Business success factors of Latvian and Swedish forestry contractors

References

• Adu P. 2019. A step-by-step guide to qualitative data coding. 1st ed. New York (NY): Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Ager B 2014. Skogsbrukets humanisering och rationalisering från 1900 och framåt [The humanization and rationalization of forestry from 1900 onwards] [dissertation]. Luleå: Luleå tekniska universitet. Swedish.
   Google Scholar
• Albrektson A, Elfving B, Lundqvist L, Valinger E. 2012. Skogsskötselns grunder och samband [The basics and connections of forest management]. Jönköping: Swedish Forest Agency. Swedish.
   Google Scholar
• Altinay L, Madanoglu M, De Vita G, Arasli H, Ekinci Y. 2016. The interface between organisational learning capability, entrepreneurial orientation, and SME growth. J Small Bus Manag. 54(3):871–891. doi:10.1111/jsbm.12219.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Amankwah‐Amoah J, Danso A, Adomako S. 2019. Entrepreneurial orientation, environmental sustainability and new venture performance: does stakeholder integration matter? Bus Strat Env. 28(1):79–87. doi:10.1002/bse.2191.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Asikainen A, Leskinen L, Pasanen K, Väätäinen K, Anttila P, Tahvanainen T 2009. Metsäkonesektorin nykytila ja tulevaisuus [Current state and future of the forest machine sector]. Vantaa: Metla. Report No. 125. Finnish.
   Google Scholar
• Aterido R, Hallward-Driemeier M, Pagés C. 2011. Big constraints to small firms’ growth? Business environment and employment growth across firms. Edcc. 59(3):609–647.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baker WE, Sinkula JM. 2009. The complementary effects of market orientation and entrepreneurial orientation on profitability in small businesses*. J Small Bus Manag. 47(4):443–464. doi:10.1111/j.1540-627X.2009.00278.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Benjaminsson F, Kronholm T, Erlandsson E. 2019. A framework for characterizing business models applied by forestry service contractors. Scand J For Res. 34(8):779–788. doi:10.1080/02827581.2019.1623304.
   Google Scholar
• Bloom N, Brynjolfsson E, Foster L, Jarmin R, Patnaik M, Saporta-Eksten I, Van Reenen J. 2019. What drives differences in management practices? Am Econ Rev. 109(5):1648–1683. doi:10.1257/aer.20170491.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bolagsfakta 2021. Sweden’s new company search. [accessed 2021 Mar 18]. https://www.bolagsfakta.se
   Google Scholar
• Chaston I, Sadler-Smith E. 2012. Entrepreneurial cognition, entrepreneurial orientation and firm capability in the creative industries. Br J Manag. 23(3):415–432.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Covin JG. 1991. Entrepreneurial versus conservative firms: a comparison of strategies and performance. J Manag Stud. 28(5):439–462. doi:10.1111/j.1467-6486.1991.tb00763.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Covin JG, Green KM, Slevin DP. 2006. Strategic process effects on the entrepreneurial orientation–sales growth rate relationship. Entrep Theory Pract. 30(1):57–81. doi:10.1111/j.1540-6520.2006.00110.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Covin JG, Slevin DP. 1989. Strategic management of small firms in hostile and benign environments. Strateg Manag J. 10(1):75–87. doi:10.1002/smj.4250100107.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Covin JG, Slevin DP. 1991. A conceptual model of entrepreneurship as firm behavior. Entrep Theory Pract. 16(1):7–26. doi:10.1177/104225879101600102.
   Google Scholar
• Cronbach LJ. 1951. Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests. Psychometrika. 16(3):297–334. doi:10.1007/BF02310555.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cronbach LJ, Shavelson RJ. 2004. My current thoughts on coefficient alpha and successor procedures. Educ Psychol Meas. 64(3):391–418. doi:10.1177/0013164404266386.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Enache C. 2021. A comparison of the tax burden on labor in the OECD. Fiscal fact. No. 764.
   Google Scholar
• Eriksson M, LeBel L, Lindroos O. 2015. Management of outsourced forest harvesting operations for better customer-contractor alignment. For Policy Econ. 53:45–55. doi:10.1016/j.forpol.2015.01.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eriksson M, LeBel L, Lindroos O. 2017. The effect of customer–contractor alignment in forest harvesting services on contractor profitability and the risk of relationship breakdown. Forests. 8(10):360. doi:10.3390/f8100360.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Erlandsson E, Fjeld D. 2017. Impacts of service buyer management on contractor profitability and satisfaction – a Swedish case study. Int J For Eng. 28(3):148–156.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Forest Information System for Europe. 2022. Countries. [accessed 2022 Mar 7]. https://forest.eea.europa.eu
   Google Scholar
• Häggström C, Kawasaki A, Lidestav G. 2013. Profiles of forestry contractors and development of the forestry-contracting sector in Sweden. Scand J For Res. 28(4):395–404. doi:10.1080/02827581.2012.738826.
   Google Scholar
• Hair JF, Black WC, Babin BJ, Anderson RE. 2010. Multivariate data analysis: a global perspective. 7th ed. Upper Saddle River (NJ): Pearson.
   Google Scholar
• Holmstrom B, Milgrom P. 1991. Multitask principal-agent analyses: incentive contracts, asset ownership, and job design. J Law Econ Organ. 7:24–52. doi:10.1093/jleo/7.special_issue.24.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johansson M, Erlandsson E, Kronholm T, Lindroos O. 2021. Key drivers and obstacles for performance among forest harvesting service contractors – a qualitative case study from Sweden. Scand J For Res. 36(7–8):598–613. doi:10.1080/02827581.2021.1981431.
   Google Scholar
• Jylhä P, Rikkonen P, Hamunen K. 2020. Size matters – an analysis of business models and the financial performance of Finnish wood-harvesting companies. Silva Fenn. 54(4):1–23. doi:10.14214/sf.10392.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kronholm T, Larsson I, Erlandsson E. 2021. Characterization of forestry contractors’ business models and profitability in Northern Sweden. Scand J For Res. 36(6):491–501. doi:10.1080/02827581.2021.1973087.
   Google Scholar
• Kronholm T, Sosa A, Bowditch E, Pohlschneider S, Hamunen K, Rikkonen P 2019. State of the art and development needs of forestry service in the Northern periphery and arctic region. Project report. [accessed 2021 Nov 18]. https://www.luke.fi/fobia/wp-content/uploads/sites/21/2019/11/State-of-the-art-and-development-needs-of-forestry-service-enterprises-in-the-NPA-region.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Latvia Ministry of Agriculture. 2021. Latvian forest sector in facts and figures 2021. [accessed 2021 Nov 18]. https://www.zm.gov.lv/public/ck/files/ZM/mezhi/buklets/skaitlifakti_ENG_2021.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Lumpkin GT, Dess GG. 1996. Clarifying the entrepreneurial orientation construct and linking it to performance. Acad Manage Rev. 21(1):135–172. doi:10.2307/258632.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lundin L, Lode E, Stendahl J, Melkerud PA, Björkvald L, Thorstensson A 2004. Soils and site types in the forsmark area.
   Google Scholar
• Lursoft. 2021. Statistics of commercial register. [accessed 2021 Mar 18]. https://www.lursoft.lv/en/statistics
   Google Scholar
• Lussier RN, Corman J. 1996. A business success versus failure prediction model for entrepreneurs with 0–10 employees. J Small Bus Strategy. 7(1):21–36.
   Google Scholar
• Lussier RN, Pfeifer S. 2001. A crossnational prediction model for business success. J Small Bus Manag. 39(3):228–239. doi:10.1111/0447-2778.00021.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Makinen P. 1997. Success factors for forest machine entrepreneurs. J For Eng. 8(2):27–35.
   Google Scholar
• Marom S, Lussier RN. 2014. A business success versus failure prediction model for small businesses in Israel. Bus Econ Res. 4(2):63–81. doi:10.5296/ber.v4i2.5997.
   Google Scholar
• Mederski P, Borz S, Duka A, Lazdiņš A. 2021. Challenges in forestry and forest engineering – case studies from four countries in east Europe. Croat J For Eng. 2(1):117–134. doi:10.5552/crojfe.2021.838.
   Google Scholar
• Miles MB, Huberman AM, Saldana J. 2014. Qualitative data analysis: a methods sourcebook. 3rd ed. Los Angeles (CA): SAGE Publications Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Miller D. 2011. Miller (1983) revisited: a reflection on EO research and some suggestions for the future. Entrep Theory Pract. 35(5):873–894. doi:10.1111/j.1540-6520.2011.00457.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moreno AM, Casillas JC. 2008. Entrepreneurial orientation and growth of SMEs: a causal model. Entrep Theory Pract. 32(3):507–528. doi:10.1111/j.1540-6520.2008.00238.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nilsson P, Roberge C, Fridman F. 2020. Forest statistics 2020. Umeå: Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences.
   Google Scholar
• Obi OF, Visser R. 2020. Productivity measurement of New Zealand forest harvesting sector using the DEA-Malmquist index. Int J For Eng. 31(3):224–232.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Official statistics of Latvia. 2021. Forest area and average timber volume in breakdown by forest growing condition type. [accessed 2021 Nov 1]. https://data.stat.gov.lv/pxweb/en/OSP_OD/OSP_OD__mezsaimn__plat_mez/MSG050.px/table/tableViewLayout1/
   Google Scholar
• Paulsson J. 2020. Gross felling in 2018 and preliminary statistics for 2019. Jönköping: Swedish Forest Agency. JO0312 SM 1801.
   Google Scholar
• Penrose E. 1959. The theory of the growth of the firm. 4th ed. New York (NY): Oxford University Press Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Penttinen M, Rummukainen A, Mikkola J. 2011. Profitability, liquidity, and solvency of wood harvesting contractors in Finland. Small-scale For. 10(2):2011–2229. doi:10.1007/s11842-010-9143-x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Poudel KP, Carter R, Lonial S. 2019. The impact of entrepreneurial orientation, technological capability, and consumer attitude on firm performance: a multi‐theory perspective. J Small Bus Manag. 57(S2):268–295. doi:10.1111/jsbm.12471.
   Google Scholar
• Rașcă L, Deaconu A. 2018. Entrepreneurial motivators and competencies – main drivers of entrepreneurial success. Proc Int Conf Bus Excell. 12(1):864–874. doi:10.2478/picbe-2018-0077.
   Google Scholar
• Roberge C. 2018. Forestry labour force in 2017. Jönköping: Swedish Forest Agency. JO11 SM 1801.
   Google Scholar
• Royal Swedish Academy of Agriculture and Forestry 2015. Forests and forestry in Sweden. [accessed 2022 Jun 5]. https://www.ksla.se/wp-content/uploads/2015/08/Forests-and-Forestry-in-Sweden_2015.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Rummukainen A, Brogt T, Kastenholz E. 2006. Challenges for forestry contractors – various structures but mutual problems in Finland, Germany, Poland and Romania. In: Niskanen A, editor. Issues affecting enterprise development in the forest sector in Europe. Joensuu: University of Joensuu; p. 149–174.
   Google Scholar
• Siow Song Teng H, Singh Bhatia G, Anwar S. 2011. A success versus failure prediction model for small businesses in Singapore. Am J Bus. 26(1):50–64. doi:10.1108/19355181111124106.
   Google Scholar
• Soirinsuo J, Mäkinen P. 2009. Importance of the financial situation for the growth of a forest machine entrepreneur. Scand J For Res. 24(3):264–272. doi:10.1080/02827580902932829.
   Google Scholar
• St‐Jean E, LeBel L, Audet J. 2010. Entrepreneurial orientation in the forestry industry: a population ecology perspective. J Small Bus Enterp. 17(2):204–217. doi:10.1108/14626001011041210.
   Google Scholar
• Swedish Forest Industries. 2021. Skogsnäringens betydelse för ekonomi och välfärd [The importance of the forest industry for the economy and welfare]. Stockholm (SE): Föreningen Skogsindustrierna; [accessed 2021 Nov 18]. https://www.skogsindustrierna.se/om-skogsindustrin/branschstatistik/ekonomisk-betydelse2/branschstatistik/ekonomisk-betydelse2/. Swedish.
   Google Scholar
• Taber KS. 2018. The use of Cronbach’s alpha when developing and reporting research instruments in science education. Res Sci Educ. 48(6):1273–1296. doi:10.1007/s11165-016-9602-2.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tehseen S, Ramayah T, Sajilan S. 2017. Testing and controlling for common method variance: a review of available methods. J Manag Sci. 4(2):146–175.
   Google Scholar
• Wales WJ, Patel PC, Parida V, Kreiser PM. 2013. Nonlinear effects of entrepreneurial orientation on small firm performance: the moderating role of resource orchestration capabilities. Strateg Entrep J. 7(2):93–121. doi:10.1002/sej.1153.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wiklund J. 1999. The sustainability of the entrepreneurial orientation–performance relationship. Entrep Theory Pract. 24(1):37–48. doi:10.1177/104225879902400103.
   Google Scholar
• Wiklund J, Patzelt H, Shepherd DA. 2009. Building an integrative model of small business growth. Small Bus Econ. 32(4):351–374. doi:10.1007/s11187-007-9084-8.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wiklund J, Shepherd DA. 2003. Aspiring for, and achieving growth: the moderating role of resources and opportunities. J Manag Stud. 40(8):1919–1941. doi:10.1046/j.1467-6486.2003.00406.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar