamäki J, Räsänen T, Terävä J. 1994. Puutavaran koneellinen hakkuu ja metsäkuljetus. Summary: mechanized cutting and forest haulage. Metsäteho report 410. 38 p (In Finnish, English summary).
   Google Scholar
• Liepiņš K, Lazdiņa D, Lazdiņš A. 2011. Productivity and cost-effectiveness of the M-planter tree planting machine in Latvian conditions. Baltic Forest. 17:308–313.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Luoranen J, Rikala R, Smolander H. 2011. Machine planting of norway spruce by Bracke and Ecoplanter: an evaluation of soil preparation, planting method and seedling performance. Silva Fenn. 45:341–357.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mäkelä M. 1979. Tilasto- ja aikatutkimustuotosten vertailua ainespuun korjuussa [Output in harvesting of industrial wood based on statistical data or time studies]. Folia Forestalia 378. 22 p (In Finnish).
   Google Scholar
• Mattsson S. 1997. Ecoplanter, planteringsmaskin med fräs [Ecoplanter, tree-planting machine with rotary cultivation]. Skogsforsk resultat 4. 4 p (In Swedish).
   Google Scholar
• Mayo E. 1933. Human problems of an industrial civilization. New York: Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• McCulloch CE, Searle SR. 2001. Generalized, linear, and mixed models. Wiley series of in probability and statistics. Hoboken (NJ): John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Ovaskainen H, Uusitalo J, Väätäinen K. 2004. Characteristics and significance of a harvester operators’ working technique in thinnings. Int J Forest Eng. 15:67–77.
   Google Scholar
• Palmroth L. 2011. Performance monitoring and operator assistance systems in mobile machines. Tampere University of Technology. Publication 955.
   Google Scholar
• Purfürst and Lindroos. 2011. The correlation between long-term productivity and short-term performance ratings of harvester operators. Croat J Forest Eng. 32:509–519.
   Google Scholar
• Rantala J, Harstela P, Saarinen V-M, Tervo L. 2009. A techno-economic evaluation of Bracke and M-Planter tree planting devices. Silva Fenn. 43:659–667.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rantala J, Laine T. 2010. Productivity of the M-Planter tree-planting device in practice. Silva Fenn. 44:859–869.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rantala J, Laine T, Tervo L, Kautto K. 2011. Tehokas työskentely M-Planer-istutuskoneella [Efficient working with M-Planter planting machine]. Handout. Available from: http://www.metla.fi/metinfo/metsanhoitopalvelut/pdf/MPlanter_tyoohje_v101.pdf (accessed March 21, 2012)
   Google Scholar
• Rummukainen A, Tervo L, Kautto K. 2002. Ilves- ja Bräcke-istutuskoneet – tuottavuus, työnjälki ja kustannukset. Abtract: Ilves and Bräcke forest planting machines – productivity, quality of work and costs. Finnish Forest Research Institute, Research Papers 857. 75 p. (In Finnish).
   Google Scholar
• Ryynänen S, Rönkkö E. 2001. Harvennusharvestereiden tuottavuus ja kustannukset [Productivity and expenses associated with thinning harvesters]. Helsinki. Työtehoseuran julkaisuja 381. 67 p (In Finnish).
   Google Scholar
• Saarinen V-M. 2006. The effect of slash and stump removal on productivity and quality of forest regeneration operations – preliminary results. Biomass Bioenergy. 30:349–356.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sirén M. 1998. Hakkuukonetyö, sen korjuujälki ja puustovaurioiden ennustaminen [One-grip harvester operation, it’s silvicultural result and possibilities to predict tree damage]. [Doctoral thesis]. Finnish Forest Research Institute. Research papers 694. 179 p (In Finnish).
   Google Scholar
• Strandström M, Saarinen V-M, Hallongren H, Hämäläinen J, Poikela A, Rantala J. 2011. Koneellisen istutuksen ja taimikonhoidon kilpailukyky [Competitivenes of mechanized planting and pre-commercial thinning]. Metsäteho Report 218. 29 p (In Finnish).
   Google Scholar
• TAPIO forestry development centre. 2007. Hyvän metsänhoidon suositukset [Finnish forest management practice recommendations]. 100 p.
   Google Scholar
• Väätäinen K, Ovaskainen H, Ranta P, Ala-Fossi A. 2005. Hakkuukoneenkuljettajan hiljaisen tiedon merkitys hakkuutulokseen työpistetasolla [The effect of tacit knowledge on harvesting result at the working point level]. Finnish Forest Research Institute, Research Papers 937. 100 p (In Finnish).
   Google Scholar
• Vartiamäki T. 2003. Koneellinen metsänistutus vuonna 2003–kyselytutkimuksen tulokset [Mechanical planting in year 2003–results of a survey research]. Metsäteho Report 154. 14 p (In Finnish).
   Google Scholar
• Ylitalo E. 2012. Puun energiakäyttö 2011 [Use of wood for energy in 2011]. Metsätilastotiedote 16/2012. Vantaa: Finnish Forest Research Institute (In Finnish).
   Google Scholar
• Työvoiman saatavuus metsätaloudessa [Availability of labour in forestry] 2005]. 2005. Pöyry consulting Ltd. 83 p; [Cited 2012 Jan 9]. Available from: http://www.metsafoorumi.fi/dokumentit/tyovoima_raportti.pdf (In Finnish).
   Google Scholar