References
- Alcantara J.I., Moore B.C., Kühnel V., Launer S. Evaluation of the noise reduction system in a commercial digital hearing aid. Int J Audiol 2003; 42: 34–42
- Allén S. Frequency dictionary of present-day Swedish (in Swedish: Nusvensk frekvensbok). Almquist & Wiksell, Stockholm 1970
- Borg G. Psychophysical scaling with applications in physical work and the perception of exertion. Scand J Work Environ Health 1990; 16: 55–58
- CHABA (Committee on Hearing, Bioacoustics and Biomechanics). Speech understanding and aging. J Acoust Soc Am 1988; 83: 859–895
- Cord M.T., Leek M.R., Walden B.E. Speech recognition ability in noise and its relationship to perceived hearing aid benefit. J Am Acad Audiol 2000; 11: 475–483
- Davis A. Population study of the ability to benefit from amplification and the provision of a hearing aid in 55–74-year-old first-time hearing aid users. Int J Audiol 2003; 42: 2S39–2S52
- Duquesnoy A. J. Effect of a single interfering noise or speech source upon the binaural sentence intelligibility of aged persons. J Acoust Soc Am 1983; 74: 739–743
- Festen J. M., Plomp R. Effects on fluctuating noise and interfering speech on the speech-reception threshold for impaired normal hearing. J Acoust Soc Am 1990; 88: 1725–1736
- Gatehouse S., Naylor G., Elberling C. Benefits from hearing aids in relation to the interaction between the user and the environment. Int J Audiol 2003; 42: S77–S85
- Girin L., Schwartz J-L., Feng G. Audio-visual enhancement of speech in noise. J Acoust Soc Am 2001; 109: 3007–3020
- Gustafsson H. A., Arlinger S. D. Masking of speech by amplitude-modulated noise. J Acoust Soc Am 1994; 95: 518–529
- Hagerman B. Sentences for testing speech intelligibility in noise. Scand Audiol 1982; 11: 79–87
- Hagerman B. Clinical measurements of speech reception treshold in noise. Scand Audiol 1984; 13: 57–63
- Hagerman B., Kinnefors C. Efficient adaptive methods for measuring speech reception threshold in quiet and in noise. Scand Audiol 1995; 24: 71–77
- Haskell G.B., Noffsinger D., Larson V.D., Williams D.W., Dobie R.A., Rogers J.L. Subjective measures of hearing aid benefit in the NIDCD/VA clinical trial. Ear Hear 2002; 23: 301–307
- Humes L.E. Dimensions of hearing aid outcome. J Am Acad Audiol 1999; 10: 26–39
- Hygge S., Rönnberg J., Larsby B., Arlinger S. Normal-hearing and hearing-impaired subjects' ability to just follow conversation in competing speech, reversed speech, and noise backgrounds. J Speech Hear Res 1992; 35: 208–215
- Hällgren M., Larsby B., Lyxell B., Arlinger S. Evaluation of a cognitive test battery in young and elderly normal-hearing and hearing-impaired subjects. J Am Acad Audiol 2001; 12: 357–370
- Larsby B., Hällgren M., Lyxell B., Arlinger S. Cognitive performance and perceived effort in speech processing tasks: effects of different noise backgrounds in normals and in hearing-impaired subjects. Int J Audiol 2005; 44: 131–143
- Larson V.D., Williams D.W., Henderson W.G., Luethke L.E., Beck L.B., Noffsinger D., et al. A multi-center, double blind clinical trial comparing benefit from three commonly used hearing aid circuits. Ear Hear 2002; 23: 269–276
- Lunner T. Cognitive function in relation to hearing aid use. Int J Audiol 2003; 42: S49–S58
- Lyxell B., Andersson U., Borg E., Ohlsson I-S. Working-memory capacity and phonological processing in deafened adults and individuals with a severe hearing impairment. Int J Audiol 2003; 42: S86–S89
- Pichora-Fuller M.K. Processing speed and timing in aging adults: psychoacoustics, speech perception, and comprehension. Int J Audiol 2003; 42: S59–S67
- Plomp R. A signal-to-noise ratio model for the speech reception threshold of the hearing-impaired. J Speech Hear Res 1986; 29: 146–154
- Rönnberg J. Cognitive and communicative function: The effect of chronological age. Eur J Cogn Psychol 1990; 2: 253–275
- Shanks J.E., Wilson R.H., Larson V., Williams D. Speech recognition performance of patients with sensorineural hearing loss under unaided and aided conditions using linear and compression hearing aids. Ear Hear 2002; 23: 280–290
- Shoben E. Semantic and lexical decisions. Handbook of research methods in human memory and cognition, C.R. Puff. Academic Press, New York 1982
- Tun P. A., O'Kane G., Wingfield A. Distraction by competing speech in young and older adult listeners. Psychol Aging 2002; 17: 453–467
- Tun P. A., Wingfield A. One voice too many: Adult age differences in language processing with different types of distracting sounds. J Gerontol 1999; 54B: 317–327
- van Rooij J. C. G. M., Plomp R. Auditive and cognitive factors in speech perception by elderly listeners. II. Multivariate analysis. J Acoust Soc Am 1990; 88: 2611–2624