101
Views
14
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Article

Near-threshold recordings of amplitude modulation following responses (AMFR) in children of different ages

, , &
Pages 339-345 | Received 22 Oct 2002, Accepted 03 Jul 2003, Published online: 07 Jul 2009

References

  • Aoyagi M., Kiren T., Furuse H., Fuse T., Suzuki Y., et al. Effects of aging on amplitude modulation following response. Acta Otolaryngol Suppl 1994a; 511: 15–22
  • Aoyagi M., Kiren T., Furuse H., Fuse T., Suzuki Y., et al. Pure-tone threshold prediction by 80 Hz amplitude-modulation following response. Acta Otolaryngol Suppl 1994b; 511: 7–14
  • Aoyagi M., Kiren T., Kim Y., Suzuki Y., Fuse T., et al. Optimal modulation frequency for amplitude-modulation following response in young children during sleep. Hear Res 1993; 65: 253–261
  • Aoyagi M., Suzuki Y., Yokota M., Furuse H., Watanabe T., et al. Reliability of 80-Hz amplitude-modulation-following response detected by phase coherence. Audiol Neurootol 1999; 4: 28–37
  • Boettcher F. A., Poth E. A., Mills J. H., Dubno J. R. The amplitude-modulation following response in young and aged human subjects. Hear Res 2001; 153: 32–42
  • Chambers R. D., Meyer T. A. Reliability of threshold estimation in hearing-impaired adults using the AMFR. J Am Acad Audiol 1993; 4: 22–32
  • Dimitrijevic A., John M. S., van Roon P., Picton T. W. Human auditory steady-state responses to tones independently modulated in both frequency and amplitude. Ear Hear 2001; 22: 100–111
  • Dobie R. A., Wilson M. J. Objective detection of auditory evoked potentials: phase coherence vs. magnitude-squared coherence. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 1994; 92: 405–413
  • Dobie R. A., Wilson M. J. Low-level steady-state auditory evoked potentials: effects of rate and sedation on detectability. J Acoust Soc Am 1998; 104: 3482–3488
  • Griffiths S. K., Chambers R. D. The amplitude modulationfollowing response as an audiometric tool. Ear Hear 1991; 12: 235–241
  • Herdman A. T. Place specificity of multiple auditory steady-state responses. J Acoust Soc Am 2002; 112: 1569–1582
  • Herdman A. T., Stapells D. R. Thresholds determined using the monotic and dichotic multiple auditory steady-state response technique in normal hearing subjects. Scand Audiol 2001; 30: 41–49
  • John M. S., Lins O. G., Boucher B. L., Picton T. W. Multiple Auditory Steady-state Responses (MASTER): stimulus and recording parameters. Audiology 1998; 37: 59–82
  • John M. S., Picton T. W. Human auditory steady-state responses: phase and latency measurements. Hear Res 2000; 141: 57–79
  • Kraus N., Smith D. I., Reed N. L., Stein L. K., Cartee C. Auditory middle latency responses in children: effects of age and diagnostic category. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 1985; 62: 343–351
  • Kuwada S., Anderson J. S., Batra R., Fitzpatrick D. C., Teissier N., et al. Sources of the scalp-recorded amplitude-modulation following response. J Am Acad Audiol 2002; 13: 188–204
  • Levi E. C., Folsom R. C., Dobie R. A. Amplitude-modulation following response (AMFR): effects of modulation rate, carrier frequency, age and state. Hear Res 1993; 68: 42–52
  • Lins O. G., Picton T. W., Boucher B. L., Durieux-Smith A., Champagne S. C., et al. Frequency-specific audiometry using steady-state responses. Ear Hear 1996; 17: 81–96
  • Lins O. G., Picton P. E., Picton T. W. Auditory steady-state responses to tones amplitude-modulated at 80-110 Hz. J Acoust Soc Am 1995; 97: 3051–3063
  • Maurizi M., Al madori G., Plaudetti G., Ottavini F., Rosignoli M., et al. 40-Hz Steady-state responses in newborns and in children. Audiology 1990; 29: 322–328
  • Perez-Abalo M. C., Savio G., Torres A., Martin V., Rodriguez E., et al. Steady state responses to multiple amplitude-modulated tones: an optimised method to test frequency-specific thresholds in hearingimpaired children and normal-hearing subjects. Ear Hear 2001; 22: 200–211
  • Pethe J., von Specht H., Mu¨hler R., Hocke T. Amplitude modulation following responses in awake and sleeping humans-a comparison for 40 Hz and 80 Hz modulation frequency. Scand Audiol Suppl 2001; 52: 152–155
  • Picton T. W., Dimitrijevic A., John M. S. Multiple auditory steady-state responses. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 2002; 111: 16–21
  • Picton T. W., John M. S., Dimitrijevic A., Purcell D. Human auditory steady-state responses. Int J Audiol 2003; 42: 177–219
  • Picton T. W., Skinner C. R., Champagne S. C., Kellett A. J.C., Maiste A. C. Potentials evoked by the sinusoidal modulation of the amplitude or frequency of a tone. J Acoust Soc Am 1987; 82: 165–178
  • Savio G., Cardenas J., Perez-Abalo M., Gonzales A., Valdes J. The low and high frequency auditory steady state responses mature at different rates. Audiol Neurootol 2001; 6: 279–287
  • van der Reijden C. S., Mens L. H.M., Snik A. F.M. Comparing signal to noise ratios of amplitude following responses from four EEGderivations in awake normally hearing adults. Audiology 2001; 40: 202–207

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.