Streamside management zone effectiveness for water temperature control in Western Montana

References

• Adams TN, Sullivan K. 1989. The physics of forest stream heating: a simple model. Olympia (WA): Timber/Fish/Wildlife Report TFW-WQ3-90-007. Washington Dept Nat Res.
   Google Scholar
• Arismendi I, Groom JD. 2019. A novel approach for examining downstream thermal responses of streams to contemporary harvest. Sci of the Total Env. 651:736–748.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bahuguna D, Mitchell SJ, Miquelajauregui Y. 2010. Windthrow and recruitment of large woody debris in riparian stands. For Ecol Manag. 259:2048–2055.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beschta RL, Bilby RE, Brown GW, Holtby LB, Hofstra TD. 1987. Stream temperature and aquatic habitat: fisheries and forestry interactions. In: Salo EO, Cundy TW, editors. Streamside management: forestry and fishery interactions. Seattle (WA): Institute of Forest Resources, University of Washington; p. 191–232.
   Google Scholar
• Bladon KD, Cook NA, Light JT, Segura C. 2016. A catchment-scale assessment of stream temperature response to contemporary forest harvesting in the Oregon Coast Range. For Ecol Manag. 379:153–164.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bladon KD, Segura C, Cook NA, Bywater-Reyes S, Reiter M. 2018. A multicatchment analysis of headwater and downstream temperature effects from contemporary forest harvesting. Hydro Proc. 32:293–304.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown GW, Krygier JT. 1970. Effects of clear-cutting on stream temperature. Water Resourc Res. 6:1133–1139.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brungs WA, Jones BR. 1977. Temperature criteria for freshwater fish: protocol and procedures. Duluth (MN): US Environmental Protection Agency. EPA–600/3–77–061.
   Google Scholar
• Cole E, Newton M. 2013. Influence of streamside buffers on stream temperature response following clear-cut harvesting in western Oregon. Can J For Res. 43:993–1005.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crookston NL, Stage AR. 1999. Percent canopy cover and stand structure statistics from the forest vegetation simulator. Ogden (UT): USDA Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station. General Technical Report RMRS–GTR–24.
   Google Scholar
• Czarnomski N, Hale C, Frueh WT, Allen M, Groom J. 2013. Effectiveness of riparian buffers at protecting stream temperature and shade in Pacific Northwest Forests: a systematic review. Portland (OR): Environmental Science Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Davis LJ, Reiter M, Groom JD. 2016. Modelling temperature change downstream of forest harvest using Newton’s law of cooling. Hydrol Proc. 30:959–971.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dent L, Vick D, Abraham K, Schoenholtz S, Johnson S. 2008. Summer temperature patterns in headwater streams of the Oregon Coast Range. J Am Water Resourc Assoc. 44:803–813.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dunham J B, Rosenberger AE, Thurow RF, Dolloff CA, Howell PJ. 2009. Chapter 8: coldwater fish in wadeable streams. In: Bonar SA, Hubert WA, Willis DW, editors. Standard methods for sampling North American freshwater fishes. Bethesda (MD): American Fisheries Society; p. 119–138.
   Google Scholar
• Garner G, Malcolm IA, Sadler JP, Hannah DM. 2014. What causes cooling water temperature gradients in forested stream reaches? Hydrol Earth Syst Sci Discuss. 11:6441–6472.
   Google Scholar
• Gomi T, Moore RD, Dhakal AS. 2006. Headwater stream temperature response to clear-cut harvesting with different riparian treatments, coastal British Columbia, Canada. Water Resourc Res. 42:W08437.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gravelle J A, Link TE. 2007. Influence of timber harvesting on headwater peak stream temperatures in a northern Idaho watershed. For Sci. 53:189–205.
   Google Scholar
• Groom J D, Dent L, Madsen LJ, Fleuret J. 2011. Response of western Oregon (USA) stream temperatures to contemporary forest management. For Ecol Manag. 262:1618–1629.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hicks BJ, Hall JD, Bisson PA, Sedell JR. 1991. Responses of salmonids to habitat changes. In: Wr M, editor. Influences of forest and rangeland management on salmonid fishes and their habitats. Special Publication 19. Bethesda (MD): American Fisheries Society; p. 483–518.
   Google Scholar
• Ice GG, Stuart GW, Waide JB, Irland LC, Ellefson PV. 1997. Twenty-five years of the clean water act: how clean are forest practices? J For. 95:9–13.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jobling M. 1984. Fish bioenergetics. New York (NY): Chapman and Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Johnson MF, Wilby RL. 2013. Shield or not shield: effects of solar radiation on water temperature sensor accuracy. Water. 5:1623–1637.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson SL. 2004. Factors influencing stream temperatures in small streams: substrate effects and a shading experiment. Can J Fish Aquat Sci. 61:913–923.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lemmon PE. 1956. A spherical densiometer for estimating forest overstory density. For Sci. 2:314–320.
   Google Scholar
• Levno A, Rothacher J. 1967. Increases in maximum stream temperatures after logging in old-growth Douglas-fir watersheds. Portland (OR): USDA Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Forest and Range Experiment Station. Research Note PNW-65.
   Google Scholar
• Moeur M. 1985. COVER: a user’s guide to the CANOPY and SHRUBS extension of the stand prognosis model. Ogden (UT): USDA Forest Service, Intermountain Research Station. General Technical Report GTR–INT–190.
   Google Scholar
• Montana Natural Heritage Program. 2018. State species of concern. [ accessed 2018 Dec 21]. http://mtnhp.org/SpeciesOfConcern/?AorP=a
   Google Scholar
• Montgomery DR, Buffington JM. 1997. Channel reach morphology in mountain drainage basins. Geol Soc Am Bull. 109:596–611.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moore RD, Spittlehouse DL, Story A. 2005. Riparian microclimate and stream temperature response to forest harvesting: a review. J Am Water Res Assoc. 41:813–834.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nip AM-K. 1991. The Tri-Creeks experimental watershed: changes in hydrology and water quality following forest harvesting and their impact on salmonid fishes in the Tri-Creeks Basin. Edmonton (AB): Alberta Forestry, Lands and Wildlife. Research Branch Technical Report No. 4.
   Google Scholar
• Omernik JA. 1987. Ecoregions of the conterminous United States. Annals Assoc Am Geogr. 77:118–125.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Palmer WC 1965. Meteorological drought. US Dept Commerce. Weather Bureau Research Paper 45.
   Google Scholar
• Pinheiro J, Bates D, DebRoy S, Sarkar D; R Core Team. 2018. nlme: linear and nonlinear mixed effects models. R package version 3.1–137. [ accessed 2018 Dec 21]. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=nlme
   Google Scholar
• Platts WS, Armour C, Booth GD, Bryant M, Bufford JL, Culpin P, Jensen S, Lienkaemper GW, Minshall GW, Monsen SB, et al. 1987. Methods for evaluating riparian habitats with applications to management. Ogden (UT): USDA Forest Service, Intermountain Research Station. General Technical Report INT–221.
   Google Scholar
• Platts WS, Nelson RL. 1988. Fluctuations in trout populations and their implications for land-use evaluation. N Am J Fish Manag. 8:333–345.
   Google Scholar
• R Core Team. 2018. R: a language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna: R Foundation for Statistical Computing. [ accessed 2018 Dec 21]. https://www.R-project.org/.
   Google Scholar
• Rishel GB, Lynch JA, Corbett ES. 1982. Seasonal stream temperature changes following forest harvesting. J Environ Qual. 11:112–116.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosgen DL. 1994. A classification of natural rivers. Catena. 22:169–199.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rutherford JC, Marsh JC, Davies PM, Bunn SE. 2004. Effects of patchy shade on stream water temperature: how quickly do small streams heat and cool? Mar Freshw Res. 55:737–748.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scientific Advisory Group Eastside (SAGE). 2017. Stand structure, tree mortality and large wood recruitment in riparian buffers on fish-bearing streams in Eastern Washington: comparison of the standard rule and the all available shade prescription for bull trout habitat. CMER Review Draft. [ accessed 2017 Sept 14].
   Google Scholar
• Selong JH, McMahon TE, Zale AV, Barrows FT. 2001. Effect of temperature on growth and survival of bull trout, with application of an improved method for determining thermal tolerance in fishes. Trans Am Fish Soc. 130:1026–1037.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Storey RG, Cowley DR. 1997. Recovery of three New Zealand rural streams as they pass through native forest remnants. Hydrobiologia. 353:63–76.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Story A, Moore RD, Macdonald JS. 2003. Stream temperatures in two shaded reaches below cutblocks and logging roads: downstream cooling linked to subsurface hydrology. Can J For Res. 33:1383–1396.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sugden BD. 2018. Estimated sediment reduction with forestry best management practices implementation on a legacy forest road network in the northern Rocky Mountains. For Sci. 64:214–224.
   Google Scholar
• Sugden BD, Hillman TW, Caldwell JE, Ryel RJ 1998. Stream temperature considerations in the development of Plum Creek’s Native Fish Habitat Conservation Plan. Columbia Falls (MT): Plum Creek Timber Company. Native Fish Habitat Conservation Plan Technical Report No. 12.
   Google Scholar
• Tytler P, Calow P. editors. 1994. Fish energetics, new perspectives. Baltimore (MD): The Johns Hopkins University Press.
   Google Scholar
• US Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA). 2003. EPA Region 10 guidance for Pacific Northwest state and tribal temperature water quality standards. EPA–910–B–03–2002. Seattle (WA): Region 10 Office of Water.
   Google Scholar
• US Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS). 1998. Determination of threatened status for the Klamath River and Columbia River distinct population segments of bull trout. Fed Reg. 63(111):31647–31674. [ accessed 2018 Dec 21]. https://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/FR-1998-06-10/pdf/98-15319.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• US Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS), National Marine Fisheries Service, Plum Creek Timber Company, CH2M Hill. 2000. Final environmental impact statement and native fish habitat conservation plan. [ accessed 2018 Dec 21]. www.fws.gov/montanafieldoffice/Endangered_Species/Habitat_Conservation_Plans/Plum_Creek_HCP/Home_pcfeis.htm
   Google Scholar
• Van Deventer JS, Platts WS. 1989. Microcomputer software system for generating population statistics from electrofishing data – user’s guide for MicroFish 3.0. Ogden (UT): USDA Forest Service, Intermountain Research Station. Gen Tech Rep INT–254.
   Google Scholar
• Wickham H 2017. Tidyverse: easily install and load the ‘Tidyverse’. R package version 1.2.1. [ accessed 2018 Dec 21]. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=tidyverse
   Google Scholar
• Wilkerson E, Hagan JM, Siegel D, Whitman AA. 2006. The effectiveness of different buffer widths for protecting headwater stream temperature in Maine. For Sci. 52:221–231.
   Google Scholar
• Zeileis A, Grothendieck G. 2005. Zoo: S3 infrastructure for regular and irregular time series. J Statistical Softw. 14(6):1–27.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zwieniecki MA, Newton M. 1999. Influence of streamside cover and stream features on temperature trends in forested streams of western Oregon. West J Appl For. 14:106–113.
   Google Scholar