The effect of audibility, signal-to-noise ratio, and temporal speech cues on the benefit from fast-acting compression in modulated noise

References

• American National Standards Institute. American National Standard Methods for the calculation of the speech intelligibility index. ANSI S3.7-1998. ANSI, New York 1998
   Google Scholar
• Bacon S. P., Gleitman R. M. Modulation detection in subjects with relatively flat hearing losses. J Speech Hear Res 1992; 35(3)642–653
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Boike K. T., Souza P. E. Effect of compression ratio on speech recognition and speech-quality ratings with wide dynamic range compression amplification. J Speech Lang Hear Res 2000; 43(2)456–468
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dreschler W. A., Verschuure J. Psychoacoustical evaluation of fast compression systems. Psychoacoustics, speech and hearing aids, B. Kollmeier. World Scientific, Singapore 1996; 183–191
   Google Scholar
• Drullman R., Festen J. M., Plomp R. Effect of reducing slow temporal modulations on speech reception. J Acoust Soc Am 1994; 95((5 Pt 1))2670–2680
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dubno J. R., Horwitz A. R., Ahlstrom J. B. Benefit of modulated maskers for speech recognition by younger and older adults with normal hearing. J Acoust Soc Am 2002; 111(6)2897–2907
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Festen J. M. Contributions of comodulation masking release and temporal resolution to the speech-reception threshold masked by an interfering voice. J Acoust Soc Am 1993; 94(3 Pt 1): 1295–1300
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Festen J. M., Plomp R. Relations between auditory functions in impaired hearing. J Acoust Soc Am 1983; 73(2)652–662
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Festen J. M., Plomp R. Effects of fluctuating noise and interfering speech on the speech reception threshold for impaired and normal hearing. J Acoust Soc Am 1990; 88(4)1725–1736
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goedegebure A., Hulshof M., Maas R. J., Dreschler W. A., Verschuure H. Effects of single-channel phonemic compression schemes on the understanding of speech by hearing-impaired listeners. Audiology 2001; 40(1)10–25
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hagerman B. Sentences for testing speech intelligibility in noise. Scand Audiol 1982; 11(2)79–87
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hagerman B. Speech recognition threshold in slightly and fully modulated noise for hearing-impaired subjects. Int J Audiol 2002; 41(6)321–329
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hagerman B., Kinnefors C. Efficient adaptive methods for measuring speech reception threshold in quiet and in noise. Scand Audiol 1995; 24(1)71–77
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hagerman B., Olofsson Å. A method to measure the effect of noise reduction algorithms using simultaneous speech and noise. Acta Acoustica 2004; 90: 356–361
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hohmann V., Kollmeier B. The effect of multichannel dynamic compression on speech intelligibility. J Acoust Soc Am 1995; 97(2)1191–1195
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hornsby B. W., Ricketts T. A. The effects of compression ratio, signal-to-noise ratio, and level on speech recognition in normal-hearing listeners. J Acoust Soc Am 2001; 109(6)2964–2973
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Horst J. W. Frequency discrimination of complex signals, frequency selectivity, and speech perception in hearing-impaired subjects. J Acoust Soc Am 1987; 82(3)874–885
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kwon B. J., Turner C. W. Consonant identification under maskers with sinusoidal modulation: masking release or modulation interference?. J Acoust Soc Am 2001; 110(2)1130–1140
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lindblad A.-C., Olofsson Å., Hagerman B. Hearing aid fitting using psychoacoustical modulation transfer function. 15th Danavox symposium: Recent developments in hearing instrument technology, J. Beilin, G. Jensen. Stougaard Jensen, Copenhagen, Denmark 1993; 491–496
   Google Scholar
• Moore B. C. Hearing. Handbook of perception and cognition. Academic Press, San Diego 1995
   Google Scholar
• Moore B. C., Johnson J. S., Clark T. M., Pluvinage V. Evaluation of a dual-channel full dynamic range compression system for people with sensorineural hearing loss. Ear Hear 1992; 13(5)349–370
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moore B. C., Oxenham A. J. Psychoacoustic consequences of compression in the peripheral auditory system. Psychol Rev 1998; 105(1)108–124
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nelson P. B., Jin S. H., Carney A. E., Nelson D. A. Understanding speech in modulated interference: cochlear implant users and normal-hearing listeners. J Acoust Soc Am 2003; 113(2)961–968
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Olofsson, Å. 1997. Nonlinear distortion measure for hearing aids with speech as input signal. Paper presented at the Second biennial hearing aid research and development conference., Bethesda, Maryland, .
   Google Scholar
• Olsen, H. L. 2004. Supra-threshold hearing loss and wide dynamic range compression, [PhD thesis]. Karolinska Institutet., Stockholm.
   Google Scholar
• Olsen, H. L., Olofsson, Å., & Hagerman, B. 2004. The effect of presentation level and compression characteristics on sentence recognition in modulated noise. Int J Audiol, 43((5)).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oxenham A. J. Forward masking: adaptation or integration?. J Acoust Soc Am 2001; 109(2)732–741
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Plomp R. The negative effect of amplitude compression in multichannel hearing aids in the light of the modulation-transfer function. J Acoust Soc Am 1988; 83(6)2322–2327
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Plomp R. Noise, amplification, and compression: considerations of three main issues in hearing aid design [published erratum appears in Ear Hear 1994 Dec;15(6). Ear Hear 1994; 15(1)2–12
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ruggero M. A., Rich N. C., Recio A., Narayan S. S., Robles L. Basilar-membrane responses to tones at the base of the chinchilla cochlea. J Acoust Soc Am 1997; 101(4)2151–2163
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schroeder M. Reference signal for quality studies. J Acoust Soc Am 1968; 44: 1735–1736
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Souza P. E. Older listeners' use of temporal cues altered by compression amplification. J Speech Lang Hear Res 2000; 43(3)661–674
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Souza P. E., Kitch V. The contribution of amplitude envelope cues to sentence identification in young and aged listeners. Ear Hear 2001; 22(2)112–119
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Souza P. E., Turner C. W. Effect of single-channel compression on temporal speech information. J Speech Hear Res 1996; 39(5)901–911
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Souza P. E., Turner C. W. Multichannel compression, temporal cues, and audibility. J Speech Lang Hear Res 1998; 41(2)315–326
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stone M. A., Moore B. C. Effect of the speed of a single-channel dynamic range compressor on intelligibility in a competing speech task. J Acoust Soc Am 2003; 114(2)1023–1034
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stone M. A., Moore B. C., Wojtczak M., Gudgin E. Effects of fast-acting high-frequency compression on the intelligibility of speech in steady and fluctuating background sounds. Br J Audiol 1997; 31(4)257–273
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ter Keurs M., Festen J. M., Plomp R. Effect of spectral envelope smearing on speech reception. II. J Acoust Soc Am 1993; 93(3)1547–1552
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Turner C. W., Souza P. E., Forget L. N. Use of temporal envelope cues in speech recognition by normal and hearing-impaired listeners. J Acoust Soc Am 1995; 97(4)2568–2576
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tyler R. S., Wood E. J., Fernandes M. Frequency resolution and hearing loss. Br J Audiol 1982; 16(1)45–63
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• van Buuren R. A., Festen J. M., Houtgast T. Compression and expansion of the temporal envelope: evaluation of speech intelligibility and sound quality. J Acoust Soc Am 1999; 105(5)2903–2913
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Tasell D. J., Soli S. D., Kirby V. M., Widin G. P. Speech waveform envelope cues for consonant recognition. J Acoust Soc Am 1987; 82(4)1152–1161
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Tasell D. J., Trine T. D. Effects of single-band syllabic amplitude compression on temporal speech information in nonsense syllables and in sentences. J Speech Hear Res 1996; 39(5)912–922
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Verschuure J., Benning F. J., Van Cappellen M., Dreschler W. A., Boeremans P. P. Speech intelligibility in noise with fast compression hearing aids. Audiology 1998; 37(3)127–150
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Yund E. W., Buckles K. M. Enhanced speech perception at low signal-to-noise ratios with multichannel compression hearing aids. J Acoust Soc Am 1995; 97(2)1224–1240
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar