References
- Aoyagi, M., Suzuki, Y, Yokota, M., Furuse, H., Watanabe, T. & Ito, T. 1999. Reliability of 80-Hz amplitude-modulation following response detected by phase coherence. Audiol Neurootol, 4, 28–37.
- Cebulla, M., Stürzebecher, E. & Wernecke, K.D. 2000. Objective detection of auditory brainstem potentials. Scand Audiol, 29, 44–51.
- Cebulla, M., Stürzebecher, E. & Wernecke, K.D. 2001. Objective detection of the amplitude modulation following response (AMFR). Audiology, 40, 245–252.
- Cebulla, M., Stürzebecher, E., Berger, E.R., Shehata-Dieler, W. & Neumann, K. 2003. A new, rapid ABR screening algorithm based on click-evoked ASSR. XVIII IERASG Biennial Symposium, Puerto de la Cruz, Teneriffa.
- Champlin, C.A. 1992. Methods for detecting auditory steady-state potentials recorded from humans. Hear Res, 58, 63–69.
- Dimitrijevic, A., John, M.S., Van Roon, P., Purcell, D.W., Adamonis, J., et al. 2002. Estimating the audiogram using multiple auditory steady-state responses. J Am Acad Audiol, 13, 205–224.
- Dobie, R.A. & Wilson, M.J. 1993. Objective response detection in the frequency domain. Electroenceph Clin Neurophysiol, 88, 516–524.
- Don, M. & Elberling, C. 1996. Use of quantitative measures of auditory brain-stem response peak amplitude and residual back ground noise in the decision to stop averaging. J Acoust Soc Am, 99, 491–499.
- Green, D.M. & Swets, J.A. 1966. Signal Detection Theory and Psycho-physics. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
- Hochberg, Y. & Tamhane, A.C. 1987. Multiple Comparison Procedures. New York: Wiley and Sons.
- Howell, D.C. 1987. Statistical Methods for Psychology. Boston, MA: Duxbury Press.
- John, M.S. & Picton, T.W 2000. MASTER: a Windows program for recording multiple auditory steady-state responses. Computer Methods and Programs in Biomedicine, 61, 125–150.
- Lins, G.L. & Picton, T.W 1995. Auditory steady-state responses to multiple simultaneous stimuli. Electroenceph Clin Neurophysiol, 96, 420–432.
- Lütkenhoner, B. 1991. Theoretical considerations on the detection of evoked responses by means of the Rayleigh test. Acta Otolaryngol (Stockh), Suppl 491, 52–60.
- Moore, B.R. 1980. A modification of the Rayleigh test for vector data. Biometrika, 67, 175–180.
- Picton, T.W., John, M.S. & Dimitrijevic, A. 2002. Possible roles for the auditory steady-state responses in identification, evaluation and management of hearing loss in infancy. Audiology Today, 14, 29–34.
- Picton, T.W, John, M.S., Dimitrijevic, A. & Purcell, D. 2003. Human auditory steady-state responses. Int J Audiol, 42, 177–219.
- Press, W.H., Flannery, B.P, Teukolsky, S.A. & Vetterling, WT. 1986. Numerical recipes: the art of scientific computing. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
- Rance, G. & Rickards, F. 2002. Prediction of hearing threshold in infants using auditory steady-state evoked potentials. J Am Acad Audiol, 13, 236–245.
- Stürzebecher, E., Cebulla, M. & Wernecke, K.D. 1999. Objective response detection in the frequency domain-Comparison of several q-sample tests. Audiology & Neurootology, 4, 2—11.
- Stürzebecher, E. 2001. Method for Hearing Screening of Newborn by Means of Steady-State Responses Evoked with High Click Rate. Patent Application 01610060.4 at the European Patent Office.
- Stürzebecher, E., Cebulla, M. & Neumann, K. 2003. Click-evoked ABR at high stimulus repetition rates for neonatal hearing screening. Int J Audiol, 42, 59–70.
- Valdes, J.L., Perez-Abalo, M.C., Martin, V., Savio, G., Sierra, C, et al. 1997. Comparison of statistical indicators for the automatic detection of 80 Hz auditory steady state responses. Ear Hear, 18, 420–429.