The state of the art in woody biomass comminution and sorting in Northern Europe

References

• Abdallah R, Auchet S, Méausoone PJ. 2011. Experimental study about the effects of disc chipper settings on the distribution of wood chip size. Biomass Bioenergy. 35:843–852.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ahonen M, Seppänen V, Nikala L. 1995. Application of the MASSAHAKE method for birch whole tree chips and for the production of raw material for mechanical pulp production (MASSAHAKE-Menetelmän soveltaminen koivulle sekä mekaanisen massan raaka-ainetuotantoon-104, in Finnish, English abstract), Bioenergia (Vuosikirja 1995. Puupoltoaineiden tuotantotekniikka), VTT Energy, Jyväskylä, Finland.
   Google Scholar
• Alakangas E. 2005. Properties of wood fuels used in Finland, Technical Research Centre of Finland, VTT Processes, Project report PRO2/P2040/05 (Project C5SU00800), Jyväskylä.
   Google Scholar
• Allen GF. 1962. Screen and pneumatic classification. Ind Eng Chem. 54:39–44.
   Google Scholar
• Altman J. 1982. Rader’s new whole tree chip debarking system, American Pulpwood Association, Washington DC, Technical Release 82-R–55.
   Google Scholar
• Aman AL, Baker SA, Green WD. 2011. Productivity and product quality measures for chippers and grinders on operational southern US timber harvest. Int J For Eng. 22:7–14.
   Google Scholar
• Anerud E. 2012. Stumps as a fuel – the influence of handling method on fuel quality, PhD thesis, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences.
   Google Scholar
• Arola RA, Winsauer SA, Radcliffe RC, Smith MR. 1983. Chunkwood production: a new concept. For Prod J. 33:43–51.
   Google Scholar
• Ashmore C, Sirois DL, Stokes BJ. 1986. Evaluation of roll designs for a roll crusher/splitter biomass harvester: test bench results, In: proceedings of the 1986 Southern For Biomass Workshop, pp, 113–119, Knoxville, TN, Norris, TN, Tennessee Valley Authority (June 16–19).
   Google Scholar
• Asikainen A, Pulkkinen P. 1998. Comminution of logging residues with Evolution 910 chipper, and Morbark1200 tub grinder, Journal of Forest Engineering 9(1):47–52.
   Google Scholar
• Athanassiadis D. 2010. Procurement costs of slash and stumps in Sweden – a comparison between south and north Sweden, World Bioenergy, Jönköping, Sweden, 25–27 May.
   Google Scholar
• Axrup L, Markides K, Nilsson T. 2000. Using miniature diode array NIR spectrometers for analysing wood chips and bark samples in motion. J Chemometr. 14:561–572.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baadsgaard-Jensen J. 1985. Micro-fractionation of whole-tree components, Danish Institute of For Technology, Copenhagen, Denmark, Report IEA-FEA-JAC14.
   Google Scholar
• Baadsgaard-Jensen J. 1988. Comminution and application of forest wood residues, Danish Institute of Forest Technology, Copenhagen, Denmark, SI 1–1988 (in Danish).
   Google Scholar
• Back EL. 1976. Sand and stone removal – considerations and equipment (Sand- och stenavskiljning. Synpunkter och utrustning – 1976, in Swedish), Project Whole-Tree Utilization, report no 17, Stockholm, Sweden (October).
   Google Scholar
• Ballesteros I, Oliva JM, Navarro AA, González J, Ballesteros M. 2000. Effect of chip size on steam explosion pretreatment of softwood. Appl Biochem Biotech. 84–86:97–110.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barcik S, Pivolusková E, Kminiak R. 2008. Effect of technological parameters and wood properties on cutting power in plane milling of juvenile poplar wood. Drvna Ind. 59:107–112.
   Google Scholar
• Bardet S, Beauchêne J, Thibaut B. 2003. Influence of basic density and temperature on mechanical properties perpendicular to grain of ten wood tropical species. Ann For Sci. 60:49–59.
   Google Scholar
• Barnes ET. 1979. Chip screening, in Chip Quality Monograph, Technical Association of the Pulp and Paper Industry (TAPPI), Hatton, J.V. ed.
   Google Scholar
• Bédard N, Laganière B. 2009. Debarking enhancement of frozen logs. Part II: infrared system for heating logs prior to debarking. For Prod J. 59:25–30.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berg J-E, Gradin PA. 2000. Effect of temperature on fracture of spruce in compression, investigated by use of acoustic emission monitoring. J Pulp Paper Sci. 28:294–299.
   Google Scholar
• Bergström D, Nordfjell T, Bergsten U. 2010. Compression processing and load compression of young Scots pine and birch trees in thinnings for bioenergy. Int J For Eng. 21:31–39.
   Google Scholar
• Bohm Larsson M. 2004. Fractions and nutrient removal when bundling green logging residues with Wood Pac (Fraktionsfördelning och näringsuttag vid Wood Pac buntning av färsk GROT, in Swedish, English abstract). Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Master’s thesis 2004–16, Department of forest ecology and management.
   Google Scholar
• Bredberg CJ, Liedholm H, Moberg L. 1975. Delimbing of small-wood bundles, Swedish Royal College of Forestry, Garpenberg, Sweden, Report 52.
   Google Scholar
• Brumm DG, Radcliffe RC, Sturos JA. 1983. Determining light transmittance characteristics of wood and bark chips, North Central Forest Experiment Station, St. Paul, Minnesota, Forest Service U.S.Department of Agriculture, Research Note NC–295.
   Google Scholar
• Choudens Cde, Lombardo G, Michalowicz G, Robert A. 1985. Destructuration of wood chips in a cylinder press – optical microscope study of structure modifications. Paperi ja Puu Papper och Trä. 3:108–116.
   Google Scholar
• Chow S, Obermajer A. 2004. Wood-to-bark adhesion of subalpine fir (Abies Lasiocarpa) in extreme temperatures. Wood Sci Tech. 38:391–403.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dahl K, Malo KA. 2009. Nonlinear shear properties of spruce softwood: experimental results, Wood Sci Tech. 43:539–558.
   Google Scholar
• Dahlin B. 1989. Cradle type multi-stem delimber, PhD thesis, Swedish University of Agricultural Science, Faculty of Forestry, Garpenberg, Department of Operational Efficiency, Research Notes No 162/1989.
   Google Scholar
• Danielsson BO. 1977. Compressing small trees and tree components, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Faculty of Forestry, Garpenberg, Sweden Department of Operational Efficiency, Research Notes No 119, (in Swedish, English abstract)
   Google Scholar
• Danielsson BO. 1988. Evaluation of chunkwood as woodfuel and the Swedish experimental machine. In: proceedings of IEA/BE Conference Task II/Activity 6 and 7, Production, storage and utilization of wood fuels, Volume I. “Production and utilization” 1988 Dec. 6–7; Uppsala, Sweden.
   Google Scholar
• Dillner B. 1976. Sorting of whole-tree chips and logging residue chips (Sortering av helträdsflis och hyggesavfallsflis, in Swedish), Progress report 1. Project Whole-Tree Utilization, report no 16, Stockholm, Sweden (October).
   Google Scholar
• Dix B, Marutzky R. 1983. Chemicals from spruce and pine bar – extraction, composition and properties, In, Strub A, Chartier P, Schleser G. Energy from biomass, 2nd E.C. Conference, 1982 Sept 20–22; Berlin, Federal Republic of Germany.
   Google Scholar
• Dumail JF, Olofsson K, Salmén L. 2000. An analysis of rolling shear of spruce wood by the Iosipescu method. Holzforschung. 54:420–426.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Erickson JR. 1972a. The status of methods for debarking wood chips. Tappi. 55:1216–1220.
   Google Scholar
• Erickson JR. 1972b. The moisture content and specific gravity of the bark and wood of northern pulpwood species. North Central Forest Experiment Station, USDA Forest Service, St Paul, Minnesota. Research Note No. NC–141.
   Google Scholar
• Eriksson D, Weiland F, Hedman H, Stenberg M, Öhrman O, Lestander TA, Bergsten U, Öhman M. 2012. Characterization of Scots pine stump-root biomass as feed-stck for gasification. Bioresour Technol. 104:729–736.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eriksson U, Moberg L. 1991. A simple method for separating fines from fuel chips, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Faculty of Forestry, Department of Operational Efficiency, Research Notes, No 224.
   Google Scholar
• Fagerlund B, Stade Y. 1978. Study tour in the U.S.A. March 1976. Project Whole-Tree Utilization, report no 28, Stockholm, Sweden.
   Google Scholar
• Filipsson J, Andersson G. 2001. Technology for dispersion of needles and slash (Teknik för barr- och risspridning, in Swedish). Working report 474, Skogforsk, Uppsala, Sweden.
   Google Scholar
• Firus S, Belter A. 1998. A power-saving device for chipping slash, brushwood or recycled wood (Energiesparende Zerkleinerung von Reisig, Rest- und Recyclingholz, in German). Wiesenschaftlich Zeitschrift dr Technischen Universität Dresden. 48:96–101.
   Google Scholar
• Forsberg M. 2009. Railway transport and terminal transhipment of short rotation willow crops, pre-study [Tägtransport och terminalhantering av Salix, förstudie in Swedish]. JTI-report 384, Uppsala, Sweden.
   Google Scholar
• Franz NC. 1958. Analysis of the wood-cutting process, Ph.D. Thesis. University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, US.
   Google Scholar
• Frazier WC, Williams GJ. 1992. Reduction of specific energy by axial precompression of wood. Pulp Pap Can. 83:T162–T168.
   Google Scholar
• Gardner RB, Schaffer EL, Erickson JR. 1978. Converting forest residue to structural flakeboard – the fingerling concept. Res. Pap. INT-200. Forest Service, Intermountain Forest and Range Experiment Station, Ogden, Utah. U.S. Dept. of Agriculture.
   Google Scholar
• Gasslander JE, Mattsson JE, Sundberg U. 1979. A pilotstudy on the energy requirements in forest logging, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Department of Operational Efficiency, Report No 127.
   Google Scholar
• Goetz AFH, Curiss B, Shiley DA. 2009. Rapid gangue mineral concentration measurement over conveyors by NIR reflectance spectroscopy. Miner Eng. 22:490–499.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hakkila P, Kalaja H, Nousiainen I. 2000, Use and prices of forest chips in Finland in 1999, export and import possibilities and fuel prices, Altener, AFB-net V Task, VTT Energy (November).
   Google Scholar
• Hartler N. 1986. Chipper design and operation for optimum chip quality. Tappi J. 69:62–66.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hartmann H, Böhm T, Daugbjerg-Jansen P, Temmerman M, Rabier F, Golser M. 2006. Methods for size classification of wood chips. Biomass Bioenergy. 30:944–953.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hartsough B, Spinelli R, Pottle S, Klepac J. 2000. Fiber recovery with chain flail delimbing/debarking and chipping of hybrid poplar. J For Eng. 11:59–68.
   Google Scholar
• Hartsough B, Spinelli R, Pottle SJ. 2002. Delimbing hybrid poplar prior to processing with a flail/chipper. For Prod J. 52:85–93.
   Google Scholar
• Heikka T, Piirainen K. 1981. Power consumption of small chippers (Pienhakkureiden voimankäyttö, in Finnish), Folia Forestalia 496
   Google Scholar
• Hedman G, Westerberg I, Lindquist H. 1991. Techniques for separation of green parts and nutrients in green parts (Teknik för gröndelsavskiljning samt näringsinnehåll i gröndelarna in Swedish, English summary), Vattenfall, Report U(B) 1991/69.
   Google Scholar
• Helgesson T. 1977. Flail delimbing – a bundle delimbing method for wood removed in thinning and cleaning, STFI-meddelande serie A, no 472.
   Google Scholar
• Hellström LM, Engstrand P, Gregerssen Ø. 2010. The influence of the wood chipping process on the energy efficiency during mechanical pulping, Manuscript, in. Hellström, L. On the wood chipping process – a study on basic mechanisms in order to optimize chip properties for pulping, Mid Sweden University, Doctoral Thesis 83.
   Google Scholar
• Higman C, Der Burgt MV. 2008. Gasification, Elsevier Science, Second ed. Burlington, MA.
   Google Scholar
• Hellström LM, Gradin PA, Carlberg T. 2008. A method for experimental investigation of the wood chipping process. Nordic Pulp Pap Res J. 23:339–342.
   Google Scholar
• Holzapple MT, Humphrey AE, Taylor JD. 1989. Energy requirements for the size reduction of poplar and aspen wood. Biotech BioEng. 33:207–210.
   Google Scholar
• Jylhä P, Keskinen N. 2006. Properties of bundled tree sections of young Scots pine in debarkning, chipping and pulping. For Prod J. 56:39–45.
   Google Scholar
• Kärhä K, Jylhä P, Laitila J. 2011. Integrated procurement of pulpwood and energy wood from early thinnings using whole-tree bundling. Biomass Bioenergy. 35:3389–3396.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kassberg M. 1994. Wood, chips and bark (Ved, flis och bark, in Swedish). Skogsindustrins utbildning, Markaryd, Sweden.
   Google Scholar
• King MJ, Vincent JFV. 1998. Fracture energy during cleaving of Pinus radiata. Holz Roh Werkstoff. 56:259–265.
   Google Scholar
• Kirkels AF, Verbong GPJ. 2011. Biomass gasification: still promising? A 30-year global overview. Renew Sustain Energy Rev. 15:471–481.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kivimaa E. 1950. Cutting force in wood-working, The State Institute for Technical Research, Publication 18, Helsinki, Finland.
   Google Scholar
• Kivimaa E, Murto JO. 1949. Investigations on factors affecting chipping of pulp wood, The State Institute for Technical Research, VTT, Helsinki, Finland.
   Google Scholar
• Klyosov AA. 2007. Wood-plastics composites. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Kristensen EF, Kofman PD, Daugbjerg Jensen P. 2003. Counter pressure on ventilation of different types of wood chip and chunkwood. Biomass Bioenergy. 25:399–408.
   Google Scholar
• Laitila J, Ranta T, Asikainen A. 2008. Productivity of stump harvesting fuel, International Journal of Forest Engineering 19(2):37–47.
   Google Scholar
• Larsson M, Lidberg B, Nordén B. 1983. Bunch delimbing of tree parts in the processing system of KMW-Mekan – a study on raw material utilization and product quality in processing of tree parts at the Dombäck terminal of MoDo (Buntkvistning av träddelar i KMW-Mekans upparbetningssystem – en studie av råvaruutnyttjande och produktkvalitet vid bearbetning av träddelar i MoDo:s Dombäcksterminal, in Swedish), Forskningsstiftelsen Skogsarbeten
   Google Scholar
• Law K-N, Lanouette R. 2000. Effect of mechanical conditioning of chips on the quality of softwood TMP, Static compression shows major benefits. Pulp Pap Can. 101:T189–T193.
   Google Scholar
• Leijon B. 1991. Whole-tree utilization and forest productivity (Helträdsutnyttjande och skogsproduktionen, in Swedish), Swedish Energy Agency, project 146 314–1, report July 1, 1987-June 30, 1991.
   Google Scholar
• Lestander TA, Samuelsson R. 2010. Production of resin and fatty acid content of biorefinery feedstock by on-line near-infrared (NIR) spectroscopy. Energy Fuels. 24:5148–5152.
   Google Scholar
• Liss J-E. 1987. Power requirement and energy consumption in fuel-chip production using a tractor-mounted chipper (Effektbehov och energiförbrukning vid produktion av bränsleflis med lantbrukstraktormonterade huggar), Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Department of Operational Efficiency report no 173.
   Google Scholar
• Liss J-E. 2003. Cost comparison between a bundle system and traditional chipping system for forest fuel havesting (Kostnadsjämförelse mellan buntsystem och traditionella flissystem vid uttag av skogsbärnsle, in Swedish), University of Dalarna, Department of Mathematics, Science and Technology, Working report nr 4.
   Google Scholar
• Logan KC, Sepall OJK, Chollet JL, Little TB. 1960. Pulpwood subdivision without compression damage. Pulp Pap Mag Can. 61:T515–523.
   Google Scholar
• Lundqvist KE, Back EL. 1977. Sand removal at chip screening in laboratory scale (Sandavskiljning vid flissållning i laboratorieskala, in Swedish), Project Whole-Tree Utilization, report no 37, Stockholm, Sweden.
   Google Scholar
• Magnuson H. 1977. Foreign elements in pulping and chemical manufacturing [Främmande grundämnen i massaframställning och kemikalieberedning, in Swedish], Project Whole-Tree Utilization, report no. 40, Stockholm, Sweden.
   Google Scholar
• Marchal R, Mothe F, Denaud L-E, Thibaut B, Bleron, L. 2009. Cutting forces in wood machining - Basics and applications in industrial processes. A review. Holzforschung. 63:157–167.
   Google Scholar
• Martin TA, McCallion H. 1996. Knife-slicing across the grain. Wood Sci Tech. 30:397–410.
   Google Scholar
• Mattson JA. 1975. Debarking chips from whole-trees in the lake states. North Central Forest Experiment Station, USDA Forest Service, St Paul, Minnesota. Research Note No. NC–115.
   Google Scholar
• Mattsson JE, Liss JE. 2010. Chunkwood indsted of conventional firewood? Final report from project Smallwood for small scale heating (in Swedish). Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Faculty of Landscape Planning, Horticulture and Agricultural Sciences, report 2010:43, Alnarp, Sweden.
   Google Scholar
• McCauley WN. 1991. Selecting the right opening for fines screening for gyratory chip screeners, TAPPI J 95–98 (July).
   Google Scholar
• McKenzie WM. 1961. Fundamental analysis of the wood-cutting process, PhD thesis, University of Michigan, Department of Wood Technology.
   Google Scholar
• Miao Z, Grift TE, Hansen AC, Ting KC. 2011. Energy requirement for comminution of biomass in relation to particle physical properties. Ind Crops Prod. 33:504–513.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moberg L. 1991. Methods for reduction of fines in fuel chips – a literature review, Swedish University of Agricultural Science, Department of Operational Efficiency, Garpenberg, Sweden, research note 202/1991.
   Google Scholar
• Monovari S, Galbe M, Zacchi G. 2009. Impact of impregnation time and chip size on sugar yield in pretreatment of softwood for ethanol production. Bioresource Tech. 100:6312–6316.
   Google Scholar
• Naimi LJ, Sokhansanj S, Mani S, Hoque M, Bi T. 2006. Cost and performance of woody biomass size reduction for energy production, Proceedings, Canadian Society for Bioengineering CSBE/SCGAB national technical conference, Paper No. 06–107. Edmonton, Alberta, Canada, July 16–19.
   Google Scholar
• Nati C, Spinelli R. 2010. How blade wear of chippers can affect fuel consuption and wood size distribution, Formec 2010, July, 11–14, Padua, Italy.
   Google Scholar
• Nati C, Spinelli R, Fabbri P. 2010. Wood chip size distribution in relation to blade wear and screen use. Biomass Bioenergy. 34:583–587.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nilsson PO. 1983. Energy from the forest results from the project 3065 09 Forestry Energy Project (Energi från skogen, resultat från projekt 3065 09 Skogsenergi, in Swedish, English abstract), Nämnden för Energiproduktionsforskning, project results NE1983:9.
   Google Scholar
• Nomura S, Tanaka T. 2011. Analysis of energy-size reduction relationships in batch tumbling ball mills. Powder Tech. 208:610–616.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nordfjell T, Liss J-E. 2000. Compressing and drying of bunched trees from a commercial thinning. Scand J For Res. 15:284–290.
   Google Scholar
• Novak W. 1986. The composition of full-tree logging residue and testing of the prototype logging residue processor (LRP), Foret Engineering Research Institute of Canada, Special report 1986:38.
   Google Scholar
• Nurmi J. 1986. Chunking and chipping with conescrew chipper. Folia For. 659:23 p.
   Google Scholar
• Nurmi J. 1987. Drying of fuel chips and chunks in wooden bins (Polttohakkeen kuivatus traktorikonteissa, in Finnish, English abstract). Folia For. 687:40 p.
   Google Scholar
• Nurmi J. 1988 Sasmo HP-30 – a commercially available medium size chunkwood chipper, in Proceedings of IEA/BE Conference, Task III/Activity 6 and 7. Production, storage and utilization of wood fuels, Volume I “Production and Utilization” Uppsala, Sweden, December 6–7.
   Google Scholar
• Papworth RL, Erickson JR. 1966. Power requirements for producing wood chips. For Prod J. 16:31–36.
   Google Scholar
• Peng F, Granfeldt T. 1996. Changes in the microstructure of spruce wood chips after screw press treatment. J Pulp Pap Sci. 22:J140–J142.
   Google Scholar
• Persson T, Stade Y. 1976. Sorting of whole-tree chips, part 2 (Sortering av helträdsflis, in Swedish), PHU 26.
   Google Scholar
• Pettersson M, Nordfjell T. 2007. Fuel quality changes during seasonal storage of compacted logging residues and young trees. Biomass Bioenergy. 31:782–792.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pottie M, Guimier D. 1985. Preparation of forest biomass for optimal conversion, FERIC Special Report No SR-32/IEA Cooperative Project No CPC3 (October).
   Google Scholar
• Radcliffe RC. 1990. Reducing particle dimensions of chunkwood, U.S. Dept. of Agriculture, Forest Service, Nort Central Experimental Station, Research Paper NC–296.
   Google Scholar
• Robertson MEA, Feather CE. 2004. Determination of gold, platinum and uranium in South African ores by high-energy XRF spectrometry. X-Ray Spectrom. 33:164–173.
   Google Scholar
• Röser DB, Mola-Yudego B, Prinz R, Emer B, Sikanen L. 2012. Chipping operations and efficiency in different operational environments. Silva Fenn. 46:275–286.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sabourin MJ. 2000. Evaluation of a compressive pretreatment process on TMP properties and energy requirements. Pulp Pap Can. 101:T54–T60.
   Google Scholar
• Sandberg K, Sterley M. 2009. Separating Norway spruce heartwood and sapwood in dried condition with near-infrared spectroscopy and multivariate data analysis. Eur J For Res. 128:475–481.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sathre R, Gustavsson L. 2009. Process-based analysis of added value in forest product industries. For Policy Econ. 11:65–75.
   Google Scholar
• Savoie P, Gagnon-Bouchard M. 2011. High-speed processing of woody stems with a flail hammer shredder. Appl Eng Agric. 27:5–12.
   Google Scholar
• Scherman S, Nordén B. 1983. Delimbing of tree sections using a bunch delimber from AC Invest/Hydrovåg (Kvistning av träddelar med AC Invests/Hydrovågs buntkvistare, in Swedish). Forskningsstiftelsen, Skogsarbeten, Result no 27.
   Google Scholar
• Scholz V, Idler C, Daries W, Egert J. 2005. Development of mould and losses during storage of wood chips (Schimmelpilzentwicklung und Verluste bei der Lagerung von Holzhackschnitzeln, in German, English abstract). Holz Roh Werkstoff. 63:449–455.
   Google Scholar
• Schubert G, Bernotat S. 2004. Comminution of non-brittle materials. Int J Miner Proc. 74S:S19–S30.
   Google Scholar
• Séguin A. 1979. L‘ébranchage: Le Débrouillard. Pulp Pap Can. 80:80–81.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Senelwa K, Sims REH. 1999. Fuel characteristics of short rotation forest biomass. Biomass Bioenergy. 17:127–140.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sirois DL, Ashmore CA. 1986. Design considerations for a roll crusher/splitter for woody biomass, in: PROCEEDINGS of the Fourth Southern Biomass Energy Research Conference, University of Georgia, Athens, GA.
   Google Scholar
• Sirois DL, Rawlings CL, Stokes BJ. 1991. Evaluation of moisture reduction in small diameter trees after crushing. Bioresource Tech. 37:53–60.
   Google Scholar
• Spinelli R, Visser RJM. 2009. Analyzing and estimating delays in wood chipping operations. Biomass Bioenergy. 33:429–433.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spinelli R, Magagnotti N. 2010. A tool for productivity and cost forecasting of decentralised wood chipping. For Policy Econ. 12:194–198.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spinelli R, Nati C, Sozzi L, Magagnotti N, Picchi G. 2011a. Physical characterization of commercial woodchips on the Italian energy market. Fuel. 90:2198–2202.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spinelli R, Ivorra L, Magagnotti N, Picchi G. 2011b. Performance of a mobile mechanical screen to improve the commercial quality of wood chips for energy. Bioresource Tech. 102:7366–7370.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spinelli R, Cavallo E, Facello A. 2012a. A new comminution device for high-quality chip production. Fuel Proc Tech. 99:69–74.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spinelli R, Cavallo E, Facello A, Magagnotti N, Nati C, Paletto G. 2012b. Performance and energy efficiency of alternative comminution principles: chipping vs. grinding. Scand J For Res. 27:393–400.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stade Y. 1975. Whole-tree utilization for pulping – a state-of-the-art review at the start of the project (Helträdsutnyttjande vid massa tillverkning), Project Whole-Tree Utilization, report no 4, Stockholm, Sweden (October).
   Google Scholar
• Stridsberg S. 1985. Development of existing and new technology for fractionation and cleaning of woody fuels (Utveckling av befintlig och ny teknik för fraktionering och rensning av skogsbränslen), Swedish Energy Agency SB-86/27 (in Swedish).
   Google Scholar
• Sturos JA. 1972. Determining the terminal velocity of wood ad bark chips, North Centraol Forest Experiment Station, Forest Service, U.S. Dept. of Agriculure, Research Note NC–131.
   Google Scholar
• Sturos JA. 1973a. Rotary screening to remove bark and foliage in the field, the Northern Logger and Timber Processor, 21: 16, 17, 38.
   Google Scholar
• Sturos JA. 1973b. Predicting segregation of wood and bark chips by differences in terminal velocities, North Central Forest Experiment Station, Forest Service, U.S. Dept. of Agriculture.
   Google Scholar
• Sturos JB. 1984. Characterization and air drying of chunkwood and chips, North Central Forest Experiment Station, Forest Service, Research Note NC-308. U.S. Dept. of Agriculture.
   Google Scholar
• Sturos JB. 1989. Teardrop chunker performance, North Central Forest Experiment Station, Forest Service, Research Note NC-285. U.S. Dept. of Agriculture.
   Google Scholar
• Sturos JA, Brumm DB. 1978. Segregating wood and bark chips by photosorting. North Central Forest Experiment Station, USDA Forest Service, St. Paul, Minnesota, Research Note No. NC–164.
   Google Scholar
• Suadicani K, Gamborg C. 1999. Fuel quality of whole-tree chips from freshly felled and summer dried Norway spruce on a poor sandy soil and a rich loamy soil. Biomass Bioenergy. 17:199–208.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Swartström J, Adolfsson K. 1990. Delivery systems for chunkwood (Leveranssystem för knubbved), Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Department of Forest Technology, Garpenberg, Sweden, Internal report nr 34.
   Google Scholar
• Thek G, Obernberger I. 2008. Wood pellet production costs under Austrian and in comparison to Swedish framework conditions. Biomass Bioenergy. 27:671–693.
   Google Scholar
• Thompson MA, Sturos JA. 1991. Performance of a portable chain flail delimber/debarker processing northern hardwoods, U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, North Central Forest Experiment Station, Research Paper NC–297.
   Google Scholar
• Thor M, Anderson G, Filipsson J, Nordén B. 2002. Technique and dispersal of needles in conjunction with extraction of tops and branches from final fellings (Teknik- och metodutveckling av barr- och risspridning, in Swedish, English abstract), Swedish Energy Agency, Final report, project P12440-1, Stockholm, Sweden.
   Google Scholar
• Twaddle A. 1997. The influence of species, chip length,and ring orientation on chip thickness. Tappi J. 80:123–131.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Uhmeier A. 1995. Some fundamental aspects of wood chipping. Tappi J. 78:79–86.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vidal BC, Dien BS, Ting KC, Singh V. 2011. Influence of feedstock particle size on lignocellulose conversion – a review. Appl Biochem BioTech. 164:1405–1421.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vikinge B. 2000. The Massahake method – integrated supply of raw material for industry and fuel from first thinning (Massahakemetoden – integrerad tillförsel av industri- och bränsleråvara från första gallring, in Swedish). in Trädbränsleuttag i gallring, PhD dissertion, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences (Silvestria 124), Umeå, Sweden.
   Google Scholar
• Watson WF, Twaddle AA, Hudson JB. 1993. Review of chain flail delimbing-debarking. J For Eng. 4:37–52.
   Google Scholar
• Wennerstrum S, Kendrick T, Tomaka J, Cain J. 2002. Size reduction solutions for hard-to-reduce materials. Powder Bulk Eng. 16:43–49.
   Google Scholar
• Werkelin J. 2008. Ash-forming elements and their chemical forms in woody biomass fuels. Academic Dissertation, Laboratory of Inorganic Chemistry, Åbo Akademi, Process Chemistry Centre, Åbo, Finland.
   Google Scholar
• Whole-Tree Utilization in the Board Industry. 1977. Final report from Project Group Board, Stockholm, Sweden.
   Google Scholar
• Wikström F. 2007. The potential of energy utilization from logging residues with regard to the availability of ashes. Biomass Bioenergy. 31:40–45.
   Google Scholar
• Wingren A, Galbe M, Zachi G. 2008. Energy considerations for an SSF-based softwood ethanol plant. Bioresour Tech. 99:2121–2131.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Woldt D, Schubert G, Jäckel H-G. 2004. Size reduction by means of low-speed rotary shears. Int J Miner Proc. 74S:S405–415.
   Google Scholar
• Woodson GE, Koch P. 1970. Tool forces and chip formation in orthogonal cutting of loblolly pine, U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Southern Forest Experiment Station, Forest Service Research Paper SO–52.
   Google Scholar
• Wooten JR, Filip To SD, Igathinathane C, Pordesimo LO. 2011. Discrimination of bark from wood chips through texture analysis by image processing. Comput Electron Agric. 79:13–19.
   Google Scholar
• Yoshioka T, Aruga K, Nitami T, Sakai H, Kobayashi H. 2006. A case study on the cost and fuel consumption of harvesting, transporting and chipping chains for logging residues in Japan. Biomass Bioenergy. 30:342–348.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xu Q, Qin M, Ni Y, Defo M, Dalpke B, Sherson G. 2011. Predictions of wood density and module of elasticity of balsam fir (Abies balsamea) and black spruce (Picea mariana) from near infrared spectral analyses. Can J For Res. 41:352–358.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Young HE, Hatton JV. 1976. Chipping of tops and branches: a comparison of a drum- and a disk – chipper. Res Life Sci. 23:1–11.
   Google Scholar