Spatial spread of neural excitation: comparison of compound action potential and forward-masking data in cochlear implant recipients

References

• Abbas P. J., Brown C. J., Shallop J. K., Firszt J. B., Hughes M. L., et al. Summary of results using the Nucleus CI24M implant to record the electrically evoked compound action potential. Ear Hear 1999; 20: 45–59
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown C. J., Abbas P. J., Ganz B. Electrically evoked whole-nerve action potentials: data from human cochlear implant users. J Acoust Soc Am 1990; 88: 1385–1391
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bruce I. C., White M. W., Irlicht L. S., O'Leary S. J., Dynes S., et al. A stochastic model of the electrically stimulated auditory nerve: single-pulse response. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 1999; 46: 617–629
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carhart R., Jerger J. Preferred method for clinical determination of pure tone thresholds. J Speech Hear Disord 1959; 24: 330–345
   Google Scholar
• Chatterjee M., Shannon R. V. Forward masked excitation patterns in multielectrode electrical stimulation. J Acoust Soc Am 1998; 103(5 Pt 1)2565–2572
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cohen L. T., Richardson L. M., Saunders E., Cowan R. S.C. Spatial spread of neural excitation in cochlear implant recipients: comparison of improved ECAP method and psychophysical forward masking. Hear Res 2003; 179: 72–87
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cohen L. T., Saunders E., Clark G. M. Psychophysics of a prototype peri-modiolar cochlear implant electrode array. Hear Res 2001; 155: 63–81
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cohen L. T., Xu J., Xu S. A., Clark G. M. Improved and simplified methods for specifying positions of the electrode bands of a cochlear implant array. Am J Otol 1996a; 17: 859–865
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Cohen L. T., Busby P. A., Clark G. M. Cochlear implant place psychophysics. 2. Comparison of forward masking and pitch estimation data. Audiol Neurootol 1996b; 1: 278–292
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Dillier N., Lai W. K., Almqvist B., Frohne C., Muller-Deile J., et al. Measurement of the electrically evoked compound action potential via a neural response telemetry system. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 2002; 111(5 Pt 1)407–414
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dillier N., Lai W. K., Wyttenbach M., Jakitis H., Spillman T., et al. First Experiences with Neural Response Telemetry (NRT). ENT Department, University Hospital Zu¨rich, Zu¨rich 1997, Report
   Google Scholar
• Franck K. H., Norton S. J. Estimation of psychophysical levels using the electrically evoked compound action potential measured with the neural response telemetry capabilities of Cochlear Corporation's CI24M device. Ear Hear 2001; 22(4)289–299
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frijns J. H.M., de Snoo S. L., Schoonhoven R. Potential distributions and neural excitation patterns in a rotationally symmetric model of the electrically stimulated cochlea. Hear Res 1995; 87: 170–186
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gordon K. A., Ebinger K. A., Gilden J. E., Shapiro W. H. Neural response telemetry in 12- to 24-month-old children. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol Suppl 2002; 189: 42–48
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hatsushika S., Shepherd R. K., Tong Y. C., Clark G. M., Funasaka S. Dimensions of the scala tympani in the human and cat with reference to cochlear implants. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 1990; 99: 871–876
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hughes M. L., Abbas P. J., Brown C. J., Gantz B. J. Using electrically evoked compound action potential thresholds to facilitate creating MAPs for children with the Nucleus CI24M. Adv Otorhinolaryngol 2000; 57: 260–265
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ketten D. R., Skinner M. W., Wang G., Vannier M. W., Gates G. A., et al. In vivo measures of cochlear length and insertion depth of Nucleus cochlear implant electrode arrays. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 1998; 107(suppl 175)1–16
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lai W. K., Dillier N. A simple two-component model of the electrically evoked compound action potential in the human cochlea. Audiol Neurootol 2000; 5: 333–345
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lim H. H., Tong Y. C., Clark G. M. Forward masking patterns produced by intracochlear electrical stimulation of one and two electrode pairs in the human cochlea. J Acoust Soc Am 1989; 86(3)971–980
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marsh M. A., Xu J., Blamey P. J., Whitford L. A., Xu S.-A., et al. Radiological evaluation of multiple-channel intracochlear implant insertion depth. Am J Otol 1993; 14: 386–391
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Rattay F., Lutter P., Felix H. A model of the electrically excited human cochlear neuron. I. Contribution of neural substructures to the generation and propagation of spikes. Hear Res 2001; 153: 43–63
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seyle K., Brown C. J. Speech perception using maps based on neural response telemetry measures. Ear Hear 2002; 23(1 Suppl, 72S-79S)
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shepherd R. K., Hatsushika S., Clark G. M. Electrical stimulation of the auditory nerve: the effect of electrode position on neural excitation. Hear Res 1993; 66: 108–120
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smoorenburg G. F., Willeboer C., Van Dijk J. E. Speech perception in Nucleus CI24M cochlear implant users with processor settings based on electrically evoked compound action potential thresholds. Audiol Neurootol 2002; 7(6)335–347
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stypulkowski P. H., van den Honert C. Physiological properties of the electrically stimulated auditory nerve. I. Compound action potential recordings. Hear Res 1984; 14: 205–223
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taylor M. M., Creelman C. D. PEST: efficient estimates on probability functions. J Acoust Soc Am 1967; 41: 782–787
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xu J., Xu S.-A., Cohen L. T., Clark G. M. Cochlear view-post-operative radiography for cochlear implantation. Am J Otol 2000; 21: 49–56
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Zimmerling M. J., Hochmair E. S. EAP recordings in Ineraid patients-correlations with psychophysical measures and possible implications for patient fitting. Ear Hear 2002; 23(2)81–91
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar