References
- Allen J.B., Hall J.L., Jeng P.S. Loudness growth in 1/2-octave bands (LGOB). A procedure for the assessment of loudness. J Acoust Soc Am 1990; 88: 745–753
- Byrne D., Dillon H. The National Acoustic Laboratories (NAL) new procedure for selecting the gain and frequency response of a hearing aid. Ear Hear 1986; 7: 257–265
- Byrne D., Dillon H., Ching T., Katsch R., Keidser G. NAL-NL1 procedure for fitting nonlinear hearing aids: Characteristics and comparisons with other procedures. J Am Acad Audiol 2001; 12: 37–51
- Cox R.M. Using loudness data for hearing aid selection: The IHAFF approach. Hearing J 1995; 48: 10, 39–44
- Cox R.M., Alexander G.C. Measuring satisfaction with amplification in daily life: the SADL scale. Ear Hear 1999; 20: 306–320
- Dillon H. NAL-NL1: A new procedure for fitting non-linear hearing aids. Hearing J 1999; 52: 10–16
- Dillon, H., Katsch, R., Byrne, D., Ching, T., Keidser, G., et al. 1998. The NAL-NL1 prescription procedure for non-linear hearing aids. Computer program v. 1.01. Sydney: NAL.
- Glasberg B.R., Moore B.C.J. A model of loudness applicable to time-varying sounds. J Audio Eng Soc 2002; 50: 331–342
- Horwitz A.R., Turner C.W. The time course of hearing aid benefit. Ear Hear 1997; 18: 1–11
- Hosmer, D.W. & Lemeshow, S. 2000. Applied logistic regression (2nd ed.). New YorkNY, USA: John Wiley & Sons.
- Humes L.E., Wilson D.L., Barlow N.N., Garner C. Changes in hearing-aid benefit following 1 or 2 years of hearing-aid use by older adults. J Speech Lang Hear Res 2002; 45: 772–82
- International Organisation for Standardisation. 1972. Assessment of noise with respect to community response. ISO-R1996. Geneva:ISO.
- Killion M., Fikret-Pasa S. The 3 types of sensorineural hearing loss: Loudness and intelligibility considerations. Hearing J 1993; 46(11)31–36
- Marriage J., Moore B.C.J., Alcántara J.I. Comparison of three procedures for initial fitting of compression hearing aids. III. Inexperienced versus experienced users. Int J Audiol 2004; 43: 198–210
- Menard, S. 2002. Applied logistic regression analysis (2nd ed. Vol. 106). Thousand OaksCA, USA: Sage Publications.
- Mershon D.H., Desaulniers D.H., Kiefer S.A., Amerson T.L.J., Mills J.T. Perceived loudness and visually-determined auditory distance. Perception 1981; 10: 531–43
- Moore B.C.J. Use of a loudness model for hearing aid fitting IV. Fitting hearing aids with multi-channel compression so as to restore ‘normal’ loudness for speech at different levels. Br J Audiol 2000; 34: 165–177
- Moore B.C.J., Alcántara J.I., Stone M.A., Glasberg B.R. Use of a loudness model for hearing aid fitting: II. Hearing aids with multi-channel compression. Br J Audiol 1999; 33: 157–170
- Moore B.C.J., Glasberg B.R. A model of loudness perception applied to cochlear hearing loss. Auditory Neuroscience 1997; 3: 289–311
- Moore B.C.J., Glasberg B.R., Stone M.A. Use of a loudness model for hearing aid fitting: III. A general method for deriving initial fittings for hearing aids with multi-channel compression. Br J Audiol 1999; 33: 241–258
- Smeds K. Is normal or less than normal overall loudness preferred by first-time hearing aid users?. Ear Hear 2004; 25: 159–172
- Smeds, K., Keidser, G., Zakis, J., Dillon, H., Leijon, A., et al., 2006. Preferred overall loudness. II. Listening through hearing in the field and laboratory. Int J Audiol, 45, 12–25.