References
- Bacon S.P., Viemeister N.F. Simultaneous masking by gated and continuous sinusoidal maskers. J Acoust Soc Am 1985; 78: 1220–1230
- Baer T., Moore B.C.J., Kluk K. Effects of lowpass filtering on the intelligibility of speech in noise for people with and without dead regions at high frequencies. J Acoust Soc Am 2002; 112: 1133–1144
- Chistovich L.A. Frequency characteristics of masking effect. Biofizika 1957; 2: 743–755
- Fletcher H. Auditory patterns. Rev Mod Phys 1940; 12: 47–65
- Florentine M., Houtsma A.J.M. Tuning curves and pitch matches in a listener with a unilateral, low-frequency hearing loss. J Acoust Soc Am 1983; 73: 961–965
- Fowler E.P. A method for the early detection of otosclerosis. Arch Otolaryngol 1936; 24: 731–741
- Glasberg B.R., Moore B.C.J. Auditory filter shapes in subjects with unilateral and bilateral cochlear impairments. J Acoust Soc Am 1986; 79: 1020–1033
- Glasberg B.R., Moore B.C.J. Derivation of auditory filter shapes from notched-noise data. Hear Res 1990; 47: 103–138
- Glasberg B.R., Moore B.C.J. Frequency selectivity as a function of level and frequency measured with uniformly exciting notched noise. J Acoust Soc Am 2000; 108: 2318–2328
- Hoekstra A., Ritsma R.J. Perceptive hearing loss and frequency selectivity. Psychophysics and Physiology of Hearing, E.F. Evans, J.P. Wilson. Academic, LondonEngland 1977; 263–271
- Huss M., Moore B.C.J. Tone decay for hearing-impaired listeners with and without dead regions in the cochlea. J Acoust Soc Am 2003; 114: 3283–3294
- Kluk K., Moore B.C.J. Factors affecting psychophysical tuning curves for normally hearing subjects. Hear Res 2004; 194: 118–134
- Kluk K., Moore B.C.J. Factors affecting psychophysical tuning curves for hearing-impaired subjects. Hear Res 2005; 200: 115–131
- Levitt H. Transformed up-down methods in psychoacoustics. J Acoust Soc Am 1971; 49: 467–477
- Mackersie C.L., Crocker T.L., Davis R.A. Limiting high-frequency hearing aid gain in listeners with and without suspected cochlear dead regions. J Am Acad Audiol 2004; 15: 498–507
- Moore B.C.J. Psychophysical tuning curves measured in simultaneous and forward masking. J Acoust Soc Am 1978; 63: 524–532
- Moore B.C.J. Cochlear Hearing Loss. Whurr, London 1998
- Moore B.C.J. Dead regions in the cochlea: Diagnosis, perceptual consequences, and implications for the fitting of hearing aids. Trends Amplif 2001; 5: 1–34
- Moore B.C.J. Response to "Articulation index predictions for hearing-impaired listeners with and without cochlear dead regions" [J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 111, 2545–2548 (2002)] (L). J Acoust Soc Am 2002; 111: 2549–2550
- Moore B.C.J. An Introduction to the Psychology of Hearing5th Ed. Academic Press, San Diego 2003
- Moore B.C.J. Dead regions in the cochlea: Conceptual foundations, diagnosis and clinical applications. Ear Hear 2004; 25: 98–116
- Moore B.C.J., Alcántara J.I. The use of psychophysical tuning curves to explore dead regions in the cochlea. Ear Hear 2001; 22: 268–278
- Moore B.C.J., Glasberg B.R. Comparisons of frequency selectivity in simultaneous and forward masking for subjects with unilateral cochlear impairments. J Acoust Soc Am 1986; 80: 93–107
- Moore B.C.J., Glasberg B.R., Stone M.A. New version of the TEN test with calibrations in dB HL. Ear Hear 2004; 25: 478–487
- Moore B.C.J., Huss M., Vickers D.A., Glasberg B.R., Alcántara J.I. A test for the diagnosis of dead regions in the cochlea. Br J Audiol 2000; 34: 205–224
- Patterson R.D. Auditory filter shape. J Acoust Soc Am 1974; 55: 802–809
- Patterson R.D. Auditory filter shapes derived with noise stimuli. J Acoust Soc Am 1976; 59: 640–654
- Patterson R.D., Moore B.C.J. Auditory filters and excitation patterns as representations of frequency resolution. Frequency Selectivity in Hearing, B.C.J. Moore. Academic, London 1986; 123–177
- Pick G., Evans E.F., Wilson J.P. Frequency resolution in patients with hearing loss of cochlear origin. Psychophysics and Physiology of Hearing, E.F. Evans, J.P. Wilson. Academic Press, London 1977; 273–281
- Rankovic C.M. Articulation index predictions for hearing-impaired listeners with and without cochlear dead regions (L). J Acoust Soc Am 2002; 111: 2545–2548
- Small A.M. Pure-tone masking. J Acoust Soc Am 1959; 31: 1619–1625
- Steinberg J.C., Gardner M.B. The dependency of hearing impairment on sound intensity. J Acoust Soc Am 1937; 9: 11–23
- Summers V. Do tests for cochlear dead regions provide important information for fitting hearing aids?. J Acoust Soc Am 2004; 115: 1420–1423
- Summers V., Molis M.R., Musch H., Walden B.E., Surr R.K., et al. Identifying dead regions in the cochlea: psychophysical tuning curves and tone detection in threshold-equalizing noise. Ear Hear 2003; 24: 133–142
- Thornton A.R., Abbas P.J. Low-frequency hearing loss: perception of filtered speech, psychophysical tuning curves, and masking. J Acoust Soc Am 1980; 67: 638–643
- Vestergaard M. Dead regions in the cochlea: implications for speech recognition and applicability of articulation index theory. Int J Audiol 2003; 42: 249–261
- Vickers D.A., Moore B.C.J., Baer T. Effects of lowpass filtering on the intelligibility of speech in quiet for people with and without dead regions at high frequencies. J Acoust Soc Am 2001; 110: 1164–1175
- Vogten L.L.M. Pure-tone masking: A new result from a new method. Facts and Models in Hearing, E. Zwicker, E. Terhardt. Springer-Verlag, Berlin 1974; 142–155
- Zwicker E. On the psychophysical equivalent of tuning curves. Facts and Models in Hearing, E. Zwicker, E. Terhardt. Springer-Verlag, Berlin 1974; 132–140
- Zwicker E., Schorn K. Psychoacoustical tuning curves in audiology. Audiology 1978; 17: 120–140