83
Views
17
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Article

Disturbance caused by varying propagation delay in non-occluding hearing aid fittings

&
Pages 594-599 | Received 17 Jun 2003, Accepted 02 Dec 2003, Published online: 04 Feb 2013

References

  • Agnew, J. & Thornton, J. 2000. Just noticeable and objectionable group delays in digital hearing aids. J Am Acad Audio, 11, 330–336.
  • Byrne, D. & Dirks, D. 1996. Effects of acclimatization and deprivation on non-speech auditory abilities. Ear Hear, 17, 29S–37S.
  • Cox, R.M. & Moore, J.N. 1988. Composite speech spectrum for hearing aid gain prescriptions. J Speech Hew Res, 31, 102–107.
  • Dillon, H., Keidser, G., O'Brien, A. & Silberstein, H. 2003. Sound quality comparisons of advanced hearing aids. Hear J, 56(4),30–40.
  • Frye, G.J. 2001. Testing digital and analog hearing instruments: pro-cessing time delays and phase measurements. Hear Rev, 8(10),34–40.
  • Gatehouse, S. & Robinson, K. 1996. Acclimatisation to monaural hearing aid fitting-effects on loudness functions and preliminary evidence for parallel electrophysiological and behavioural effects. In: B. Kollmeier (ed.) Psychoacoustics, Speech and Hearing Aids. Singapore: World Scientific, pp. 319–330.
  • Killion, M, Wilber, L.A. & Gudmundsen, G 1988. Zwislocki was right .. A potential solution to the 'hollow' voice problem (the amplified occlusion effect) with deeply seated earmolds. Hear lustrum, 39(1),14–18.
  • Olsen, S.O., Rasmussen, A.N., Nielsen, L.H. & Borgkvist, B.V. 1999. Loudness perception is influenced by long-term hearing aid use. Audiology, 38, 202–205.
  • Stone, M.A. & Moore, B.C.J. 1999. Tolerable hearing aid delays. II. Estimation of limits imposed by the auditory path alone using simulated hearing losses. Ear Hear, 20, 182–192.
  • Stone, M.A. & Moore, B.C.J. 2002. Tolerable hearing aid delays. III. Estimation of limits imposed during speech production. Ear Hear, 23, 325–338.
  • Stone, M.A. & Moore, B.C.J. 2003. Tolerable hearing aid delays. III. Effects on speech production and perception of across-frequency variation in delay. Ear Hear, 24, 175–183.
  • Summerfield, Q. 1992. Lipreading and audio-visual speech perception. Philos Trans R Soc Land B Biol Sci, 335, 71–78.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.