Audiometric testing and hearing protection training through multimedia technology

References

• American National Standards Institute. 1996. Specification for audiometers. ANSI, S3.6-1996, New York: ANSI.
   Google Scholar
• American National Standards Institute. 1999. American National Standard for maximum permissible ambient noise levels for audiometric test rooms. ANSI, S3.1-1999, New York: ANSI.
   Google Scholar
• Atherley G., Noble W. Occupational deafness: the continuing challenge of early German and Scottish research. Am J Indus Med 1985; 8: 101–117
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Balas E.A., Austin S.M., Mitchel J.A., Ewigman B.G., Bopp K.D., et al. The clinical value of computerized information services: a review of 98 randomized clinical trials. Arch Fam Med 1996; 5: 271–278
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bull F.C., Kreuter M., Scharff D.P. Effects of tailored, personalized and general health messages on physical activity. Patient Educ Couns 1999; 36: 181–192
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Vries H., Brug J. Computer-tailored interventions motivating people to adopt health-promoting behaviors: introduction to a new approach. Special Issue: Computer-tailored education. Patient Educ Couns 1999; 36: 99–195
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dear T.A. Updating damage risk criteria to include performance under workplace noise regulations. J Occup Hear Loss 1998; 1: 61–66
   Google Scholar
• Dirkx J.M., Prenger S.M. A guide for planning and implementing instruction for adults: a theme-based approach. Jossey-Bass, San Francisco, CA 1997
   Google Scholar
• Franks J.R. Noise in the construction industry and its effect on hearing. Hear Instr 1990; 41: 18–21
   Google Scholar
• Hong, O., Lusk, S.L., &, Ronis, D.L. 2005. Ethnicity differences in predictors for hearing protection behavior in Black and White workers. Res Theor for Nurs Pract, An Int J, 19, 61–74.
   Google Scholar
• Hong O., Wilber L.A., Furner S. Use of hearing protection and hearing threshold levels among noise-exposed Korean airport workers. J Occup Hear Loss 1998; 1: 271–279
   Google Scholar
• Karmy S.J., Martin A.M. Employee attitudes towards hearing protection as affected by serial audiometry. Personal hearing protection in industry, P.W. Alberti. Raven Press, New York 1982; 491–509
   Google Scholar
• Krishna S., Balas A., Spencer D.C., Griffin J.Z., Boren S.A. Clinical trials of interactive computerized patient education: implications for family practice. J Fam Prac 1997; 45: 25–33
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leaffer T., Gonda B. The Internet: an underutilized tool in patient education. Comput Nurs 2000; 18: 47–52
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lee W.W., Owens D.L. Multimedia-based instructional design. Jossey-Bass/Pfeiffer, San Francisco, CA 2000
   Google Scholar
• Lewis D. Computer-based approaches to patient education: a review of literature. J Am Med Inform Assoc 1999; 6: 272–282
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lusk S.L., Hong O., Ronis D.L., Eakin B.L., Kerr M.J., et al. Test of the effectiveness of an intervention to increase use of hearing protection devices in construction workers. Hum Factors 1999; 41: 487–494
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marcus B.H., Bock B.C., Pinto B.M., Forsyth L.A.H., Roberts M.B., et al. Efficacy of an individualized, motivationally-tailored physical activity intervention. Ann Behav Med 1998; 20: 174–180
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH). 1988. National occupational exposure survey. Cincinnati, OH: U. S. Department of Health & Human Services, NIOSH Publications.
   Google Scholar
• National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH). National occupational research agenda. U. S. Department of Health & Human Services, Washington, DC 1996a
   Google Scholar
• National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH). Criteria for a recommended standard, noise exposure revised criteria. U. S. Department of Health & Human Services, Washington, DC 1996b
   Google Scholar
• National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH). Criteria for a recommended standard: Occupational noise exposure, revised criteria 1998. U. S. Department of Health & Human Services, Pub. No. 98–126, NIOSH, Cincinnati, OH 1998
   Google Scholar
• Reilly M.J., Rosenman K.D., Kalinowski D.J. Occupational noise-induced hearing loss surveillance in Michigan. J Environ Occup Med 1998; 48: 667–674
   Google Scholar
• Rhodes F., Fishbein M., Reis J. Using behavioral theory in computer-based health promotion and appraisal. Health Educ Behav 1997; 24: 20–34
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ronis, D.L., Hong, O., &. Lusk, S.L. 1999. Test of revised health promotion model as a causal model of workers’ use of hearing protection. Proc 23rd Midwestern Nurs Res Soc Annu Conf.
   Google Scholar
• Royster, J.D. 1985. Audiometric evaluation for industrial hearing conservation. Sound Vib, May, 24–29.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Royster L.H., Royster J.D. Education and motivation. Noise and Hearing Conservation Manual4^th ed., E.H. Berger, W.D. Ward, J.C. Morrill, L.H. Royster. American, Akron, OH 1991; 383–416
   Google Scholar
• Sataloff R.T., Sataloff J. Occupational hearing loss. Hearing Loss3^rd ed., R.T. Sataloff, J. Sataloff. Marcel Dekker, New York 1993; 371–402
   Google Scholar
• Schneider, S. 1995. Preventing hearing loss among construction workers. Proc Hear Conserv. Conf III/XX, 11–15.
   Google Scholar
• Schneider S., Johanning E., Belard J., Engholm G. Noise, vibration, and heat and cold. Occup Med: State of the Art Rev 1995; 10: 363–383
   Google Scholar
• Strecher V.J., Greenwood T., Wang C., Dumont D. Interactive multimedia and risk communication. J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr 1999; 25: 134–139
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• U.S. Department of Labor (USDL) – Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA). 1981. Occupational noise exposure, hearing conservation amendment. Fed Reg, 46, 4078–4179.
   Google Scholar
• U.S. Department of Labor (USDL) – Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA). 1983. Occupational noise exposure, hearing conservation amendment; Final Rule. Fed Reg, 48, 9738–9785.
   Google Scholar
• Velicer W.F., Prochaska J.O., Bellis J.M., DiClemente C.C., Rossi J.S., et al. An expert system intervention for smoking cessation. Add Behav 1993; 18: 269–290
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Welch L., Roto P. Medical surveillance programs for construction workers. Occup Med: State of the Art Rev 1995; 10: 421–433
   Google Scholar
• World Health Organization (WHO). 1986. Prevention of deafness and hearing impairment. Thirty-ninth world health assembly, EB 79/10; Annex A 39/14. GenevaSwitzerland: World Health Organ, 1–18.
   Google Scholar
• Zohar D., Cohen A., Azar N. Promoting increased use of ear protectors in noise through information feedback. Hum Factors 1980; 22: 69–79
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar