A longitudinal study of changes in evoked otoacoustic emissions and pure-tone thresholds as measured in a hearing conservation program

References

• American National Standards Institute. Methods for Manual Pure-tone Threshold Audiometry. ANSI S3.21-R1997, ANSI, New York 1978
   Google Scholar
• American National Standards Institute. Maximum Permissible Ambient Noise Levels for Audiometric Test Rooms. ANSI S3.1, ANSI, New York 1991
   Google Scholar
• Arnold D. J., Lonsbury-Martin B. L., Martin G. K. High-frequency hearing influences lower-frequency distortion-product otoacoustic emissions. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1999; 125(2)215–222
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Attias J., Bresloff I. Noise induced temporary otoacoustic emission shifts. J Basic Clin Physiol Pharmacol 1996; 7(3)221–233
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Attias J., Furst M., Furman V., Reshef I., Horowitz G., et al. Noise-induced otoacoustic emission loss with or without hearing loss. Ear Hear 1995; 16(6)612–618
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Attias J., Horovitz G., El-Hatib N., Nageris B. Detection and clinical diagnosis of noise-induced hearing loss by otoacoustic emissions. Noise Health 2001; 3(12)19–31
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Avan P., Bonfils P., Loth D. Effects of acoustic overstimulation on distortion-product and transient-evoked otoacoustic emissions. Scientific Basis of Noise-induced Hearing Loss, A. Axelsson, P. A. Hellstrom, H. Borchgrevink, D. Henderson, R. P. Hamernik, et al. George Thieme Verlag, Stuttgart 1996; 65–81
   Google Scholar
• Avan P., Bonfils P., Loth D., Elbez M., Erminy M. Transient-evoked otoacoustic emissions and high-frequency acoustic trauma in the guinea pig. J Acoust Soc Am 1995; 97(5 Pt 1)3012–3020
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Avan P., Elbez M., Bonfils P. Click-evoked otoacoustic emissions and the influence of high-frequency hearing losses in humans. J Acoust Soc Am 1997; 101(5 Pt 1)2771–2777
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beattie R. C., Bleech J. Effects of sample size on the reliability of noise floor and DPOAE. Br J Audiol 2000; 34(5)305–309
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davis R. I., Ahroon W. A., Hamernik R. P. The relation among hearing loss, sensory cell loss and tuning characteristics in the chinchilla. Hear Res 1989; 41(1)1–14
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Desai A., Reed D., Cheyne A., Richards S., Prasher D. Absence of otoacoustic emissions in subjects with normal audiometric thresholds implies exposure to noise. Noise Health 1999; 2: 58–65
   Google Scholar
• Dorn P. A., Piskorski P., Gorga M. P., Neely S. T., Keefe D. H. Predicting audiometric status from distortion product otoacoustic emissions using multivariate analyses. Ear Hear 1999; 20(2)149–163
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dorn P. A., Piskorski P., Keefe D. H., Neely S. T., Gorga M. P. On the existence of an age/threshold/frequency interaction in distortion product otoacoustic emissions. J Acoust Soc Am 1998; 104(2 Pt 1)964–971
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Engdahl B. Effects of noise and exercise on distortion product otoacoustic emissions. Hear Res 1996; 93(1-2)72–82
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Engdahl B. Otoacoustic emissions in the general adult population of Nord-Trondelag, Norway: I. Distributions by age, gender, and ear side. Int J Audiol 2002; 41: 64–77
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Franklin D. J., McCoy M. J., Martin G. K., Lonsbury-Martin B. L. Test/retest reliability of distortion-product and transiently evoked otoacoustic emissions. Ear Hear 1992; 13(6)417–429
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ghiselli E. E. Theory of Psychological Measurement1st edn. McGraw-Hill, New York 1964
   Google Scholar
• Hamernik R. P., Ahroon W. A., Lei S. F. The cubic distortion product otoacoustic emissions from the normal and noise-damaged chinchilla cochlea. J Acoust Soc Am 1996; 100(2 Pt 1)1003–1012
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hamernik R. P., Qiu W. Correlations among evoked potential thresholds, distortion product otoacoustic emissions and hair cell loss following various noise exposures in the chinchilla. Hear Res 2000; 150(1-2)245–257
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hotz M. A., Probst R., Harris F. P., Hauser R. Monitoring the effects of noise exposure using transiently evoked otoacoustic emissions. Acta Otolaryngol 1993; 113(4)478–482
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kapadia S., Lutman M. E. Are normal hearing thresholds a sufficient condition for click-evoked otoacoustic emissions?. J Acoust Soc Am 1997; 101(6)3566–3567
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kemp D. T. Otoacoustic emissions, travelling waves and cochlear mechanisms. Hear Res 1986; 22: 95–104
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kemp D. T. Exploring cochlear status with otoacoustic emissions: the potential for new clinical applications. Otoacoustic Emissions: Clinical Applications2nd edn., M. S. Robinette, T. J. Glattke. Thieme, New York 2002; 1–47
   Google Scholar
• Lapsley Miller J. A., Marshall L. Monitoring the effects of noise with otoacoustic emissions. Semin Hear 2001a; 22(4)393–403
   Google Scholar
• Lapsley Miller J. A., Marshall L. Hearing conservation programs of the future: what role will otoacoustic emissions play?. Spectrum 2001b; 18(1)1–6
   Google Scholar
• LePage E. L. Occupational noise-induced hearing loss: origin, characterisation and prevention. Acoustics Australia 1998; 26(2)57–61
   Google Scholar
• LePage E. L., Murray N. M. Click-evoked otoacoustic emissions: comparing emission strengths with pure tone audiometric thresholds. Aust J Audiol 1993; 15(1)9–22
   Google Scholar
• LePage E. L., Murray N. M., Seymour J. D., Zhou D. Evidence of human cochlear mapping changes with aging in a longitudinal TEOAE study. Assoc Res Otolaryngol Abs 2001; 211–212
   Google Scholar
• LePage E. L., Murray N. M., Tran K., Harrap M. J. The ear as an acoustical generator: otoacoustic emissions and their diagnostic potential. Acoustics Australia 1993; 21(3)86–90
   Google Scholar
• Liberman M. C., Dodds L. W., Learson D. A. Structure-function correlation in noise-damaged ears: a light and electron-microscopic study. Basic and Applied Aspects of Noise-induced Hearing Loss, R. J. Salvi, D. Henderson, R. P. Hamernik, V. Colletti. Plenum Press, New York 1986; 111: 163–177
   Google Scholar
• Lonsbury-Martin B. L., Martin G. K., Probst R., Coats A. C. Acoustic distortion products in rabbit ear canal. I. Basic features and physiological vulnerability. Hear Res 1987; 28(2-3)173–189
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lucertini M., Moleti A., Sisto R. On the detection of early cochlear damage by otoacoustic emission analysis. J Acoust Soc Am 2002; 111(2)972–978
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mansfield J. D., Baghurst P. A., Newton V. E. Otoacoustic emissions in 28 young adults exposed to amplified music. Br J Audiol 1999; 33(4)211–222
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marshall L., Heller L. M. Reliability of transient-evoked otoacoustic emissions. Ear Hear 1996; 17(3)237–254
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marshall L., Heller L. M. Transient-evoked otoacoustic emissions as a measure of noise-induced threshold shift. J Speech Lang Hear Res 1998; 41(6)1319–1334
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marshall L., Heller L. M., Westhusin L. J. Effect of negative middle-ear pressure on transient-evoked otoacoustic emissions. Ear Hear 1997; 18(3)218–226
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marshall L., Lapsley Miller J. A., Heller L. M. Distortion-product otoacoustic emissions as a screening tool for noise-induced hearing loss. Noise Health 2001; 3(12)43–60
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Murray N. M., LePage E. L. Age dependence of otoacoustic emissions and apparent rates of ageing of the inner ear in an Australian population. Aust J Audiol 1993; 15(2)59–70
   Google Scholar
• Murray N. M., LePage E. L. A nine-year longitudinal study of the hearing of orchestral musicians. Paper presented at the International Auditory Congress, MelbourneAustralia, 2002
   Google Scholar
• Murray N. M., LePage E. L., Tran K. Repeatability of click-evoked otoacoustic emissions. Aust J Audiol 1997; 19(2)109–118
   Google Scholar
• Navy Occupational Health and Safety Program. OPNAVINST 5100.23E: Hearing Conservation and Noise Abatement. Chief of Naval Operations, Washington, DC 1999
   Google Scholar
• Nordmann A. S., Bohne B. A., Harding G. W. Histopathological differences between temporary and permanent threshold shift. Hear Res 2000; 139(1-2)13–30
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pearson J. D., Morrell C. H., Gordon-Salant S., Brant L. J., Metter E. J., et al. Gender differences in a longitudinal study of age-associated hearing loss. J Acoust Soc Am 1995; 97(2)1196–1205
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Probst R., Lonsbury-Martin B. L., Martin G. K. A review of otoacoustic emissions. J Acoust Soc Am 1991; 89(5)2027–2067
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Radomskij P., Schmidt M. A., Heron C. W., Prasher D. Effect of MRI noise on cochlear function. Lancet 2002; 359(9316)1485
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schmiedt R. A. Acoustic distortion in the ear canal. I. Cubic difference tones: effects of acute noise injury. J Acoust Soc Am 1986; 79(5)1481–1490
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shaw E. A. Earcanal pressure generated by circumaural and supraaural earphones. J Acoust Soc Am 1966; 39(3)471–479
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shera C. A., Guinan J. J., Jr. Evoked otoacoustic emissions arise by two fundamentally different mechanisms: a taxonomy for mammalian OAEs. J Acoust Soc Am 1999; 105(2 Pt 1)782–798
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sliwinska-Kowalska M., Kotylo P. Otoacoustic emission in industrial hearing loss assessment. Noise Health 2001; 3(12)75–84
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Spoor A. Presbycusis values in relation to noise-induced hearing loss. Int J Audiol 1967; 6(1)48–57
   Google Scholar
• Sutton L. A., Lonsbury-Martin B. L., Martin G. K., Whitehead M. L. Sensitivity of distortion-product otoacoustic emissions in humans to tonal over-exposure: time course of recovery and effects of lowering L2. Hear Res 1994; 75(1-2)161–174
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Veuillet E., Martin V., Suc B., Vesson J. F., Morgon A., et al. Otoacoustic emissions and medial olivocochlear suppression during auditory recovery from acoustic trauma in humans. Acta Otolaryngol 2001; 121(2)278–283
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Whitehead M. L., Lonsbury-Martin B., Martin G. K. Relevance of animal models to the clinical application of otoacoustic emissions. Semin Hear 1992; 13(1)81–101
   Google Scholar
• Whitehead M. L., Lonsbury-Martin B., Martin G. K., McCoy M. J. Otoacoustic emissions: animal models and clinical observations. Clinical Aspects of Hearing, T. R. Van DeWater, A. N. Popper, R. R. Fay. Springer-Verlag, New York 1996; 6: 199–257
   Google Scholar
• Withnell R. H., Yates G. K., Kirk D. L. Changes to low-frequency components of the TEOAE following acoustic trauma to the base of the cochlea. Hear Res 2000; 139(1-2)1–12
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yates G. K., Withnell R. H. The role of intermodulation distortion in transient-evoked otoacoustic emissions. Hear Res 1999; 136(1-2)49–64
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zurek P. M., Clark W. W., Kim D. O. The behavior of acoustic distortion products in the ear canals of chinchillas with normal or damaged ears. J Acoust Soc Am 1982; 72(3)774–780
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar