Capacities characterization of wood harvest machine operators’ by cognitive and motor processes

References

• Ashton MC, Lee K. 2007. Empirical, theoretical, and practical advantages of the HEXACO model of personality structure. Pers Soc Psychol Rev. 11(2):150–166. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/1088868306294907.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barrett LF, Tugade MM, Engle RW. 2004. Individual differences in working memory capacity and dual-process theories of the mind. Psychol Bull. 130(4):553–573. doi:https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.130.4.553.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buckingham M, Clifton D. 2006. Descubra seus pontos fortes. Rio de Janeiro: Sextante; p. 270.
   Google Scholar
• Burgoyne J. 1993. The competence movement: issues, stakeholders and prospects. Pers Rev. 22(6):6–13. doi:https://doi.org/10.1108/EUM0000000000812.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carlson AG (2013). Fine motor skills and executive function: two non-academic predictors of academic achievement. Doctoral Dissertation, George Mason University, Fairfax: VA.
   Google Scholar
• Cavalli R, Amishev D. 2019. Steep terrain forest operations – challenges, technology development, current implementation, and future opportunities.Journal. Int J For Eng. 30(3):175–181. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/14942119.2019.1603030.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cheng C, Bouganis C Accelerating random forest training process using FPGA,” 2013 23rd International Conference on Field programmable Logic and Applications, Porto, 2013, pp. 1–7.
   Google Scholar
• Chiavenato I. 2010. Gestão de pessoas: o novo papel dos recursos humanos nas organização. 3. ed. Rio de Janeiro: Elsevier.
   Google Scholar
• Cluff T, and Scott SH. Rapid feedback responses correlate with reach adaptation and properties of novel upper limb loads. J Neurosci 33: 15903–15914, 2013.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Costa PT, McCrae RR. 1992. Revised NEO personality inventory (NEO-PI-R) and NEO five-factor inventory (NEOFFI) professional manual. Odessa (FL): Psychological Assessment Center.
   Google Scholar
• Christou A, Miall RC, McNab F, and Galea JM. Individual differences in explicit and implicit visuomotor learning and working memory capacity. Sci Rep. 2016;6:36633.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cyril J. Sadowski & Helen E. Cogburn (1997) Need for Cognition in the Big-Five Factor Structure, The Journal of Psychology, 131:3, 307–312, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00223989709603517
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Donnellan MB, Lucas RE. 2008. Age differences in the big five across the life span: evidence from two national samples. Psychol Aging. 23(3):558–566. doi:https://doi.org/10.1037/a0012897.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dreyer A. 1954. Aspiration behavior as influenced by expectation and group comparison. Hum Relat. 7(2):175–190. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/001872675400700205.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Durand G. 1997. As estruturas antropológicas do imaginário: introdução à arquetipologia geral. Tradução de Helder Godinho. São Paulo: Martins Fontes.
   Google Scholar
• Evans C. 1995. Choosing people: recruitment and selection as leverage on subjects and disciplines studies in higher education, Studies in Higher Education. 20(3): 253–265.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fraga AB, Silva FL, Hongyu K, Santos DDS, Murphy TW, and Lopes FB. 2015. Multivariate analysis to evaluate genetic groups and productiontraits of crossbred Holstein × Zebu cows. Engineering and Science, 5(1): 1–6.
   Google Scholar
• French R, Rumbles S. 2010. Research output: chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceeding › Chapter (peer-reviewed). Original language. English Title of host publication Leading, managing and developing people Editors Gary Rees, Ray French Place of Publication London Publisher CIPD Publications Pages169-190 Number of pages 22.
   Google Scholar
• Franklin S, Wolpert DM, and Franklin DW. Visuomotor feedback gains upregulate during the learning of novel dynamics. J Neurophysiol 108: 467–478, 2012
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gellerstedt S. 2002. Operation of the single-grip harvester: motor-sensory and cognitive work. Int J For Eng. 13(2):35–47. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/14942119.2002.10702461.
   Google Scholar
• Häggström C, and Lindroos O. 2016 Human, technology, organization and environment – a human factors perspective on performance in forest harvesting. International Journal of Forest Engineering.:27(2):67–78https://doi.org/10.1080/14942119.2016.1170495
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Helson R, Kwan VSY. 2000. Personality development in adulthood: the broad picture and processes in one longitudinal sample. In: Hampson S, editor. Advances in personality psychology (Vol. 1). London: Routledge; p. 77–106.
   Google Scholar
• Heuer A, Schubö A. 2016. The focus of attention in visual working memory: protection of focused representations and its individual variation. PLoS ONE. 11(4):e0154228. doi:https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0154228.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hongyu K. 2012. Distribuição empírica dos autovalores associados à matriz de interação dos modelos AMMI pelo método bootstrapnão-paramétrico Dissertação (Mestrado em Estatística e Experimentação Agronômica) – escola. Master's dissertation. 104.
   Google Scholar
• John OP, Srivastava S. 1999. The big five trait taxonomy: history, measurement, and theoretical perspectives. In: Pervin LA, John OP, editors. Handbook of personality: theory and Research. 2nd ed. New York: Guilford Press; p. 102–138.
   Google Scholar
• Kaiser HF. 1958. The varimax criterion for analytic rotation in factor analysis. Psychometrika. 23(3):187–200. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02289233.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kirk PM, Byers JS, Parker RJ, Sullman MJ. 2013. Mechanisation developments within the New Zealand forest industry: the human factors. J For Eng. 8(1):75–80. 1997.
   Google Scholar
• Lindroos O, Hera PL, Häggström C. 2017. Drivers of advances in mechanized timber harvesting – a selective review of technological innovation. Croat J For Eng. 38(2):243–258.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lopes ES, Pagnussat MB. 2017. Effect of the behavioral profile on operator performance in timber harvesting. Int J For Eng. 28(3):1–6.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lopes SE. 2007. Análise técnica e econômica de um sistema de colheita florestal. 2007, 124f. Tese (Doutorado em Engenharia Agrícola). Viçosa: - Universidade Federal de Viçosa.
   Google Scholar
• Moraes C, Ciasca SM, and Ribeiro MVM. 2006. Problemas escolares e sua associação com o transtorno de déficit de atenção e hiperatividade. In: Neuropsiquiatria: infância e adolescência. ABENEPI. Rev. psicopedag. 33. Rio de Janeiro: Wak, 100.
   Google Scholar
• Ola Picchio R, Proto AR, Civitarese V, Marzio N, Latterini F. 2019. Recent contributions of some fields of the electronics in development of forest operations technologies. Electronics. 8(12):1465. doi:https://doi.org/10.3390/electronics8121465.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parise D, Malinovski JR. 2002. Análise e reflexões sobre o desenvolvimento tecnológico da colheita florestal no Brasil. In: Seminário de Atualização Sobre Sistema de Colheita de Madeira e Transporte Florestal. Anais. Curitiba: UFPR - FUPEF; p. 78–109.
   Google Scholar
• Purfürst FT. 2010. Learning Curves of Harvester operators. Croat J For Eng. 31(2):89–97.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ranta P, Laamanen V, Pohjolainen S, Väätäinen K. 2004. Making a harvester operator´s tacit knowledge explicit. Finlândia: Tampere University of Technology, Digital Media Institute. Hypermedia Laboratory.
   Google Scholar
• Rerko L, Oberauer K. 2013. Focused, unfocused, and defocused information in working memory. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 39(4):1075–1096. doi:https://doi.org/10.1037/a0031172.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roberts BW, Walton KE, Viechtbauer W. 2006. Personality traits change in adulthood: reply to Costa and McCrae. Psychol Bull. 132(1):29–32. doi:https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.132.1.29.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shipstead Z, Broadway JM. 2013. Individual differences in working memory capacity and the Stroop effect: do high spans block the words? Learn Individ Differ. 26:191–195. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2012.04.003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seidler, R.D., and Carson, R.G. Sensorimotor Learning: Neurocognitive Mechanisms and Individual Differences. J NeuroEngineering Rehabil 14, 74 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12984-017-0279-1
   Google Scholar