Volume and value recovery comparison of processor and conventional systems in pine stands of the U.S. South

References

• Barrett SM, Bolding MC, Munsell JF. 2017. Characteristics of logging businesses across Virginia’s diverse physiographic regions. Forests. 468:13.
   Google Scholar
• Blinn CR, O’Hara TJ, Chura DT, Russell MB. 2015. Minnesota’s logging businesses: an assessment of the health and viability of the sector. For Sci. 61:381–387.
   Google Scholar
• Blinn CR, Snyder SA, Russell MB, Peterson RR. 2019. Status of the Minnesota logging sector in 2016. St. Paul (MN): University of Minnesota Department of Forest Resources. Staff Paper Series No. 251.
   Google Scholar
• Boston K, Murphy G. 2003. Value recovery from two mechanized bucking operations in the southeastern United States. South J Appl For. 27:259–263.
   Google Scholar
• Bullock B 1998. Modeling green weight of loblolly pine (Pinus taeda L.) [master’s thesis]. Blacksburg (VA): Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University.
   Google Scholar
• Carino H, Arano K, Blanche C, Patawaran M. 2006. Impact of curve sawing on southern pine dimension lumber manufacturing: part 1. Lumber volume and value yields. For Prod J. 56(7/8):61–68.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cass RD, Baker SA, Greene WD. 2009. Cost and productivity impacts of product sorting on conventional ground-based timber harvesting operations. For Prod J. 59(11/12):108–114.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chhetri SG, Gordon JS, Munn IA, Henderson JE. 2018. Factors influencing the use of consulting foresters by non-industrial private forest landowners in Mississippi. Forest Chron. 94:254–259.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Conrad JL IV, Dahlen J. 2019. Productivity and cost of processors in whole-tree harvesting systems in southern pine stands. For Sci. doi:10.1093/forsci/fxz036
   Google Scholar
• Conrad JL IV, Demchik MC, Vokoun MM, Evans AM, Lynch MP. 2017a. Foresters’ perceptions of the frequency, cost, and rationale for seasonal timber harvesting restrictions in Wisconsin. For Sci. 63:331–341.
   Google Scholar
• Conrad JL IV, Greene WD, Hiesl P. 2018a. A review of changes in US logging businesses 1980s-present. J For. 116:291–303.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Conrad JL IV, Greene WD, Hiesl P. 2018b. The evolution of logging businesses in Georgia 1987-2017 and South Carolina 2012-2017. For Sci. 64:671–681.
   Google Scholar
• Conrad JL IV, Vokoun MM, Prisley SP, Bolding MC. 2017b. Barriers to logging production and efficiency in Wisconsin. Int J For Eng. 28:57–65.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Daniel MJ, Gallagher T, Mitchell D, McDonald T, Via B. 2019. Differences in total stem value when merchandizing with a tracked processor versus a knuckle-boom loader in Pinus taeda. For Res Eng Int J. 2:184–187.
   Google Scholar
• Eberhardt TL, Dahlen J, Schimleck L. 2017. Species comparison of the physical properties of loblolly and slash pine wood and bark. Can J For Res. 47:1495–1505.
   Google Scholar
• Eggers J, McEwan A, Conradie B. 2010. Pinus saw timber tree optimization in South Africa: a comparison of mechanized tree optimization (harvester/processor) versus current manual methods. Southern For. 72:23–30.
   Google Scholar
• Eliasson L, Manner J, Thor M. 2019. Costs for thinning and final felling operations in Sweden, 2000 to 2017. Scand J For Res. doi:10.1080/02827581.2019.1596303
   Google Scholar
• Flick WA. 1985. The wood dealer system in Mississippi: an essay on regional economics and culture. Journal of Forest History. 29:131–138.
   Google Scholar
• Gautam S, Pulkki R, Shahi C, Leitch M. 2013. Quality assessment of cut-to-length logging residues for bioenergy production in Northwestern Ontario. Int J For Eng. 24(1):53–59.
   Google Scholar
• Gellerstedt S, Dahlin B. 1999. Cut-to-length: the next decade. J For Eng. 10(2):17–25.
   Google Scholar
• Gingras JF. 1996. The cost of product sorting during harvesting. Quebec (CA): Forest Engineering Research Institute of Canada (FERIC) Technical Note TN-245.
   Google Scholar
• Gingras JF. 2004. Early studies of multi-tree handling in eastern Canada. Int J For Eng. 15(2):18–22.
   Google Scholar
• Gingras JF, Soucy M. 1999. Sorting of multiple products with a cut-to-length system. Quebec (CA): Forest Engineering Research Institute of Canada (FERIC) Technical Note TN-296.
   Google Scholar
• Hairn D. 2019. Timber trends: february 2019. Portland (OR): Campbell Global Forest & Natural Resource Investments.
   Google Scholar
• Hamsley AK 2008. Value recovery and product sorting in the southeastern United States: a comparison of conventional and modified tree-length systems [master’s thesis]. Athens (GA): University of Georgia.
   Google Scholar
• Hamsley AK, Greene WD, Baker SA. 2009. Comparison of value harvested by modified and conventional tree-length systems in the Southeastern United States. For Prod J. 59(4):29–34.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hodges DG, Hartsell AJ, Brandeis C, Brandeis TJ, Bentley JW. 2011. Recession effects on the forests and forest products industries of the South. For Prod J. 61:614–624.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hood H, Harris T, Siry S, Baldwin S, Smith J, Caulfield J. 2017. A summary of the US south stumpage and delivered timber prices, logging rates, biomass & chip prices, timberland transactions, & forest product market conditions in 2017. Athens (GA): TimberMart-South.
   Google Scholar
• JMP®. 2016. Version 13.2.0. Cary (NC):SAS Institute Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Kellogg LD, Bettinger P, Studier D. 1993. Terminology of ground-based mechanized logging in the Pacific Northwest. Corvallis (OR): College of Forestry, Forest Research Laboratory, Oregon State University.
   Google Scholar
• Klepacka AM, Siry JP, Bettinger P. 2017. Stumpage prices: a review of influential factors. Int For Rev. 19:158–169.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lang AH, Baker SA, Greene WD, Murphy GE. 2010. Individual stem value recovery of modified and conventional tree-length systems in the Southeastern United States. Int J For Eng. 21:7–11.
   Google Scholar
• Leon BH, Benjamin JG. 2012. A survey of business attributes, harvest capacity and equipment infrastructure of logging businesses in the Northern Forest. Orono (ME): The University of Maine School of Forest Resources.
   Google Scholar
• Mac Donagh P, Botta G, Schlichter T, Cubbage F. 2017. Harvesting contractor production and costs in forest plantations of Argentina, Brazil, and Uruguay. Int J For Eng. 28:157–168.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Malinen J, Laitila J, Vaatainen K, Viitamaki K. 2016. Variation in age, annual usage and resale price of cut-to-length machinery in different regions of Europe. Int J For Eng. 27:95–102.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McKenney D, Yemshanov D, Pedlar J, Allen D, Lawrence K, Hope E, Lu B, Eddy B. 2016. Canada’s timber supply: current status and future prospects under a changing climate. Sault Ste. Marie (Ontario): Canadian Forest Service Information Report GLC-X-15.
   Google Scholar
• R Core Team. 2018. R Version 3.5.1: A language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna (Austria):R Foundation for Statistical Computing.
   Google Scholar
• Reep ND, Blinn CR, Kilgore MA. 2017. Assessment of stumpage payment methods used by state and county timber sale programs in the United States. J For. 115:513–521.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rickenbach M, Vokoun M, Saunders S. 2015. Wisconsin logging sector: status and future direction. Madison (WI): University of Wisconsin Extension G4073.
   Google Scholar
• RISI. 2017. North American woodfiber and biomass markets May 2017. Bedford (MA):RISI, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• RStudio. 2018. RStudio: integrated development environment for R (Version 3.3.1). Boston (MA): R Studio, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Smith S, Baldwin S. 2012. The South’s softwood sawmill capacity 2011: losses & changes. 4th Quarter 2011. Athens (GA): Timber Mart-South Market News Quarterly.
   Google Scholar
• Spelter H. 2002. Sawmill closures, openings, and net capacity changes in the softwood lumber sector, 1996–2003. Madison (WI): USDA For. Serv. Res. Pap. FPL-RP-603.
   Google Scholar
• TimberMart-South. 2018. Stumpage price summary: 3rd Quarter 2018. Athens (GA):TimberMart-South.
   Google Scholar
• United States Census Bureau. 2018. Historical data, new residential construction. [accessed 2018 Sep 26]. https://www.census.gov/construction/nrc/historical‌_data/index.html.
   Google Scholar
• United States Department of Commerce (USDOC). 2017. Commerce finds dumping and subsidization of imports of softwood lumber from Canada. [accessed 2019 Apr 3]. https://www.trade.gov/enforcement/factsheets/factsheet-canada-softwood-lumber-ad-cvd-final-110217.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Wickham H, Francois R 2017. dplyr: A grammar of data manipulation. R package version 0.7.4. [accessed 2019 Apr 30]. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=dplyr.
   Google Scholar
• Zhang D, Warren S, Bailey C. 1998. The role of assistance foresters in nonindustrial private forest management: Alabama landowners’ perspectives. South J Appl For. 22:101–105.
   Google Scholar