160
Views
5
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Predicting delay factors when chipping wood at forest roadside landings

ORCID Icon &
Pages 128-137 | Received 24 Nov 2017, Accepted 05 Apr 2018, Published online: 15 May 2018

References

  • Asikainen A. 1998. Chipping terminal logistics. Scand J For Res. 13:386–392. https://doi.org/10.1080/02827589809382998
  • Asikainen A. 2010. Simulation of stump crushing and truck transport of chips. Scand J For Res. 25:245–250.
  • Asikainen A, Liiri H, Peltola S, Karjalainen T, Laitila J. 2008. Forest energy potential in Europe (EU 27). Report series: Working Papers of the Finnish Forest Research Institute. Report number 69. ISBN 978-951-40-2080-3. Helsinki, Finland: Finnish Forest Research Institute. http://www.metla.fi/julkaisut/workingpapers/2008/mwp069.pdf
  • Asikainen A, Pulkkinen P. 1998. Comminution of logging residues with evolution 910R chipper, MOHA chipper truck, and Morbark 1200 tub grinder. Int J For Eng. 9:47–53.
  • Björheden R, Thompson MA 1995. An international nomenclature for forest work study. Proceedings of IUFRO 1995 S304 Subject Area: 20th World Congress; Tampere, Finland. [accessed August 6-12]. https://www.fs.usda.gov/treesearch/pubs/15500
  • Eliasson L. 2010. Chipper trucks increaingly common. In: Thorsén Å, Björheden R, Eliasson L, editors. Efficient forest fuel supply systems. Uppsala: Skogforsk; p. 70–71.
  • Eliasson L, Eriksson A, Mohtashami S. 2017. Analysis of factors affecting productivity and costs for a high-performance chip supply system. Appl Energy. 185:497–505.
  • Eliasson L, Lundström H, Granlund P. 2014. Bruks 806 STC - En studie av prestation och bränsleförbrukning vid flisning av bokgrot [Bruks 806 STC - performance and fuel consumption when chipping logging residues of beech]. Uppsala (Sweden): Skogforsk. nr. 833.
  • Eliasson L, Von Hofsten H, Johannesson T, Spinelli R, Thierfelder T. 2015. Effects of sieve size on chipper productivity, fuel consumption and chip size distribution for open drum chippers. Croat J Eng. 36:11–17.
  • Eriksson A, Eliasson L, Jirjis R. 2014a. Simulation-based evaluation of supply chains for stump fuel. Int J For Eng. 25:23–36.
  • Eriksson A, Eliasson L, Jirjis R. 2014b. Simulation and modeling of wood chip container logistics at forest landings. Helsinki: Bioenergy from Forest 2014. 2017. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/265793092_SIMULATION_AND_MODELING_OF_WOOD_CHIP_CONTAINER_LOGISTICS_AT_FOREST_LANDINGS
  • Kons K, Bergström D, Eriksson U, Athanassiadis D, Nordfjell T. 2014. Characteristics of Swedish forest biomass terminals for energy. Int J For Eng. 25:238–246.
  • Kärhä K. 2011. Industrial supply chains and production machinery of forest chips in Finland. Biomass Bioenergy. 35:3404–3413.
  • Liss J-E, Johansson J. 2006. Utvärdering av et nytt ekipage för vidaretransport av bränsleflis. Garpenberg: Institutionen för matematik, naturvetenskap och teknik. Högskolan i Dalarna; p. 3.
  • Magagnotti N, Spinelli R, Acuna M, Bigot M, Guerra S, Hartsough B, Kanzian C, Kärhä K, Lindroos O, Magagnotti N, et al. 2012. Good practice guidelines for biomass production studies. Sesto Fiorentino (Italy): CNR IVALSA. http://www.forestenergy.org/pages/wg_2
  • Picchi G, Eliasson L. 2015. Chip truck utilization for a container handling chipper truck when chipping logging residues and the effect of two grapple types on chipping efficiency. Int J For Eng. 26:203–211.
  • Ranta T, Rinne S. 2006. The profitability of transporting uncomminuted raw materials in Finland. Biomass Bioenergy. 30:231–237. English.
  • Röser D. 2012. Operational efficiency of forest energy supply chains in different operational environments. Joensuu: University of Esatern Finland.
  • Röser D, Mola-Yudego B, Prinz R, Emer B, Sikanen L. . Chipping operations and efficiency in different operational environments. Silva Fennica. 46:275–286.
  • Samset I. 1990. Some observations on time and performance studies in forestry. Vol. 43.5. Ås: Norsk Institutt for Skogforskning.
  • Spinelli R, Hartsough B. 2001. A survey of Italian chipping operations. Biomass Bioenergy. 21:433–444.
  • Spinelli R, Magagnotti N. 2010. A tool for productivity and cost forecasting of decentralised wood chipping. For Policy Econ. 12:194–198.
  • Spinelli R, Visser R. 2008. Analyzing and estimating delays in harvester operations [Research article]. Int J For Eng. 19:36–41.
  • Spinelli R, Visser RJM. 2009. Analyzing and estimating delays in wood chipping operations. Biomass Bioenergy. 33:429–433.
  • Stokes BJ, Ashmore C, Rawlins CL, Sirois DL. 1989. Glossary of terms used in timber harvesting and forest engineering. New Orleans (LA): U.S. Dept of Agriculture, Forest Service, Sourthern Forest Experiment Station; p. SO–73.
  • Søvde NE. 2015. Algorithms for estimating the suitability of potential landing sites [Peer-reviewed Optimization Papers]. Math Computational For Nat Resource Sci. 7:1–8.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.