Advanced search
Publication Cover
International Journal of Audiology Volume 44, 2005 - Issue 1
Submit an article Journal homepage
132
Views
18
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Article

Otoacoustic emissions and extended high-frequency hearing sensitivity in young adults Emisiones otoacústicas y sensibilidad extendida a frecuencias altas en adultos jóvenes

Nicolas Schmuziger Department of Otorhinolaryngology, University Hospital Basel, Basel, Switzerland
,
Rudolf Probst Department of Otorhinolaryngology, University Hospital Basel, Basel, Switzerland
&
Jacek Smurzynski Department of Otorhinolaryngology, University Hospital Basel, Basel, Switzerland; Department of Communicative Disorders, East Tennessee State University, Johnson City, USACorrespondence[email protected]
Pages 24-30 | Received 04 Aug 2003, Accepted 30 Mar 2004, Published online: 07 Jul 2009

References

  • Arnold, D.J., Lonsbury-Martin, B.L. & Martin, G.K. 1999. High-frequency hearing influences lower-frequency distortion-product otoacoustic emissions. Archives of Otolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, 125, 215–222.
  • Avan, P., Bonfils, P., Loth, D., Elbez, M. & Erminy, M. 1995. Transient-evoked otoacoustic emissions and high-frequency acoustic trauma in the guinea pig. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 97, 3012–3020.
  • Avan, P., Elbez, M. & Bonfils, P. 1997. Click-evoked otoacoustic emissions and the influence of high-frequency hearing losses in humans. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 101, 2771–2777.
  • Bowman, D.M., Brown, D.K. & Kimberley, B.P 2000. An examination of gender differences in DPOAE phase delay measurements in normal-hearing human adults. Hearing Research, 142, 1 - 11.
  • Cacace, A.T., McClelland, WA., Weiner, J. & McFarland, D.J. 1996. Individual differences and the reliability of 2F1-F2 distortion-product otoacoustic emissions: effects of time-of-day, stimulus variables, and gender. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 39, 1138–1148.
  • Cazals, Y. 2000. Auditory sensori-neural alterations induced by salicylate. Progress in Neurobiology, 62, 583–631.
  • Engdahl, B. & Tambs, K. 2002. Otoacoustic emissions in the general adult population of Nord-Trondelag, Norway: II. Effects of noise, head injuries, and ear infections. International Journal of Audiology, 41, 78–87.
  • Glattke, T.J. & Robinette, M.S. 2002. Transient evoked otoacoustic emissions. In: M.S. Robinette & T.J. Glattke (eds.) Otoacoustic Emissions: Clinical Applications. New York: Thieme, pp. 95–115.
  • Harris, F.P & Probst, R. 2002. Otoacoustic emissions and audiometric outcomes. In: M.S. Robinette & T.J. Glattke (eds.) Otoacoustic Emissions: Clinical Applications. New York: Thieme, pp. 213–42.
  • Hooks-Horton, S., Geer, S. & Stuart, A. 2001. Effects of exercise and noise on auditory thresholds and distortion-product otoacoustic emissions. Journal of the American Academy of Audiology, 12, 52–58.
  • International Organization for Standardization. (1998). Acoustics. Reference zero for the calibration of audiometric equipment-Part 5: Reference equivalent threshold sound pressure levels for pure tones in the frequency range 8 kHz to 16 kHz. (ISO/TR 389-5, 1998). Geneva: ISO.
  • International Organization of Standardization. (1989). Acoustics. Audio-metric test methods-Part 1: Basic pure tone air and bone conduction threshold audiometry. (ISO 8523-1, 1989). Geneva: ISO.
  • Kulawiec, J.T. & Orlando, M.S. 1995. The contribution of spontaneous otoacoustic emissions to the click evoked otoacoustic emissions. Ear and Hearing, 16, 515–520.
  • Kuroda, T, Fukuda, S., Chida, E., Kashiwamura, M., Matsumura, M., Ohwatari, R., et al. 2001. Effects of spontaneous otoacoustic emissions on distortion product otoacoustic emission. Auris Nasus Larynx, 28, 33–38.
  • Lonsbury-Martin, B.L. & Martin, G.K. 2002. Distortion product otoacoustic emissions. In: M.S. Robinette & T.J. Glattke (eds.) Otoacoustic Emissions: Clinical Applications. New York: Thieme, pp. 116–142.
  • McFadden, D. 2001. Otoacoustic emissions as a window onto prenatal development and sexual differentiation. Seminars in Hearing, 22, 347–360.
  • McFadden, D. & Mishra, R. 1993. On the relation between hearing sensitivity and otoacoustic emissions. Hearing Research, 71, 208–213.
  • Moulin, A., Collet, L., Veuillet, E. & Morgon, A. 1993. Interrelations between transiently evoked otoacoustic emissions, spontaneous otoacoustic emissions and acoustic distortion products in normally hearing subjects. Hearing Research, 65, 216–233.
  • Osterhammel, PA., Rasmussen, A.N., Olsen, S. & Nielsen, L.H. 1996. The influence of spontaneous otoacoustic emissions on the amplitude of transient-evoked emissions. Scandinavian Audiology, 25, 187–192.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Order Reprints Request Corporate Permissions

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

Request Academic Permissions

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.

Related research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.